Scroll down for all 2015 meeting minutes.

Return to Index of 2015 Minutes

MINUTES FOR JANUARY 8th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Haldis Toppel, Richard Wulliger, Donna Vaccarino, Paul Glasgall, Cathy Russell, Sue Kohl, Gilbert Dembo, Reza Akef, Carol Pfannkuche and Amy Kalp.

Voting Alternates:  Susan Payne, Brian Deming, Brenda Theveny, Quentin Fleming, Jennifer Lee, Doug McCormick and David Kaplan.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Schuyler Dietz, Laura Mack, Sash Ramaswami, Ted Mackie, Kevin Niles, Bruce Schwartz, Michael Soneff, David Peterson and Barbara Marinacci.

1.    Start of Business Meeting.  Reading of Community Council’s Mission. Paul Glasgall read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:06 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes.  Adoption of the December 11, 2014 minutes. Next Meetings:  January 22: Proposed New Design Guidelines for the Palisades commercial and Village areas; community input is sought and welcome. Feb. 12: DONE presentation on the Neighborhood Council (NC) process. Feb. 26: Westside Neighborhood Prosecutor Veronica de la Cruz-Robles presentation on crime and related legal issues. Mar. 4: Special Hillside Fire Safety and Preparedness Community Meeting, co-sponsored by PPCC and Brentwood Community Council (BCC), Paul Revere Charter Middle School, 6:30-9:00 pm. http://www.cafiresafecouncil.org. All Palisades residents, homeowner associations and business owners/operators are invited.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report. Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of January 8, 2015. The total account balances equal $37,489.99.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    PPCC 2015 Outreach Committee.  Chris announced the formation of this committee with Andrew Wolfberg (Chair), Brian Deming, Gil Dembo, Schuyler Dietz, Michael Soneff, Maryam Zar; new stakeholder member David Afzal. See committee report below, Item 8.1.1.

7.1.2.    PPCC Organizational Representatives.  Chris welcomed in the Service Clubs category, the new alternate organization is the Rotary Club, Kevin Niles representative.

7.1.3.    16990-17000 W. Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.  Chris announced that the hearing on 1/21/15 before the West LA Planning Commission will be on certain residents’ appeal from the Zoning Administrator’s approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the project. PPCC will reiterate its request for a focused EIR to address public safety and security concerns. See attached letter below.  [See also Public Comment discussion, Item 11.1 below.]

7.1.4.    PPCC Letter to Caruso Affiliated regarding PPCC Village Project Land Use Committee and suggested haul route conditions.  Chris encouraged the board and public to see attached letter and committee report below, Item 8.2.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla reported on Mike Bonin’s recent motion to support and provide funding (via developer application fees) for the LADBS to ensure code compliance.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s Website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom’s Office, Stephanie Cohen Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Office: (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    US Congressman Ted Lieu, Janet Turner; District Representative. janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.  Janet reported on the Washington DC swearing in. Immediate efforts by the Congressman including climate change and the related impact on the country’s children, problems and concerns in his district (the VA property in West Los Angeles, the homeless counts, etc.).

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.  (1) Brian Deming (Area 3/Homeless Task Force Co-Chair) reported that he attended the Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Coalition meeting where it was reported that Los Angeles has the largest homeless veterans population and property. Obama, Garcetti, Lieu are pushing for the VA to do it’s job and execute better its programs and infrastructure that are in place.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations — None.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors. (1) Laura Mack, Sustainability.  Laura defined sustainability as ‘safeguarding our future and assuring that resources are available for future generations’ by protecting economic and social well being. The Mayor’s Office has a new draft sustainability plan to make LA the largest sustainable green city by 2015 considering climate change, water, affordable housing, equity issues, good jobs, etc. using a holistic approach. Laura is working with other NCs in the City on a sustainability council. Particulars include a draft ordinance to support bee keeping on residential properties, neighborhood walkabouts with CD-11, benefits for law reduction, and downtown forum on sustainability. Chris encouraged interested persons to see the topic on Facebook or contact Laura directly.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Outreach Committee.

Chris reported that Andrew Wolfberg (Chair) submitted the following report: The committee met in December 2014. Discussed and implemented new social media outreach via Instagram (PPCC account created and first photograph posted by Schuyler Dietz during the Committee meeting; board and community members should use #PalisadesCouncil in Instagram posts and the Committee will select pictures to go on the official PPCC feed and onto the PPCC Facebook page; pictures of different aspects of the Palisades would be appreciated, including natural beauty, current events, restaurants and other businesses in the Palisades). Enhanced Farmers Market tabling and other outreach discussed/recommended. The Committee will meet again in January (date to be determined) to continue discussion of opportunities for outreach and will report back to the board.

8.2.    Village Project Land Use Committee (VPLUC).

David Kaplan (Chair) reported that the committee met in December 2014. Discussed organization and procedure. Affirmed that its purpose is to review all proposals relative to the Village Project and report back to the board (recommendations to be made on a vote of at least 4 of the 6 voting members). Adopted the general goal regarding the Project: “maximizing the benefits to the community and minimizing its impact on the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly during the remediation phase and build-out.” VPLUC meetings will be open to the public and scheduled on an as needed basis. Next meeting (tentative): February 10, 2015, 3-5pm in the Palisades branch library. Also unanimously recommended proposed haul route conditions during the remediation phase (adopted by the PPCC Executive Committee as per attached letter); further update re haul route conditions/status to be provided to the board on 1/8 or as available. David also reported that there was a meeting with Caruso affiliated regarding the haul route (PCH to Temescal to Sunset to Swarthmore and back the same way) including a new driveway opposite Maison Giraud. The City approved 9 am to 3:30 PM hauling, however Caruso has voluntarily agreed to 9 AM to 2 PM during the week and Saturdays from 8 AM to 5 PM. Digging on approximately 30 percent of the site area will begin at 7 AM with holes from 5 to 80 feet deep. Hauling will be limited in strong winds and excessively contaminated soil will be placed in containers. Trucks will be covered with approximately ten (10) 10-wheel trucks utilized and staged likely on Temescal Canyon Blvd. This remediation phase is expected to be concluded by April 2015. A new drain will be installed in the street with flaggers in place. The hearing is on January 13, 2015 at 9:30 AM, downtown LADBS.

8.3.    PP Homeless Task Force.  Maryam Zar (Chair). Updates on Task Force outreach and the Citywide/Palisades Homeless Count, Jan. 29, 2015. Volunteers needed; contact pacpalihtf@gmail.com for more information.

8.4.    Bylaws Committee.

Jennifer Malaret (Chair) reported that monthly meetings are scheduled for the first Thursday of each month. Periodic reports will be made to the board; proposed amendments to the bylaws will have two readings and require vote by the full board to be adopted. First Reading: Proposed Amendments to Article VII, Election of Officers. See Proposed Amendments attached. To view current version of Article VII, go to http://www.pp90272.org/BylawsJuly2014.pdf, p. 5. Please direct questions or comments regarding the existing PPCC bylaws and/or suggested changes to malaret5@me.com.

8.5.    Three Chairs Committee Barbara Kohn (Chair).

Richard Cohen reported that there will be no nominations at this time for open Alternate positions in Areas 1, 7 and 8. As to the position for Area 3, First Alternate Representative Richard Cohen read a statement from Barbara regarding the process and nomination of Howard Robinson. Richard Cohen stated that Christy Dennis and David Afzal were considered for the position as well. In nominating Howard, the Three Chairs committee feels he is qualified and notes his land use experience and expertise. In Greg Sinaiko’s absence, Richard reported that Greg supports this nomination. Reza Akef seconded the motion. Action: the board voted and unanimously approved the nomination.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Advanced Meter Project Update.

Presentation by Ray Verches of So. California Gas Company. Update of prior presentation to PPCC; reference prior PPCC minutes of 12/12/13. The advanced meter program is to automate how the city reads the gas meter usage. First phase is communication to get the 1 million meters in Los Angeles readable and then to implement the new information process. In the Palisades an additional communication device needs to be added at 751 San Lorenzo Street (dead end at Riviera Country Club) onto an existing pole. The project is to be completed in the summer 2015. (1) Cathy Russell asked if Mr. Verches could present at the upcoming Santa Monica Canyon Association meeting. (2) Gil Dembo asked how accurate the automated meters are and what accuracy testing has been done. Ray said that the testing has gone well without RF issues and that the automated readings are far more accurate than manual readings. (3) Reza Akef asked how information is collected. Ray stated that there are three antennas in the area so if one goes down another will pick it up. (4) Haldis Toppel asked about homeowner notification. Ray stated they give 30 days notice to homeowners in an area regarding gates or pets that need to be secured. There are no third party contractors associated with the program and there is no need for workers to enter the house. (5) Laura Mack asked if the program would allow for more frequent usage reporting to customers. Ray said that rather than monthly bills homeowners can read their usage daily and a mobile app is in the works.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    LADWP Recycled Water Use Program.

Presentation by Yoshiko Tsunehara yoshiko.tsunehara@ladwp.com and Anthony Tew Anthony.tew@ladwp.com of LADWP; Q&A. Serge Haddad, Jeff Childers also attending. Presentation: Anthony stated that recycled water is a complicated subject. The program is part of One Water LA. Nearly 90% of LA’s water comes from hundreds of miles away, some of which is purchased and other that comes through the LA Aqueduct. 10% comes from local ground water and 1% comes from existing recycled water projects. There are legal, environment and supply challenges to LA’s water. The three-phase approach is capture, conserve and reuse. Since 1970, LA’s population has grown by 1 million people but we are using less water today; thus water conservation works and LADWP would like us to do more. Recycled water is wastewater that is treated for designated purposes by LA Sanitation. The City treats over 350 million gallons of wastewater at 4 facilities. Much of this water is discharged into the ocean and LADWP wants to capture more of this water rather than relying on importing. LADWP wants to increase the use of purple pipes and initiate a groundwater replenishment project. Yoshi spoke on the future groundwater replenishment project (to be constructed in the San Fernando Valley) which will treat the water, convey it to spreading grounds, replenish the aquifer with recycled water such that LA’s ground water supply will be increased. Orange County has been replenishing its water since 2008. El Segundo does this also. The EIR draft is expected at the end of 2015 and the plan is to be in operation by 2022. Outreach: communities and elected officials are briefed along with the Recycled Water Advisory Group (“RWAG” – currently over 60 representative people/organizations). LADWP invited PPCC to participate in RWAG. See recycledwaterinfo@ladwp.com; www.ladwp.com/recycledwater. Support cards are available for mailing and residents can sign up for information on the website. Discussion: Jennifer Lee asked about consumer costs. Recycled water is free in a sense because sanitation already has to remediate the water. There are costs associated with the pipeline projects and LADWP tries not to embark on projects that cost more than imported water costs. Doug McCormick asked about standards for existing LADWP water and how it differs from what recycled water will be. The state sets limits on each chemical that are in our various types of water. Richard Cohen asked with the completion of all the contemplated projects what percentage of use in the City may be affected. Yoshi said 4% for the recycled water project and a possible culmination of another 4%, meaning that LADWP could reduce its imports and increase efficiencies by roughly 10%. Donna Vaccarino asked about Governor Brown’s new twin tunnel/Bay Delta water project. Serge said the goal of the project is to secure a reliable water supply from these tunnels which supply 50-70% of the water in southern California. Bruce Schwartz asked about heavy metals. Yoshi said they are removed and the technology is very advanced and amazing.

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    16990-17000 W. Sunset Blvd. apartment project.

Chris gave a background presentation on information presented to the council prior to her tenure as Chair, i.e., that the project was by right and Code compliant. The board was never asked to take a position on the project nor was it aware that residents opposed the project on grounds it violated the Coastal Act. To take a position, PPCC would need to hear from both sides.

(1) Gil Dembo states that a by right project is 24 units per acre and the developer is asking for 48 units per acre. Gil is concerned that if the density is granted then adjacent projects can be demolished and the density of other sites could be enlarged. Gil stated that the project violates applicable community plans, Coastal guidelines and the Coastal Act. (2) Michael Soneff disclosed that he is being paid to work with the resident’s group to oppose the project. Michael stated that density and safety are issues with the 122 parking spaces proposed on that small lot. 5 stories are proposed and out of scale with the surrounding buildings. Construction will eliminate one of the last public views for drivers on Sunset. The large size of the building is a safety threat to the mobile homes below. See dangerousdevelopment.com/take action. (3) Rena Conner, resident, asked for the community to be aware of the proposed project because of traffic concerns at that intersection and for the schools, the developer’s geologist not being licensed, and safety concerns for residents below the site. (4) Brian Deming stated that the adjacent building owner has done his own geology studies and is actively working to oppose the project on concerns regarding safety and density. (5) Christian Martin, resident, said concerned persons are going door to door and asked that area representatives get the word out regarding this outreach. (6) Paul Glasgall said that he had looked at traffic concerns relative to impacts on the Highlands. (7) Quentin Fleming said the proposal affects the Palisades as a whole with the aging stock of many of the existing apartment buildings. (8) Cathy Russell and Sue Kohl asked about Code compliance and whether the residents would be happy with any construction on that site. Rena stated that most of the appellants feel nothing should be built on the site. (9) Jim Rea concurred with Quentin’s comments about precedent affecting not only coastal bluffs in the Palisades but throughout the district and state.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:57 PM.

ATTACHMENTS  

ITEM 7.1.3 — 16990-17000 W. Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project

January 6, 2015

West Los Angeles Planning Commission
200 North Spring Street, Room 272
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re: ZA-2012-130- CDP-MEL-1A
Project @ 16990-17000 Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
Hearing Date: January 21, 2015

Honorable Commissioners:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) has been the voice of the community for more than forty years. The public record will evidence that, on April 10, 2013, February 23, 2013, and June 17, 2013, PPCC submitted comments and concerns upon which the council based its request for the City of Los Angeles to require that a Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared for this proposed multi-family residential development. Copies of PPCC’s letters of February 23 and June 17, 2013, are enclosed for convenience.

As stated in its February 23 letter, “PPCC recognizes and respects property rights and the ability of property owners to use and develop their property in accordance with the law, however, the safety and security of the community must first be addressed.” PPCC’s “Guiding Principles” further provide: “PPCC maintains that planning and zoning regulations, building codes, rules, restrictions and ordinances have been established for the good of the community. They should be applied, upheld and enforced by the Zoning Administrator, Building and Safety, and other governing bodies with jurisdiction over the approval, execution and enforcement processes.” A copy of p. 22 of the PPCC Bylaws, setting forth the “Guiding Principles,” is attached for convenience. The complete PPCC Bylaws can be accessed at: http://www.pp90272.org/BylawsJuly2014.pdf.

PPCC reiterates its request that prior to issuance of a Coastal Development Permit, a Focused EIR be required for this proposed project regarding soils, hydrology, haul routes, traffic and storm-drain/sewer access. PPCC has not considered and therefore takes no position on other legal or factual issues raised in this matter, except that consistent with its “Guiding Principles” PPCC requests that the West Los Angeles Planning Commission apply, uphold and enforce all applicable City zoning regulations and provisions of the Coastal Act.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Christina Spitz, President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

Encls. (PPCC letters dated February 23 and June 17, 2013; p. 22 of PPCC Bylaws)
cc (via email):
Councilmember Mike Bonin (CD11)
Debbie Dyner-Harris, District Director, CD11
Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel, CD11
Tricia Keane, Planning Director, CD11
Chris Robertson, Planning Deputy, CD11

ITEM 7.1.4 – Letter to Caruso Affiliated

December 19, 2014

Mr. Rick Caruso
Caruso Affiliated
101 The Grove Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90026                   Via email to: rcaruso@carusoaffiliated.com

Re: Caruso Affiliated Palisades Village Project (Village Project)

Dear Mr. Caruso:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC), an all-volunteer non-profit organization, has been the eyes, ears and voice of the Pacific Palisades community for over 40 years. PPCC is closely following developments related to the Village Project and appreciates your extensive outreach to the community. Recently, an ad hoc PPCC committee was formed – the Village Project Land Use Committee (VPLUC) – to review all proposals relative to the Village Project and report back to the PPCC Board, with an eye towards maximizing the benefits to the community and minimizing its impact on the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly during the remediation phase and build-out. I emphasize that the purpose of the VPLUC is to provide input and recommendations when warranted to the PPCC Board and/or Executive Committee, as allowed pursuant to the PPCC bylaws; the VPLUC will not make decisions for or otherwise supplant the judgment and authority of the Board.

It is our understanding that a haul route hearing relative to the remediation phase is expected to be scheduled in the near future (PPCC has not yet received official notice and understands that the hearing date is currently uncertain). Pending receipt and review of the relevant documents, and based on initial VPLUC recommendations and subsequent approval of the PPCC Executive Committee, I write on behalf of PPCC to convey the following suggested conditions for the haul route relative to the remediation phase:

Haul route egress to be from the site to Swarthmore Ave. south to Sunset Blvd. west to Temescal Canyon south to PCH; haul route ingress to be from Sunset Blvd. to Monument St. west to the site.

Hours of hauling and loading to be set after consultation by Caruso Affiliated with Village area schools, including Palisades Elementary Charter School, Village School, Seven Arrows Elementary School, Corpus Christi School and Palisades Charter High School, to assure minimal disruption of school drop-off and pick-up.

Additional concerns/suggestions: monitors and traffic flaggers to be in place at the site; regulation of idling engines at the site; hosing of truck undercarriages and dust control as needed, depending on the type of trucks used (it is understood that tanker-type trucks will be used which will alleviate much of the dust); a 24/7 hotline to be put in place to deal with issues as they arise.

PPCC requests that you forward all relevant documents, including the haul route application and any and all reports/comments received from government agencies, as soon as possible for review by the VPLUC.

The VPLUC also recommends that issues involving the use of the site for parking and the ongoing status of the Farmers Market during build-out should be addressed by Caruso Affiliated in the near future to gain clarity for the community.

VPLUC Chair David Kaplan and I invite you and/or your representatives to attend the VPLUC meeting scheduled for February 10, 2015, from 3-5pm in the Palisades Branch Library to discuss these and other issues as may arise at that time. Of course, you and your team are also welcome at our Board meetings, which take place on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays of each month from 7-9pm at the Palisades branch library (except for one meeting on the 2nd Thursday in July, August, November and December).

PPCC looks forward to an ongoing constructive relationship with Caruso Affiliated as the Village project progresses.

Thank you so much.

Best regards,
Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council
cc (via email):
Councilmember Mike Bonin, CD11
Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel to Councilmember Bonin
Matt Middlebrook, EVP, Development, Caruso Affiliated
Rick Lemmo, SVP, Community Relations, Caruso Affiliated
Michael Gazzano, Manager, Development, Caruso Affiliated
David Kaplan, Chair, PPCC Village Project Land Use Committee

ITEM 8.4 – Proposed Amendments to Article VII of PPCC Bylaws [proposed changes in bold for convenience only]
ARTICLE VII
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Sec. 1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE. No later than the first meeting in April, the Chair shall appoint a Nominating Committee of at least three members, to nominate a Chair, Vice-Chair, Treasurer and Secretary, which shall meet at least once in person to select and approve a list of candidates. The Nominating Committee shall consist of at least one Elected Representative. No current Officer shall be a member of the Nominating Committee.
Sec. 2. NOMINATIONS. The Nominating Committee shall present its list of candidates at the first regular meeting in May of each year. Candidates for the office of Chair must be past or present Board members. Candidates for any office must satisfy the membership requirements set forth in Article IV. In addition to the candidates submitted by the Nominating Committee, any Board member may nominate candidates until 15 minutes prior to the scheduled close of the second regular meeting in May.

Sec. 3. CANDIDATES FORUM. If there are any contested offices, a candidates’ forum shall be held during the first regular meeting in June.

Sec. 4. ELECTION. At the first regular meeting in June of each year, after the candidates’ forum if held, the Board shall elect Officers who shall take office on July 1 of that year.
A. The voting shall be by written secret ballot. A majority vote of those present shall be necessary for election. Two members of the Board appointed by the Chair shall count ballots. The Chair shall ask PPCC’s outside accountant to be present during the ballot counting. The numerical vote shall be announced.
B. If there are more than two candidates for an office and no one candidate received a majority vote on the first ballot, a run-off election shall be held immediately between the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes.
C. No Chair or Vice-Chair shall serve more than two consecutive one-year terms in that office.
D. At any meeting when the Chair is absent, the Presiding Officer for that meeting shall be the Vice-Chair and in the absence of both the Chair and the Vice-Chair, the Presiding Officer for that meeting shall be the Treasurer.
E. In the event of permanent vacancy in the office of Chair, Vice-Chair, Treasurer or Secretary, the Presiding Officer shall nominate a replacement who shall be seated after approval by a majority of the entire Board.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR JANUARY 22nd 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Haldis Toppel, Amy Kalp, Gilbert Dembo, Richard Wulliger, Greg Sinaiko, Brenda Theveny, Maryam Zar, Paul Glasgall, George Wolfberg, Reza Akef, Rick Mills, Donna Vaccarino, Janet Anderson and Carol Pfannkuche.

Voting Alternates:  Steve Boyers, Sash Ramaswami, David Kaplan, and Doug McCormick.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Kevin Niles, David Peterson, Barbara Marinacci, Ted Mackie, Laura Mack, and Diane Bleak.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Richard Cohen read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:07 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes.  January 8, 2015 minutes deemed approved as corrected. Next Meetings: Feb. 12: DONE presentation on the Neighborhood Council (NC) process. Feb. 26: Westside Neighborhood Prosecutor Veronica de la Cruz-Robles presentation on crime and related legal issues. Tentative: presentation by developer and discussion of the 16990-17000 W. Sunset Boulevard Apartment Project. Mar. 4: special Hillside Fire Safety and Preparedness Community Meeting, co-sponsored by PPCC and Brentwood Community Council (BCC), Paul Revere Charter Middle School, 6:30-9:00 pm. http://www.cafiresafecouncil.org.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of January 22, 2015. The total account balances equal $35,979.61. PPCC’s has timely filed its federal, state and attorney general filings for the year. Else no significant transactions have occurred.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    16990-17000 W. Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.  Chris announced that the Coastal Development Permit appeal hearing continued to March 4. (Tentative) presentation by developer and discussion of the project on 2/26/15.

7.1.2.    PPCC Bylaws.  Chris reviewed the process for board member request(s) to place items on the agenda; board members reminded to read draft minutes distributed with each agenda and let secretary or president know of any changes prior to board meeting. Chris referenced Article IX, Section 5 of the bylaws for procedures.

7.1.3.    PPCC Draft Minutes.  Chris encouraged all board members to read the minutes prior to the board meeting and contact the Secretary or President with corrections.

7.1.4.    WRAC report.  Chris reported that at the recent meeting several motions were passed. Sometimes those motions are considered by PPCC pending consultation by the President with the Executive Committee and/or other board members.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”).  SLO Officer Moore was in attendance and reported that residential burglaries are fluctuating in number each week and encouraged residents to lock their doors and windows.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office. www.11thdistrict.com. Norman.kulla@lacity.org.

Norman Kulla reported that (1) a problem has arisen with the Coastal Interceptor Relief Sewer project that has to do with the condition of the roadway and may delay the project for several months. (2) relative to Potrero, CD-11 met with CalTrans relative to bluff repair, any path from the mouth of the canyon which would be on the old state highway, support the pedestrian bridge supported by the citizen’s committee, locating the sump station off of PCH to facilitate the riparian portion of the project, DWP’s consideration of undergrounding utilities adjacent to PCH, the March 2015 lot sales and the expectation that the 2015 contract to build the park will be let and its opening date TBD. Norman offered to have a future presentation on Potrero Canyon to the board and committee. (3) Andrew asked about CD-11’s involvement with the VA relative to private parking arrangements. Norm reported that tournament parking is being reevaluated in light of the ACLU litigation seeking cancellation of all contracts not related to Veteran’s health care. (4) Gil Dembo asked Norm to communicate to the City Councilmembers that it reflects poorly on them when they take money from billboard companies while the City is in litigation with some of those companies. (5) Palisades Drive – Diane Bleak asked if the City could remove the three piles of excess asphalt debris. Norm is familiar with the situation where the debris may be the fault of the City, DWP or the cable company so CD-11 has asked the sanitation bureau to remove the debris on its own budget.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s Website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom’s Office, Stephanie Cohen Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Office: (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    US Congressman Ted Lieu, Janet Turner; District Representative.
janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095 — Not in attendance.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers & Area Representatives.

(1) Area 8 (Reza Akef): Area 8 and 7 reps met with the City regarding the upcoming golf tournament and how parking is going to be restricted (no parking from 7 am to 4 PM on one side and 2 hour parking on the other). This year there should be full enforcement. (2) Area 4 (Rick Mills): the El Medio bluff area is using NextDoor to become active including a neighborhood watch meeting at Palisades High School. (3) George Wolfberg (At-Large): George reported that he attended the first City of Santa Monica CA Incline Traffic Safety Working Group. Patti Post attended along with other representatives of SMCCA and BOCA Neighborhood Group. Others: Debbie Dyner-Harris, Mo Blofroshan from LA City, and the SM City reps included Acting Traffic Engineer and several Public Works people and two people from CALTROP consultants to SM. The SM City Council is expected to approve the contract next Tuesday evening. The project was bid as a 365-day project (all bidders agreed with this time frame). Santa Monica is doing everything in its power to finish before Summer 2016. Closure of the Incline will occur no earlier than March 16 (LA Marathon). Dynamic Message Signs will be put up 30 days in advance of project for duration: three on Hwy 101, four in Pacific Palisades and one in SM along highway to discourage/inform traffic as appropriate. (1) SM will pay for a traffic officer at Canyon School for duration of closure. (2) Bonin’s office will request LAPD to patrol through area more often at key times; emphasis is on visibility, rather than writing tickets. SM will check to see if SMPD patrols can also swing through Canyon by extending existing beats from 7th and from Ocean; to add enforcement visibility. (3) LADOT has committed to completing re-striping and signage prior to the closure; under Federal rules, SM cannot help pay for this. (4) LADOT approved the left turn prohibition from Ocean Avenue Ext. onto Mabery, and will put up the necessary signs; SM may contribute the necessary physical barrier needed to narrow the opening to discourage scofflaws. Other barriers noting: “Local Traffic Only,” are planned. Finally, the group agreed to reconvene about one week after the closure to review how everything is going once in play. That meeting date will be determined once closure date is finalized. Overlap with the CIRS project will occur with a currently estimated completion date for that project of June 15. (Soil subsidence and need for compaction greatly exceeded estimate). The Sewer liner is in and the tunneling machine was removed last weekend. Pipe still on the highway is defective or damaged and unused liner. The actual sewer line is yet to be installed as well as extensive grouting around pipes and just below the roadway. Estimate maximum overlap is 90 days.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives.  (1) Chamber of Commerce (Joyce Brunelle): Joyce invited the board and public to the Chamber’s annual installation dinner next week at the Riviera Country Club. (310) 459-7963 for more information, call the Chamber office.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.  (1) Dick Wulliger reported that this Sunday at the Woman’s Club there will be a meeting with Kuehl, Lieu, Bonin, Bloom, Galperin, and Allen. Open to the public and the event is free. 2-4 PM. (2) Haldis Toppel encouraged attendance at the Women’s Club wine event.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Village Project Land Use Committee – David Kaplan (Chair).

David reported that the Village Project haul route hearing has been continued to 1/27; the next committee meeting (tentative) Feb. 10, 2015, 3-5pm at Palisades Branch Library (open to the public); potential agenda topic: ABC (liquor) license renewal (to be confirmed).  The buildings have been demolished but no building or remediation has taken place pending approval of the haul route.

8.2.    PP Homeless Task Force – Maryam Zar; pacpalihtf@gmail.com.

Introduced individuals in attendance involved with the Task Force.  Maryam introduced the goal of the committee to represent both those who wish to see the homeless removed and those who want resources employed to help them. Several subcommittees have been established. (1) The Count Committee. In the Palisades the count will take place on Jan. 29, 2015 starting at 5 AM with a 6:30 AM deployment. To sign up: Google search the Pacific Palisades Count and the URL is available. (2) The Best Practices Committee. (3) The Community Outreach Committee. (4) Government Relations Committee. (5) PR and Media Outreach Committee. The next meeting will be January 22, 2015 from 6:30 PM to 8 PM.

8.3.    Bylaws Committee.

Jennifer Malaret reminded board members to direct questions or comments regarding the existing PPCC bylaws and/or suggested changes to malaret5@me.com. (A) first reading of proposed changes in response to a change in tax laws for non-profit corporations that no longer allows non-voting ex-officio members. NO DISCUSSION. See first reading of proposed changes below. (B) second reading of proposed changes to Article VII, Election of Officers See proposed motion below, sponsored by the Bylaws Committee [attachment]. Reza Akef seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    PPCC 2014 Online Survey Report.

Chris welcomed and thanked Jim Rea for his presentation. Jim thanked Laura Mack for her help with the survey questions. Jim reported that the survey dates ran from 6/21/14 through 10/1/14 with 322 respondents. 72% were familiar with the PPCC. 45% had attended a meeting. Facebook only connected 2% of the residents, far below the Post, emails and website. Respondents did not attend meetings regularly. 55% of respondents did not know the area in which they lived in. 36% of respondents stated that they knew who their representative was. 28% voted in the PPCC election. 66% of respondents did not know what organizations were on PPCC. Respondents felt that top concerns were Caruso’s plan, LAPD/LAFD, homeless, PCH/traffic, and public parks/open space. In the middle were safety on Sunset campaign, coastal act compliance, motorcycle noise, emergency training and safety, billboards and art murals. Lessor concerns but of interest were cell towers, group homes, awards, and athletic events and of least concern were liquor licenses. People prefer contact by email monthly. Some community interest in social media as a means of communication. 65% of respondents have two adults in their households. 73% of households have no children. 29% of respondents have been in the Palisades more than 30 years. Copies of the survey are available at jimrea.com/files/ppcc-survey.pdf.

9.2.    Palisades Business Improvement District (BID).

Update/Presentation by Laurie Sale and Elliot Zorensky. Presentation: Laurie reported that the BID is strictly supported by property owners (including Caruso Affiliated) through property assessments. BID sponsors would like to fill in gaps that the City has not kept up with, i.e., tree trimming, sidewalks, and other needs identified by PRIDE and other community groups. BID meetings will be governed by the Brown Act and are expected to begin January 2016. BID’s board will have 9 voting members (one chamber, one merchant and 7 property owners) and a website. Discussion: Donna Vaccarino and Gil Dembo praised the BID effort and originators. Reza Akef asked about holiday lights within the business district.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation on PPDRB Proposed Design Guidelines.

Barbara Kohn, PPDRB Chair.  Presentation: Barbara Kohn reported that the PPDRB consists of 7 members appointed by Councilmember Mike Bonin. Barbara Kohn, Donna Vaccarino, Stuart Mueller, Kelly Comras, Paul Darrall, Sarah Griffin and David Hibbert; see also ppdrb.org.  The mission is to oversee the commercial districts within the Specific Plan areas. The DRB reviews projects and proposals for design, signage and other aspects of development proposals. An Ad-hoc committee has been formed by the DRB to review the existing guidelines and make recommendations for new design guidelines. The Design Guideline Committee is Robert Meiklejohn, Adam Christian and Randy Young, Barbara Kohn, Kelly Comras and Donna Vaccarino. Joan Graves spoke regarding the history of town meetings in the early 1980’s to rally in support of saving the existing Land & Water building. With the assistance of Councilman Braude, Topa purchased the building and brought it up to earthquake standards. Joan spoke on signage, the history of problems when Swarthmore was made a one-way street; ficus tree removal, height limits in commercial areas and along the Sunset corridor, etc. Joan asked the PPCC to back the current DRB. Randy Young passed out copies of the Specific Plan and prior guidelines that were not adopted. Donna Vaccarino explained that the DRB Guideline Committee has reviewed the existing guidelines for Pacific Palisades along with those good design guideline examples from other communities. Many areas such as San Pedro, Davis, South Pasadena, La Jolla have produced new design guidelines. The DRB Guideline Committee is working with an advisory group of business interests, sustainability, and persons involved previously. The goal is to submit the new design guideline document to the City for approval by the CD-11 Council Office and City Council. Donna passed out a flow chart explaining the planning process and a survey to solicited responses from the board and audience and public through the DRB’s website. The Design Guideline process and the DRB are organized by City ordinance and are subject to conflict of interest rules and other rules relevant to city employees without pay. Discussion: Rick Mills praised the current DRB membership and energy, commenting that the Caruso project will likely come before the DRB finalizes its document. Nevertheless the DRB’s input will be gathered as crucial input to Caruso’s effort and encouraged the DRB and PPCC to work cooperatively. Gil Dembo encouraged proper tenants to locate in the Palisades. No time was allotted for PPCC board or audience discussion.

The DRB’s mailing address is the Design Review Board, 528 Palisades Drive, #166, Pacific Palisades, CA 90272. Email is info@ppdrb.org. Website is www.ppdrb.org.

10.2.    PPCC Awards: Citizen of the Year, Community Service Award & Sparkplug Awards.

Presentation: Chris explained the background of the awards history. The EC unanimously recommends the language in the motion with the exception of the award name and residency requirements. See recommended motion below sponsored by the Executive Committee relative to consolidation and updates to award guidelines, selection and event procedures [attachment]. A brief discussion was held. Due to time expiring and the need to adjourn the meeting no action was taken on this item and it will be held over for action on the next agenda.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 8.1.3(A) – BYLAWS COMMITTEE 2015 PROPOSED CHANGES TO EXISTING BYLAWS NECESSITATED BY CHANGES TO APPLICABLE TAX LAW. FIRST READING.

V.1.A. The Board. There shall be only 23 voting members of the Board consisting of the Chair Emeritus (immediate past Chair), nine Elected Representatives, the four officers specified in Sec. 2 of this Article and a representative from each of the nine Organizations Eligible to Send Representatives as specified in Appendix A (“Organizational Representative”). If a past Chair is unable or unwilling to serve as Chair Emeritus, this position shall be filled by the most recent past Chair willing to serve. However, a first Alternate Elected or Organizational Representative shall serve as the voting member [] of the Board at any Board meeting where his or her corresponding voting member is not present.
V.1.C. The Legal Advisor and any Special or Youth Advisors shall be nonvoting advisors of the Board, provided, however, that if any voting member of the Board is appointed as a Legal Advisor, that member shall retain the right to vote.

ITEM 8.1.3(B) – BYLAWS COMMITTEE 2015 PROPOSED CHANGES TO ARTICLE VII, ELECTION OF OFFICERS. SECOND READING. MOTION: THE PPCC 2015 BYLAWS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD ADOPT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO ARTICLE VII, ELECTION OF OFFICERS:

ARTICLE VII
ELECTION OF OFFICERS

Sec. 1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE. No later than the first meeting in April, the Chair shall appoint a Nominating Committee of at least three members, to nominate a Chair, Vice-Chair, Treasurer and Secretary, which shall meet at least once in person to select and approve a list of candidates. The Nominating Committee shall consist of at least one Elected Representative. No current Officer shall be a member of the Nominating Committee.

Sec. 2. NOMINATIONS. The Nominating Committee shall present its list of candidates at the first regular meeting in May of each year. Candidates for the office of Chair must be past or present Board members. Candidates for any office must satisfy the membership requirements set forth in Article IV. In addition to the candidates submitted by the Nominating Committee, any Board member may nominate candidates until 15 minutes prior to the scheduled close of the second regular meeting in May.

Sec. 3. CANDIDATES FORUM. If there are any contested offices, a candidates’ forum shall be held during the first regular meeting in June.

Sec. 4. ELECTION. At the first regular meeting in June of each year, after the candidates’ forum if held, the Board shall elect Officers who shall take office on July 1 of that year.
A. The voting shall be by written secret ballot. A majority vote of those present shall be necessary for election. Two members of the Board appointed by the Chair shall count ballots. The Chair shall ask PPCC’s outside accountant to be present during the ballot counting. The numerical vote shall be announced.
B. If there are more than two candidates for an office and no one candidate received a majority vote on the first ballot, a run-off election shall be held immediately between the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes.
C. No Chair or Vice-Chair shall serve more than two consecutive one-year terms in that office.
D. At any meeting when the Chair is absent, the Presiding Officer for that meeting shall be the Vice-Chair and in the absence of both the Chair and the Vice-Chair, the Presiding Officer for that meeting shall be the Treasurer.
E. In the event of permanent vacancy in the office of Chair, Vice-Chair, Treasurer or Secretary, the Presiding Officer shall nominate a replacement who shall be seated after approval by a majority of the entire Board.

ITEM 10.2 (A) – PPCC AWARDS: CITIZEN OF THE YEAR, COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD & SPARKPLUG AWARDS. MOTION: RELATIVE TO THE CONSOLIDATION AND UPDATES TO AWARD GUIDELINES, SELECTIONS AND EVENT PROCEDURES THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD ADOPT AND INSERT THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE TO AND INTO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS HANDBOOK:

PACIFIC PALISADES COMMUNITY COUNCIL AWARDS

Each year the Community Council honors those who have made a voluntary contribution to Pacific Palisades that benefits the community at-large. There have been two types of awards.

The first award is to honor those whose contribution to Pacific Palisades has been both a recent effort resulting in a substantial benefit to the community and steady, reliable long-term service to the Palisades. The Council bestowed that recognition in two ways, as a Sponsor and Co-Sponsor with the Palisadian Post for the “Citizen of the Year” Award and its own “Community Service Award.” Now, as the sole sponsor of both awards, PPCC may give an award to an individual annually in December beginning in 2015, to be entitled the [“Citizen of the Year Community Award”/”Community Citizen of the Year Award’]

The second award, the “Golden Sparkplug Award,” is to honor those who have an idea and effort resulting in an original contribution to Pacific Palisades that benefits the community. The Golden Sparkplug Award ceremony is held in conjunction and in cooperation with the [Citizen of the Year Community Award/Community Citizen of the Year Award].

The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award to each recipient, with each Award recipient and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.

Guidelines for these Awards, procedures for selection and the Awards Event and the names of past recipients are set forth below. The Guidelines are recommended practices that allow flexibility in interpretation, implementation or use.

_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: [CITIZEN OF THE YEAR COMMUNITY AWARD/COMMUNITY CITIZEN OF THE YEAR AWARD]

A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the [Citizen of the Year Community Award (“CYCA”)/Community Citizen of the Year Award (“CCYA”)] is to honor long term and continuing outstanding volunteer service as well as a recent extraordinary accomplishment by an individual that resulted in a substantial benefit to the Pacific Palisades community-at-large.

B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the Award must both (a) state the nature of the extraordinary recent accomplishment done by the candidate that resulted in a substantial benefit to the community at-large and (b) summarize the candidate’s steady, reliable, long-term service within the community.

C. RECIPIENT: [The recipient must be an individual who owned real property located in, resided in, or operated a business located in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered./The recipient must be an individual who resided in the Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered.] Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services directly related to his or her responsibilities as a board member, although long-term services may be considered as qualifying factors. There shall be only one Award given each calendar year.

D. AWARD: The Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations. The Award recipient and his or her immediate family members shall be guests of the PPCC at the Award Event.

_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: GOLDEN SPARKPLUG AWARD(S)

A. PURPOSE: The Golden Sparkplug Award honors those citizens who ignite ideas and projects into community action that benefit Palisadians throughout the community.

B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the award must state (a) the nature of the original idea, effort or project, (b) in what way the effort or project benefitted the community at-large and (c) how the effort or project was initiated, in progress or completed during the previous calendar year.

C. RECIPIENT(S): The recipient(s) must be individual(s) who owned real property located in, resided in, or operated a business located in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered. Both adults and youth are eligible for the Award. While there may be multiple recipients in a given year, the Award may be given to only one member of a particular group or community. Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services related to his or her responsibilities as a board member.

D. AWARD(S): The Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient(s) at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations. The Award recipient(s) and their immediate family members shall be guests of the PPCC at the Award Event.
_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: SELECTION AND EVENT COMMITTEES; AWARDS EVENT

A. AWARDS SELECTION COMMITTEE: The Chair shall appoint a Committee of not less than three (3) current board members, plus one previous Citizen of the Year recipient not currently serving on the board and one previous Community Service Award recipient not currently serving on the board (if such persons are available to serve) to review the nominations and select the person to receive the [CYCA/CCYA] and the person(s) to receive the Golden Sparkplug Award(s). The Awards Selection Committee (“ASC”) shall select both the [CYCA/CCYA] and Golden Sparkplug(s) recipients. Prior to the ASC selecting a person or persons for the Award(s), the ASC Chair shall circulate by email to other current members of the Board a list of those persons who have been nominated and ask that if any members of the Board desire to submit comments about any nominee, they should submit any comments to the ASC Chair to be received within five days.

B. AWARDS EVENT DATE: No later than 9 months prior to the event, i.e., March of each calendar year, the Chair shall establish the Event date and the venue and notify the Palisades Chamber of Commerce to place the Event date on the community calendar.

C. AWARDS EVENT COMMITTEE: No later than the first meeting in October, the Chair shall establish the Awards Event Committee (“AEC”). The Chair and the Chair of the AEC shall establish the deadline for the selection of the [CYCA/CCYA] and Golden Sparkplug Award winners and coordinate publicity for the request for nominations. The AEC Chair shall coordinate the Event details, such as budget, menu items, and dinner ticket cost, paid reservation procedures, decoration, event ceremony, complimentary dinner tickets, parking, and other assignment of duties and tasks for the night of the event.

D. TIME FRAME & PROCEDURE:

1.First October Meeting: Distribute Award Guidelines and discuss the Awards. Appoint AEC Chair and committee members. Submit press release to relevant publications soliciting nominations. Appoint ASC Chair and committee members.

2.The last Saturday in October: Deadline for receipt of nominations.

3.First Week in November: The ASC meets in person to open nominating letters and sort by names into youth and adult categories. Check for multiple nominations in one envelope. Review nomination letters. Review comments from the Board. Evaluate how well the candidates meet the guidelines and sort into 3 groups: those requiring no further consideration and those eligible for further consideration and selection. The ASC shall discuss merits of each potential award winner. The ASC shall vote; however, no committee member who nominates shall vote when that nomination is considered, and no committee member shall vote for him/herself or a family member. The ASC Chair shall complete a synopsis of the committee’s efforts and shall notify the Chair of the efforts and the award recipient(s).

4.Early November: Immediately following receipt of the ASC Chair’s synopsis and results, the Chair shall notify the winner(s) prior to any public announcements, notify the press, local elected officials and dignitaries who will be invited to the event, and authorize the preparation of the award plaque(s).

5.Early November: The AEC Chair shall follow up with a written notification of the Award winner(s) and event details such as reservations and parking, submit the biography of the winner(s) for press release, and mail or email or post invitation letters to the prior “Community Service Award” and “Citizen of the Year Award” winners.

6.PPCC November Meeting: ASC announces award winner(s), notifies the winner(s), notifies the press and the Board of Governors. AEC provides details of the Awards Event and invites recipients to the event.

7.PPCC December Meeting: The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award(s) to each recipient, with each Award recipient and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.
8.Any future revision of the Awards Guidelines shall be upon recommendation of the Executive Committee and subject to a vote for approval by the PPCC Board.

PRIOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

[INSERT LIST CITIZEN OF THE YEAR]

[INSERT LIST COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD]

[INSERT LIST GOLDEN SPARKPLUG]

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 12th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Amy Kalp, Kelly Comras, Richard Wulliger, Gilbert Dembo, Donna Vaccarino, Brenda Theveny, Greg Sinaiko, Maryam Zar, Paul Glasgall, George Wolfberg, Stuart Muller, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills, Cathy Russell and Reza Akef.

Voting Alternates:  Janet Anderson.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Barbara Marinacci, David Kaplan, Ted Mackie, Doug McCormick, Bruce Schwartz, Howard Robinson, Michael Soneff, Brian Deming, Dave Peterson, Andrew Sachs and Laura Mack.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  George Wolfberg read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:06 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes.  Chris deemed the January 22, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Next meeting: Feb. 26: presentations and discussion of the 16990-17000 W. Sunset Boulevard apartment project likely deferred as the hearing date has been delayed until June 3, 2015. March 2015 is Public Safety Month at PPCC: March 4: special Hillside Fire Safety and Preparedness Community Meeting, co-sponsored by PPCC and Brentwood Community Council (BCC), Paul Revere Charter Middle School auditorium, 6:30-9:00 pm. http://www.cafiresafecouncil.org. March 12: Red Cross presentation regarding public health and safety; (tentative) discussion of the Caruso Affiliated (Village Project) ABC license renewal application. March 26: Westside Neighborhood Prosecutor Veronica de la Cruz-Robles presentation on crime and related legal issues.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of February 12, 2014. The total account balances equal $35,265.61. Richard stated that the only significant transaction was payment of a deposit for PPCC’s December 2015 holiday party.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    2014 Community Involvement/Survey.

Chris reported that, as most board members were aware, the results of the 2014 PPCC online survey were reported at our last board meeting. Some public reaction viewed the results in a “glass half empty” light and suggested various improvements to PPCC. Chris stated that another view is that this survey was PPCC’s first time ever survey, was started before PPCC had begun to do extended outreach, and 322 more responses to PPCC were received and recorded than ever before. As did prior PPCC Presidents Barbara Kohn and Janet Turner, Chris stated that she welcomed all positive suggestions for improvement and invited anyone and everyone in the community with constructive ideas to attend PPCC meetings, participate, ask to be on PPCC’s email list for notices, attend our meetings, and join all of us who volunteer our time on the PPCC board in helping to implement ideas and action to benefit our wonderful community. Chris reminded everyone to Like Us on Facebook – go to facebook.com/pacpalicc!

7.1.2.    AT&T cell tower/light pole at Sunset & Napoli.

Chris reported that the pole structure going up at this corner is a combined street light pole and so-called “stealth” cell tower, with the antennas to be hidden in the top portion. PPCC had presentations and discussion about this proposed structure with AT&T representatives in 2010 and 2011. Assuming the antennas will eventually be encased in a canister, it appears to conform with renderings we were previously shown. Please note that the Bureau of Street Lighting approved the structure and PPCC has been told that its size and design were dictated by the Bureau’s requirements in order to handle the weight of the new equipment. Chris stated that she would be available after the meeting to answere any further questions.

7.1.3.    Archer Forward Project/BCC position.

Chris reminded the board that PPCC had submitted a previous letter submitted to the City on this matter.  She reported that Brentwood Community Council passed a resolution last week to oppose the Archer Forward project as proposed in the Final EIR, “because of the substantial number of adverse impacts it would impose on the community.”  The resolution further states that BCC supports the current CUP and Alternative Plan No. 2 in the Final EIR, “provided that authorized traffic levels cannot exceed current levels.” BCC is continuing to work with all parties toward a resolution for Brentwood and the greater community.

7.1.4.    Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training, sponsored by BCC.  March 5 (and 7 consecutive Thursdays thereafter): 6:30-9pm, Paul Revere. Chris reported that Palisadians are welcome to attend (please note conflict with certain PPCC board meetings in March and April). To sign up or for more information, contact info@brentwoodcommunitycouncil.org or call Jerry at 310-472-4733.

7.1.5.    PPCC December 2015 meeting/holiday party venue.  Chris reported that the party will be held at the Gladstone’s private dining room. This location is large enough for our needs, has a nice menu and great atmosphere and will be a good value. The YMCA has been holding events there and reports very positively on their experience. We look forward to seeing you all at the event in December!

7.1.6.    Sunset Repaving.  Sunset will be closed between Kenter and Barrington February 14th and 15th.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office. www.11thdistrict.com.

Norman Kulla in attendance. (1) Interim Control Ordinance – Norman had a correction to what was published in the Palisadian Post, i.e., much of the Palisades is in the coastal zone and hillside areas that the Interim Control Ordinance does not apply to – ie. what Blumenberg and most of the rules talked about do not apply to the Palisades. Where the BMO is applicable in the Palisades will remain the same. There is a Citywide initiative to eliminate increases of square footages in living area based on green requirements and balconies/patios. (2) Riviera Golf Tournament – the VA cancelled use of its parking which was 2,000 public spaces. Current shuttles will run from PCH Beach Will Rogeres parking lots (W, T and F and Beaches 3, 2, and 1 with excess parking going onto Temescal) and the Water Garden. (3) Reza Akef thanked CD-11 (Anna) for helping to clean up the catch basin at Allenford and Sunset. The catch basin at Will Rogers/before Brooktree going west on Sunset is still clogged. (4) Paul Glasgall thanked CD-11 (Anna) for its attention to the telephone pole at Bienveneda.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s Website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom’s Office, Stephanie Cohen Field Representataive.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Office: (310) 450-0041.

Stephanie Cohen in attendance. (1) Homeless Task Force – Stephanie thanked everyone who came out for the homeless count. (2) The legislative package for this year is being decided with one bill being introduced involving the arts. (3) Upcoming events include the 2/22/2015 child car seat safety event and an income tax preparation seminar for on 2/28/2015 for low-income individuals. Please call 1-866-910-9559 for more information.

7.2.5.    US Congressman Ted Lieu, Janet Turner; District Representative. janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

Janet Turner in attendance. (1) Janet thanked Stuart Muller and all of the participants for their help with the homeless count. (2) VA Property – hearings will begin and Janet encouraged anyone with an interest or stake to contact her. (3) Ted’s swearing in will take place at Royce Hall on March 4th, 2 pm-4pm and Janet encouraged anyone interested in RSVP’ing to contact her. (4) Art Contest – [janet insert]. (5) Anthem Blue Cross Computer Breach – Anthem has reached out to the Congressman’s office so anyone who believes they are affected can contact Janet.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors – Written reports only.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives — None.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.  (1) Civic League will be meeting on Monday 2/23 to discuss the BMO. Issues include square footage, side yards and access to the rear yards.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.  Laura Mack (Sustainability), report on NC Sustainability Alliance event, Feb. 21, 2015.  See report below [attachment].

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.1.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

Direct questions or comments regarding the existing PPCC bylaws and/or suggested changes to malaret5@me.com. (A) The committee met in February 2015 and discussed changes to Appendix A and election procedures. (B) See second reading and proposed motion below to adopt proposed changes in response to a change in tax laws for non-profit corporations that no longer allows non-voting ex-officio board members. The bylaws committee sponsored the motion and George Wolfberg seconded. The motion passed unanimously.  [See attachment below.]

8.1.2.    Outreach Committee – Andrew Wolfberg (Chair).

Andrew reported on the recent committee meeting and plans for expanded outreach (social media/Facebook and table events) in accordance with their February 2015 meeting. Focus will be directed at the Facebook page where 253 people currently like the page. Andrew encouraged board members and all attendees to like PPCC on Facebook. The outreach committee will be at the Farmer’s Market also focusing on getting people to start with the Facebook page first and then going to PPCC’s website for more information. Andrew asked for people to submit photos that could be posted on Instagram (use #palisadescouncil) to also increase PPCC’s presence in the community and promoting resident’s ability to take part in and ownership of their community.

8.1.3.    PP Homeless Task Force – Maryam Zar (Chair).

Maryam submitted a report on the Homeless Count, Jan. 29, 2015. See report below [attachment].  Maps may be made available upon request. pacpalihtf@gmail.com. Maryam recognized those in attendance who were part of the Task Force and praised the organizers for how prepared the process was. Maryam summarized that going forward the next phase of the Task Force will be to engage a survey of the homeless encountered through LASA and the Department of Mental Health with a target completion date of February 2015 and information will be gathered through the summer of 2015. Transition into housing is an option and the task force is also working on other best practices that have helped other communities and to examine those that have not. Fire risk and safety assessment is of primary concern. Maryam asked the public to go to PPCC’s Facebook page and like it along with liking the Homeless Task Force page too. Chris thanked Maryam and all of the volunteers for their commitment and energy and enthusiasm devoted to the task force.

8.1.4.    Village Project Land Use Committee – David Kaplan (Chair).

David reported that the haul route conditions (environmental remediation phase) have been approved by the Board of Building & Safety Commissioners and work is expected to begin Feb. 11, 2015.  To view the conditions go to www.pacpalicc.org and click on link to the approval letter. The next tentative committee meeting is expected early March (date/time tbd), Palisades branch library, open to the public; expected discussion of Caruso Affiliated (Village Project) ABC license renewal application. Look for meeting details/confirmation to be announced via PPCC email and notices in the press and on Facebook/Nextdoor.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.   PPCC Awards – Citizen of the Year, Community Service Award & Sparkplug Awards.  Chris deferred the topic to the next agenda.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Department of Neighborhood Empowerment (“DONE”) presentation regarding Neighborhood Council process.

Guest Speakers:  Thomas Soong, DONE Representative. Steve Sann, President, Westwood Community Council (WCC). Sandy Brown, Westwood community leader and board member of both WCC and Westwood Neighborhood Council (WNC). Sharon Commins, past President, Mar Vista Community Council (a certified Neighborhood Council), Co-Chair, Westside Regional Alliance of Councils Land Use & Planning Committee, and Co-Chair, ReCodeLA Zoning Advisory Committee. Additional remarks during the meeting from Dr. Jerry Brown, President of WNC and Jay Handal, President of West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council (WLANC). Information and discussion only, no motions entertained.

Background: Chris Spitz reported that it has come to PPCC’s attention that there is interest in the community in forming a Neighborhood Council and that members of the community are meeting with CD-11 and other City Officials (including the City Attorney) to promote this effort. PPCC has discussed this matter in the past and again encourages the discussion to come out into the open for a transparent public discussion. This is why the matter is placed on tonight’s agenda.

Presentation: Thomas Soong. In 1999 the City Charter was changed to create the DONE. At that time there were no neighborhood NC’s so the charge was to work with the community to create NC’s. Today there are 96 NC’s within the City. NC’s have two main purposes. First to promote more citizen participation and second to make government more responsive to local needs. Benefits for NCs are: the ability to advise the mayor on the budget process at the Mayor’s annual budget day (through Budget Advocates who take input from stakeholders), $37,000 in annual funds (hire administrative staff, use neighborhood purpose grants to provide schools and non-profits with monies), file Community Impact Statements (“CIS”) which are read into City Council motions, to embrace the City’s stakeholder definition (live, work or own property and those that have a continued interest in the community), get the early notification system to see the City Council agendas/follow council files, before they are acted on, file CIS for and against land use proposals and to work with area planning staff with early notice of development in their area. NCs are partnering with each other to create emergency plan/LAFD/CERT task forces and collaborate with each other in various ways. NC’s can designate a liaison to work with City Departments on issues when needed. Over the last 16 years DONE has seen NC board members rise to participate in larger levels of City government. Thomas’ department provides technical assistance, training, mediation among NCs, and general support. To become a NC there is an application process (structure, outreach, petition, etc.) and then DONE does a report which is submitted to the Board of Commissioners that oversees the DONE department. The Board of Commissioners will certify or not prospective NCs. Speakers: Sharon Commins, Mar Vista, past President. NCs have a different election process, board members have to be removed by the City Attorney, there is no ability to sue, NC’s cannot appeal land use decisions by the City, and cautioned that regulations make it far different to function than a community council. Steve Sann, Westwood Community Council, President – Steve thanked PPCC for helping them form the Westwood CC and being the model for their council. Steve said that DONE has structural problems within their department. PPCC is the gold standard having existed for 40 years where DONE has existed for only 16 years. PPCC meets far more often than any NC. The NC system has positives including the $37,000 of taxpayer money that is received but that money comes at a heavy price. Rules are cumbersome to spend the money. Westwood is the only community that has both a neighborhood council and a community council. The NC was forced on the community in Westwood by a few disgruntled residents. Not one single NC organizer in Westwood was elected to the NC board and those affiliated with the community council have been elected to the NC board over the past three elections. The problem with duplicative councils is the potential for divisiveness and mischief when one group takes an opposing view that is not supported by the community but is listened to by the council member. Two case studies are the Playa Vista land use when the Playa Vista developer loaded the neighborhood council with their representatives for two years. In Eagle Rock the same thing happened where pot growers offered incentives to vote for their supporters on NC election boards. Steve stated that CIS are often not read nor considered by council members. NCs are governed by the Brown Act despite the fact that they are purely advisory and do not make any laws. Steve suggested that PPCC does not need the City to empower itself. Steve also remarked that the Palisades is unlike most other areas of the City, in that we have significant geographic portions that are regulated by County and/or State agencies (e.g., PCH, Santa Monica Mountains); PPCC often is called upon to interface with these agencies and an NC (a City agency) may be constrained from doing so. Sandy Brown, Westwood Property Owners Association and a WNC and WCC board member. Sandy stated that NCs lose their independent identity and spontaneous ability to hold meetings and control agendas. PPCC is already participating in the City government already and the NC idea is for those communities who have not had leadership in the past.

Discussion: (1) George Wolfberg stated that PPCC has participated in every budget day since 1999 but PPCC is not able to vote to select a Budget Advocate. Sharon Commins stated that Brentwood Community Council voted and that particularly with land use issues CCs do vote. (2) Reza Akef asked DONE to explain the process again. Thomas repeated that an application must be filed (structure, purpose, 250 petitions), DONE does a report and then the Board of Commissioners decides whether to certify the NC or not. (3) Amy Kalp suggested that PPCC form a subcommittee and asked to hear from someone from a Neighborhood Council. Jerry Brown, President of the Westwood NC, stated that the people who formed the NC have not attended a meeting in the last 4 ½ years. Several hundred signatures were obtained a Farmer’s Market in support and thousands of signatures were submitted in opposition with UCLA’s Chancellor asking to opt out. The parameters used by DONE look at the people who turn out to vote as a very important factor along with CIS that are filed. The councilmember does not respond to the NCs’ CIS or requests for input. Jerry stated that PPCC would be surrendering its autonomy because of the Brown Act. (4) David Kaplan asked Thomas what DONE can do for PPCC that we don’t already have other than the $37,000. Thomas stated partnerships with the Mayor and City Departments. (5) Richard Cohen noted that illuminated advertising on street furniture all over WLA but not in the Palisades Village. The City wanted that furniture placed here and so did our councilmember. Palisades and Brentwood, two places with community councils, fought the City Council and Rosendahl and prevailed by hiring lawyers and arguing the specific plan and need for CEQA review. (7) Howard Robinson asked if there could be two NCs in one geography. Thomas said no. Howard asked how a NC would disband. Thomas said the NC could become decertified but that there is a process to do that. Howard asked if a geography has a NC if a CC can be formed. Thomas stated yes. (8) Gil Dembo asked residents who are seeking to form a NC to come to the PPCC and express their concerns or why they feel additional representation is needed and suggested that the topic is premature. (9) Donna Vaccarino stated that it is a good thing for a community to discuss how it would like to be organized and supported the idea of PPCC forming a subcommittee. (11) Paul Glasgall thanked Westwood leaders for coming and giving their experiences in having dual organizations and encouraged the PPCC to not ignore their advice to remain as a community council. (12) Laura Mack asked Thomas to address the negative comments that guest speakers raised earlier. Thomas asked Jay Handal (President of West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council) to speak. Jay Handal stated that every council should have representation and whether it is a NC or CC is really an individual preference of each neighborhood. If the process is taken through by organizers Jay believes a NC will be certified because of the overall plan for the City of Los Angeles to have NCs in each areas. NC board members are supposed to support all interests. Jay stated that the NC process sometimes seems overburdening (liability, risk management, Brown Act, etc.) but the positive is access to the City attorney, planning, etc. NCs cannot sue and NCs cannot appeal but community councils do not often sue as a practical matter. Brentwood has talked about having a NC in addition to their CC for the past year. Jay suggested fact-finding and for the Palisades to have an open and honest dialogue. (13) Barbara Kohn reminded the board that PPCC was the model for the NC system and that these discussions have taken place for a long period of time. Previously board members were required to file financial disclosures to sit on a NC and NCs have conflict of interest rules that PPCC has previously been unwilling to adopt. (14) Ted Weitz stated that residents do not feel there is an elected body that represents their interests. Ted has heard there is a lack of respect and lack of interest in the council. People feel that an elected body will give them their voice rather than appointed persons and officers who elect themselves. (15) Rick Mills stated that whether there is a NC or CC the group should represent the broadest cross section of the Palisades and PPCC can certainly improve its outreach and run its meetings to be fair and open. (16) Michael Soneff suggested that there be a point person to advocate for a NC. (17) Jennifer Malaret encouraged people who have questions or are dissatisfied with election procedures or any provision with the bylaws to please email malaret5@me.com. (18) Chris Spitz, PPCC President, stated that PPCC already receives official “early notifications” from the City regarding land use matters, has a good relationship with City, County and State agencies and officials, and receives prompt responses and attention from CD11, Planning Dept. officials, the City Attorney and other public officials.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:03 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.3.3 – REPORT BY ADVISOR LAURA MACK ON NC SUSTAINABILITY ALLIANCE EVENT, FEB. 21, 2015

The newly formed Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance (NCSA) — which connects and engages NC stakeholders on citywide sustainability and resilience issues — invites all to attend the NCSA’s inaugural event, a sustainable water forum. The event will be held Saturday, February 21, from 2:00 – 4:30pm, at the TreePeople Conference Center in Beverly Hills.
On Feb. 4, 2015, L.A. County was among 55 counties in California to be designated as a natural disaster area due to drought impacts.
Come learn about water and landscaping strategies that protect precious natural resources and habitat while saving money, and related advocacy and outreach opportunities for Neighborhood Councils.
Confirmed speakers include the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Sustainability, TreePeople, and the Mar Vista Community Council Green Committee. LADWP will also be on hand to share information about the California-Friendly Landscaping Incentive Program, rainbarrel rebates, and other resources.
Arrive early to enjoy the hiking trails and beautiful park surrounding TreePeople’s site, or just enjoy refreshments with us! Children ages 5 and up are also welcome to come, and will be treated to their own activity, courtesy of TreePeople. Reservations are required. To learn more and RSVP, please visit: http://ncsa.nationbuilder.com.

ITEM 8.1.1(B) – BYLAWS COMMITTEE 2015 PROPOSED CHANGES TO EXISTING BYLAWS NECESSITATED BY CHANGES TO APPLICABLE TAX LAW. SECOND READING.

The Bylaws Committee moves that the changes denoted in bold face type be made to PPCC’s existing Bylaws, Article V.1.A and V.1.C.

V.1.A. The Board. There shall be only 23 voting members of the Board consisting of the Chair Emeritus (immediate past Chair), nine Elected Representatives, the four officers specified in Sec. 2 of this Article and a representative from each of the nine Organizations Eligible to Send Representatives as specified in Appendix A (“Organizational Representative”). If a past Chair is unable or unwilling to serve as Chair Emeritus, this position shall be filled by the most recent past Chair willing to serve. However, a first Alternate Elected or Organizational Representative shall serve as the voting member [] of the Board at any Board meeting where his or her corresponding voting member is not present.
V.1.C. The Legal Advisor and any Special or Youth Advisors shall be nonvoting advisors of the Board, provided, however, that if any voting member of the Board is appointed as a Legal Advisor, that member shall retain the right to vote.

ITEM 8.3.3 – PP HHOMELESS TASK FORCE REPORT, SUBMITTED BY MARYAM ZAR, CHAIR.

PACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS REPORT; FOLLOWING THE 1ST EVER PACIFIC PALISADES HOMELESS COUNT, ON JANUARY 29, 2015
In the early morning of January 29th Pacific Palisades conducted its first ever Homeless Count as part of the LAHSA county-wide effort to quantify the number of homeless living in Los Angeles.
Our Count went very well. Kim Clary and Brian Deming who are the Heads of our Task Force subcommittee on the Count, with the help of David Morena, had organized the morning flawlessly, with maps and marked tracts organized by number and locale.
Nearly 100 volunteers filed in beginning at 4:45 to either help with registration or to walk the Count. At 5:30 Stephanie Inyama from LAHSA arrived for a 1 hour training. Our groups deployed around 6:30, with 12 teams of 4.
We had one section that we designated for LAPD and Lead Officer Michael Moore, because we knew it was dense with homeless encampments and tough to trek. None of our groups were met with resistance although one homeless gentleman seemed to know that the count was on and he was being counted. Apparently he hollered out, “count me!”
Councilman Mike Bonin stopped by to support our volunteers and former Palisadian Norman Kulla from his office walked the count for Pac Palisades. 4 members of Assemblyman Bloom’s office along with Stephanie Cohen also joined our ranks. And Janet Turner from Congressman Ted Lieu’s office volunteered as well. In the end we tallied at least 70 homeless people and approximately 74 encampments, including make shift shelters and one van.
Our thanks to David Morena, who mapped out the LAHSA tract maps into street views, divided the large tracts into smaller ones and divvied volunteers into teams that were well equipped to scour familiar areas of the Palisades. Thanks also to the 70 plus community members who volunteered for the Pacific Palisades count.
We’d like to publicly thank Officer Moore from the LAPD for his unyielding support to this community, ACS Security and Palisades Patrol who lent their resources to us on the morning of the count, Palisades Charter High School for allowing us to set up our base at Mercer Hall, Kristen and Doug McCormick who organized the entire registration process, Sharon Kilbride and Helga Jenson who secured donations of food for the volunteers from Vons, Noah’s, Starbucks, Ralphs and Caffeinated Club Soda.
Our thanks also to Councilman Mike Bonin and Assemblyman Richard Bloom for their support of this task force, and the volunteers from their office who counted with our community on January 29th.
Now the work of the task force begins in earnest, to find services and solutions to transition people into housing, to the extent possible.
The next phase of our work is to engage in a survey of the homeless that we have counted, which will be overseen by LAHSA. This will be a demographic survey conducted by the West Side Homeless Coalition (WSHC) and Department of Mental Health (DMH). This portion has a target completion date for the end of February. The 2nd part of the surveying consists of a more comprehensive ‘assessment’ period, which will continue through the spring. During the assessment, those volunteers from Pacific Palisades who choose to get involved through the task force and have been trained by the WSHC, will begin to form a dialogue with some of the homeless to determine which are willing to accept services to transition out of homelessness, and what services are available for them. Our task force subcommittee for Outreach, headed by Courtney Graff, is actively looking for community volunteers who would like to take part and be trained by WSHC. The Outreach sub-committee is also exploring whether there are Palisadians with expertise in the fields of mental health, law, and job training who would be willing to volunteer some of their time to work with the homeless.
On other fronts, the task force is working on unearthing some of the strategies and practices that have worked for other locales in addressing and alleviating their homeless problems, and which have not. The sub-committee dedicated to ascertaining what practices could be best followed here in Pacific Palisades is headed by Doug McCormick, and has already begun to introduce the task force to some helpful findings. We also have a sub-committee dedicated to law enforcement suggesting ways where LAPD and LAFD can help us secure high fire hazard zones in the Palisades that have multiple make-shift encampments. Our objective there is to make sure the make-shift shelters that crop up around Palisades are kept safe and do not pose a fire or other safety hazard to the community. Lead Officer Michael Moore has been a great help to the task force through this subcommittee, headed by Palisadian Bruce Schwartz.
Please visit us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/PacPaliHTF) or on our PPCC website tab (http://www.pp90272.org/Homeless.pdf), or email us at pacpalihtf@gmail.com and give us your thoughts and ideas. We are looking for full community engagement and hope to partner with all of you to make this task force a success.
Pacific Palisades Homeless Count, January 29, 2015
Summary of Results

Team   Tract Area   Time Out   Time In   Homeless Persons   Homeless Shelters
1 Palisades Highlands 6:50 9:00 0 1
2A Village North of Sunset between Temescal and Chatauqua 6:45 8:45 3 0
2B North of Sunset: Chatauqua to Will Rogers 6:45 8:45 0 8
3A PCH, lower Castellammare between Sunset and Coastline and Los Liones 6:45 9:35 14 13
3B Upper Castellammare and Paseo Miramar 6:45 8:45 0 0
3C North of Sunset: Marquez, Palisades Dr to Bienveneda 6:45 8:40 3 2
3D North of Sunset: Beinveneda to Will Rogers 6:40 ~8:40 1 1
4A South of Sunset from PCH and Sunset to Las Pulgas Canyon 6:45 8:40 3 5 4B South of Sunset from PCH and Las Pulgas Canyon to Temescal Canyon 6:45 9:00 11 2
5 South of Sunset to PCH between Temescal Canyon and Chatauqua 6:40 ~9:45 15 41
6A North of PCH between Chatauqua /Sunset and Entrada/Amalfi (approx) 6:45 9:10 20 1
6B North of PCH between Amalfi/Sunset and San Vicente (approximately) 6:45 ~9:00 0 0
TOTAL  70 Homeless Persons,  74 Shelters

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 26th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Amy Kalp, Gilbert Dembo, Richard Wulliger, Brenda Theveny, Donna Vaccarino, Greg Sinaiko, George Wolfberg, Paul Glasgall, Reza Akef, Stuart Muller, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills, Cathy Russell, Carol Pfannkuche, Maryam Zar and Kelly Comras.

Voting Alternates:  Kevin Niles

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Schuyler Dietz, Ted Mackie, Peter Culhane, Steve Boyers, Barbara Marinacci, David Kaplan, Diane Bleak, Bruce Schwartz, Andrew Sacks, Laura Mack and Carol Bruch.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Andrew Wolfberg read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:07pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes.  Adoption of the February 12, 2015 minutes. March 2015 is PPCC Public Safety Month. Mar. 4: special Hillside Fire Safety and Preparedness Community Meeting, co-sponsored by PPCC and Brentwood Community Council (BCC), Paul Revere Charter Middle School, 7:00 -9:00 pm. http://www.cafiresafecouncil.org. March 12: American Red Cross, Santa Monica Chapter CEO Julie Thomas presentation on health & public safety (additional tentative discussion: renewal of the Village Project/Caruso’s ABC license). March 26: Neighborhood Prosecutor Veronica de la Cruz-Robles presentation on crime and related legal issues (additional discussion: CUB permit application for mini-mart/beer & wine sales at the Shell Station on Sunset Blvd. & Via de la Paz, whereby the existing Village Mobil sales activities would relocate due to a change in ownership).

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of February 26, 2015. The total account balances equal $34,718. Richard reported that the only significant transaction has been the payment of the D&O insurance premium.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Ground Rules.  Code of Conduct/Executive and Other Committees/Duties of Chair/Meetings. (SR 8, Appendix C, PPCC Bylaws; Arts. V.3, V.4, VI.1 and IX.1-6, PPCC Bylaws).

Chris announced that due to library rules PPCC meetings must end promptly at 9pm. Her goal is to allow as many people as possible within our limited time to speak on discussion items or in public comment. At the end of the meeting when possible Chris will stay in the parking lot if anyone wishes to continue discussing any matter. Matters can also be held over for the next meeting if it becomes necessary. As president, Chris will conduct the order of the meetings; some topics may be rearranged at her discretion. Per PPCC’s Code of Conduct as well as Roberts Rules of Order board members as well as the audience shall only speak when called upon by the Chair; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. Regarding the Code of Conduct, board members shall: 1) Honor the role of the Chair in maintaining order; 2) Practice civility, professionalism and decorum in discussion and debate; 3) Continue respectful behavior before and after Board meetings, which standard is required of board members at all times when engaging in discussion of PPCC matters, wherever and whenever such discussions might take place (in other words, not only at Board meetings); and 4) Be welcoming, respectful and courteous to members of the public and speakers. Regarding PPCC committees and the agenda process, the bylaws provide that the president appoints all committees except for the Executive Committee. Again, as previously explained, the Executive Committee is automatically made up of the 4 officers and the Chair Emeritus as well as 2 members elected by the officers and Chair Emeritus (an area rep, in this case Paul Glasgall, and an organizational rep, in this case Janet Anderson). The Executive Committee does not act for the board except in emergencies when there is no time for the board to take action; otherwise, from time to time the Chair relies on the Executive Committee for advice. The only other committees required under the bylaws are the Nominating Committee, the Elections Committee and the Three Chairs Committee. All other committees are strictly ad hoc and formed at the Chair’s discretion. In exercising that discretion the Chair may, from time to time, seek the advice of the Executive Committee or other board members as to committee formation. The President sets all agendas; the Executive Committee does not set or draft agendas and has not been consulted about any specific meeting agenda since Chris became President. No question or complaint about any meeting agendas (for example, why a topic is included or why certain speakers are listed) has been received before any board meeting since Chris became President; the last meeting agenda was no exception. At all times Chris acts as authorized and required by the bylaws, and with the best interests of PPCC and the Palisades community in mind.

7.1.2.    March 4, 2015 Fire Safety Meeting and Public Safety Month.  Chris reviewed the dates listed in Sec. 4 above. Chris announced that this meeting is co-sponsored by Brentwood and the PPCC. Flyers are available to the board and public and have been distributed via email and social media.

7.1.3.    Neighborhood Council Process.

February 12, 2015 board discussion; letter to Post; Summary re PPCC and WRAC members’ composition. The February 12 board meeting featured a discussion about neighborhood council/NC (as compared with community council/CC) process. As announced, this was intended to be an open, initial discussion, to be continued at a future public board meeting in the event of a request by a board member and further community interest. Those interested are encouraged to consider actual facts and available information about the NC and CC process. See the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment website: http://www.lacityneighborhoods.com/home.htm. See also (A) Letter to the Editor recently submitted to the Palisadian Post and (B) a Summary of PPCC’s composition as compared with other Westside CCs/NCs and related facts. See materials attached below. Chris announced that board members and the public are aware of PPCC’s discussions to date concerning the Neighborhood Council process. Chris stated that she would not repeat what is in the agenda and that if anyone wants to know more they should review the attached documents as well as the minutes of our February 12, 2015 meeting which extensively detail what was discussed and are posted on PPCC’s website. After the February 12, 2015 meeting certain emails were widely circulated with comments about the meeting. Chris did not repeat her response to the initial email nor the responses of others at this time and stated only that 1) if PPCC were a Neighborhood Council, these emails would have been prohibited by the Brown Act; and 2) she received a clarification from Civic League President Richard Blumenberg as to whether the comments were, as stated, “those of the Civic League Board.” Mr. Blumenberg advised Chris on February 24, 2015 that the Civic League representative’s email was “only from her point of view as a member of the Civic League. It does not reflect the position of the Board.” Chris proceeded to ask the PPCC board for an advisory opinion, by way of a straw vote, as to whether PPCC should further investigate formation of a Neighborhood Council via an ad hoc committee to be formed by Chris for that purpose. It was stressed that organizational members represent their organizations on the board and should only vote the position of their organizations, not their own personal views. If their respective organizations’ boards have not taken or expressed a position, organizational members should abstain from voting either on this issue or any other matter that comes before the board for a vote. Chis emphasized that this is not a discussion item; after the straw vote is taken, if any board member wishes to continue the discussion he/she may request pursuant to the procedures set forth in the bylaws that it be agendized at a future meeting. Action: a straw vote was taken. 3 in favor, 10 opposed and 8 abstained.

7.1.4.    Input from board and community members regarding concerns or suggested changes.

To date, we have received a few suggested bylaws changes but no suggested broader policy or other concerns. Chris received a few helpful suggestions for meeting process, including a suggestion from Michael Soneff regarding providing coffee at our meetings, which she donated tonight (the brownies were courtesy of Andrew Wolfberg, who baked them himself). If anyone is interested in donating coffee or treats for upcoming meetings or serving on a meeting hospitality committee, please let Chris know. As to broader policy concerns or suggestions, please submit any suggestions to me at info@pacpalicc.org; we may at a future meeting devote time to an open discussion of suggestions and concerns.

7.1.5.    Chris announced that Gil Dembo was elected President of Temescal Canyon Association.

7.1.6.    Chris announced that the organizational representative for the Chamber of Commerce will no longer be Joyce Brunelle.  Susan Payne will become the Primary and Mark Lasky the Alternate representatives. Chris thanked Joyce for her years of service to PPCC.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email: 27995@lapd.lacity.org.

SLO Moore said that the Palisades is up 109% in residential burglaries and 184% in vehicle break ins. The night watch officers did arrest a burglary suspect last night. He reported that there are City programs to add street lighting to dark streets though there is a cost to homeowners (possibly on existing poles, a DWP program). Discussion: (1) Rick Mills thanked SLO Moore for his presence in neighborhood watch meetings and Palisades High School for the same. (2) Paul thanked SLO Moore for coming to the Highlands Council. Diane Bleak asked about the placement of police cars and patrol in the Highlands given the two recent burglaries. (3) Maryam thanked SLO Moore for his contributions to the homeless task force. (4) Andrew Wolfberg asked about comparable statistics in Brentwood. SLO Moore stated that he believes they are up but not as much as the Palisades. (5) Brenda Theveny asked about an insurance card she had received regarding inspections and updating inspections. (6) Cathy Russell thanked SLO Moore for attending homeowner group meetings. (7) Carol Bruch asked for an update on the motorcycle situation. SLO Moore stated that reserve officers are still involved working on that problem. West Traffic Division includes WLA, Hollywood and Olympic division so they cannot be here every night but are aware of the problem and do send out task force for both vehicles and motorcycles. (8) If a suspicious person is sighted then call the non-emergency number 877-275-5273 (877-ASK_LAPD) or contact SLO Moore directly. To report a possibly active crime call 911. (9) Paul commented on the CPAB meeting where auto burglaries have been the result of a large number of vehicles left open. Paul suggested if you have a photo of a suspected offender please send that picture to LAPD and don’t distribute it on social media with possibly untrue labels.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office. Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.

Norman Kulla reported that (1) Maryam Zar is doing a spectacular job on the PPCC and praised her contributions to, and of, the Homeless Task Force. (2) Castellammare residents organized a neighborhood watch and burglaries in Area 1 have been reduced as a result. (3) Norman visited the Highlands in response to the burglary activity there. (4) board and residents should attend the March 4th Hillside Fire Event. Discussions: (1) Gil Dembo commented that the Coastline Parking Lot and View Pier Project has been finished for several months (a $9 million project) and the gate is still locked. Norman stated that there is a landscape firm who is supposed to open the lock every morning and they do not; it was agreed that the County Supervisor should be contacted. Barbara Kohn stated that there are still workers making improvement on-site.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm. Daniel.tamm@lacity.org.

Daniel Tamm reported that (1) Mayor Garcetti will be speaking at the Wonder Woman Tech Conference to encourage girls and women to learn about the future of women in tech. Playa Vista Hanger, Herculeas Campus, wonderwomentech.com. (2) the Mayor signed his business tax cut into law and received the endorsement of LA’s business council to increase the minimum wage. The issue of the minimum wage is expected to come out of City Council in April or May 2015. (3) Mayor Garcetti announced that Obama’s spending in the federal budget includes $330 million in critical funding to extend the purple line (under Western and to Avenue of the Stars, to finish the downtown regional connector, etc.). (4) the 2015 LASA Homeless Count that Pacific Palisades participated in was the first time that every neighborhood in WLA participated in the count. Daniel participated in the VA task force that counted homeless on the VA property in Westwood. The Mayor has pledged to end veteran’s homelessness by the end of 2015. (5) DWP rebates for lawn replacement in favor of drought tolerant plants is still going on. www.ladwp.com/cf. Discussion: (1) Carol Bruch asked about the mandatory seismic ordinances and changes to the draft in ordinances that weaken what the Mayor has been talking about (lines rather than soft stories, etc.). (2) Stuart Muller and George Wolfberg reported LADWP billing problems (not getting bills, estimated bills, payments, questions not answered etc.). Daniel Tamm reported that Marcie Edwards and her staff are working it. (3) Maryam Zar asked about the Mayor’s efforts to form a Youth Council. Daniel Tamm is seeking to speak with school faculty that is involved in leadership efforts. The program will be open to high school students, preferably rising 9th and 10th graders. Go to mayor.youthcouncil@lacity.org. The deadline is imminent but Daniel encouraged the word to be spread in the Palisades community. Carol Pfannkuche runs a related youth program at Palisades High School and offered to assist. (4) Donna Vaccarino supports the Mayor’s program on sustainability and the recent efforts of neighborhoods to get together (including efforts of Laura Mack) which has been inspired by the Mayor’s program. (5) Gil Dembo stated that residents are concerned with the Mayor’s relationship with the unions, etc. and the undisclosed $40 million in funds and asked that the Mayor and Controller push for disclosure, accountability and a solution.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative. Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative. Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6. U   nited States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095. Not in attendance.  Written announcements the March 1, 2015 ceremonial swearing in at Royce Hall, and problems regarding the US Postal Service can be directed to Janet.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.  (1) Reza Akef (Area 8) reported that the Northern Trust Open went relatively well and traffic problems were alleviated with the change from VA parking to the Water Garden. Problems with Paul Revere Charter School have escalated with students littering on properties, cars parking in driveways, illegal traffic maneuvering, traffic violations, etc. Conflicts have been escalating between residents, students and their parents.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – No reports given.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.  (1) Laura Mack reported that DWP is looking for a location to do workshops on sustainable landscaping, preferably in a visible area of the Palisades.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.  (1) Richard Cohen stated that at the CPAB meeting it was reported Tina Nieto would be replacing Captain Nathan when she retires. She tweets as LAPDTina.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.1.    Bylaws Committee – Chris Spitz/Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

As announced at past public board meetings, a new PPCC bylaws committee has been meeting since last November to consider and recommend possible changes in the PPCC bylaws. The process is ongoing. The board, with no objections or any requests for further changes, has already adopted several proposed revisions. As of agenda distribution suggested revisions were submitted by Donna Vaccarino and resident Ted Weitz. PPCC continues to invite members of the board and the public to submit suggestions for proposed bylaws changes. Additionally, PPCC invites the board and members of the public to submit any concerns and/or suggestions that may go beyond technical bylaws changes (i.e., broader suggestions/concerns about direction, policy, status, mission, outreach and the like). Submit suggestions via email to info@pacpalicc.org, or send to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades, CA 90272. Suggestions may also be made during public comment at any PPCC board meetings.

8.1.2.    Outreach Committee – Andrew Wolfberg (Chair).  Andrew asked for a show of hands for who is on FaceBook and encouraged people and their friends to like us on Facebook.

8.1.3.    PP Homeless Task Force – Maryam Zar (Chair).

Maryam reported that there are three meetings coming up (March 24, April 28 and May 26; 6:30-8:00 pm) at the Palisades Charter Library. Members and the public are welcome to join the five subcommittees that are working diligently to move forward on this matter. Please see their Facebook page easily accessed through the council’s website and Google. pacpalihtf@gmail.com is the email address for questions, comments, information, minutes, etc. Discussion: Diane Bleak asked about how the funding works (federal, state, city, local, etc.) as it relates to the count that was just taken. Maryam explained that the count puts the Palisades on the list as having homeless such that qualifying health & safety, fire hazards, policing, etc. funds can be identified.

8.1.4.    Village Project Land Use Committee – David Kaplan (Chair).

David reported that the tentative date for the next meeting is March 10, 2015 from 3-5 pm at the Palisades Library to discuss updates on the Caruso project and the renewal of the ABC license in the Village (subject to confirmation with Caruso Affiliated).

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    PPCC Awards: Citizen of the Year, Community Service Award & Sparkplug Awards.

The Executive Committee recommends that, relative to the consolidation and updates to PPCC’s award guidelines, the board adopt and insert the following language to and into the Board of Governors Handbook and website (motion language unanimously recommended, with the exception of phrases in bold face/italics, which are recommended by all but one member who recommends alternate language as set forth below). See motion below. Background: Chris explained briefly why these proposed Award Guidelines revisions are being recommended. PPCC became the sole sponsor of the Citizen of the Year Award in 2014. That Award in the past had been given in the spring of each year, along with the Sparkplug Awards that are sponsored by PPCC. The Community Service Award, also sponsored by PPCC, is given at the December meeting/holiday party. PPCC doe not have the financial and volunteer resources to continue producing and hosting two Awards events. The Citizen and Community Service Awards are substantially similar. There are no specific current and published guidelines for the Citizen Award. For these reasons, Chris asked for assistance and advice from the Executive Committee as to whether we should recommend revised guidelines for all the PPCC Awards. Jennifer Malaret drafted the proposed revisions and sought input from the Executive Committee and Randy Young and George Wolfberg, past Citizens of the Year. With regard to the issue of the basic eligibility requirement for the new combined Citizen/Community Service Award, all but one Committee member believed it is appropriate for the requirement to mirror the bylaws definition of stakeholder-members of PPCC: that is, someone who either resides, owns property, or operates a business located within the PPCC boundaries. There is nothing in the bylaws requiring PPCC to host or give out any awards. PPCC has Guidelines with respect to the Community Service and Sparkplug awards, which are posted on the website. If the proposed motion does not pass, those Guidelines will remain in place until amended. Unless the Guidelines are amended, the Citizen and Sparkplug awards will likely not be given this year and only the Community Service award will be given in December (assuming an eligible recipient is found). Action: the motion was seconded by Gil Dembo. Discussion: (a) Jennifer Malaret explained the motion with the fundamental issue being for the combined Citizen award should qualification be (a) limited to residents only / (b) open to anyone / or (c) contain the “compromise” language in the proposed motion which is that the award is open to individuals who qualify for membership in PPCC, i.e., a resident, property owner or someone who runs a local business. (b) Barbara Kohn said that the history of the Citizen of the Year award had historically been given to a citizen resident. The Community Council started the Community Service Award in 1996 and that has a long history as well so the concern is opening the award to residents outside of 90272 and the canyon areas within the PPCC’s geographical area. Barbara encouraged the Citizen award to be restricted to residents of the Palisades only. (c) Richard Cohen disagreed with Barbara and discussed other award winners who have not met a strict resident requirement and suggested that the residency issue should be a matter for the discretion of the evaluating committee and not a disqualifying element of the award. (d) Brenda Theveny thinks restricting the award to residents is the best or the award should be given to anyone who does good works for the community. (e) George Wolfberg spoke in favor of the motion and does not support a resident only restriction. (f) Reza Akef said that there is no residency requirement for organizational representatives so if board members do not have to be residents then it is not reasonable to restrict awards in such a manner. People like parents and employees and others who may not live here and do great things should still be eligible. (g) Rick Mills supported the broader language and the discretion of the evaluating committee. (h) Cathy Russell noted that this language can be amended in the future particularly as it is not part of the bylaws. (g) David Kaplan supported the language set forth in the motion. (h) Stuart Muller spoke out against the committee process in determining award recipient process in terms of numbers of committee members and historical lack of time given to consider qualifying applicants. Stuart Muller stated there were too many awards and that there should be only one big award that is really special. (i) Amy Kalp said that Citizen of the Year should be given to a person who lives in the Palisades and does not agree with combining the awards. (j) Barbara Kohn suggested that the awards not be combined and that the three awards, Citizen of the Year, CSA and Sparkplugs be given at the December event. Action: 9 voted in favor, 10 opposed and 2 absentions. The motion failed. Gil Dembo made a motion for the PPCC to bestow all of its awards at the December meeting and eliminate the April Sparkplug award event. Andrew Wolfberg seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

10.    New Business – None.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.3 — FEBRUARY 12, 2015 INITIAL BOARD DISCUSSION REGARDING NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY COUNCIL ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS.
(A)
February 20, 2015
Letter to Post Editor

As noted in a Post article of September 19, the PPCC board recently heard from various individuals about the neighborhood council process in Los Angeles. The meeting was intended as a beginning discussion about neighborhood councils for those interested in this issue. If there is continuing interest and a board member request, we will take up the matter again at a future meeting.

The Post article states that “community council” leaders were invited to speak at the meeting. In fact, readers should know that only one community council president spoke (from Westwood Community Council), while several leaders and others involved with the neighborhood council system provided information to the board, including Mr. Soong from the City’s Department of Neighborhood Empowerment, two current presidents and a past president of neighborhood councils (as explained at the meeting, Mar Vista Community Council is a certified neighborhood council, despite its name), as well as an individual who is a board member of both the neighborhood and community councils in Westwood. Westwood leaders have a unique perspective because theirs is the only area in Los Angeles with both a neighborhood council and a community council; if there is any interest in forming a neighborhood council to exist alongside PPCC in the Palisades, it would be important to know what the Westwood experience has been.

PPCC has been the voice of the Palisades community since the council’s founding in 1973. As discussed at the September 12 meeting, PPCC was the model for the current neighborhood council system (formed in the early 2000s). If “under-representation” is now believed to be an issue in the Palisades (as expressed by only one audience member at the meeting), formation of a neighborhood council will not necessarily be a panacea; indeed, as Westwood leaders cautioned, having two councils in one area could be divisive and may lead to a weakening of our community’s position vis a vis elected officials.

Comparing PPCC’s structure and process with those of the other 12 member-councils of the Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC), PPCC compares favorably or even surpasses some councils in terms of public representation. PPCC has nine elected area and at-large representatives and an equal number of organizational (appointed) representatives. Representation on the PPCC board includes all geographic areas and almost all categories of organizations in our community (with the exception of faith-based institutions, which in the past were invited but declined to participate). In contrast, no other community council in the City (i.e., in Brentwood or Westwood) has any elected representatives. Moreover, the ratio of elected vs. organizational (appointed) voting members (other than officers) varies widely among neighborhood councils – ranging from one council with 43 organizational (appointed) members and only two elected at-large representatives (Bel Air-Beverly Crest), to another council with 14 elected non-officer members (“Community Officers”) from no particular geographical areas and no organizational members at all (Venice). In addition, in 10 of the 13 WRAC member-councils (including PPCC), officers are elected by the board.

Our community faces many important issues which PPCC addresses – and has addressed for 42 years – on a regular basis. I encourage all Palisadians to get involved, become engaged and add your voices to the discussion. Visit our website, pacpalicc.org, for more information. Send your inquiries, comments and suggestions to info@pacpalicc.org. Attend our public meetings held twice a month. And don’t forget to Like Us on Facebook: facebook.com/pacpalicc!

Sincerely,
Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council
310-721-0532

(B)
Summary — PPCC Composition & Elected Rep Attendance,
WRAC Member Officer Elections, WRAC Member Composition

A. PPCC Composition (Voting Members Other Than Officers)

9 Area/At Large Representatives (elected by public/stakeholders)
9 Organizational Representatives (appointed by member organizations)

B. PPCC Elected Representative Attendance (since 10/9/14)

10/9/14   9       1/8/15    4
10/23/14  9      1/22/15   5
11/13/14   8      2/12/15   9
12/11/14   8

C. WRAC Member Officer Elections

10 of 13 WRAC members (including PPCC): officers elected by respective boards.

3 WRAC members: officers elected by public/stakeholders (Del Rey NC, Palms NC and Venice NC only).

D. WRAC Member Composition (Voting Members Other Than Officers)

Bel Air-Beverly Crest NC: 43 representatives (HOAs, residents’, business & other organizational groups) appointed by respective groups/organizations; 2 at large representatives elected by public/stakeholders.

Brentwood CC: 13 representatives (HOAs, residents’ groups) appointed by respective groups/organizations; 12 representatives (business & other organizational groups, at large) elected by board. No representatives elected by public/stakeholders.

Del Rey NC: 8 representatives (geographic area) elected by public/stakeholders.

Mar Vista CC (a certified NC): 7 representatives (geographic zones, “community” and at large) elected by public/stakeholders.

PPCC: See Section A above.

Palms NC: 9 representatives (geographic area residential/business; at large/ organizational) elected by public/stakeholders.

South Robertson NC: 24 representatives (residential, business, organizational and at large) elected by public/stakeholders; 1 representative (school youth) appointed by board.

Venice NC: 14 representatives (at large/community and “community interest”) elected by public/stakeholders.

NC Westchester-Playa del Rey: 31 representatives (residential, business, organizational and at large) elected by public/stakeholders.

West LA NC: 15 representatives (residential, business, organizational and at large) elected by public/stakeholders (organizational representative candidates appointed by respective groups/organizations).

Westside NC: 3 representatives (organizational) appointed by various respective groups/organizations (or selected by board if more than 1 organization submits candidate for each seat); 14 representatives (residential, business, at large) elected by public/stakeholders.

Westwood CC: 6 representatives (HOAs, residents’ groups) appointed by respective groups/organizations; 17 representatives (business & other organizational groups, at large) elected by board. No representatives elected by public/stakeholders.

Westwood NC: 19 representatives (residential, business, organizational, at large) elected by public/stakeholders.

Chris Spitz, PPCC President
February 2015

ITEM 9.1– PPCC AWARDS: CITIZEN OF THE YEAR, COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD & SPARKPLUG AWARDS. MOTION: RELATIVE TO THE CONSOLIDATION AND UPDATES TO AWARD GUIDELINES, SELECTIONS AND EVENT PROCEDURES THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD ADOPT AND INSERT THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE TO AND INTO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS HANDBOOK AND WEBSITE

PACIFIC PALISADES COMMUNITY COUNCIL AWARDS

Each year the Community Council honors those who have made a voluntary contribution to Pacific Palisades that benefits the community at-large. There have been two types of awards.

The first award is to honor those whose contribution to Pacific Palisades has been both a recent effort resulting in a substantial benefit to the community and steady, reliable long-term service to the Palisades. The Council bestowed that recognition in two ways, as a Sponsor and Co-Sponsor with the Palisadian Post for the “Citizen of the Year” Award and its own “Community Service Award.” Now, as the sole sponsor of both awards, PPCC may give an award to an individual annually in December beginning in 2015, to be entitled the [“Citizen of the Year Community Award”/”Community Citizen of the Year Award’]

The second award, the “Golden Sparkplug Award,” is to honor those who have an idea and effort resulting in an original contribution to Pacific Palisades that benefits the community. The Golden Sparkplug Award ceremony is held in conjunction and in cooperation with the [Citizen of the Year Community Award/Community Citizen of the Year Award].

The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award to each recipient, with each Award recipient and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.

Guidelines for these Awards, procedures for selection and the Awards Event and the names of past recipients are set forth below. The Guidelines are recommended practices that allow flexibility in interpretation, implementation or use.

_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: [CITIZEN OF THE YEAR COMMUNITY AWARD/COMMUNITY CITIZEN OF THE YEAR AWARD]

A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the [Citizen of the Year Community Award (“CYCA”)/Community Citizen of the Year Award (“CCYA”)] is to honor long term and continuing outstanding volunteer service as well as a recent extraordinary accomplishment by an individual that resulted in a substantial benefit to the Pacific Palisades community-at-large.

B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the Award must both (a) state the nature of the extraordinary recent accomplishment done by the candidate that resulted in a substantial benefit to the community at-large and (b) summarize the candidate’s steady, reliable, long-term service within the community.

C. RECIPIENT: [The recipient must be an individual who owned real property located in, resided in, or operated a business located in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered./The recipient must be an individual who resided in the Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered.] Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services directly related to his or her responsibilities as a board member, although long-term services may be considered as qualifying factors. There shall be only one Award given each calendar year.

D. AWARD: The Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations. The Award recipient and his or her immediate family members shall be guests of the PPCC at the Award Event.
_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: GOLDEN SPARKPLUG AWARD(S)

A. PURPOSE: The Golden Sparkplug Award honors those citizens who ignite ideas and projects into community action that benefit Palisadians throughout the community.

B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the award must state (a) the nature of the original idea, effort or project, (b) in what way the effort or project benefitted the community at-large and (c) how the effort or project was initiated, in progress or completed during the previous calendar year.

C. RECIPIENT(S): The recipient(s) must be individual(s) who owned real property located in, resided in, or operated a business located in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered. Both adults and youth are eligible for the Award. While there may be multiple recipients in a given year, the Award may be given to only one member of a particular group or community. Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services related to his or her responsibilities as a board member.

D. AWARD(S): The Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient(s) at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations. The Award recipient(s) and their immediate family members shall be guests of the PPCC at the Award Event.
_________________________________________________________

GUIDELINES: SELECTION AND EVENT COMMITTEES; AWARDS EVENT

A. AWARDS SELECTION COMMITTEE: The Chair shall appoint a Committee of not less than three (3) current board members, plus one previous Citizen of the Year recipient not currently serving on the board and one previous Community Service Award recipient not currently serving on the board (if such persons are available to serve) to review the nominations and select the person to receive the [CYCA/CCYA] and the person(s) to receive the Golden Sparkplug Award(s). The Awards Selection Committee (“ASC”) shall select both the [CYCA/CCYA] and Golden Sparkplug(s) recipients. Prior to the ASC selecting a person or persons for the Award(s), the ASC Chair shall circulate by email to other current members of the Board a list of those persons who have been nominated and ask that if any members of the Board desire to submit comments about any nominee, they should submit any comments to the ASC Chair to be received within five days.

B. AWARDS EVENT DATE: No later than 9 months prior to the event, i.e., March of each calendar year, the Chair shall establish the Event date and the venue and notify the Palisades Chamber of Commerce to place the Event date on the community calendar.
C. AWARDS EVENT COMMITTEE: No later than the first meeting in October, the Chair shall establish the Awards Event Committee (“AEC”). The Chair and the Chair of the AEC shall establish the deadline for the selection of the [CYCA/CCYA] and Golden Sparkplug Award winners and coordinate publicity for the request for nominations. The AEC Chair shall coordinate the Event details, such as budget, menu items, and dinner ticket cost, paid reservation procedures, decoration, event ceremony, complimentary dinner tickets, parking, and other assignment of duties and tasks for the night of the event.

D. TIME FRAME & PROCEDURE:

1.First October Meeting: Distribute Award Guidelines and discuss the Awards. Appoint AEC Chair and committee members. Submit press release to relevant publications soliciting nominations. Appoint ASC Chair and committee members.

2.The last Saturday in October: Deadline for receipt of nominations.

3.First Week in November: The ASC meets in person to open nominating letters and sort by names into youth and adult categories. Check for multiple nominations in one envelope. Review nomination letters. Review comments from the Board. Evaluate how well the candidates meet the guidelines and sort into 3 groups: those requiring no further consideration and those eligible for further consideration and selection. The ASC shall discuss merits of each potential award winner. The ASC shall vote; however, no committee member who nominates shall vote when that nomination is considered, and no committee member shall vote for him/herself or a family member. The ASC Chair shall complete a synopsis of the committee’s efforts and shall notify the Chair of the efforts and the award recipient(s).

4.Early November: Immediately following receipt of the ASC Chair’s synopsis and results, the Chair shall notify the winner(s) prior to any public announcements, notify the press, local elected officials and dignitaries who will be invited to the event, and authorize the preparation of the award plaque(s).

5.Early November: The AEC Chair shall follow up with a written notification of the Award winner(s) and event details such as reservations and parking, submit the biography of the winner(s) for press release, and mail or email or post invitation letters to the prior “Community Service Award” and “Citizen of the Year Award” winners.

6.PPCC November Meeting: ASC announces award winner(s), notifies the winner(s), notifies the press and the Board of Governors. AEC provides details of the Awards Event and invites recipients to the event.

7.PPCC December Meeting: The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award(s) to each recipient, with each Award recipient and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.
8.Any future revision of the Awards Guidelines shall be upon recommendation of the Executive Committee and subject to a vote for approval by the PPCC Board.

PRIOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

[INSERT LIST CITIZEN OF THE YEAR]

[INSERT LIST COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD]

[INSERT LIST GOLDEN SPARKPLUG]

ITEM 9.1, CONTINUED: ALTERNATE LANGUAGE RECOMMENDED BY ONE MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RE PHRASES IN BOLDFACE /ITALICS ABOVE (FOR INFORMATION/REFERENCE ONLY):
Citizen Award Name: Community Citizen of the Year Award/CCYA
Citizen Award Guideline, ¶C, Recipient: The recipient must be an individual who resided in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC boundaries) at the time the services were rendered.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR MARCH 12th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Sue Kohl, Haldis Toppel, Richard Wulliger, Brenda Theveny, Maryam Zar, Janet Anderson, Paul Glasgall, Stuart Muller, Rick Lemmo, Rick Mills, Amy Kalp, Reza Akef, George Wolfberg, Janet Anderson and Gil Dembo.

Voting Alternates:  Steve Boyers, Doug McCormick and Brian Deming,

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Flo Elfant, Bruce Schwartz, Diane Bleak, Kevin Niles, Peter Culhane, Ron Dean, David Kaplan, Barbara Marinacci and Laura Mack.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Reza Akef read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum. Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:06 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris announced the February 26, 2015 minutes were adopted as corrected. Upcoming meetings were announced as: March 2015 is PPCC Public Safety Month. March 26: presentation by Neighborhood Prosecutor Veronica de la Cruz-Robles and LAPD Senior Lead Officer Michael Moore on crime and related legal issues (additional discussion: CUB permit application for mini-mart/beer & wine sales at the Shell Station on Sunset Blvd. & Via de la Paz, whereby the existing Village Mobil sales activities would relocate due to a change in ownership). April 9: presentation by Civic League President Richard Blumenberg and CD11 Land Use & Planning Director Tricia Keane (invited) on proposed amendments to the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of March 12, 2015. The total account balances equal $34,536.61. Richard reported that there were no significant transactions since the last meeting.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  Chris reminded the board that 1) Due to library rules, meeting must end promptly at 9pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    New PPCC Organizational Representatives.

Chris announced that new PPCC representatives have been appointed as follows: (a) Business Category, Chamber of Commerce: Rick Lemmo, Primary; Susan Payne, Alternate. (b) Recreation Category: AYSO/Janet Anderson, Primary; PPBA/Rick McGeagh, Alternate. We thank and congratulate former YMCA representative Carol Pfannkuche, who is leaving to become Director of the Ketchum Downtown Los Angeles YMCA. Chris announced that the Chamber of Commerce representative, being employed by Caruso Affiliated will recuse himself from discussion or voting on the Village project and Susan Payne will represent the Chamber interests. Chris congratulated Carol Pfannkuche on her new appointment as the Ketchum Downtown YMCA director and thanked her for her services to PPCC and on behalf of the community.

7.1.3.    March 4, 2015 Hillside Fire Safety and Preparedness Community Meeting, co-sponsored by PPCC and Brentwood Community Council (BCC).

Chris announced that for useful information, including videos of lectures about fire ecology and behavior, landscaping, home “hardening” measures and evacuation route/safety enhancement, go to www.ntcfsc.org (website of the North Topanga Canyon Fire Safe Council).  Chris announced that the meeting went well though public attendance was low. Chris referred interested individuals to the article in the March 12, 2015 Palisadian Post.

7.1.4.    Baseline Mansionization Ordinance/Letter to Editor.  See attached.

7.1.5.    Resources – Governmental Representatives.  Chris announced there is a new link on pacpalicc.org home page (scroll to bottom of page). That link provides contact information for the council’s agendas contacts and other public officials relevant to the Palisades. Chris thanked Ted Mackie for putting this information on the council’s website.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore.  Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.  Norman announced that on March 28th there will be a Hike with Mike 9am – 12 noon at Temescal Canyon Gateway Park.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041.

Stephanie announced that:  (1) The AM introduced his legislative package several weeks ago. Topics this year include arts districts, youth homelessness, environment, animals, water and the AM is the Chair of Budget Committee No. 3 on Transportation and Resources. More information on bill language will be coming in the upcoming weeks. (2) The AM’s office is moving within the same building to Suite 105 as of March 15, 2015. The old Suite was 150 so the new office will be Suite 105. 2800 28th Street, Suite 105, Santa Monica, CA 90405.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

Janet reported that (1) there will be a meeting with USPS Postmasters and directors from the district. Anyone with postal problems should contact Janet. (2) VA Town Hall Meeting – will be upcoming and the date is to be announced. (3) High School Arts Competition – flyers are available. (4) she has been assigned to focus on national parks and wildlife. If anyone has something on the federal level having to do with parks and wildlife please contact Janet. Maryam Zar asked about the office’s FB feed and how to get information.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives – Report on Behalf of Areas — None.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.  (1) Amy Kalp introduced Sandy Eddy who does marketing for the Friends of the Library. Sandy reported that the next parking lot book sale will be on March 21, 2015 and asked the community to please come and help support the library.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

(1) Laura Mack reported that the Palisades has the highest water usage in the city despite the Mayor’s directive to cut water use. March 29 (Mar Vista) and Brentwood (April 12) are having sustainability events (see PPCC FB page for details. Long term the City has a plan to integrate potable water, recycled water, etc. and recently there was a stakeholder meeting attended by Laura and George Wolfberg. People interested in seeing related documents should contact Laura; comments are due by March 17, 2015.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

Jennifer reported that the committee held its regularly scheduled March 2015 meeting. Suggestions from the public and the board were reviewed. It was agreed by the committee to report at this public meeting and seek “sense of the board” directional advice (not a discussion item) as to possible structural changes for PPCC on the following topics. If there is no overwhelming support for or against a proposal, the item will be placed on the agenda for a full board discussion at a later meeting; items may also be placed on the agenda for discussion at a future meeting at the request of a board member (Bylaws Art. (IX.5.A); moreover, any bylaws changes ultimately recommended by the committee will be subject to full board discussion and vote after two public readings (Bylaws Art. XII.2). Discussion: Stuart Muller stated that he was disturbed by the bylaws committee meeting process because it was not open. Jennifer Malaret responded that the prior bylaws committee on which Stuart Muller served for two years had meetings that were closed, however he and all other board members and the public have been told that currently the meetings are open to those who submit comments and suggested bylaws changes on the relevant date that those topics are discussed should they wish to attend. Jennifer also reminded Stuart and the board that this “sense of the board vote” was something new that was being tried in an effort to bring in more views to the bylaws committee as was the current method of topical amendments rather than the multi-year process that prior Chairs and committee members including Stuart have engaged in. Stuart stated that he had a problem with how the bylaws committee was appointed. Jennifer replied that pursuant to the bylaws, this committee and all committees serve at the direction of the Chair. Jennifer invited Stuart to submit his redlined comments to the bylaws document and that these comments along with comments from any other person would be considered and discussed in due course. Action: sense of the board votes were as follows:

(1) Organizational Members:
*Should organizational members be eliminated altogether? NO.
*If organizations remain on the board should they become NON-VOTING members? NO.
*If organizations remain on the board, should the organizational membership list and categories be re-evaluated? YES
*If organizations remain on the board, should “standing seats” be eliminated such that all seats within a category rotate at least once? YES (to be determined/was included in the question above).
*If organizations remain on the board should membership become open to faith-based churches, temples and organizations? YES
*If organizations stay on the board should the bylaws contain an application process for interested organizations to seek membership on PPCC? YES

(2) Term Limits:
*Currently the position of Chair is limited to two consecutive terms in office. Should that be reduced to a single one-year term? NO.
*Should all board members be subject to a personal limit of four consecutive one-year terms? NO.
*Should the bylaws committee explore term limits of any kind different than what are contained in the bylaws presently? SPLIT. TO BE AGENDIZED.

(3) Election of Area and At-Large Representatives; How Should The Selection Process be Accomplished:
*Should election results determine, i.e., the recipient with the most votes is the elected representative AND the candidate with the second most votes becomes the first alternate? NO
*Should the position of second alternate be eliminated? SPLIT: TO BE AGENDIZED.
*IF NO, should the second alternate position be elected, i.e., the candidate with the third most number of votes? Moot per prior question. Split/to be agendized.
*IF NO, should the second alternate position be appointed (mechanism TBD)? Moot per prior question. Split/to be agendized.

(4) “Primary Residence”: should the bylaws include the term “primary residence” as it may apply to certain provisions? YES

Jennifer reported that the bylaws committee determined that comments received and related to election of officers will not be re-evaluated given that, in sum: (1) the full board quite recently voted unanimously to support this committee’s work and recommended changes on that subject after full compliance with the bylaws and organizational process, (2) the Article XII language approved unanimously by the board is consistent with officer election procedures of other NCs, CCs and non-profit boards, and (3) the process for electing the council’s 2015/2016 officers begins next month making further imminent changes impractical. PPCC continues to invite members of the board and the public to submit suggestions for proposed bylaws changes. Additionally, PPCC invites the board and members of the public to submit any concerns and/or suggestions that may go beyond technical bylaws changes (i.e., broader suggestions/concerns about direction, policy, status, mission, outreach and the like). Submit suggestions via email to info@pacpalicc.org, or send to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades, and CA 90272. Suggestions may also be made during public comment at any PPCC board meetings. Board members may also request that the President agendize topics for discussion (see Bylaws Art. IX.5.A for requirements in connection with board member agenda requests).

8.2.    Outreach Committee – Andrew Wolfberg (Chair).  Like Us on Facebook –
facebook.com/pacpalicc.  To receive future PPCC meeting agendas and notices, send a request to info@pacpalicc.org. Andrew reported the council has 299 likes. Please like the council and encourage your friends to like the council’s FB page.

8.3.    PP Homeless Task Force – Maryam Zar (Chair).

For more information go to the PPCC website (pacpalicc.org) and click on link to the Task Force; email pacpalihtf@gmail.com; or visit the Task Force’s FB page: Facebook.com/pacpalihtf. Maryam reported that the task force met on March 12th and there is a broader task force meeting coming up on March 24th. Current efforts related to clean-ups, surveys (March 22 – 2 pm to 4 pm is training), email list, FB page and connecting to service providers such as OPCC. Maryam thanked Marge Gold for her efforts to beautify the Village Green.

8.4.    Village Project Land Use Committee – David Kaplan (Chair).  No meetings scheduled and no updates.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Public Safety, Disaster Relief and Emergency Preparedness.

Presentation/Q&A. Featured speaker: Julie Thomas, CEO, Santa Monica Bay Chapter American Red Cross. Presentation: The Red Cross mission is to prevent and alleviate human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors. The Red Cross does disaster services, blood services, preparedness/health & safety, international services (such as 95% of the recent Ebola burials) and service to the armed forces. On a daily basis in LA the Red Cross responds to house fires (on average 5 per day). The Red Cross collects about 40 percent of America’s blood. In Los Angeles during 2014 there were 1,694 disasters, 2,284 home fires, 1,479 volunteers respond for disaster response, and $340,246 was given in relief aid. For preparedness: get a disaster kit (by the bed have shoes/flashlight/glasses; water/food/first aid for 3 days and a backpack to grab and go), make a plan (out of state contact, two evacuation routes, two places to meet) and be informed (radio stations KNX1070 and KFI 640; reverse 911 www.alert.lacounty.gov allow registration of cell phones and email; redcross.org/safeandwell allows people to register if they can get on line to let others know they are safe; download apps from the RedCross at the App Store or Google). The Red Cross’s resources are used to help get families and people more prepared through programs such as PrepareU, PrepareKIDS, PrepareYOUTH, PrepareTEENS, and Preparedness Apps. To prepare the community the Red Cross offers programs including CERT and Teen CERT, Map your Neighborhood and Health and Safety Classes. To prepare organizations the Red Cross offers programs including Ready when the Time Comes, Ready Rating, PrepareBiz, Business Simulation, Ready Certified (fee based), and In-School Youth Clubs. The Red Cross is looking at building community resiliency so communities can come back as quickly as possible after a disaster. Programs for this include Community Event, Community Ambassador, Faith Based Initiative, Blood Drives/Rare Blood Initiative, Job Training & Placement. Questions: Gil asked about the location of stockpiles. Most supplies are in a central location and there are some small containers and vehicles in decentralized locations. Preparesocal.org is the website for the public to go to for updated information and videos. Doug McCormick asked about the life of plastic bottles. Julie said generally one year. Tablets to get rid of bacteria in water are available at REI. Donna Vaccarino asked about the budget and sources of funds. Julie said around $18 million in Los Angeles and most of that comes from individual and corporate donations. Kathleen Jensen asked about testing shelter construction here in Pacific Palisades similar to that in Malibu. Julie stated there are different kinds of testing available. Steve Boyers expressed the concern that the Palisades is very geographically isolated and asked if the Red Cross has thought ahead to pre-positioning its vehicles to ensure that help could get to the Palisades within three days. Haldis Toppel suggested putting emergency bags in vehicles. Rick Mills suggested reviewing Topanga’s information not only for earthquake risk but also the likelihood of wildfires. Flo Elfant began her disaster preparedness efforts more than twenty years ago and she encouraged members of interested groups and neighborhoods to act as a team during a disaster. People need to get trained and be prepared but as importantly the neighborhood around everyone need to be prepared. Flo reminded everyone that her Disaster Preparedness packet is on the website.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:45 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.4: BASELINE MANSIONIZATION ORDINANCE/LETTER TO EDITOR

March 7, 2015

Letter to Editor, Palisadian Post:

I did not attend the Feb. 23 meeting of the Civic League and cannot comment on what was expressed there. I am concerned that the March 5 Post article may be misleading in terms of the actual status of proposed amendments to the existing Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO).

As reflected in the Council File related to this matter (CF 14-0656 – accessible at www.lacity.org), on November 4, 2014, the City Council unanimously voted to amend the BMO to address certain bonuses and exemptions as outlined in the motion brought by Councilmember Koretz (seconded by Councilmember Bonin) in May 2014. At the same time, the City Council voted to establish an Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) that would temporarily restrict the issuance of building and/or demolition permits in specific neighborhoods of the City; no Palisades neighborhoods are included in the ICO. It is widely reported that the process of drafting and enacting amendments to the BMO – frequently referred to as “closing loopholes” in order to preserve neighborhood integrity – will take at least 12 to 18 months. In the meantime, it is my understanding that the current provisions will continue to govern those neighborhoods in Pacific Palisades that are subject to the BMO (primarily non-hillside, Alphabet Streets north of Sunset).

As PPCC President, I have attended numerous meetings of community leaders Citywide in which the proposed BMO amendments and ICO have been discussed (generally with favorable and/or supportive reactions). The leadership of the Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC) has recommended to all member councils (including PPCC) that they support a WRAC motion to approve the BMO amendments and essentially “fast track” the ICO process. Understanding that public opinion in the Palisades may be quite different, I have not yet agendized this motion for consideration by our board. Civic League President Richard Blumenberg will give a presentation on the BMO amendments at the PPCC public board meeting on April 9. All interested are invited. In the meantime, letters in opposition to or support of the amendments should be submitted to Council File 14-0656. For more information contact info@pacpalicc.org.

Sincerely,
Chris Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council
310-721-0532

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR MARCH 26th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Haldis Toppel, Amy Kalp, Richard Wulliger, Brenda Theveny, Gilbert Dembo, George Wolfberg, Cathy Russell, Stuart Muller, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills, Reza Akef and Maryam Zar.

Voting Alternates:  Rick McGeagh, Bruce Schwartz, Diane Bleak and Doug McCormick.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Kevin Niles, Ted Mackie, Eric Dugdale, Barbara Marinacci, Michael Soneff and David Kaplan.

Start of Business Meeting

1.     Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Sue Kohl read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris Spitz certified that a quorum was present at 7:07 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Adoption of the March 12, 2015 minutes. Upcoming Meetings: 4/9/15: (Tentative) Further Revised Award Guidelines, Bylaws (Officer Election, Nominating Committee; possible discussion re term limits, second alternates). 4/23/15: Presentation by LAFD Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Castro. 5/14/15: Presentation by Richard Blumenberg, AIA, President of the Civic League and Tricia Keane, Planning & Land Use Director, CD11, regarding proposed amendments to the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (“BMO”). ** Note: topics noticed in advance may change. Chris encouraged all members and the public to like PPCC on Facebook and receive Emails and other important notices by receiving the council emails.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported (via email) the financial status as of March 25, 2015. The total account balances equal $34,482.61 with no significant transactions since the last meeting.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, meeting must end promptly at 9 PM; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2. Area 2 (Highlands).

Chris reported that Paul Glasgall has resigned as the Elected Representative for Area 2, the Highlands. Pursuant to PPCC’s bylaws the first alternate Peter Culhane has now become the primary Area 2 Representative and the second alternate, Diane Bleak, has become the first alternate (with the second alternate seat now being open). Peter was unable to attend tonight so Diane is sitting as the voting member in his absence. Chris welcomed both Peter and Diane in these new capacities.

7.1.3.    PPCC Executive Committee.

With Paul’s resignation, Chris stated that the Executive Committee became short one member. The officers and Chair Emeritus have unanimously voted to appoint David Kaplan as a member of the Executive Committee. Chris said that this appointment was pursuant to their authority under the bylaws (Art. V.3.A), as well as precedent and the advice of PPCC’s legal counsel Ron Dean – i.e., that alternates are eligible to serve on the Executive Committee under the bylaws. Chris said that David’s experience, judgment and advice on behalf of the Council and the community will be welcomed particularly as David is a new member to the Council and can bring a fresh voice and fresh ideas to the Executive Committee. Amy Kalp has recently suggested clarification of the bylaws regarding alternate eligibility for the Executive Committee, which Chris stated she appreciated and the bylaws committee will take up in due course. Amy also suggested suspension of this appointment pending a decision on a possible bylaws clarification or change; the officers and Chair Emeritus do not agree at this time to suspend the appointment, which again was made pursuant to the bylaws, precedent and advice of PPCC’s legal counsel. If anyone has questions about the Executive Committee’s authority, role or purpose, please see the President’s explanatory remarks to the Board contained in PPCC minutes for Oct. 9, 2014 and Feb. 26, 2015, which can be accessed online at the PPCC website.

7.1.4.    Above Ground Facilities Ordinance (“AGF”) Ordinance, Cell Tower Upgrade at Via De La Paz and De Pauw.

Chris announced that some have probably seen the huge new T-Mobile cell facility at the corner of Via de la Paz and DePauw in Area 6. Chris passed around a photo. These are actually upgrades or extensions to an existing cell tower. Many people are expressing astonishment and concern over the size of this facility. The original cell tower was erected without notice or any required permitting, because it was subject to a so-called “utility pole exemption” under our current laws. The same is likely true of this new version. Chris is awaiting explanation from Councilmember Bonin’s office, which will be speaking with T-Mobile representatives. Chris is also still awaiting word from the City Attorney about the draft revisions to the Above Ground Facilities Ordinance, which that office has been sitting on for many months while it is ostensibly undergoing review of a related FCC decision that was issued last November. If and when these revisions are ever enacted, the utility pole exemption would be eliminated and facilities such as this would be subject to permitting, something that PPCC strongly supports. We are continuing to monitor the situation.

7.1.5.    Complaints/Concerns/Suggestions.

Chris stated that for the past several months, as reflected in PPCC’s minutes, we have expressly been asking the public and the board for suggestions for possible bylaws changes as well as broader policy or procedural changes. Chris has received several suggestions, which are appreciated. Unfortunately, in the past few weeks, questions have been raised publicly about whether the PPCC is interested in hearing from the public or even from the board about issues of concern to constituents/residents. Chris stated that she sought to clear up any misunderstandings tonight, if possible. PPCC has a Department of Suggestions. It’s here in this room, not in the press or anywhere else. There is a 24/7 window open for bylaws suggestions, headed by Jennifer Malaret, who is happy to receive your suggestions for the committee. There are now two windows open (24/7) for other suggestions, headed by Chris and our Chair Emeritus Barbara Kohn. If you aren’t comfortable making suggestions to Chris, you can choose Barbara’s window instead, or vice versa. All of our emails are on the PPCC website. Constructive, specific suggestions of all kinds are welcome from everyone at any time. We ask that you please refrain from using this process to air personal grievances or to make free-floating complaints or accusations of misconduct; there is a process required under the bylaws for the latter. Chris stated that if anyone would like to suggest a particular task or activity for PPCC to engage in, please offer to work on that task. If someone wants the President to agendize a particular item for discussion, that person must provide sufficient information about the item and assist in organizing the presentation, inviting any necessary speakers and the like. Sometimes a suggestion might require the approval of the board; whenever possible we will attempt to do that, or again, we’ll agendize the matter for a discussion as time allows. Of course, not all suggestions will be accepted; Chris said that sometimes in her administrative discretion she may decide not to follow a specific suggestion; at other times the Board will disagree, as we’ve seen happen in a few cases. Nonetheless, all suggestions are welcome in the first instance. Chris stated that she hoped the board and public can work together in a cooperative and positive spirit going forward.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org.  SLO Moore in attendance.  See remarks below [Item 10.1].

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.

Norman Kulla in attendance. (1) Hike with Mike this Saturday at Temescal Canyon Park. (2) AGF – Ted Jordan is the City Attorney who is in charge of drafting the AGF ordinance. Ted wrote stating that that the ordinance continues to be a top priority and that the federal FCC ordinance presents complex issues that are not known. (3) Street Containers – for construction are allowed on the street for construction materials where there is no reasonable way to maintain the materials on private property. Plywood has to go underneath and reflective barricades on the ends such that the containers are visible at night are required.

7.2.3.   Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative.  Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

Janet Turner in attendance, who reported that 12 postal complaints were received in the Palisades. The following report from Charles Hearne charles.f.hearne@usps.gov was submitted regarding Pacific Palisades USPS 90272 complaints: “As you may know, I was in Washington last week meeting with the congressional members regarding Postal matters. I thank you for allowing me and my staff to share what the constituents here in the Palisades think about the service we are providing Good or Bad. I will address each and every complaint with the hope of fixing all of them soon. I have received additional staffing in the last couple of weeks and this should prevent late delivery. Please keep me posted regarding other issues I may not be aware of as we move forward with resolving all issues.”

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives — None.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations. (1) Gil Dembo, Temescal Canyon Association: The rocks at the waterfall in Temescal Canyon were covered by graffiti that TCA is trying to remove; please keep an eye out for new tags. Contact Gil at gildembo@gmail.com.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

(1) Laura Mack, Sustainability: State Water Board Expands and Extends Emergency Water Conservation Regulations; How Palisadians Can Help: As California enters a fourth year of severe drought, the State Water Resources Control Board on Tuesday March 17 adopted an expanded emergency regulation to safeguard the state’s remaining water supplies. While Californians have made great strides to conserve water, more effort is needed. Palisadians can learn simple ways to help conserve water, at two upcoming local events: Sun, March 29: Water Wise Expo, Mar Vista. Hosted by CD 11 and the Mar Vista Community Council Green Committee. http://waterwiseexpo.blogspot.com. Sun, April 12: Water Wise Garden Tour, Brentwood. Tour begins at the beautiful Brentwood School at 1 p.m., and goes to several locations from there. Donation of $25 to Brentwood Beautiful. For tickets go to http://waterwisegardentour.eventbrite.com, or call 310-476-7234.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.  (1) Jennifer Malaret: Pacific Palisades Recreation Center’s Spring “Eggstravaganza” will be held on Saturday April 4th from 10 am to 1 pm. The public is welcome.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Outreach Committee – Andrew Wolfberg (Chair).  Like Us on Facebook: facebook.com/pacpalicc. To receive future PPCC meeting agendas and notices, send a request to info@pacpalicc.org.  Farmers Market events to continue in mid-April.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation/Q&A re crime and related legal issues in the Palisades.

Presenting: Veronica de la Cruz-Robles, Deputy City Attorney and Westside Neighborhood Prosecutor (veronica.delacruz-robles@lacity.org) and LAPD Senior Lead Officer Michael Moore.  Presentation: Materials were passed out to the board and public. Veronica provided her personal background and stated that her experience has always been in the criminal division focusing on safe neighborhoods. Most recently she has been a school prosecutor in WLA dealing with safety around schools, code enforcement, rent control issues and has been a Neighborhood Prosecutor since 2011. A measure of success is not determined by how many convictions there are or how many people are put in jail; it is about the quality of life in the subject neighborhood. Veronica stated that she emphasizes the “vacant building” (she said “broken window”) approach, i.e., helping what is happening within a community at ground level for purposes of identifying and solving issues at ground level. Proposition 47 was passed and is having effects on the courts that some may not have been expecting. Veronica’s office is being impacted because cases that used to be felonies are now for the Neighborhood Prosecutor to do. Veronica’s office is at the LAX Courthouse (Imperial Highway and La Cienega) and she is also at the WLA Division. New Programs: there is a free Dispute Resolution Program for neighbors and small business owners or others with small problems seeking resolution. There is a Neighborhood Justice Program for stakeholders to provide input on how criminal matters are affecting them and what punishment they think should be implemented. Administrative Citation Enforcement (“ACE”) offers an alternative method for property violations like giving people a ticket for violations rather than implementing a court case. ACE is a tool to be used along side with court proceedings, i.e., an ACE ticket is not mutually exclusive and does not prevent a subsequent misdemeanor filing. Another program is Preventing Fraud for Seniors. Also there is a Kids and the Law Guide that is put out by the California Bar Association that puts topics out for discussion between parents and youth. Case Law Effecting Encampment Laws: in sum, Jones v. City of LA prevents enforcement of overnight sleeping on the sidewalks until there is necessary housing stock provided for the homeless. LaVon v. City of Los Angeles prevents the City of LA from removing or destroying a homeless person’s property. The case relates to personal property and not bulky items but the issues arise when there is an abundance of personal property. LASA and the Bureau of Street Services are doing outreach and giving options to the homeless. Being homeless is not illegal; however laws (public intoxication, etc.) are still enforceable. SLO Moore: local issues include public urination that cannot be cited unless there is not an available restroom that can be used within 500 feet. Some communities have dealt with the issue by having permanent portable potties throughout their communities. Public indecency laws relative to a sidewalk have to include an act of sexual gratification for that persons’ self or someone else to be enforceable. Blocking the sidewalks: LAMC 41.18A, all of the sidewalk must be blocked whereby someone is forced to walk into the street. Photos are required to file a charge by a witness who was obstructed along with evidence of outreach to the offending individual. Sleeping on the sidewalks also requires evidence of outreach and photos to bring to trial. Leaf Blowers: LAMC 112.04 (c) – gas powered leaf blowers are illegal in a residential area; electric blowers can be used but not between 10 pm and 7 am. The issue is enforcement and it is hoped that more enforcement can be done through the ACE program. Door to Door Solicitation: permits can be issued for people seeking contributions to non-profits but those permits are not given to people selling or seeking services. A LAMC 21.02 “No Advertising” Sign should prevent people from coming onto your property. Legitimate people have a permit, information and are required to show identification. If someone comes to the door, acknowledge that they are there and then ask him or her to leave because this will prevent a potential burglar trying to break in. Parks: have very specific hours and individuals are prohibited from sleeping in the park overnight. SLO Moore reminded people to call LAFD immediately if they see fire activity.. Questions: (1) Doug McCormick asked about sleeping on the beaches and how those rules work with the Coastal Commission. Veronica stated that those issues have not been agreed. (2) Leaf Blowers – could we have public service announcements in English and Spanish so people know that the activity is illegal, along with animal control information? Citations have to be given out. (3) What is the status of sleeping in vehicles? Veronica said that an ordinance is being drafted in response to recent case law. (4) Dog pee on Antioch. Veronica stated that ACE would help with that situation because Animal Services could cite. (5) Motorcycle Noise on Sunset – SLO Moore responded that there are 2 reserve officers putting their service time on that problem. West Traffic Division is responsible for the enforcement and have a wide area to cover. (6) Residential Burglaries – what groups are these attributed to? SLO Moore said that there are South LA gang members who are targeting homes because of lesser legal penalties especially for daytime activity when people are at work and are not on site. (7) Homeless – it was suggested for LAPD and the press to give information to the public about how the case law works. SLO Moore spoke about visible bluff encampments that affect private and Caltrans property along PCH that are in process of remediation with multi-jurisdictional agencies such as Caltrans.

10.2.    Presentation/Q&A re CUB/CUP application for mini-mart/beer & wine sales at Shell Station located at Sunset Blvd. & Via de la Paz.

Presenting: owner/applicant Saeed Kohanoff, architect Richard Finkel and land development consultant King Woods.  Background: Chris welcomed the new owner of the Shell Station, Saeed Kohanoff, who was present with his architect Richard Finkel and land development consultant King Woods to present information about the proposed project and to answer questions. Chris emphasized that discussion and decisions about project design are within the jurisdiction of the Pacific Palisades Design Review Board; DRB members who are also PPCC board members will accordingly be recusing themselves from the meeting. Matters within the purview of the DRB are not the purpose of this meeting, which is to hear from the owner about the plans for the project and the proposed use and to obtain input from the community. Chris noted that Mr. Kohanoff and his team would be making a brief presentation of approximately 10 minutes, and then there would be an opportunity for public comment and questions. Presentation: King Woods articulated the purchase and sale history of the property. Because the Shell Station does not have a license to sell liquor that is why the application needs to be filed. The public hearing is expected within the next 4-6 months. The plan is to demolish the Shell Station and build a new station. A conceptual landscape plan and colored elevations were shown. Improvement in access is sought such that cars do not cue up on Sunset Boulevard and are directed to the alley behind the street. Light shields will be put in so the adjacent condominiums will not have light shining into their homes. The theme will be Mediterranean, tile, sympathetic colors, tower elements, real concrete, antique light fixtures of brown and cream to blend in with the community. The new station will have a store where people can buy amenities rather than car repairs. The owner wants to make the station better than what is there right now and the taller height of the building will help light intrusion and will be something that the surrounding neighbors may embrace. The operation of the new store will be the same as what is on the Mobil site right now except the size of the building will be larger (2,700 square feet v. 800 square feet). Operations would be 24 hours with beer and wine sales to take place from 6 am to 2 am though the owners are willing to reduce the hours of beer and wine sales. Public Comment: (1) Andy Frew spoke on behalf of the adjacent condominium in opposition to all three changes – the mini mart, 24 hours a day and beer and wine sales. The location is bad because there is no residential buffer zone rather than the 250 feet that exists currently. There are 9 facing bedrooms with no sound or light mitigation. Andy brought a petition signed by 82 residents. Andy said that there were inaccuracies in the application and that the community wants Eli (current mechanical operator) to stay. (2) Ron Dean opposed beer and wine next to an apartment building, is opposed to the beer and wine hours but also wants negotiation on the 24 hour operation because the new location is not strictly commercial. (3) Sandy Eddy asked if a traffic impact study has been done for this location. With the Mobil Station, people are constantly stopping and starting to get in and out of a gas station and traffic impacts from gas stations are known to be serious. (4) Hours of operation should stop at this location at 10 pm. Relative to beer and wine sales the location is closer to the high school so it will become a gathering place and is close to a number of schools and walkways for students. The prior license had 4 suspensions including under age sales. Relative to traffic the curb break presents a dangerous corner and needs to be pushed back to a reasonable amount of feet to eliminate diagonal traffic. (5) There is not an outcry in this community for liquor at 6 am or 2 am. Prior sales to minors is not something to support. The location will bring in more traffic and possibly may exacerbate the motorcycle issue. (6) The prior traffic study that was done for a car wash in this location had documented this being an extremely dangerous corner and did not support a use that increased traffic. (7) Current hours at the Mobil Station are 24 hours and there are 4 pumps with 2 nozzles on each side. The number of gas dispensers will not change. (8) How will the change affect Ritrovo? The arrangement is in place now but after construction there will be no more shared parking allowed. (9) Do homeless come to the Mobil Station? They do come and action that can be taken is limited under the law. (10) What is the increase in retail space? How much beer and wine is being sold? If there are 12 cooler doors then approximately 3 would be beer and wine. (11) How many employees will be there? 4 to 5 during the day and reducing 1 to 2 during the evening. (12) Beer and wine sales are currently 6 am to 2 am. Perhaps reducing the night sales by 2 hours. (13) Parking. There are 11 striped stalls and 8 spaces at the pumps total 19 available spaces. (14) A prior gas station at Entrada and PCH (per WLAAPC approval in 2008): got no alcohol sales, operating hours of 5 am to 11 pm daily, delivery hours between 7 am to 7 pm daily, and compliance with the applicable provisions of the Specific Plan was required. (14) Concern regarding operating hours. Starbucks agreed to close at 10 pm at their new location in the Highlands and will there be assurances that the location could not be converted into a 7-11 or some other use if the gas station aspect does not work out? The owner said the gas franchise is the business. (15) The application is misleading because it states that there is a mini-market at this site already and that is not true. What does the reference to “deviations from the code” mean? The requested operations past 11 PM require a deviation from the commercial corner ordinance. Relative to traffic, an Environmental Assessment Form was filed and to this date no traffic report/study/analysis has been required but it may be. (16) PPCC’s prior position on the Highland Starbucks had the same requested deviation from the applicant; the Council opposed the application with reduced hours of operation and restrictions on deliveries. For the prior proposed car wash, the Specific Plan prohibited the use and the CUP was also opposed on noise and traffic grounds and because there were inaccuracies/misrepresentations in the application. (17) The target audience for buying goods 24 hours a day might not be what the community is looking for. (18) Gas deliveries are within the control of the station owner and do not necessarily have to happen during high traffic or hours that would otherwise disturb residents. (18) The Via lot is slightly larger than the Mobil lot. (19) The trash dump area opens into the area next to the residences. There is a 20-foot buffer zone between the existing station and the condominiums. (20) The increase in square footage is intended to allow the owner to sell more goods and to increase the volume of people coming to the business during certain hours. The applicant stated that he appreciated the opportunity to present to the Council and would consider all the comments made.

11.    General Public Comment — None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:02 PM.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR APRIL 9th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Janet Anderson, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Rick Lemmo, Nancy Niles, Richard Wulliger, Brenda Theveny, George Wolfberg, Cathy Russell, Stuart Muller, Reza Akef, Rick Mills, Sue Kohl, Gil Dembo, Greg Sinaiko and Rick Mills.

Voting Alternates:  Diane Bleak and Barbara Marinacci.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  David Kaplan, Laura Mack and Ted Mackie.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Barbara Kohn read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:07 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Adoption of the March 26, 2015 minutes. Upcoming Meetings (Tentative): 4/23/15: Presentation by LAFD Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Castro. 5/14/15: Presentation by Richard Blumenberg, AIA, President of the Civic League and Tricia Keane, Planning & Land Use Director, CD11, regarding the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (“BMO”) and short-term vacation rentals.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of April 9, 2015. The total account balances equal $33,578.81. PPCC’s insurance policy was paid; there were no other significant transactions.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    Purchase of General Comprehensive Liability Insurance.

Chris reported that she directed the purchase of General Comprehensive Liability Insurance for PPCC.  This was on the unanimous advice of the EC. PPCC previously had only D&O insurance; in light of the council’s increased outreach, including the Farmers Market events and the in person election, it was determined that obtaining liability insurance was important. If anyone has any questions please let Chris know.

7.1.3.    Letter to Editor from PPCC Executive Committee.  See below.

7.1.4.    2015 Officer Elections.

Pursuant to the bylaws, Art. VII, Section 1, Chris reported that she has appointed the members of the Nominating Committee for the election of officers: Cathy Russell (Chair), Janet Anderson and George Wolfberg are the additional members. The committee will work independently and will decide on a list of nominees for the officer positions, which will be presented at PPCC’s first meeting in May (May 14). In addition to the nominees presented by the committee, any board member may nominate candidates until 15 minutes prior to the scheduled close of the 2nd regular meeting in May (May 28). If there are contested offices, there will be a candidates’ forum during the first meeting in June (June 11); the board will elect the officers after the candidates’ forum, if any, on June 11. The election procedures were unanimously approved by the board this past January and are set forth in detail in Art. VII, Section 4 of the bylaws.

7.1.5.    PPCC Organizational Representatives.  Chris announced changes to the Service Clubs category: (primary) Woman’s Club, (new) Nancy Niles; (alternate) Rotary Club, Kevin Niles.

7.1.6.    Waterwise Events.

Chris announced that on Saturday 4/11, 9 am there will be a Free Lawn Be Gone Workshop, Pacific Palisades, co-sponsored by LADWP, at 1160 Charm Acres Pl., Pacific Palisades.  Learn how to tear out turf without chemicals, install a rain barrel and build healthy living soil. Added bonus for LADWP ratepayers: a free garden coaching session with a Garden Guru (one per household). Register at: http://www.watershedwisetraining.com/turf-removal/ladwp-turf-removal/. Sun., 4/12, 1pm: Water Wise Garden Tour, Brentwood. Tour begins at the beautiful Brentwood School at 1 p.m., and goes to several locations from there. RSVP and info: http://www.formlainc.com/events/brentwood-garden-tour/

7.1.7.    WRAC Roundtable with Mayor Garcetti 4/25.  Chris reported that she will be attending along with other PPCC board members. Chris solicited concerns from board members at the end of the meeting or via email.

7.1.8.    PPCC Suggestions.  Chris reminded board members and the public to submit all constructive suggestions for changes to: Jennifer Malaret (bylaws); Chris Spitz or Barbara Kohn (other policies or procedures).

7.1.9.    Hospitality Committee (new) – Reza Akef (Chair), Jennifer Malaret.

Reza passed around a sign up sheet for board members to volunteer to contribute coffee and treats for PPCC meetings through summer 2015. Chris thanked Diane Bleak and Starbucks Palisades Highlands for donating coffee and treats at this meeting.

7.1.10.    Short-Term Vacation Rentals.

Chris referred to the recently highlighted Los Angeles Times articles about Airbnb; proliferation in Palisades’ residential neighborhoods, including listings on Airbnb, VRBO, HomeAway, etc. Chris reported that there would be a presentation at our meeting on 5/14 by Tricia Keane, CD-11 re status, existing law, motion by Mike Bonin regarding possible regulation, etc. Public comment will be solicited at the 5/14 meeting.

7.1.11.    Spotlight on Organizations.

Chris reported that there would be a new continuing agenda item beginning 4/23 (as time allows) for informational presentations by organizational members about their organizations. AYSO/Janet Anderson (tentative) will make the first presentation. Additional organizational representative volunteers are invited to contact Chris to agendize their presentations.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office. Website: www.11thdistrict.com.  Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.

Norman reported that (1) all are invited to attend the water conservation events, (2) the chief legislative analyst report on short term rental housing is expected within the next few weeks and the topic is expected to be very controversial. Questions: (1) will short-term rental operators be required to pay taxes? Norman said that would be the easy answer as currently they are not allowed in R1 zones but they are going on. (2) How will HOAs and condo associations deal with reduction in water usage? Programs will be phased in for multi-families and other entities later on. savethedropLA.org will have resources for the various types of property owners to look up possible action and resources. (3) What about the bridge across PCH to Potrero Canyon Park? Norman reported that power lines are in the way now of where a possible bridge would go. Motions may be introduced to underground those lines as talks are on-going with LADWP. The first step is to create a district that could become part of a program funded by LADWP as a general expense. If that goes forward the second step is the rendering and design of a bridge that goes over PCH and would require CalTrans support. Part of the design is to take it all the way to the bike path such that the bridge could be both a pedestrian and bicycle path. The Coastal Commission has asked for three approaches to get across PCH (underground, at grade or the bridge). There will be a report back to the Coastal Commission. Funding is to be determined. The cost of the bridge may be $3-5 million if a pre-existing form could be utilized. (4) The remaining lots around the Potrero rim will be auctioned on 6-17-2015. (5) How is the construction of large apartment buildings consistent with the call to save water? (6) Will the CA Incline close on 4/20/15? Yes, that is a firm date. Santa Monica has hired a company to manage the traffic with a 24-hour hotline. There are sensors going in at Kanan, Las Virgines, Topanga, PCH, etc. to direct traffic. There will be no restriping of Moomat Ahiko. (7) The PCH low flow project should be completed shortly but there will still be overlap with the closure of the Incline. (8) Any updates on the location for LADWP’s DS-104? LADWP has asked for a meeting with CD-11 and there will be a briefing but no information is currently available.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative.  Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095. Janet Turner in attendance who reported that: (1) There is a Town Hall meeting in May in WLA in the evening with the date TBD regarding the VA Property in Westwood. (2) A RFP has been released for companies interested in developing the campus which is 200 pages long; interested parties can contact Janet. (3) A FAA Helicopter noise hotline and informational website have been established; concerned parties can telephone 424-348-4354 or go on-line to www.heli-noise-la.com.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area & At-Large Representatives – Report on Behalf of Areas.

(1) George Wolfberg (At-Large) reported that he and Patti Post (transportation) met with County representatives (primarily public works) who are going to put together a proposal for funding for completion of the pedestrian walkway along PCH. Currently the walk extends from Venice to Santa Monica and stops at California Avenue. North of that there is only a bike path so pedestrians and bike riders are together and with increasing use the path has become increasingly unsafe. To arrange funding will be a lot of work as will figuring safe passage throughout the route. The County is the lead agency and Santa Monica is actively participating. On April 23rd, 5:30 PM in the Palisades Library there will be a public meeting to explain the project and take community input. (2) Reza Akef (Area 8) thanked Norm Kulla for the cleaning on Sunset between Will Rogers and Amalfi has been completed and two storm drains have been cleared.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.

(1) Rick Lemmo reported that residential memberships are available on the Chamber. The next Networking breakfast is April 23; other events are May 7th and the popular auto exhibit is taking place in May; please go to the Chamber’s website.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

(1) Laura Mack, Sustainability. Laura attended the Mayor’s Sustainability event and spoke regarding the event where the focus is on single-family residences to reduce potable water. Please see Lamayor.org/sustainability. The plan has short (2017) and long-term (2025-2035) measures regarding conservation, energy, clean livability, etc. Also Laura informed the board and public that to report water waste email waterwaste@ladwp.com.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Stuart Muller spoke regarding press coverage of PPCC meetings and stated that the Post’s coverage was inaccurate. Stuart suggested that PPCC committee meetings be in public places and made public. Minutes should be transcribed from a recorded audio report and the Secretary does not have to be and should not be on the council. Regional issues should not be included or discussed; only local issues. The agendas are controlled by the Chair and other issues should be included. (2) Reza Akef reported that the Department of Sanitation is posting “no parking” signs on streets that are too small for their trucks to go down on trash day. Residents are being ticketed and no notice of the signs being posted went out. Tickets are $73. (3) Barbara Kohn reported that the next DRB meeting is April 22, 2015 at 7 PM at the Chamber Office; please see ppdrb.org. (4) President Chris Spitz reiterated that board member requests to agendize any items must be made pursuant to the bylaws (Art. IX.5.A); no such requests have been made to date by the Area 6 representative.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.1.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

(a) The Committee met on April 2, 2015. Topics of discussion were Article IX (Meetings), Article X (Voting and Quorum), and a review of the Board’s input at the March 12, 2015 Board meeting. The Committee unanimously recommends the proposed Article IX (meetings); see first reading of proposed language (highlighted in bold) below. The purposes of the changes are first to reflect that information today is electronic rather than physically posted and, second, to clarify the order of business. (b) The Committee will be returning to other matters originally scheduled pursuant to and pending input from the Chair and Board: Organizational membership/process/structure, Area & At-Large Representative elections, Area & At-Large Alternate membership, term limits and the inclusion of the term “Primary Residence” as it may apply to certain provisions of the bylaws. Topics for future agendas: Alternate Eligibility on the Executive Committee, Discipline, Code of Conduct, addition of Conflict of Interest rules, and consolidation/simplification of the bylaws/guidelines/standing rules/attachments.

8.1.2.    Outreach Committee – Andrew Wolfberg (Chair).

Like Us on Facebook: facebook.com/pacpalicc. To receive future PPCC meeting agendas and notices, send a request to info@pacpalicc.org. Farmers Market events to continue in mid-April. Andrew reported that Farmer’s Market events would continue.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.1.    Further Revised Award Guidelines.

The Executive Committee unanimously supports and sponsors the motion to adopt the Revised Award Guidelines set forth below.  Presentation: Chris stated that these revised guidelines, in sum: 1) retain most of the prior policies and procedures; 2) continue to combine the two similar awards (Citizen & Community Service Award “CSA”) but now call the new combined award simply “Citizen of the Year”; 3) require “residency” as a baseline for the Citizen of the Year award; and 4) codify the 2014 optional recognition “Pride of the Palisades” that can be given to anyone regardless of residency or lack of other qualifications, i.e., if in the award committee’s judgment that person did significant service for the Palisades and is worthy of recognition. Comments from the Board will be solicited as to all candidates for awards and/or recognition. Action: Rick Lemmo seconded the motion. Discussion: (1) all of the awards would be awarded at the same time of year. (2) it is not required that all of the awards be given every year. See Section (4)(A).  Action: the motion passed unanimously.

9.1.2.    Board discussion regarding possible bylaw amendments on the issues of (a) term limits (Officers, Elected Reps, Alternates, Organizational Reps, Advisors) and (b) membership seats for Second Alternates.

Reference March 12, 2015 PPCC Minutes. Term Limits of Some Kind Other than What is in the Bylaws. Presentation: Chris articulated a summary of what term limits are contained in the bylaws presently.

(a) Term Limits. Chris recalled that the board was split when the “sense of the board” advisory vote taken on March 12 on the issue of whether there should be term limits of some kind other than what are already in the bylaws. She stated at the time that there would be board discussion on any such issues. It is important to review what the bylaws do provide for:  Officers. All officers are elected by the board for one year terms. Only the President and the VP are limited to two consecutive one year terms.  Area and At-Large Reps. These are elected by the public for two year terms. There are currently no limits on the number of terms that these reps can serve. The alternates are elected by the board for two year terms as well, with no limits on the number of terms that alternates can serve. Organizational Reps. These are appointed by their respective organizations. They serve one year terms, but with no limits on the number of terms that they can serve. Subsets of Organizational Reps are: (a) 4 non-rotating or permanent organizational seats; they each have alternates appointed by their organizations each year, again with no limits on their terms. (b) 5 rotating seats, which again are appointed each year by the organizations. There are no express term limits on the rotating seats, however, as a practical matter categories with more than 2 members are effectively termed out after two years, because each serves only one year as the primary rep in that category and one year as the alternate, with the primary seat then rotating to the next organization in order. Advisors. Per Article V of the bylaws there are two required advisors, the Legal and the Youth advisors; all other advisors are considered special advisors appointed by the Chair. All advisors serve “at the pleasure of the chair”; there are no terms for advisors or any limits on the time they may serve. Discussion: (1) if we move to term limits that will result in involved stakeholders not being on PPCC and then new people who are solicited may not show up so organizations then could be left not having a quorum. (2) no term limits because we have people who are very knowledgeable in their disciplines. (3) term limits will result in the loss of institutional memory. (4) continuity of membership is important. (5) the bylaws as written are sufficient provided that PPCC does sufficient outreach to solicit new voices without forcing out valuable board members. (6) term limits are called for when the advantage of incumbency is overwhelming but PPCC does not have that here based on the last election with three incumbents having been defeated; thus why not allow the constituency to elect who they choose. Officers are elected so they can be voted out annually. Organizational reps are named by the organization and their autonomy is logical. (7) term limits are good because they promote more people to come forward. (8) outreach and free elections promote new faces and voices so there is no need for absolute caps and if everyone is new there would be chaos. (9) there are seats where people are not coming forward such as Area 7 and 8 alternates despite existing board members’ best efforts. (10) strong HOAs have the ability to dominate seats because the only way for non-HOA members to participate if the HOA chooses to dominate the seat so term limits are favorable because they prevent turnover. (11) HOAs have term limits because movement and creativity is desirable not necessarily related to age. Government bodies can be steered by elections if people are voting properly but if the community is not aggressive then the council stagnates. If term limits engender creativity then they are a good thing; if they cause problems then term limits are not. Action: Chris asked for a show of hands of those present for a sense to direct the bylaws committee to consider term limits further. No hands were raised.

(b) Second Alternates. The bylaws allow for second alternates only for Area and At-Large Representatives. The board was also split on the issue as to whether these membership seats should continue or not. Discussion: (1) second alternates were originally intended to be optional. (2) second alternates are not needed, the process cause discourse, organizational reps only have one alternate, the council is too large, there is too much disagreement and too many people for the council to be manageable. (3) the second alternate is a way to recruit new people and get them involved without a heavy commitment upfront so that is a good thing. (4) there was opposition to second alternates when they were added because the council was already large enough, (5) second alternates are needed in the event that an elected representative or first alternate needs to vacate the seat then there is someone to move up, (6) historically the idea of optional second alternates created disparity in areas where some had two alternates and others had none. (7) there is not a big demand for alternates and alternates are not motivated to come physically to the meeting, (8) second alternates do great work behind the scenes for the council, (9) second alternates add other voices that may be dissonant from the majority voice. Action: Chris asked for a show of hands of those present to show interest in removing the second alternate positions but none were raised.

10.    New Business – None.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:32 PM.

ATTACHMENTS  

ITEM 7.1.3 – LETTER FROM PPCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO THE PALISADIAN POST

March 30, 2015

Letter to the Editor, Palisadian Post:

PPCC’s Executive Committee is disappointed by the inflammatory allegations raised in two recent Post articles. Specifically the articles included unsubstantiated claims by named and unnamed individuals that the PPCC Board is supposedly trying to silence the public, suppressing speech and engaging in other alleged improprieties. People making anonymous claims are often seeking to push personal agendas. It is unfortunate that the Post did not seek to interview any of the signatories to this letter in order to verify the accuracy of these charges. This Executive Committee has made a concerted effort to solicit comment and hold discussions on significant issues in our community and for the organization itself. We are proud of PPCC’s record and these vague, unsubstantiated claims are absolutely false and simply unfair.

Nevertheless, we appreciate the Post’s focus on PPCC and invite more discussion on all issues of concern to stakeholders. Area Representatives can (and many regularly do) communicate with constituents on matters of concern and give area reports at our meetings; unfortunately the one source named by the Post (Area 6 Representative Stuart Muller) does not regularly engage with a notable number of Area 6 constituents (including the Huntington HOA), and accordingly cannot and does not report on Area 6 concerns.

All points of view are given an opportunity to be heard at PPCC meetings. During public discussion regarding Neighborhood Councils, at two meetings, the Board was overwhelmingly against having a Neighborhood Council in Pacific Palisades. In an advisory opinion the full Board voted against further investigating the issue. Any Board member is welcome to agendize this matter again (or any matter) in accordance with the bylaws for public discussion at a future meeting; there is a big difference between not being heard and being heard and disagreed with.

PPCC’s Board is an all-volunteer, non-profit community member organization working diligently to preserve and protect the quality of life in Pacific Palisades. We hope that everyone can become constructively involved with the numerous fantastic Palisades volunteer organizations, including PPCC.

Sincerely,

The PPCC Executive Committee:
Christina Spitz, President                                    Barbara Kohn, President Emeritus
Janet Anderson, Recreation Representative   Jennifer Malaret, Secretary
Richard G. Cohen, Treasurer                              Andrew Wolfberg, Vice-President
David Kaplan, Area 6 First Alternate Representative

ITEM 8.1.1 – BYLAWS COMMITTEE REPORT AND FIRST READING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS ARTICLE IX (MEETINGS)
ARTICLE IX
MEETINGS
Sec. 1. MEETINGS SHALL BE PUBLIC. All PPCC and Board meetings shall be open to the public and to the press, except for confidential matters which relate to personnel issues or litigation.
Sec. 2. SCHEDULE. The regular meetings of the PPCC shall be on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month except when the Board has voted to cancel one or more of such meetings. The Chair, or in the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair, may call Special Meetings of the PPCC as the Chair or Vice-Chair deems necessary.
Sec. 3. MINUTES. Minutes of each PPCC meeting shall be [] electronically available to Board members and the public.
Sec. 4. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The Order of Business for the Board shall be as follows, subject to the Chair’s discretion to rearrange the order of agenda items:
1. Reading of the PPCC’s Mission from the Bylaws.
2.Introduction of the Board and Audience.
3.Certification of Quorum.
4.Approval and Adoption of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
5.Consideration of the Agenda.
6.Treasurer’s Report.
7. Announcements and Concerns from Board Members.
8. Reports of Committees.
9.Old Business.
10.New Business.
11.General Public Comment
12.Adjournment
Sec. 5. AGENDAS.
Any member of the Board desiring to have an item included on the Agenda of a meeting shall make a request to the Chair at least ten days in advance of the meeting. The Chair shall place the matter on the Agenda. The member requesting that the item be placed on the Agenda shall furnish information concerning the request prior to the meeting, preferably by email. At the discretion of the Chair, an item requiring action by the Board shall be added to the agenda no later than four days prior to the meeting and the requestor shall at the discretion of the chair provide sufficient information regarding that item
A copy of the Agenda shall be [] distributed to the PPCC email list, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting except when a Special Meeting is called, in which case the Agenda will be [] distributed 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Sec. 6. PUBLIC INPUT. Subject to the Chair’s discretion to limit the total amount of time allocated on particular issues and for each individual speaker, every member of the public attending a PPCC Meeting shall have the opportunity to directly address the Board on any agenda item [] at the appropriate time for such comment. General Public Comment shall be reserved for non-Board members to speak on any item of interest to the public [] within the subject matter jurisdiction of the PPCC, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the [] distributed agenda.

ITEM 9.1.1 – FURTHER REVISED AWARD GUIDELINES. The Executive Committee unanimously recommends that the following language be adopted by the Board and placed on the PPCC’s website:

PACIFIC PALISADES COMMUNITY COUNCIL AWARDS

Overview, Guidelines, Honoree Archive

I. OVERVIEW

Pacific Palisades Community Council honors individuals who have made voluntary contributions to Pacific Palisades that benefit the community at large.

PPCC has honored community contributions in the following ways: as a former co-sponsor with the Palisadian Post of the “Citizen of the Year” and “Golden Sparkplug” Awards and as sole sponsor of the “Community Service” Award. Beginning in December 2015, as the sole sponsor of all awards, PPCC awards honorees annually with the Citizen of the Year Award (combining the prior “Citizen of the Year” and “Community Service” Awards) and the Golden Sparkplug Award.

Citizen of the Year Award: Honors those whose contributions to Pacific Palisades have been both a recent effort resulting in a substantial benefit to the community, and a steady, reliable long-term history of service to the Palisades.

Golden Sparkplug Award: Honors those who have an idea and effort resulting in an original contribution to Pacific Palisades that benefits the community. The Golden Sparkplug Award ceremony is held in conjunction and in cooperation with the Citizen of the Year Award.

The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award to each honoree, with each Award honoree and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.

Guidelines for these Awards, procedures for selection and the Awards Event, and the names of past honorees are set forth below. The Guidelines are recommended practices that allow flexibility in interpretation, implementation or use.

_________________________________________________________

2. GUIDELINES: CITIZEN OF THE YEAR AWARD

A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Citizen of the Year Award (“Citizen Award”) is to honor long term and continuing outstanding volunteer service as well as a recent extraordinary accomplishment by an individual that resulted in a substantial benefit to the Pacific Palisades community-at-large.

B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the Citizen Award must both (a) state the nature of the extraordinary recent accomplishment done by the candidate that resulted in a substantial benefit to the community at-large and (b) summarize the candidate’s steady, reliable, long-term service within the community.

C. RECIPIENT: The recipient must be an adult individual who resided in the Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC Area boundaries) at the time the accomplishment and the long-term services were rendered. Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Citizen Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services directly related to his or her responsibilities as a board member, although long term services may be considered as qualifying factors. There shall be only one Citizen Award given each calendar year.

D. AWARD: The Citizen Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Citizen Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations.

_________________________________________________________

3. GUIDELINES: GOLDEN SPARKPLUG AWARD(S)

A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Golden Sparkplug Award (“Sparkplug Award”) is to honor those citizens who ignite ideas and projects into community action that benefit Palisadians throughout the community.
B. NOMINATIONS: Any organization or individual in the community may nominate a candidate. There is no limit on the number of nominations an individual or organization may submit. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Pacific Palisades Community Council at PO Box 1131 or by email (info@pacpalicc.org) by October [], 201[]. The nomination for the Sparkplug Award must state (a) the nature of the original idea, effort or project, (b) in what way the effort or project benefitted the community at-large and (c) how the effort or project was initiated, in progress or completed during the current or prior calendar year.

C. RECIPIENT(S): The recipient(s) must be individual(s) who owned real property located in, resided in, or operated a business located in Pacific Palisades (within the PPCC Area boundaries) at the time the services were rendered. Both adults and youth are eligible for the Sparkplug Award. While there may be multiple recipients in a given year, the Sparkplug Award may be given to only one member of a particular group or community. Each recipient’s service should be of a voluntary nature and not be any beneficial outcome of official, financial, business or professional work or occupation that the recipient is engaged in. The Sparkplug Award shall not be given to any PPCC board member based on services related to his or her responsibilities as a board member.

D. AWARD(S): The Sparkplug Award shall be chosen and prepared by the Awards Selection Committee and presented to the recipient(s) at the Pacific Palisades Community Council December Meeting/Holiday Party/Award Event. The Sparkplug Award shall be given based on the quality or benefits achieved of work and not the quantity of nominations.
_________________________________________________________

4. GUIDELINES: SELECTION AND EVENT COMMITTEES;
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION; SELECTION PROCESS;
AWARDS EVENT

A. AWARDS SELECTION COMMITTEE: The Chair shall appoint a Committee of not less than three (3) current board members, plus one previous “Citizen of the Year Award” recipient not currently serving on the board and one previous “Community Service Award” recipient not currently serving on the board (if such persons are available to serve) to review the nominations and select the person to receive the Citizen Award and the person(s) to receive the Sparkplug Award(s). The Awards Selection Committee (“ASC”) shall select both the Citizen Award and Sparkplug Award(s) recipients. Prior to the ASC selecting a person or persons for the Award(s), the ASC Chair shall circulate by email to other current members of the Board a list of those persons who have been nominated and ask that if any members of the Board desire to submit comments about any nominee, they should submit any comments to the ASC Chair to be received within five days. The ASC is not obligated to select any recipients for the Citizen Award or Sparkplug Award(s) if in the ASC’s judgment no nominees meet all qualifications for such Award(s).

B. OPTIONAL SPECIAL RECOGNITION: From time to time in special circumstances, the ASC may determine, at its discretion, that an individual who is not a resident or qualified in all respects for the Citizen Award or Sparkplug Award should receive “Pride of the Palisades” recognition for extraordinary service to the Palisades community. In such case, the name of the individual shall be circulated to the Board for comments as set forth in section A above. After consideration of Board comments, should the ASC then select that individual for “Pride of the Palisades” recognition, all procedures set forth in sections E.3-7 below shall also apply to the individual to be honored with this recognition.

C. AWARDS EVENT DATE: No later than 9 months prior to the event, i.e., March of each calendar year, the Chair shall establish the Event date and the venue and notify the Palisades Chamber of Commerce to place the Event date on the community calendar.
D. AWARDS EVENT COMMITTEE: No later than the first meeting in October, the Chair shall establish the Awards Event Committee (“AEC”). The Chair and the Chair of the AEC shall establish the deadline for the selection of the Citizen Award and Sparkplug Award winners and coordinate publicity for the request for nominations. The AEC Chair shall coordinate the Event details, such as budget, menu items, and dinner ticket cost, paid reservation procedures, decoration, event ceremony, complimentary dinner tickets, parking, and other assignment of duties and tasks for the night of the event.

E. TIME FRAME & PROCEDURE:

1.First October Meeting: Distribute Award Guidelines and discuss the Awards. Appoint AEC Chair and committee members. Submit press release to relevant publications soliciting nominations. Appoint ASC Chair and committee members.

2.The last Saturday in October: Deadline for receipt of nominations.

3.First Week in November: The ASC meets in person to open nominating letters and sort by names into youth and adult categories. Check for multiple nominations in one envelope. Review nomination letters. Review comments from the Board. Evaluate how well the candidates meet the guidelines and sort into 2 groups: those requiring no further consideration and those eligible for further consideration and selection. The ASC shall discuss merits of each potential award winner. The ASC shall vote; however, no committee member who nominates shall vote when that nomination is considered, and no committee member shall vote for him/herself or a family member. The ASC Chair shall complete a synopsis of the committee’s efforts and shall notify the Chair of the efforts and the award recipient(s).

4.Early November: Immediately following receipt of the ASC Chair’s synopsis and results, the Chair shall notify the winner(s) prior to any public announcements, notify the press, local elected officials and dignitaries who will be invited to the event, and authorize the preparation of the award plaque(s).

5.Early November: The AEC Chair shall follow up with a written notification of the Award winner(s) and event details such as reservations and parking, submit the biography of the winner(s) for press release, and mail or email or post invitation letters to the prior “Community Service Award” and “Citizen of the Year Award” winners.

6.PPCC November Meeting: ASC announces award winner(s), notifies the winner(s), notifies the press and the Board of Governors. AEC provides details of the Awards Event and invites recipients to the event.

7.PPCC December Meeting: The Awards Event, sponsored by PPCC, shall generally be held on the 2nd Thursday in December in conjunction with the Board’s annual holiday party and in lieu of its regular meeting, but exigent circumstances and any conflicts with religious holidays are to be considered. The PPCC Chair makes the opening remarks at the Event and presents the Award(s) to each honoree, with each Award honoree and members of their immediate family being guests of the PPCC.
8.Any future revision of the Awards Guidelines shall be upon recommendation of the Executive Committee and subject to a vote for approval by the PPCC Board.

5. HONOREE ARCHIVE

[INSERT LIST CITIZEN OF THE YEAR]

[INSERT LIST COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD]

[INSERT LIST GOLDEN SPARKPLUG]

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR APRIL 23rd 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Cathy Russell, Greg Sinaiko, Nancy Niles, Brenda Theveny, Stuart Muller, George Wolfberg, Janet Anderson, Peter Culhane, Sue Kohl, Reza Akef, Amy Kalp, Rick Mills, Donna Vaccarino, Gil Dembo, Maryam Zar and Brenda Theveny.

Voting Alternates:  Eric Dugdale, Doug McCormick and Susan Payne.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  David Kaplan, Laura Mack, Michael Soneff, Diane Bleak, Ted Mackie, Brian Deming and Barbara Marinacci.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Richard Cohen read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:08 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris stated that the minutes of April 9, 2015 were adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings (Tentative): 5/14/15: Presentation by Richard Blumenberg, AIA, President of the Civic League and Tricia Keane, Planning & Land Use Director, CD11, regarding the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (“BMO”). Presentation/discussion regarding Short-Term Residential Vacation Rentals. Nominating Committee report to recommend PPCC Officers 2015/2016. 5/28/15: Presentation by Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (PPHTF): status update and plans going forward. Stephanie Cohen (Field Representative, Assemblymember Richard Bloom) and Maryam Zar (Chair, PPHTF). 06/11/15: PPCC 2015/2016 Officer Elections.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of April 23, 2015 where the total account balances equaled $33,524.81. No significant transactions were reported.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    PPCC 2015/2016 Officer Election Process.

Chris announced that nominees would be announced by Nominating Committee on 5/14/15; interested persons could contact Chair Cathy Russell with any questions. Chris stated that after the announcement on May 14, 2015 any board member can nominate other candidates until 15 minutes before scheduled close of 2nd regular meeting in May (May 28, 2015).

7.1.3.    Bylaws Committee.  Chris reported that Carol Bruch is no longer able to serve. Maryam Zar, Organizational Representative/Education, has been appointed to the committee.

7.1.4.    Letter to City Planning Commission regarding the Archer School project and update regarding 4/23/15 hearing.

See attached. Chris reported that she attended the hearing today and spoke on behalf of PPCC to express concerns regarding traffic impacts. Chris reported that the project was approved with a few modifications and that CD-11 staff had expressed that Councilmember Bonin was looking at this (and all projects) “through the lens of traffic.” Chris reported that she is coordinating with CD-11 regarding whether the Archer start date would be after completion of the California Incline project.

7.1.5.    Parking of Enclosed Storage Units (PODs) in the Palisades.  Chris reported that to verify if PODs parked in public rights of way (streets) are permitted, residents should call 311 or Bureau of Street Services (800-996-2489) and report the address. Chris thanked Area 4 resident Karen Ridgley for this information.

7.1.6.    Proposed La Cruz Parklet.

Chris reminded the board of the status and history of this matter, including previous positions taken by PPCC. Chris referenced several letters and emails under Items 7.1.9 and 9.1 (Oct. 9, 2014),
http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2014.htm#09OCT14; see also discussions in July and September of 2014 as reflected in PPCC minutes (pacpalicc.org). Chris reported that the issue has come before the board several times in the past. Chris re-read the September 12, 2014 position. Since that time there have not been updates to the board but PRIDE has been working with LADOT to make modifications to the application. Jennifer Malaret reported that today there was a brief meeting at the parklet location where CD-11, LADOT, PRIDE, representatives from the Huntington HOA, Don Scott and concerned residents met to continue to provide input particularly about the need to enhance safety measures at the intersection and for cars turning off of Sunset Boulevard headed towards the proposed parklet location.

7.1.7.    Proposed CUB’s at 544 and 548 Palisades Drive.

Chris reported that tentative plans had been received for a proposed mini mart/gourmet grocery with full takeout liquor sales, hours 9 AM to 10 PM and renewal of Chez Mimi’s expired CUB to accommodate a new restaurant tenant (Highlands Plaza). A future presentation to PPCC is expected; if interested, please contact Area 2 Representatives Peter Culhane and/or Diane Bleak.

7.1.8.    Suggestions, agenda items, PPCC operations.

Chris encouraged input from the board and the public, i.e., send suggestions to: Jennifer Malaret (bylaws); Chris Spitz or Barbara Kohn. Board members are welcome to submit agenda requests pursuant to PPCC bylaws, Art. IX.5.A. In light of recent remarks at PPCC meetings and press reports, Chris invited anyone with lingering questions/concerns about PPCC operations (committee or Board meeting procedures, minutes, agendas, etc.) to contact her for fact-based answers.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org.

SLO Moore reported that (1) there has been a cleanup of the transient location behind the Corona Del Mar Bluffs wall. SLO Moore encouraged residents to report if any of the camps return. Homeless occupants were talked to and given notice of a move out date. (2) There are new traffic signs and regulations in Santa Monica because of the California Incline closure. LAPD is getting used to current traffic patterns such that when violations are happening citations will begin. Questions: (1) what about the homeless in Potrero Canyon? SLO Moore replied that many of the property owners have signed legal documents to enable LAPD to remove them. LAPD is working to get organizations that help the homeless find housing in response to their effort. SLO Moore also reported that the 72-hour storage rule does not apply to private property and that the impact of recent removal efforts is that the homeless are increasing in number at the beach. (2) Can No-Trespassing signs be put on the barricades? Yes. (3) “No Camping Signs” have been installed at the top and bottom of the Recreation Center areas to facilitate enforcement.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461 — Not in attendance.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative.  Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095 — Not in attendance.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) George Wolfberg, At-Large Representative. (A) There is a County of Los Angeles proposal in cooperation with the City of Santa Monica to apply for an active transportation grant for a separate walking path on the beach from California Ave. in Santa Monica north to the Temescal Parking Lot. The meeting was well attended and the LA County Department of Public Works has until June 1, 2015 to make their application. (B) Closure of the California Incline. George reported that discretionary commuters decided to take the 101 to the 405. Increased signage is intended to help reduce impact. (C) There are two beach pedestrian tunnels at West Channel Road and “Little Tunnel” at the base of Ocean Way. Because of runoff from 101 Ocean and a single-family residence, George reported that water runs down the steps and into the Little Tunnel. There is a sump pump that breaks and local residents are working with Caltrans to come up with a solution, along with having the City of LA determine if there is any illegal runoff. (D) Rustic Canyon Historic Clubhouse – there is a strong effort to rehabilitate the facility. The annual fundraiser will be June 6, 2015. Interested people can contact George. (2) Greg Sinaiko (Area 3) reported that the Marquez Beautification meeting took place and was well attended. The project will begin in the next week from 3 PM to 9 PM and then commence during regular workday hours in the summer months. The project is projected to be completed in November.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.

(1) Amy Kalp, Friends of the Library. Amy reported that the Pop Up Book Sale is tomorrow and Saturday from 10 AM to 4 PM in the Library’s community room and the money goes to supplement the Palisades Branch Library and its sister branches. (2) Barbara Marinacci, Pacific Palisades Garden Club. The annual fundraising event, the Spring Garden Tour, is this Sunday 12 PM to 4 PM with an additional garden in the northeast canyon of Temescal Canyon Park being open for viewing until 5 PM. Barbara said that the money that is raised goes to community beautification and supporting school gardens. (3) Eric Dugdale, Historical Society. “Murder in the Palisades” will be on May 18, 2015 at 7 pm at Theatre Palisades. Roger McGrath and Randy Young will present famous cases of mystery and mayhem. The event is free and open to the public. (4) Janet Anderson, AYSO Region 69, reported that fall registration is now open and is either at Paul Revere this Saturday or available on-line www.AYSO69.org. (5) Maryam Zar reported that Homeless Task Force Meeting is next Tuesday here in the Palisades Library from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

(1) Laura Mack, Sustainability. The City launched a Save the Drop Campaign to get people to cut water through outdoor landscaping projects and lawns. Please visit SavetheDropLA.org . Mar Vista has the largest collection of sustainable gardens in LA and Laura encouraged residents to attend their garden tour.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Bylaws Committee.  Second reading of proposed changes to Article IX (Meetings).  Discussion and vote were deferred by the President, to be rescheduled on a future PPCC agenda.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation/Q&A re new LAFD operational system and fire season threat.

Presenting: LAFD Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Castro. Chris reported that this item was CANCELLED as LAFD was unable to attend tonight and that the item will be rescheduled on a future PPCC agenda.

10.2.    Presentation/Q&A concerning proposed Citywide Zoning Code Amendment to Allow “Backyard Beekeeping in Single Family Zones.”

CPC-2-15-578-CA, Council File #12-0785.  Presenting in support: Katie Peterson, Tom Rothmann, Dept. of City Planning; Erik Knutzen (HoneyLove Public Affairs; RootSimple.com; co-author of The Urban Homestead and Making It: Radical Home Economics for a Post-Consumer World; co-founder of the Los Angeles Bread Bakers). Presenting in opposition: Marcia Rozelle, Area 6 resident.  Reference: http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/1084379/25956241/1423951975837/Beekeeping+Staff+Hearing+Packet.pdf?token=%2BtiBLvy1%2FKxdKgvfbiFxiAR2Kl8%3D.

See attached motions below. Chris announced that these motions would not be heard tonight as agreed by the sponsors of the motions in the spirit of encouraging additional community input and work on the issue.

Presentation/City: Cities have supported beekeeping. The practice supports beekeeping and neighbors. Currently beekeeping is allowed in A and I zones. The City Council motion was to investigate beekeeping in all residential zones. Meetings in January 2015 were held with the food council and PlanCheck LA that had a total of roughly 50 attendees. There was a hearing in March 2015 by staff. The suggestion to Council from Planning was to focus on single-family zones rather than all residential zones. Planning has looked at other ordinances that address backyard beekeeping. Some regulations were pulled from other cities and were tailored to LA – the City of Santa Monica (2 hives per lot, typical lot 5,000 lot, 5 foot distance, 6 foot barrier unless height is 8 feet above grade; 1 violation reported since 2012) and the City of San Diego (similar requirements with additional set backs for more than 2 hives). Being proposed in LA are minimum distance limits, walls and guidelines for hive management, water and equipment storage. Registration with the County of LA would be required. A maximum of 1 hive for every 2,500 square feet of lot size is proposed. 5 foot set backs and 20 feet from public rights of way (PROW). Hives must face away from PROWs In the future terms need to be added within the zoning code (i.e., guidelines). Katie read the definitions in the ordinance of bees and the structure, i.e., a sound and useable condition, water must be kept and hive maintenance materials must be stored in an enclosure. The next steps are presentation of the staff report to the CPC on 5/14/2015, then to PLUM and to the full City Council.

Presentation/Support/HoneyLove: Backyard beekeeping is something we can all do to improve our environment. Legalizing beekeeping encourages bees and pollinators and the fruit on our trees and bees do that. Erik thanked the Planning Department that has done an exhausting job of talking to beekeepers and considering other cities throughout the world such as London and Paris. Legalizing bees is like legalizing the sun because the bees are here. LA is a bee paradise because it is so sunny and nice here. We are better off in a city where beekeepers can keep an eye on the bees rather than the situation we have now with swarms and hives in people’s walls. Beekeepers can open walls and remove bees at no cost or a low cost and it is easier to do if bees are legal because beekeepers can take bees from where they are not wanted to where they are wanted. A hive is anywhere from a few thousand to 30,000 so the largest box would have 30-40,000 bees. All the bees together are not separate they are a single organism like a dog. They are not really individual. It would be common to have two hives. HoneyLove bought a “starter” box and perhaps 4-5 boxes would be stacked together.

Presentation/Opposing: the ordinance was just noticed to residents last week. The ordinance does not address training, notification of neighbors, the maximum size of a beehive, there is not a maximum per lot, there is no signage alerting emergency workers, outdoor workers, no distance limits, no best practices, the guidelines are not regulations, there is no oversight, enforcement, or defined liability. When the motion was proffered the City Council asked Planning to address hazards and allergies. When Planning was contacted they were asked if they contacted other agencies. The answer was no. Vector control receives over 7,000 calls per year for bees and swarms. To register as a beekeeper you fill out the form and you re-register every year and no regulations are required. Planning talked to beekeepers, HoneyLove and other cities for input. The City of LA is different than the City of Santa Monica. Local beekeepers are competent and support the existence of bees in Los Angeles. HoneyLove talks about how the bees in LA are thriving. HoneyLove wants to have more bees but bees cause more deaths than all animals combined. With 2 percent of the population allergic, approximately 80,000 people will be impacted. The City of LA has a duty to write a people supportive ordinance that protects public health and safety. Public Comment: (1) Opposing the ordinance, bees roam and how do I tell who should pay when my property is damaged? (2) Opposing the bees because 4 hives prevented backyard use and enjoyment, too many hives are allowed which can likely cause a private or public nuisance. (3) The park board opposed by straw poll the backyard bee ordinance. (4) If profit is not the reason for keeping bees why keep them? Bees increase fruit set and the production of fruit on a property. The way to prevent swarms is to have managed bees because managed bees do not swarm. (5) It is important to find out whether it is true that passing this ordinance will help the problem of colony collapse. (6) There is a concern about what causes a swarm. A swarm helps with the reproduction and is not dangerous because there is no honey to protect. (7) Why is this ordinance necessary and why does it have to be in the zoning here? (8) Not everyone is going to be an expert beekeeper and that is dangerous. (9) People here are too close and the houses are on top of each other. (10) Even professional beekeepers state that bees are unpredictable. (11) There is concern over communications between all of the different City and County agencies that would be required to enforce this ordinance. (12) There is concern that other ordinances in other cities are relatively new and have not been time tested so is that sufficient for the City of LA to move ahead with the idea of backyard beekeeping. Planning has talked to LADBS and Animal Services only because they are the 2 departments directed to enforce the ordinance. Swarms and feral bees are handled by other departments. (13) There is no distance limit from schools so bees could be 5 feet away if there is a single-family house next to the school. (14) Support for the ordinance, I would like to have a beehive in my backyard.

Board Questions: (1) the bee population is determined by the amount of available food. Richard Cohen asked if it the case that the bee population is fixed and if someone establishes a colony in their backyard then it is taking resources away from feral bees? Erik said the density of bees is fixed based on forage so we are better off having bees that are tended rather than in walls, hot tubs and feral bees. (2) David Kaplan expressed that the self-regulation of bees does not prevent a bunch of people on one block from registering to be beekeepers than there would be a bunch of bees without sufficient food and resources that would go elsewhere. Regulation is proposed pursuant the nuisance standards. (3) Reza Akef wondered whether as a responsible beekeeper why wouldn’t you want a responsible set of guidelines to be followed such as notice to your neighbors within a 500 foot radius – would you support firm regulations including notice, training, enforcement and regulations? It is already taken care of. (4) Donna Vaccarino spoke in support of bee behavior and education. She has personal experience as a backyard beekeeper for eight years. Donna claimed that in the Palisades there is nothing to be afraid of. (5) Sue Kohl asked about foraging, how are they contained, how far do they go and when they are out are people at risk for being stung? HoneyLove says they are not contained but they are not dangerous. They go 3-5 miles from the hive. There are 10 feral hives per mile in Los Angeles. (6) Maryam Zar reported that she advised LAUSD who will be making their Office of Environmental Healthy & Safety aware of the proposed ordinance. Can the process be a permitted process and notice provisions? Tom Rothmann said it could be a permitted process and that would come down to staffing and training. LADBS have large areas to cover and notification would be a huge undertaking. Truck gardening is allowed on SFR lots and home occupations are allowed on SFR lots so having regulations and enforcing them would have a revenue impact to the City. Comments can be sent to the CPC Hearing that is taking place on May 14, 2015. (7) Gil Dembo referred to a City Directory that has information regarding a bee problem. (8) George Wolfberg said that any ordinance is circulated throughout the city. How does the State Apiary Commission fit into all of this? The City did not know. (9) Stuart Muller did not think permitting would work, guessed that dogs are more dangerous than bees and would see a problem with LADBS enforcement. (10) Andy Schrader, Paul Koretz’s Office. Andy praised the efforts of HoneyLove’s outreach efforts and said there has been a lot of press. Andy claimed that Councilmember Koretz feels comfortable with the ordinance because is no more natural habitat so the hives per square mile will be controlled and will be safer. The ordinance does not cause more bees and colony collapse disorder is a huge problem. In Los Angeles where we don’t use pesticides we can support the bees because without bees we cannot have food. Andy claimed that Councilmember Koretz is satisfied with the ordinance and does not see the need to codify regulations. (11) Rick Mills stated that this ordinance does need more specific regulations. (12) Diane Bleak works in a hospital reported that when kids come in with allergic reactions they are sometimes tubed and sometimes not and that it is very serious and very frightening to treat these patients.

10.3.    Spotlight on Organizations (new continuing segment).

As time allows, presentations by Janet Anderson, AYSO; Eric Dugdale, Historical Society; Gil Dembo, Temescal Canyon Association.  The matter was deferred by the President due to lack of time and will be scheduled on a future PPCC agenda.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:58 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.4 – LETTER FROM PPCC TO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING THE ARCHER SCHOOL PROJECT

April 16, 2015

City Planning Commission
City of Los Angeles
Attn: James K. Williams, Commission Executive Assistant II
Via email to: James.K.Williams@lacity.org; cpc@lacity.org

Re: Case No. CPC-2014-666-VCU-ZAA-SPR; CEQA No. ENV 2011-2689-EIR; SCH No. 2012011001 – ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS (hearing date: 4/23/15)

In our written comment on the DEIR dated April 22, 2014 (attached for convenience), Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) stressed our concern about the potential for further increased levels of traffic congestion and negative impacts on Pacific Palisades (the community immediately to the west of Brentwood). PPCC emphasized the fact that Sunset is one of two primary routes of ingress and egress in the Palisades; that many community members travel that route regularly to and from work; and that traffic at peak travel times on Sunset, San Vicente and neighboring streets is already extremely congested. A particular concern expressed was the potential for an increase in the already lengthy emergency response time for locations in Pacific Palisades during peak hours. PPCC continues to have these serious concerns.

Pacific Palisades residents are naturally concerned about the start date for the newly proposed 3-year accelerated construction schedule. The Fehr & Peers memorandum of April 7, 2015 (part of Exhibit F to the staff report) indicates that one of the most impactful phases of the project (demolition and hauling) will not commence until 2017, yet the main body of the staff report contains no reference to a construction start date. If construction were to commence in 2015 or 2016, there would almost certainly be overlap with the California Incline replacement project, which starts on 4/20/15 and is planned to be completed by the end of May 2016. That completion date cannot be guaranteed, so other projects need to adjust their own schedules to accommodate projects already underway.

Substantial negative impacts on the Palisades community are anticipated due to the California Incline project. Forcing a community of 25,000 people to endure severe traffic congestion for several months along both of its primary access routes (Sunset and Pacific Coast Highway) as a result of significant overlapping construction projects is unacceptable. No plan should be approved for the Archer project without a thorough assessment of the potential cumulative impact of the proposed accelerated construction schedule along with impacts expected to be generated by the California Incline project or other major construction projects in the area.

Although PPCC has not yet taken a position on the proposed Archer project, we note with great interest that Brentwood Community Council (BCC) has passed a resolution opposing the project “due to the substantial number of adverse impacts it would impose on the community” and supporting observance of the current school CUP, provided that “authorized traffic levels cannot exceed current actual levels” (BCC resolution adopted 2/3/15). PPCC shares BCC’s concerns about traffic impacts and similarly urges that no plan be approved without verifiable assurances to the impacted neighboring communities that all negative traffic impacts – including those identified in the LADOT traffic study of February 7, 2014 – can and will be mitigated.
Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

Cc: Councilmember Mike Bonin, CD11
Tricia Keane, Planning & Land Use Director, CD11

Encl: PPCC Letter to Dept. of City Planning dated 4/22/14

PPCC Letter of 4/22/14 (enclosure to April 16, 2014 letter to City Planning Commission):

April 22, 2014

Department of City Planning
City of Los Angeles
Attn: Adam Villani – via email to adam.villani@lacity.org

Re: DEIR (ENV-2011-2689-EIR) – ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) has long been concerned with traffic congestion on Sunset Blvd. and surrounding Brentwood streets, including San Vicente Blvd., which negatively affects thousands of Palisadians on a daily basis. Sunset is one of two primary routes of ingress and egress in the Palisades, the other is Pacific Coast Highway; it is the most direct route to Brentwood, the 405 Freeway and areas north/east for many community members who travel that route regularly to and from work. Traffic at peak travel times on Sunset, San Vicente and neighboring streets is extremely congested creating potentially stressful driving conditions for commuters.

In reference to traffic conditions, PPCC notes the conclusion of the Department of Transportation (DOT) that six locations will be significantly impacted under certain scenarios by the project and that these impacts cannot be mitigated (DEIR Appendix P2, 2/7/14 DOT traffic assessment letter, pp. 3, 5-6).

We are concerned in light of the conclusion that the project as proposed may lead to further increased levels of traffic congestion and negative impacts not only on Brentwood but also on Pacific Palisades including potentially increasing the already delayed emergency response during peak hours.

We request that the final EIR specifically address:

1. potential traffic impacts on Pacific Palisades and whether or not any such impacts
can be mitigated;
2. the accuracy and/or validity of the DOT’s conclusions that six locations will be
significantly impacted, which impacts cannot be mitigated; and
3. the cumulative impact of the proposed project along with impacts generated by the
operations of nearby schools, including Paul Revere Middle School, St. Martin of Tours
Elementary School, the Sunshine Preschool, the Brentwood School (lower and upper
schools) and other nearby religious schools and facilities.

Sincerely,
Barbara Kohn
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc: Councilmember Mike Bonin, CD11
Tricia Keane, Planning Director, CD11

ITEM 8.1.1 – BYLAWS COMMITTEE REPORT AND SECOND READING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS ARTICLE IX (MEETINGS)
ARTICLE IX
MEETINGS
Sec. 1. MEETINGS SHALL BE PUBLIC. All PPCC and Board meetings shall be open to the public and to the press, except for confidential matters which relate to personnel issues or litigation.
Sec. 2. SCHEDULE. The regular meetings of the PPCC shall be on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month except when the Board has voted to cancel one or more of such meetings. The Chair, or in the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair, may call Special Meetings of the PPCC as the Chair or Vice-Chair deems necessary.
Sec. 3. MINUTES. Minutes of each PPCC meeting shall be [] electronically available to Board members and the public.
Sec. 4. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The Order of Business for the Board shall be as follows, subject to the Chair’s discretion to rearrange the order of agenda items:
1. Reading of the PPCC’s Mission from the Bylaws.
2.Introduction of the Board and Audience.
3.Certification of Quorum.
4.Approval and Adoption of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
5.Consideration of the Agenda.
6.Treasurer’s Report.
7. Announcements and Concerns from Board Members.
8. Reports of Committees.
9.Old Business.
10.New Business.
11.General Public Comment
12.Adjournment
Sec. 5. AGENDAS.
Any member of the Board desiring to have an item included on the Agenda of a meeting shall make a request to the Chair at least ten days in advance of the meeting. The Chair shall place the matter on the Agenda. The member requesting that the item be placed on the Agenda shall furnish information concerning the request prior to the meeting, preferably by email. At the discretion of the Chair, an item requiring action by the Board shall be added to the agenda no later than four days prior to the meeting and the requestor shall at the discretion of the chair provide sufficient information regarding that item
A copy of the Agenda shall be [] distributed to the PPCC email list, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting except when a Special Meeting is called, in which case the Agenda will be [] distributed 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Sec. 6. PUBLIC INPUT. Subject to the Chair’s discretion to limit the total amount of time allocated on particular issues and for each individual speaker, every member of the public attending a PPCC Meeting shall have the opportunity to directly address the Board on any agenda item [] at the appropriate time for such comment. General Public Comment shall be reserved for non-Board members to speak on any item of interest to the public [] within the subject matter jurisdiction of the PPCC, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the [] distributed agenda.

ITEM 10.2 — [PROPOSED] MOTION IN SUPPORT OF BACKYARD BEEKEEPING IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONES  [Ref. only; motion not made]

EMAIL:
katherine.peterson@lacity.org
councilmember.huizar@lacity.org
councilmember.cedillo@lacity.org
councilmember.englander@lacity.org

CC:
mike.bonin@lacity.org
councilmember.labonge@lacity.org
councilmember.ofarrell@lacity.org
martin.schlageter@lacity.org
mayor.garcetti@lacity.org
info@honeylove.org

PPCC MOTION: Letter of support re: Council File: 12-0785 Beekeeping / Single Family Residential (R1) Zones
SUBJECT: Council File: 12-0785 Beekeeping / Single Family Residential (R1) Zones
The Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) supports making the legalization of beekeeping and the establishment of a humane bee rescue policy one of the City of Los Angeles’ top priorities.
Bees are an essential part of our food system. According to the USDA, bees are responsible for the production of about a third of our diet. In addition, bees are a boon to local gardeners and urban farmers.
Honeybees worldwide are in crisis. They have fallen prey to the Colony Collapse Disorder at an alarming rate and are making beekeeping a serious food security issue.
In recent years, urban beekeeping has gained widespread attention and acceptance. For example, the Cities of San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Portland, Denver, Chicago, Santa Monica, and Redondo Beach have all taken decisive action to legalize urban beekeeping.
With all that in mind, the PPCC urges the City of Los Angeles to support efforts to: develop a new ordinance which will legalize beekeeping within R1 districts in Los Angeles; improve Bee Rescue policy; and create a legal bee yard within the city of Los Angeles that will operate as a secure, temporary holding area for feral honeybee colonies that are awaiting relocation to agricultural zones outside city limits.
REFERENCE: LA City Council File 12-0785
http://cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkconnect/index.cfm?fa=ccfi.viewrecord&cfnumber=12-0785
Thank you for taking the time to consider this globally important issue.

ITEM 10.2 — [PROPOSED] MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO “BACKYARD BEEKEEPING” IN ALL SINGLE FAMILY (RESIDENTIAL, “R”) ZONES  [Ref. only; motion not made]
by Jennifer Malaret & Barbara Kohn

“If you care about blueberries, you care about this.”
City Councilmember Mike Bonin quoted in support of exploring legalization for beekeeping in single-family homes & neighborhoods throughout Los Angeles, 02/12/2014.

“If we don’t vote FOR it it’ll be buzz kill.”
– City Councilmember Mitchell Englander joked, 02/12/2014.
.
“The swarm of bees darkened the sky above Rob and Chelsea McFarland’s backyard before settling into a football-sized honeycomb on a tree branch. Most people would find this sight terrifying but the beekeeping couple knew better than to panic . . . [] as many as 30,000 bees call [one honeycomb] home”
– Rob & Chelsea McFarland, LA Non-Profit Organization “Honeylove”

“City staffers [must] make sure the report explains how hazards and potential heath issues such as bee allergies would be addressed.”
City Councilmember Bernard Parks, 02/12/2014

Blondie: “You see, in this world there’s two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.”
1966 Movie, “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.”

INTRODUCTION/LEGISLATIVE HISTORY.

We care deeply about the preservation of R1 zones and the quality of life within them. We have watched allergic family and friends experience “Anaphylaxis” which is the inability to breathe and occurs within seconds or minutes of a bee sting. We knew nothing about this proposed ordinance until last week – the City has done no outreach, gave no notice to PPCC/the Palisades/the local press regarding the sponsoring motion (2012), gave no notice for the recent Planning presentation (March 2015), and the public comment deadline has now passed for the first public hearing (May 2015) .

So we decided to dig. And to keep digging until we understood how such a sweeping amendment to the zoning code had gotten seemingly so far with such little attention.

Backyard beekeeping is illegal in a majority (58%) of cities within Los Angeles County . In the minority of cities that do permit bees in R zones, there are large differences in how these cities regulate the practice, public opinion and municipal codes. Currently in LA, bees exist in a “legal grey area”, i.e., the County allows them but the City has no laws pertaining to urban beekeeping on private property. If bees are found on public property, the City must exterminate them. There is no overwhelming precedent to allow backyard beekeeping on private property in single-family neighborhoods throughout Los Angeles.

The purpose of the City Council’s Motion (2012, Rosendahl) was to authorize the exploration of backyard beekeeping “in single family residential (“R1″) zones . . . as a practice to foster healthier bee population[s].” Supporting council file evidence was scant:

1. Santa Monica had passed an ordinance that allowed a maximum of 2 hives in single-family backyards. There were only three people keeping bees in Santa Monica; a fourth was removed after a swarm attacked a neighboring barbeque.

2. Mar Vista’s Stakeholder Beekeeping Survey, intended for a pilot program that garnered a mere 212 responses from the public. 173 people supported the idea. 89 of those people (51%) refused to participate and did not want to have bees.

3. “Councilman Bill Rosendahl, who [was] picking up greens for his turkeys and chickens and finches and cockatiels [didn’t] need to be lobbied about bees . . . “you got me, babe” he tells the McFarlands. “We’re with ya!” He puts forth a motion asking the City Planning Department to amend the zoning code to allow beekeeping in residential zones.”

Of course, the City of Los Angeles is very different than the City of Santa Monica or the limited area of Mar Vista. LA has almost four million people and one million children under the age of 18. The number of allergic persons is truly unknown, with estimates ranging from one or two people per 1,000 to between two and five percent of the population (ie, hundreds of thousands of people within the City of LA). In light of Planning’s assertion that “allowing backyard beekeeping in single family zones would help support the bee population” we dug for answers but didn’t get any: (i) how many backyard R1 beekeepers do there need to be to support the bee population? (ii) how many hives does the City look/need to add in the City of LA and within the Palisades? (iii) at an estimated 30,000 bees per honeycomb and colonies of up to 60,000 individuals what is the total amount of non-naturally existing bees projected to be added? (iv) how many adults and children live in R1 zoned areas and will be potentially affected? (iv) how are the bees going to get into single-family neighborhoods?

II. THE ORDINANCE FAILS TO PROTECT BACKYARD BEEKEEPERS
AND THE BEES.
Rosendahl’s motion claimed that it is “in the interest of the City’s residents to promote the growth of healthier honey bee colonies, to harvest honey bee by-products such as honey and wax, to increase pollination of local trees, vines and plants, and to decrease the inhumane removal of honey bees in the City.” There are current backyard beekeepers who are a small group of passionate, dedicated, well trained, responsible and considerate beekeepers who commit many hours a week to nurturing their backyard beehives and educating their fellow beekeepers. The LA movement is well funded and well organized and has been working towards this ordinance for at least four years (honeylove.org) .

We dug. We don’t understand why this proposed ordinance is completely void of any regulations to protect “good” beekeepers and fails to require best practices for backyard beekeeping. Backyard beekeepers, confident in the safety of their bees, should readily agree to follow regulations and accept liability. Thus, any ordinance considered by the City of LA must correct the following deficiencies of the current draft:

There are no educational requirements, no training requirements, no written test, and no minimum age limits. For $10 anyone can register with the County to be a backyard beekeeper .
No City of Los Angeles Planning Department Land Use sign off is required for this accessory use. Registration with the City’ Animal Control is not required.
No proof of ownership, property or bees, is required.
No proof of insurance is required.
There are no requirements for beekeepers to have the right clothing (bee suit, gloves, boots), right equipment (hive tool, honey extractor), moveable frames and combs, a bait hive (to prevent swarming by giving bees a place to reside outside of their normal hive), hives that are not infected or purchased second-hand, and sealed containers or other bee proof enclosures within which to sore hive maintenance materials .
“Even with a few colonies weekly inspections are needed.” There are no inspection requirements to ensure that barriers are in place, bees have fresh water so they don’t go elsewhere to hydrate, bees are not aggravated, that there is sufficient forage on-site and apiary hygiene is sufficient to prevent the spread of pests and diseases.
There are no requirements to have a queen bee present in the hive or to re-queen the hive to prevent swarming.
There is no requirement to have a bee smoker on hand to subdue the bees if they get out of control.
Registration does not include acceptance of liability by the beekeepers “for any personal injury or property damage that occurs in connection with the keeping and maintaining of bees, bee equipment, queen breeding equipment, apiaries and appliances” .
Registration does not require a backyard beekeeper to maintain medication on-site.
Registration does not put information in the emergency response system so that firefighters, police and paramedics know before hand that they might encounter bees at the property .
Registration does not enable the Department of Building & Safety to track hives in their own category so they cannot track complaints about managed hives.
Registered beekeepers do not have to agree to give the City or County a right of entry for removal of deficient or abandoned hives .

THIS ORDINANCE FAILS TO PROTECT RESIDENTS

The operation of backyard beekeeping can be “a highly impactful use in R zones” and thus any proposed change to the LAMC must “involve community input”. The trouble with honeybees, of course is that they sting and some people are extremely allergic. “That is a huge issue,” Rosendahl said, adding that any ordinance will have to deal with the issue of neighbors.” “And if Rosendahl was kismet [to the backyard beekeepers], neighborhood are a bitch.”

We dug. Based on a conversation with Planning we learned, in sum: (i) there are no guidelines developed, (ii) there is no definition for defensive or objectionable bee behavior, (iii) as for liability, how do you know who owns the bees? (iv) they do not know who is going to enforce the ordinance, (v) they did not talk with the Fire Department, (vi) they did not talk with Vector Control, and (vii) they did not consider schools or parks.

Planning claims to just write the amendment to modify land use. Planning asserts they do not deal with bee behavior. Councilmember Bonin has expressed support for this ordinance, stating in addition: “Currently, we allow single-family homes to do truck gardening — growing berries, flowers, fruits, herbs, mushrooms and nuts for private use or for sale at farmers’ markets . . . this proposal would afford the same opportunity for beekeeping. ” Pacific Palisades is a residential community, not an agricultural one. While we understand the necessity of bees in agriculture, the same is not true in residential neighborhoods. With all due respect to Councilmember Bonin, perhaps people are allergic to fruit or nuts but they don’t fly from house to house.

Thus:

We oppose any effort to modify the existing Code and beekeeping in all single-family zones should remain illegal.
To the extent that any ordinance is considered by the City of LA, it should be on a “pilot program basis”, limited in scope (perhaps to “R zones that abut A zones” or “R Zones that abut I Zones”) and temporary in time .
To the extent this ordinance would apply to said pilot program, the following deficiencies in the current draft must be corrected:

Notice to adjacent and surrounding neighbors must be required. The prior feasibility study on which this ordinance is based concluded, “notification to abutting residents is a pre-requisite for obtaining clearance from the city to register with the county” thus there should be no dispute remedying this omission. Sign offs from immediate neighbors due to allergies and backyard enjoyment should also be required.
The ordinance must cap allowable hives per lot. The prior feasibility study on which this ordinance is based included a general requirement that no more than two hives may be maintained on any single-family residential property”. HoneyLove agrees there should be only 2 hives per lot. Santa Monica and San Diego both cap hives at 2 per lot. Other cities impose stricter regulations for more than 2 hives per lot. Inexplicably, the proposed ordinance allows 1 hive for every 2,500 square feet with no upward cap. There are many hillside and bluff properties in the Palisades with little flat land but due to large square footage calculations (due to up and down slopes) that could have a dozen or more hives 5 feet from their neighbors. There is no reason to allow an unlimited number of hives on a R1 lot particularly since the original feasibility study also found that two hives is sufficient for healthy beekeeping practices.
The ordinance must not allow hives to be mounted 8 feet above ground without barriers of any kind. Since the ordinance also proposes to allow hives behind a six-foot wall or vegetative barrier between hives and adjacent lots why isn’t that sufficient? There are no findings or compelling reasons given to also allow mounting of unprotected higher hives particularly since many Palisades neighborhoods have 2 and 3 story homes in close proximity to each other. Further, in a grid system of housing like the Palisades there is frankly no way to be “positioning hives to face away from neighbors” without the necessity of having the hives facing the sidewalks and streets. That should not be done without barriers given that children, the elderly and public walk expecting some modicum of safety from urbanized bees “carrying out their work of pollination.”
The ordinance must contain a concentration limit (“cap”) on how many beekeepers can be registered within a certain lineal foot distance of each other (or per square mile, zip code or other acceptable standard).
The ordinance must require distance limits from “sensitive uses” such as schools, public parks and churches .
Performance standards, guidelines and language for “objectionable behavior” must be written into the ordinance, and that language must be based on input from independent third party experts as well as ordinance sponsors and opposing residents. The original feasibility study on which this ordinance was based offered the following language for offenders, now absent: “1. Colonies of bees [that] exhibit defensive or objectionable behavior, or interfere with the normal use of neighboring properties. 2. Colonies of bees [that] swarm. 3. Bees or hives [that] do not conform to this code. 4. Hives [that] become abandoned by resident bees or by the owner.”
The ordinance must clarify liability for the City, the beekeepers and the victim resident(s). Are bees subject to a ‘one bite’ rule like dogs? In Santa Monica there is a $250 fine for an infraction; a misdemeanor infraction carries a fine of $1,000 and no more than 6 months in county jail .
The ordinance must clearly set forth meaningful enforcement authority and process . To wit: (i) currently the LA Department of Agriculture says to call them. Their rep said they have never prosecuted an insect case because “of course” it is difficult to prove whom the offending bee belongs to. (ii) since the ordinance changes the zoning code, calls to LADBS could enforce it. (iii) or bees could be treated like off-leash dogs, resulting in calls to LAPD. (iv) or bees could be treated like snakes, resulting in calls to Animal Control.
The ordinance must include fees to cover inspection costs (at minimum part of any future abatement order).
The ordinance must include language to regulate the “exit strategy” for registered beekeepers no longer interested in keeping bees. Although required by the sponsoring motion, there is no language for the “inhumane” removal of bees nor is there any mention of how the Bureau of Street Services (which handles calls about unwanted hives) relocates “nuisance” hives or promotes alternatives to extermination.
There needs to be a dialogue about whether the ordinance should prohibit feral bees (wild swarms) and chemical treatments. Should residents be allowed to catch a feral swarm in the wild for free or for around $100 have to purchase a hive from a breeder. The Los Angeles County Beekeepers Association favors purchased hives because their genetics are known and believes that feral bees are unpredictable (even some organic beekeepers like HoneyLove kill the feral queen when they first catch a swarm, replacing her with a selectively bred queen).

V. PROPOSED MOTION & CONCLUSION

April 23, 2015 BACKYARD BEEKEEPING IN SINGLE-FAMILY ZONES MOTION.
Jennifer Malaret and Barbara Kohn. Upon motion by _________,
Seconded by __________ the Council approved the following resolution:

PACIFIC PALISADES COMMUNITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION RELATED TO THE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES’, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, COUNCIL FILE 12-0875; CASE CPC-2015-578-CA. Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Pacific Palisades Community Council OPPOSES the Ordinance as currently written.

We are done digging. If you have chosen to read this far, we trust you agree that it is irrefutable that this ordinance as presently written must be rejected on its face – notwithstanding the “blueberries and buzz kill.”

Sincerely,

Jennifer Malaret, PPCC Secretary
Barbara Kohn, PPCC President Emeritus

i http://patch.com/california/venice/the-beekeepers-of-mar-vista’ http//articles.latimes.com/2014feb/12/local/la-me0213-bees-20140213.
ii Per 4/17/15 email from Norman Kulla, CD-11 will reach out to Planning Deputies to find out why PPCC, Brentwood CC and Westwood CC received no notice on this matter – particularly following CM Bonin’s motion to instruct the same.
iii The LA Times ran a single article in 2014.
iv A majority of cities (49 out of 84) expressly prohibit bees or do not mention bees (or apiaries) in their codes making backyard beekeeping illegal. Only 35 cities permit bees. 42 cities reference bees in their municipal codes and 21 cities reference them in zoning codes. Source: LA County Cultivate LA.
v http://smdp.com/urban-beekeeping-taking-root-in-santa-monica/85256
vi http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2012/12-0785_pc_12-10-13.pdf. A total of 2,886 signatures were received including on-line petitions in “local, national and international areas” through change.org.
vii http://www.laweekly.com/news/could-la-become-a-honeybee-mecca-the-backwards-beekeepers-are-on-it-2614312. “I don’t care if laws exist or don’t exist . . . anybody who doesn’t support this is crazy . . . Ed Reyes, Bill Rosendahl, brother! You know I did that motion – it has to do with beekeeping in single-family residences and I’m trying to make law out of it – I’d like to ask you to get it out of committee and get it before the full council.” “You know, I have three beehives in my property. One is already creating honey,” he tells Reyes. “Great. Great. Thank you babe.” “Rosendahl’s successor [] Mike Bonin has agreed to take up the cause.”
viii http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2012/12-0785_pc_12-10-13.pdf.
ix http://www.ars.usda.gov/Research/docs.htm?docid=11067.
x http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services/pdf/news/beekeeping.pdf.
xihttp://www.komonews.com/news/local/Millions-of-bees-swarm-I-5-in-Lynnwood-as-bee-truck-crashes-300280101.html. Yet, “Bees [are] very popular.” “It’s the adrenaline and a smile.” “The Griffith Park people said, ‘You are the most delightful agenda item we’ve ever had,’ Chelsea recalls. “We try to rock that.” “Chelsea McFarland, a dancer, sees a cooperative, all-female, vegetarian society communicating through dance. Rob realizes that bees are a ‘super organism.'” See FN #7.
xii LA County Beekeepers Association and the Backwards Beekeepers agree on one matter. “We are for urbanized beekeeping but we want to make sure it is done with the proper training.” “What constitutes proper training, however is the kicker. Do you chemically treat your bees and otherwise deploy the full range of technology available? Or do you call it “backwards”, trust in nature’s wisdom and [] let the bees be bees?” See FN #7.
xiii “A HoneyLove staffer was stung 30 times on the face the first time she inspective a hive. She was new to beekeeping and cavalier about it . . . bees have facial recognition . . . so they know to go for your eyes . . . it was a good lesson . . . she experienced phantom pains.” See FN 7.
xiv http://www.nationalbeeunit.com/index.cfm?sectionnid=70. Santa Monica requires inspection of the property by Animal Control officers.
xv http://smdp.com/urban-beekeeping-taking-root-in-santa-monica/85256. The County of LA merely requires access (MVCC feasibility study, p.20).
xvi http://homeguides.sfgate.com/dangers-back-yard-bee-hive-56367.html. Santa Monica & San Diego require hives to be re-queened every two years. The MVCC Beekeeping Feasibility Study (p.21) recommended including a regulation that: “Colonies shall be re-queened following any swarming or aggressive behavior.”
xvii We note the council file contained a West Virginia committee bill & 2010 article reporting that West Virginia became the first state to pass a law giving bee keepers complete immunity from civil liability for ordinary negligence provided they follow 14 rules.
xviii The obvious analogy is that anyone registered to engage in a high fire risk activity would want/be required to have a fire extinguisher on hand.
xix Santa Monica gives registration information to emergency responders.
xx In San Francisco, the Department of Public Health can issue citations and require mitigation of any hazard including reducing the size of the colonies, moving the hives to another parcel or requiring that all beekeeping operations in an area cease altogether. Http//www.sfenvironment.org/article/animal-husbandry/regulations-on-beekeeping-by-the-san-francisco-department-of-public-health.
xxi LA Weekly, June 2013. We note also that HoneyLove says, “It’s like if you owned a vineyard, and within the community we share each others honey. It’s like fine wine.” We respectfully disagree. So does the City of San Diego that says, among other things: if you keep bees you will be stung . . . and other hazards clearly not present in grape growing.
xxii http://www.sandiego.gov/development-services/pdf/news/beekeeping.pdf
xxiii See FN #7.
xxiv See FN#7. We asked Norman Kulla if Councilmember supports this ordinance “as written.” No reply was received.
xxv It is simply not appropriate to allow backyard beekeeping under undiscriminating practices and guidelines throughout all single-family zones of Los Angeles – which are nowhere near zoning where bees are legally permitted currently. Start small with a system for notice, tracking, complaints and effective enforcement and see how it goes. Paul Hekimian, also with HoneyLove, [would] like to see L.A. adopt rules similar to what his community has in place. “The ordinance here in Santa Monica is very simple,” says Hekimian. You are allowed to have two hives facing five feet away from your neighbor’s property line.” http://blogs.kcrw.com/goodfood/2014/01/can-l-a-become-a-bee-friendly-city/.
xxvi MVCC Beekeeping Feasibility Study, p. 20.
xxvii Page 1 of the DCP report also states that “requiring minimum distances from lot lines to public rights-of-way [results in] interactions between bees and neighboring humans [being] minimized.” No findings or studies are provided to evidence that bees understand 5-foot set backs, where lot lines are drawn and PROWs.
xxviii Kids cannot bring nuts and peanut butter to school . . . but an adjacent homeowner can keep hives next door to a school? How will the Department of Recreation and Parks be required to adjust their programming if homes adjacent to the park have bee hives less than 5 feet away? Has there been a Revenue Impact Statement done? What is the position of the Department of Recreation and Parks? Do they support the draft ordinance as written? Does it change school release policies? What are the risks to LAUSD and other schools if they release an allergic child to a backyard beekeeper? Does LAUSD support the ordinance as written?
xxix Urban Beekeeping – City Comparison Matrix (by Honeylove.org).
xxx Jan Selder, director of operations at the City’s Department of Animal Services, can’t remember enforcing a single beekeeping violation in her 18 years of fieldwork. Neither can anyone at code enforcement. No one really goes out on bee calls. See FN#7.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR MAY 14th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Donna Vaccarino, Amy Kalp, Kelly Comras, Stuart Muller, George Wolfberg, Maryam Zar, Peter Culhane, Reza Akef, Rick Mills and Cathy Russell.

Voting Alternates:  Ted Mackie and Brian Deming,

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Bruce Schwartz, David Kaplan, Doug McCormick and Barbara Marinacci.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Richard Cohen read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:09 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the April 23, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings. 5/28/15: (1) LAFD Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Castro – fire season threat and LAFD new operational structure. (2) Presentation by Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (PPHTF): status update and plans going forward. Stephanie Cohen (Field Representative, Assemblymember Richard Bloom) and Maryam Zar (Chair, PPHTF). 06/11/15: PPCC Candidates Forum (if applicable); 2015/2016 Officer Elections. 06/25/15 – California Walks Presentation (http://californiawalks.org). The July PPCC meeting will be held on July 23, 2015.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of May 14, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,844.56. The one significant transaction was $626 paid for web and email expenditures.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules. 1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    Backyard Beekeeping Ordinance.

Chris reported that the City Planning Commission (“CPC”) hearing was this morning and the draft ordinance was approved as written. The draft ordinance will move forward to the City’s Planning and Land Use Management Committee (“PLUM”) at some point in the future. PPCC has not taken a position on the ordinance and Chris stated that the topic may or may not be taken up in the future.

7.1.3.    16900-17000 Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.

Chris reported that the Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”) appeal hearing scheduled for June 3, 2015 has been postponed until September 2, 2015. Plans for a reduced project are to be presented at a future PPCC meeting. Chris reported that the date of the presentation is TBD.

7.1.4.    Support for Senate Bill 218 (ending photo enforcement of stop signs in MRCA parklands).

http://huff.cssrc.us/content/huff-weekly-capitol-comment-april-23-2015.  See attached letter. Chris reported that the bill did not pass in committee (chaired by Fran Pavley) but the committee voted unanimously to reconsider it, perhaps in January 2016.

7.1.5.    Suggestions/Complaints.

Submit suggested bylaws changes to Jennifer Malaret. Submit other constructive suggestions for improvement and/or concerns/complaints to Chris Spitz or Barbara Kohn. Board members may submit agenda requests pursuant to PPCC bylaws, Art. IX.5.A. Board members are also requested to inform Chris of any complaints received from community members and to encourage anyone with concerns to contact Chris for accurate information about PPCC process and activities.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore.  Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.

(1) the VA hearing was very positive and (think these “outsiders” actually are staffers from outside of the local VA; one, I think from Arizona, you could double check with NK) outsiders have been brought in to help the veterans and take control of what is going to be done. In early June there will be an announcement about who the urban planner will be with the idea being to go back to the 1888 deed to create a home that is veteran centric with services at the VA campus. (2) Norman announced he will be retiring on July 1, 2015.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month). Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4. California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.  Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu.  Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) Stuart Muller (Area 6) explained the geographical boundaries of Area 6. (2) Cathy Russell (Area 7) reported that the annual Rustic Nights will be in the clubhouse on Saturday June 6, 2015 at 6 pm and is a fundraiser to support the restoration of the facility. Interested persons should contact Cathy or rusticnight.org .

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.

(1) Pacific Palisades Woman’s Club. Stuart Muller advocated the club’s free exercise class for seniors on Wednesdays and Fridays starting at 10:30 am. (2) Historical Society – Barbara Kohn informed the public about an upcoming presentation on Thelma Todd. (3) Chamber of Commerce – the Expo is this Sunday, an always popular event with classic cars.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Maryam Zar, PP Homeless Task Force. The next general meeting May 26, 2015, 6:30-8 p.m., Palisades branch library. Joe Castro will also be speaking. For more information contact pacpalihtf@gmail.com. (2) Jennifer Malaret, Pacific Palisades Park Advisory Board (“PP-PAB”). The Park Rangers are enforcing park regulations for the safety of everyone: it is illegal to have your dog off leash in the park, recent incidents have brought attention to safety of kids and all patrons, other regulations include no smoking anywhere in the park, parking in the park is for the use of park patrons, no alcohol is allowed and there is no camping or lodging permitted. (3) Barbara Kohn reported that the Design Review Board (“DRB”) met last night regarding a building identification sign request at 881 Alma Real Drive made by the Palisadian Post. The DRB did not support (approve?)the proposed signage.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.1.    Nominating Committee – Cathy Russell (Chair).

Cathy reported that the decision was unanimous to nominate as Officers for 2015/2016 Chris Spitz (President), Vice President (Maryam Zar), Secretary (Jennifer Malaret) and Richard Cohen (Treasurer). Chris thanked Andrew Wolfberg for his support and all of the work that he has done this past year for PPCC and announced that with Andrew’s regrets he will be unable to return. Cathy announced that the recommendations are nominations only and nominations of anyone else seeking an Officer position can now be made. Board members have until 8:45 pm at the May 28, 2015 meeting to nominate additional candidates.

8.1.2.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

(a) The Committee met on May 7, 2015. (1) First Reading: the Committee unanimously recommends the proposed changes to Article IX (meetings); see attached. The language is the same as the most recent two PPCC agendas & readings except to codify in Section 2 (Schedule) the more than decade-long practice of PPCC to hold only one meeting during four months of the year and to correct a typo in Section 4 (Order of Business). (b) Input from two board members was discussed at length on topics including the Executive Committee, Secretary, Minutes, Composition of Committees, Agenda and Legal Advisor. (c) The Committee will be returning to other matters originally scheduled pursuant to and pending input from the Chair and Board: Organizational membership/ process/structure, Area & At-Large Representative elections including inclusion of the term “Primary Residence”. Long-term topics of consideration may be Discipline, Code of Conduct, addition of Conflict of Interest rules, and simplification of the overall document. For information, questions or comments, please contact Jennifer Malaret at malaret5@me.com.

8.1.3.    Outreach Committee – Like Us on Facebook: facebook.com/pacpalicc.

Chirs reported that PPCC Farmers Market table events are continuing (next event: May 17, 2015, 9 a.m.-12 p.m.). To receive future PPCC meeting agendas and notices, send a request to info@pacpalicc.org.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO) – Proposed Amendments.

Discussion. Do we need amendments to close loopholes in existing law? Should or can any Palisades neighborhoods be included in the related Interim Control Ordinance? Do homeowners in affected neighborhoods (particularly the Alphabet Streets) want further restrictions on the size of home construction? Presentation: Tricia Keane, Planning & Land Use Director, CD11. Planners working on the ordinance are Tom Rothmann and Erik Lopez. Tricia stated that the BMO Interim Control Ordinance (“ICO”) was adopted for the two-year term allowed by state law. The BMO ICO does not apply to the Palisades, nor is there the opportunity to apply it. In CD11 it applies to Kentwood, Mar Vista and Venice east of Lincoln Blvd. The BMO does not apply in most of the Palisades. It only applies to SFR zoned properties, not in the Coastal Zone therefore it is relevant primarily to the Alphabet Streets in the Palisades. Tricia passed out a map. Tricia stated at this point there is no discussion within the City about expanding the BMO to apply to any area that it does not presently cover. The City’s ZIMAS system will disclose by address if any property is subject to the BMO. For properties where the BMO applies, nothing has changed as of today. For the BMO as it applies citywide there are things that are in the “works”. Changes began with the Kortez motion to “close loopholes in the BMO.” The BMO was adopted as a means to deal with out of scale development. The tool that the BMO uses to do that is the upper limit on the floor area ratios (“FAR”s). The FARs are the same throughout the city despite much different conditions. The exceptions and bonuses to FAR limits may not have achieved what was originally hoped to achieve citywide because some perceive that the context of the neighborhoods is ignored. The BMO was adopted in 2008 after the wave of development from the prior housing boom. When the BMO was put into affect the pace of development was much slower than it is today. The economic recovery is what prompted Councilmember Koretz to ask that the regulations be reconsidered. Part 1 of that reconsideration is the ICO – again not applicable to the Palisades. Part 2 is to prepare amendments to the citywide BMO that will then apply to everywhere the BMO applies. Planning still needs to develop the recommendations. The Kortez motion listed a number of things that Planning was directed to consider which was essentially to reconsider the entirety of the BMO provisions. Planning expects 18 months to work through this process and the public will be allowed to weigh in to the planners. The hope is that future changes would be sensitive to community contexts rather than the “one size fits all” approach that we have now. The city is also working on creating new single-family zones through the ReCodeLA effort. Those new neighborhoods will talk about building envelopes and other measures not just the FAR like we do today. Presentation: Richard Blumenberg, AIA, Civic League President. Richard reiterated that what was passed in terms of the ICO relate to five historic overlay zones. The other areas affected by the BMO had criteria not consistently applied and involving basements, the bonus and FARs. The Civic League believes that the BMO was a “rush to judgment” and that primarily further area restrictions should be included in the BMO. Richard said the height allowances in the BMO result in the ability of owners to have a box at the set back line and the Civic League would like to see a height envelope going from 22 feet at the setback to 28 feet maximum height in Tract 9300. The Civic League believes that the City should not reduce the base area of all lots including those less than 7,500 square feet to 45 percent. A 5,000 square foot lot would only allow a 2,250 square foot house. This is too small of an area for this size lot. Additionally the Civic League believes there is a problem in the Alphabet streets with second floor roof-decks and set backs that should be adjusted in response to concerns that neighbors have a loss of privacy. Richard encouraged the City to include the coastal zone in the BMO to primarily control the height of structures. Part of the ICO exceptions relate to covered porches and covered porches on the first floor; those eliminate the mass of a house and make the second floor step back and that is something positive. Richard passed out various handouts and a chart. Discussion: (1) are the values listed for the ground floor footprint? The BMO gives you a base percentage which is a percentage of the total lot and is for the first and second floor but in some cases a bonus area is possible. (2) in the height comparison chart are the side set backs different? Yes, 2 feet or so. So the width is not the same; as you go up the house gets narrower. Is it fair to say that existing rules do add contour to the existing house? The BMO has no envelope, the set back is based only on the height of the project. (3) a resident recalled a similar effort to regulate years ago. The three issues were loss of privacy, the loss of light and the loss of views. Do the regulations accomplish what we set out to do and put us where we want to be? Before we have more regulations let’s think about the unintended consequences. (4) any proposal should be closely examined and too much regulation that restricts the size of what can be built would effect property values and that could negatively affect the elderly and retired who want to sell their properties for the value they deserve. (5) BMO is a haphazard public policy. It seems like a reactionary step during a building boom to respond to a few but loudest voices. Not all large houses are ugly houses. The one size fits all attempt is a reaction to people complaining about large houses. Public policy has to address local standards and the feasibility of local implementation. (6) to build a new house, residents have to comply with new rules that are very tough and I cannot build what I have now and what my neighbors have and under the new rules I can build less than what I have now. It is not fair to people who have invested and then cannot build on a lot that costs so much or in comparable size to the neighborhood. (7) infrastructures are failing and the more we build big structures it exacerbates the problem. (8) houses in the Palisades are different. Why not focus on enforcements of permits first? Tricia stated that the compliance unit is being staffed up but initially it will be focused narrowly on certain conditional use permits. To enforce building size there are a lot of houses built prior to the BHO. Anything built before 2008 does not have the same FAR in place today. There are some projects in the works that were grandfathered in under the old rules which is consistent across the board as to how new zoning codes are applied. (9) does the table increase proportionally? The formula is based on a percentage times the area so it is proportional. (10) creativity goes into pushing the limits of the guidelines. A house with non-conforming set backs of 3 feet was used to grandfather in the setbacks even though the structure was not saved. Side yards are important because they allow safe access in emergency situations and landscaping for privacy concerns. The overall square footage should be calculated based on the gross square footage and not the net to reduce the bulk of new homes. Additional information about residential zoning and mansionization: (http://recode.la/sites/default/files/file_attachments/event/ZAC%20Presentation%2025Mar2015_Single%20Family%20Residential%20Zones.pdf (3-25-15 Power Point presentation to the Zoning Advisory Committee associated with the re:codeLA initiative to rewrite the Los Angeles Zoning Code). http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-0656_rpt_PLAN_04-17-2015.pdf (4-17-15 City Planning Dept. report re BMO amendment process; see pp. 2-3, Amending the BMO and Creating Contextual Single Family Zones (reference re:codeLA initiative)).

10.2.    Short Term Residential Vacation Rentals.

Are these forms of commercial activity allowed in low-density residential zones? Should they be regulated further and/or subject to transient lodging/local hotel taxes?  Presentation: Tricia Keane, CD11. Tricia stated that in the City of LA the concept of short-term rentals was renting out a space in your house or home sharing which is different then renting out a home or apartment building you don’t live in. The CAO released a report about the impact on the shared economy from short-term rentals where the gist is that the CAO recommended that the City undertake a comprehensive outreach program to ensure that input is received about the real issues and what workable regulations could be. Likely in LA any regulations would likely be more broad than Santa Monica. Councilmember Bonin is most concerned with affordable housing and the amount/expense of rental housing stock. Tricia reported that Councilmember Bonin is concerned that a proliferation of short-term rentals means that housing stock is not available to regular homeowners and regular renters. Tricia suggested that maybe there is a limit on the total number of days a house can be rented out or how many rentals can be in a certain area. Discussion. (1) under the current zoning regulations if the property is being rented for less than 30 days that activity is not allowed in single-family residential zones. Some of the enforcement challenges relate to savvy platforms that don’t have identifying information until the property is booked. (2) the concern in the Palisades is quality of life first and quantity of housing stock second. (3) short term rentals are a business and are getting an unfair subsidy and advantage because legitimate short-term rental operators pay tax and legal wages to their helpers. (4) in a local apartment building two units were rented by someone never intending to live there and the impact on the quality of life was terrible for the actual residents with travelers coming and going every 2 days. (5) safety is a concern without fire and public health inspections. (6) a short-term rental is less than 30 days. (7) CC&Rs and homeowner’s documents can have limitations. For the City of LA there could be conditions put into permits for new condominiums or condominium conversions. (8) the City should get out ahead of the problem. (9) an example was given of a house and garage in the Palisades Highlands being rented out for weddings and proms. Additional information: (1) http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2015/15-0002-S31_reso_03-31-2015.pdf (3-31-15 Motion (Wesson-Bonin; adopted 5/8/15) calling for a City Council resolution to oppose AB 1220, which would prohibit cities from levying local hotel/transient occupancy taxes on short term rentals). (2) http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635_mot_12-02-14.pdf (12-4-14 Motion (Bonin-Wesson; in Council Economic Development and PLUM Committees) calling for review, input and investigation regarding possible preparation of City ordinance to regulate short term vacation rentals). (3) http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/la-fi-santa-monica-council-votes-to-rein-in-shortterm-rentals-20150428-story.html (information about proposed new Santa Monica regulations).

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:33 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.4 – MAY 11, 2015 LETTER TO STATE SENATORS; SUPPORT FOR SB 218

May 11, 2015

To: Hon. California State Senators Robert Huff, Fran Pavley and Ben Allen

Via email:
Senator.huff@sen.ca.gov; cc junay.gardner@sen.ca.gov.
Senator.pavley@sen.ca.gov; cc kara.seward@sen.ca.gov.
Senator.allen@sen.ca.gov; cc sam.liu@sen.ca.gov.

Re: SUPPORT for Senate Bill 218 (Huff); in Natural Resources Committee 5/12/15

As the most broadly based organization in Pacific Palisades, Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) has been the voice of our community since 1973.

PPCC supports SB 218, which would end photo enforcement of stop signs by the Mountains Recreation Conservancy Authority (MRCA) within MRCA parklands. The legislative exception that MRCA carved out of the California Vehicle Code for itself several years ago was unwarranted and has been abused. This exception means that MRCA can install automated ticket issuing machines without measures required by the Vehicle Code including engineering studies, demonstration of need or any other justification for its stop sign photo enforcement. In fact, the two photo enforcement machines MRCA placed in Pacific Palisades’ Temescal Canyon Gateway Park are at intersections with no history of accidents or injury and very little traffic. As a result, PPCC has received numerous complaints about erroneous enforcement by these machines.
The reason that local entities were originally forbidden under the Vehicle Code from making their own traffic rules was to eliminate speed traps used by small towns in the Central Valley to raise local revenue through the unreasonable issuance of tickets. It should be noted that even the U.S. Air Force was required to comply with the Vehicle Code in a notable case. No entity should be exempt from the reasonable requirements of the Vehicle Code.

Thank you for your consideration and anticipated support of SB 218.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

ITEM 8.1.2 – BYLAWS COMMITTEE REPORT AND FIRST READING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS ARTICLE IX (MEETINGS)
ARTICLE IX
MEETINGS
Sec. 1. MEETINGS SHALL BE PUBLIC. All PPCC and Board meetings shall be open to the public and to the press, except for confidential matters which relate to personnel issues or litigation.
Sec. 2. SCHEDULE. The regular meetings of the PPCC shall be on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month except during July, August, November and December when there shall be one regular meeting, or when the Board has voted to cancel one or more of such meetings. The Chair, or in the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair, may call Special Meetings of the PPCC as the Chair or Vice-Chair deems necessary.
Sec. 3. MINUTES. Minutes of each PPCC meeting shall be [deleted: sent] electronically available to [deleted: all] Board members and [deleted: their Alternates and to such others in the Community as the Board directs, and shall be available to] the public.
Sec. 4. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The Order of Business for the Board shall be as follows, subject to the Chair’s discretion to rearrange the order of agenda items:
1. Reading of the PPCC’s Mission from the Bylaws.
2.Introduction of the Board and Audience.
3.Certification of Quorum.
4.[Deleted: Reading and Adoption] Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
5.Consideration of the Agenda.
6.Treasurer’s Report.
7. Announcements and Concerns from Board Members.
8. Reports of Committees.
9.Old Business.
10.New Business.
11.General Public Comment
12.Adjournment
Sec. 5. AGENDAS.
Any member of the Board desiring to have an item included on the Agenda of a meeting shall make a request to the Chair at least ten days in advance of the meeting. The Chair shall place the matter on the Agenda. The member requesting that the item be placed on the Agenda shall furnish information concerning the request prior to the meeting, preferably by email. At the discretion of the Chair, an item requiring action by the Board shall be added to the agenda no later than four days prior to the meeting and the requestor shall at the discretion of the chair provide sufficient information regarding that item
A copy of the Agenda shall be [deleted: posted in the Pacific Palisades Public Library and Post Office, on the PPCC Website and] distributed to the PPCC email list, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting except when a Special Meeting is called, in which case the Agenda will be [deleted: posted and] distributed 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Sec. 6. PUBLIC INPUT. Subject to the Chair’s discretion to limit the total amount of time allocated on particular issues and for each individual speaker, every member of the public attending a PPCC Meeting shall have the opportunity to directly address the Board on any agenda item [before or during the Board’s consideration of the item, and] at the appropriate time for such comment [deleted ,]. General Public Comment shall be reserved for non-Board members to speak on any item of interest to the public [deleted: that is] within the subject matter jurisdiction of the PPCC, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the [deleted: posted and] distributed agenda.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR MAY 28th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Donna Vaccarino, Maryam Zar, Stuart Muller, Richard Wulliger, Reza Akef, Peter Culhane, Greg Sinaiko, Rick Mills, Sue Kohl, Nancy Niles, Gil Dembo, George Wolfberg and Cathy Russell.

Voting Alternates:  Barbara Marinacci, Susan Payne and Doug McCormick.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Bruce Schwartz, Brian Deming, Brenda Theveny, Eric Dugdale, Schuyler Dietz, Dave Kaplan, Kevin Niles and Laura Mack.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission. Barbara Kohn read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:09 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the May 14, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings. 06/11/15: PPCC Candidates Forum (if applicable); 2015/2016 Officer Elections. 06/25/15: (1) Report from Los Angeles County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl (3rd District, http://supervisorkuehl.com). Presenting: Rachel Zaiden, Westside Field Deputy, 313-974-3333, rzaiden@bos.lacounty.gov. (2) California Walks: Pedestrian Safety and Walkability on PCH (http://californiawalks.org). Presenting: Tony Dang, Deputy Director and Caro Juaregui, Southern California Policy Manager. 07/23/15: topic/s TBD.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of May 28, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,191.00. The one significant transaction reported was a $600.00 payment to PAPA to sponsor PPCC’s vehicle in the Fourth of July parade.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules. 1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    New “Playing Fields Committee.”

Chris announced that a new committee has been formed to address the need for more recreational space (for organized sports as well as free play). Janet Anderson (Chair), George Wolfberg. Additional members are invited; interested persons are encouraged to contact Chris Spitz.

7.1.3.    Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC) Update.

Chris explained that PPCC is one of thirteen Westside councils belonging to WRAC. Chris reported that: (1) there was unanimous support by member councils for affording community councils same status as neighborhood councils and neighborhood council alliances in being provided an additional 5 minutes for argument before public comment at City Council and other City agency meetings/hearings. This is a recommendation that the WRAC group is making to Councilmember Wesson, the sponsor of a motion to allow the additional five minutes. (2) there is a recommended WRAC motion regarding planning and land use recommendations (see item 10.3 below).

7.1.4.    Update on AB 57 (limiting local government authority to regulate cell towers).

See attached message. Passed in Assembly May 22. More information: http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/793a8209-30cc-40f1-9f71-ed5f9154660b.
(opposition of California State Association of Counties and American Association of Planners, California Chapter); http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/aa02035b-46c0-41c1-a4be-e46ebef40d2f (opposition of League of California Cities); http://ab57.info (arguments in opposition by telecom law expert Jonathan Kramer). Chris explained that the details of the bill would not be addressed in detail. The bill is now before the senate and relates to the regulation of above ground facilities (cell towers). Interested persons should contact Chris Spitz.

7.1.5.    Citizen of the Year/Sparkplug Awards Event, formerly held in the spring of each year.

Chris reiterated that per the vote of the PPCC Board, the event will now be held at the December PPCC holiday meeting/party, to take place this year on December 10, 2015, at Gladstone’s Restaurant. See pacpalicc.org (click on awards tab at upper right). Further details to come this fall.

7.1.6.    17000 Sunset Blvd. Apt. Project Appeal Hearing, formerly June 3.

Chris reiterated that the hearing was postponed to September 2, 2015. PPCC’s position: an EIR is required (see PPCC minutes of 01/08/15, Item 7.1.3). As announced at the May 14 PPCC Board meeting, the developer states that he will now present plans for a reduced project at a PPCC Board meeting this summer (date TBD but prior to the September hearing date).

7.1.7.    Suggestions/Complaints/Concerns.  Chris reported that no complaints or concerns were received. Constructive suggestions for PPCC operations continue to be welcomed.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.

Norman reported that (1) the CAO issued a report to be considered about sidewalk repair citywide. It proposes a fix and release policy for residential areas. That means that the current 40-year policy of the City to repair sidewalks will be ending. The City in residential areas will fix the sidewalk, there will be a certificate of compliance and then they will release responsibility to the homeowner. A survey may be done and if the sidewalks do not require fixing then the certificate will be released. Commercial property owners will not have a city exercise of fix and release. It will be a release with a 2-year phase in to bring sidewalks in front of commercial properties into compliance. Discussion: (a) person trips after the certificate and I am liable. Yes. I cannot restrict who walks on the sidewalk. Yes. (b) is the 50/50 project still applicable? No but you may want to lobby for that. (c) this is part of the lawsuit against the city. (d) will owners of commercial properties be able to encroach on the sidewalks with tables, chairs, signs, etc.? No, there is no change to control of the sidewalk. The dedicated public right of way (PROW) exists but the property owner needs to maintain it. (e) how will HOA insurance cover liability? Unknown. (2) Norman thanked the PPCC Task Force on homelessness for their incredible work.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month). Mayors website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm.

Daniel Tamm reported that: (1) in 2011 FEMA talked to people who had been through disasters and studied why people were not more prepared for the inevitable earthquake. We have many things in our homes to make use of in the event of an earthquake; Daniel passed out various handouts and referred interested persons to the City of Los Angeles Emergency Management Department (EMD) for more information. (2) the Mayor’s effort to raise the minimum wage is on going and there is another committee meeting tomorrow. If passed, the minimum wage would go from $9 per hour to $10.50 and then escalating up to $15 by 2020 and to be tied to the CPI thereafter. Daniel thanked CCs, NCs and Councilmember Bonin who have been supportive. (3) the City of LA has a 2015/2016 budget focusing on a safe, livable and sustainable city. See lamayor.org/budget or the City Clerk’s website. (4) the Mayor has been in Washington developing a relationship with Obama’s Transportation Secretary and staff to ensure spending and planning. In LA the Mayor hosted events to bring people together. Discussion: (1) is Dr. Lucy Jones still working with the City? Yes. A suggestion was made for earthquake sensors in Temescal Canyon. lamayor.org has additional information.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative. Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041.

Stephanie reported that: (1) the House of Origin deadline is next week which means that bills have to be off the floor or will not be heard again until next January. (2) the budget needs to be approved by next June. (3) AB888 is the micro beads bill related to banning beads in personal care products. The concern is they go through the sewage system and marine animals eat them and die. (4) AB189 related to arts districts in California will allow the Arts Council to name districts. (5) AB57 was voted in favor for by Bloom because he wants to work with the author on amendments in the Senate. It must come back to the assembly to get to the governor’s desk and ASM welcomes comments.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative. Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994.

Fernando reported that: (1) Senator Allen had a bull bill package of 20 bills. 6 have passed and 9 are in transit. (2) a UCLA study talks about heat studies in LA which are expected to increase substantially and that is part of why the Senator is pushing for additional environmental legislation (SB54 to protect groundwater and strengthen the water board’s oversight). (3) SB773 provides an extra incentive for local jurisdictions to fine polluting automobiles. (4) AB57 the Senator did vote for it but remains open to further comments and criticism. Discussion: (1) Senator Allen made a speech in favor of SB218 yet it failed. Perhaps the Senator could talk with MRCA about ending photo enforcement in Pacific Palisades.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

Janet reported that: (1) a meeting took place with USPS supervisors who have new scanning equipment in place that allow tracking of when packages arrive. A GPS system will be put into place for carriers. A new dynamic routing system is also being worked on so more work can be done in the post-traffic evening hours. The bad news is that a substantial portion of the USPS workforce is retiring. For more information: http//postalinspectors.usps.gov. Mail theft can be reported to 1-877-876-2455.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) Stuart Muller (Area 6) reported that the Sylmar ground project will not require any trenching and passed out a handout of the boundaries for Area 6 including the south commercial village. Stuart recalled the Clearwater Mural and stated that the mural is up for refurbishment and fundraising is in process.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives.

(1) Susan Payne (Chamber of Commerce): on June 13th they will be having “Bite Night” at the Women’s Club. $25 per ticket and there is tasking for wine, food and possibly beer. 4-7 PM at the Women’s Club. (2) Eric Dugdale (Historical Society): on June 18th, 12:30 pm there will be lunch at Aldersgate. $15 is the entrance fee and the speech will be on the first people (Indians) of the Palisades. The Historical Society membership fees are due for those interested, $20 per year.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

(1) Laura Mack spoke about the Neighborhood Sustainability Alliance (NCSA) that is an outreach partner to the Mayor’s Office and there are seats available for lunch at the Mayor’s house regarding water conservation. (2) on June 6th from 11 am to 1 pm there will be a drought tolerant landscaping workshop hosted by MKPOA and including Laura and Tree People.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Nominating Committee – Cathy Russell (Chair).

Call for any additional nominations from Board members for candidates for 2015/2016 Officer positions. Nominations open until 8:45pm (15 minutes. before meeting close). Cathy reported that the committee was maintaining its nominations and that additional nominations for Officers was now open. No board members made nominations. Chris reiterated that nominations would be open until 8:45 tonight. At 8:45 the nominations were officially closed. No additional nominations were made. Nominations for PPCC’s 2015/2016 Officer positions were closed.

8.2.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

Second Reading: the Committee unanimously recommends proposed changes to Article IX (Meetings) – see attached (text in boldface). The language is the same as the most recent two PPCC agendas & readings except to codify in Section 2 (Schedule) the more than decade-long practice of PPCC to hold only one meeting during four months of the year; to correct a typo in Section 4 (Order of Business); and to add a new heading at the beginning of Section 5.B (Distribution of Agenda). For information, questions or comments, please contact malaret5@me.com. The matter was deferred for lack of time.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    LAFD Operational Structure and Fire Season Threat Update.

Presenting: Joseph Castro, LAFD Deputy Chief and Commander, West Bureau Operations. (213) 216-7379 (cell). (323) 857-4121 (office). Facebook: LAFD West. Joseph.castro@lacity.org. Presentation: the current City leaders are supportive and demanding in terms of efficiency particularly in terms of communication. The LAFD’s emergency response has been moved out of downtown to field offices. Mr. Castro has 800 firefighters and an office with dedicated staff specific to this area. The idea is to drill down to the specific safety needs of the West Bureau. (a) The Palisades has wild land areas and LAFD sees the threat as 2 ½ months ahead of schedule for fire season due to the increased use of the parks (social media and word of mouth), the drought, increased size of homes and population density, potential terrorist threats, and homeless encampments in the wildlife. The good news is that LAFD has better ability to protect wind events. Fire code restrictions are the most significant then they have been in the past 40 years. (b) Brush Augmentation on high fire days – up to 200 extra staff is hired on red flag days. Training is better than ever. The enforcement entities of all of these codes have limited budgets and that is a problem for LAFD. Apathy of the public to the threat of fire is a big problem because there is still a large part of the population that does not heed warnings, clear their brush or maintain home safety supplies. LA/FD.org and mysafela.org both have educational tools and videos. Discussion: (1) there is an app called pulse point that notifies you of events taking place within your area and that also allows people to filter what kind of emergencies they want to be notified of. (2) there are no divisions, there is an on-line map of the 4 bureaus which are parallel to those of the LAPD. (3) the Palisades is geographically isolated with the ocean to the west and we ask that 23 and 69 have extra resources because traffic times and home size require large resources. We would like to see Engine 69 restored. (4) staffing levels are being increased but it has to be seen in the perspective that levels are being restored from prior cuts to less than what was needed on safe days.

10.2.    Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (PPTFH).

Status update and plans going forward.  Presenting: Maryam Zar (Chair, PPTFH) and Stephanie Cohen (Vice-Chair, PPTFH and Field Representative, Assemblymember Richard Bloom). Presentation: Stephanie provided a background on the formation of the task force following two PPCC sponsored forums on homelessness. The task force would like to focus on the problem of homelessness with compassion and beyond something more than moving homeless people from one location to another. The Task force has been working since November 2014 to investigate the problem, best practices and how to address the geographical isolation of the Palisades that has effectively no resources for this area. The Task Force has subcommittees that work on best practices, the homeless count, government and community relations, fundraising and outreach. One initial conclusion is that a full service provider for outreach to the homeless needs to be brought in. That provider has trained people to talk with the homeless to assess them to evaluate resources and services needed so they can be successful in housing. President Obama advocates “housing first” which the City agrees with but Stephanie advocates housing with services. Proposals from PATH and OPCC have been received. They are expensive and there is no funding. The committee is moving ahead with OPCC to bring several workers five days a week but that effort will take $125,000 per year to engage. The Homeless Task Force will be separating from the PPCC due to the active, fundraising nature of the effort needed. Maryam reported that resources have been requested from the City, LAFD, and Park Rangers. The council office was asked for funding with signage and the task force is constantly asking for resources. Specific to this community safe guards are being worked on and the next meeting is June 10th in the Palisades Library. The contract with OPCC will not be signed until the $125,000 is raised and in place. Interested local organizations have reached out. Discussion: (1) why doesn’t the Mayor’s budget have money for homelessness? Norman Kulla reported that Mike Bonin is the chair of the ad-hoc committee on homelessness. That committee recently received $1 million to address the homeless problem but that money is not ready to be identified geographically. At the moment no funds have been allocated but the process is starting. There are 40,000 homeless in the City of LA. The Palisades has roughly 150 homeless people. CD-11 has 4,000 homeless persons approximately in its area with 2,000 hoped to be in transition. If you can fundraise the Palisades can take control by hiring OPCC. If you wait for funding it will take a long time and the Palisades will stand in line. (2) the $125,000 is to help the homeless move into housing at which point in time services are paid for. (3) Daniel Tamm communicated the Mayor’s policy to deal with persons un-housed and that policy is to begin with Veterans. The office is working to bring together pieces needed for change. There are 7,000 veterans identified as being un-housed within the City. Over 50% of those veterans have been housed. (4) if we help the local homeless then what is to stop more from migrating to this area? It depends if the person is chronically homeless or homeless because of a situation. The outreach people are not coming in to give people things, they are here to ask people to change and move into housing but the latter takes time. (5) the $1 million won’t make it to the Palisades. The Palisades is the magnet because Ralphs is feeding them, they are allowed into the park and private people are the ones who need to get the homeless people to go by not supporting their presence here. (6) there are lawless, visual and safety issues with having the homeless here and we need to educate residents to not give food, money and other support to the local homeless. Presentation: Maryam presented awards from LAHSA for the homeless count to Brian Deming, Kim Clary, and Doug McCormick, Norman Kulla and Chris Spitz (PPCC). pacpalihtf@gmail.com. Next general meeting: June 10, 2015 from 5:30-7:30 pm at the Palisades Library.

10.3.    WRAC-recommended motion regarding planning and land use recommendations.

The motion states: “WRAC recommends that land use and planning-related recommendations shall be disclosed in all City determinations in a “standing” section of City Staff Reports and City Determinations called “Neighborhood Council/Community Council Recommendations.” Along with those recommendations, an explanation is to be provided by the City decision maker within 30 days if the NC/CC recommendations are NOT followed.” The matter was deferred due to time.

10.4.    Spotlight on Organizations (as time allows).  Historical Society/Eric Dugdale. The presentation was deferred to a later date due to time.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:54 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.4 – MESSAGE RE AB 57.

Email Message dated May 18, 2015, to Assemblymember Richard Bloom (via deputies):

I have just learned that AB 57 (Quirk) may be voted on this afternoon in the full Assembly (having passed in the Local Governments Committee on 5/13/15).

According to telecommunications experts such as nationally known attorney Jonathan Kramer, this bill will severely truncate the ability of local governments to regulate wireless communications facilities and/or make local decisions about cell tower siting. See: http://ab57.info. It appears that the bill’s supporters are entirely wireless industry-related, while its opponents include the California State Association of Counties, the American Planning Association, the City of Burbank and others who understand the importance of preserving local regulatory authority.

While PPCC has not taken a position specific to AB 57, we are on record as strongly supporting enhanced local regulation of wireless facilities in the public right of way (including much-needed revisions of the City of Los Angeles’ Above Ground Facilities ordinance). On this basis, I urge Assemblymember Bloom to vote against this ill-advised bill today.

Sincerely,
Chris Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council

ITEM 8.1.2 – BYLAWS COMMITTEE UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION AND SECOND READING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS ARTICLE IX (MEETINGS).
ARTICLE IX
MEETINGS
Sec. 1. MEETINGS SHALL BE PUBLIC. All PPCC and Board meetings shall be open to the public and to the press, except for confidential matters which relate to personnel issues or litigation.
Sec. 2. SCHEDULE. The regular meetings of the PPCC shall be on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month except during July, August, November and December when there shall be one regular meeting, or when the Board has voted to cancel one or more of such meetings. The Chair, or in the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair, may call Special Meetings of the PPCC as the Chair or Vice-Chair deems necessary.
Sec. 3. MINUTES. Minutes of each PPCC meeting shall be [deleted: sent] electronically available to [deleted: all] Board members and [deleted: their Alternates and to such others in the Community as the Board directs, and shall be available to] the public.
Sec. 4. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The Order of Business for the Board shall be as follows, subject to the Chair’s discretion to rearrange the order of agenda items:
1. Reading of the PPCC’s Mission from the Bylaws.
2.Introduction of the Board and Audience.
3.Certification of Quorum.
4.[Deleted: Reading and Adoption] Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
5.Consideration of the Agenda.
6.Treasurer’s Report.
7. Announcements and Concerns from Board Members.
8. Reports of Committees.
9.Old Business.
10.New Business.
11.General Public Comment
12.Adjournment
Sec. 5. AGENDAS.
Any member of the Board desiring to have an item included on the Agenda of a meeting shall make a request to the Chair at least ten days in advance of the meeting. The Chair shall place the matter on the Agenda. The member requesting that the item be placed on the Agenda shall furnish information concerning the request prior to the meeting, preferably by email. At the discretion of the Chair, an item requiring action by the Board shall be added to the agenda no later than four days prior to the meeting and the requestor shall at the discretion of the chair provide sufficient information regarding that item.
[Deleted: Posting and Mailing.] Distribution of Agenda. A copy of the Agenda shall be [deleted: posted in the Pacific Palisades Public Library and Post Office, on the PPCC Website and] distributed to the PPCC email list, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting except when a Special Meeting is called, in which case the Agenda will be [deleted: posted and] distributed 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Sec. 6. PUBLIC INPUT. Subject to the Chair’s discretion to limit the total amount of time allocated on particular issues and for each individual speaker, every member of the public attending a PPCC Meeting shall have the opportunity to directly address the Board on any agenda item [before or during the Board’s consideration of the item, and] at the appropriate time for such comment [deleted ,]. General Public Comment shall be reserved for non-Board members to speak on any item of interest to the public [deleted: that is] within the subject matter jurisdiction of the PPCC, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the [deleted: posted and] distributed agenda.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR JUNE 11th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Donna Vacarrino, Nancy Niles, Richard Wulliger, Richard Wulliger, Gilbert Dembo, Stuart Muller, Brenda Theveny, Maryam Zar, Janet Anderson, Rick Lemmo, Cathy Russell, Reza Akef, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills and Amy Kalp.

Voting Alternates:  Doug McCormick, Michael Soneff and Brian Deming.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Kevin Niles, Eric Dugdale, David Kaplan, Bruce Schwartz, Susan Payne, Ted Mackie, Carol Bruch, David Peterson and Barbara Marinacci.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Sue Kohl read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.   Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:04 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the minutes of May 28, 2015 adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings. 06/25/15: (1) Report from Los Angeles County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl (3rd District, http://supervisorkuehl.com). Presenting: Rachel Zaiden, Westside Field Deputy, 313-974-3333, rzaiden@bos.lacounty.gov. (2) California Walks: Pedestrian Safety and Walkability on PCH (http://californiawalks.org). Presenting: Tony Dang, Deputy Director and Caro Juaregui, Southern California Policy Manager. 07/23/15: (Tentative) presentation on proposed Highlands Plaza Conditional Use Permits (alcohol/beverage sales). 08/27/15: TBD. * Note: PPCC summer meeting dates are only once per month, this year on July 23, 2015 and August 27, 2015.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of June 11, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,035.97. There were no significant transactions this period.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules. 1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    CD11 Senior Counsel Norman Kulla Retirement (as of 6/30/15).

Update on meeting with Councilmember Mike Bonin to discuss the “Kulla Portfolio” of ongoing Palisades matters. (Tentative) Councilmember Bonin to speak at the PPCC meeting on either 9/10 or 9/24. Presentation: Chris recognized Norman Kulla and presented him an inscribed book and certificate of appreciation from the Board. Chris read her book inscription: “Working with you for the past 8 years has been at times frustrating, more often than not rewarding, and always illuminating. Your knowledge, insight, judgment and honesty have been much appreciated, not only by me, but by all of us on PPCC who have had the pleasure of interacting with you over the years. From over-height fences to street construction issues, from Potrero Canyon to cell towers, from the DWP to the infamous parklet, it’s hard to imagine dealing with all the issues facing the Palisades without your expert advice and counsel. I wish you the very best in the exciting new endeavors that are sure to await you. And please don’t be a stranger!” Additional Presentations: (1) Gil Dembo on behalf of TCA thanked Norman and presented him with a sweatshirt, bag, map, free hike and lots of best wishes. (2) Donna Vaccarino on behalf of Palisades Beautiful presented Norman with words from members and the TAG (Temescal Garden) participants and the first bounty of flowers and vegetables from the garden. (3) Janet Turner on behalf of Congressman Lieu presented a certificate and thanked Norman for his counsel, advice and contributions to the Palisades community.

7.1.3.    Re: Meeting with Mike Bonin.

Chris reported that a small group of PPCC board members who have worked extensively with Norman met with Councilmember Mike Bonin – the President, George Wolfberg, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Reza Akef and Maryam last week to discuss Norman’s “portfolio” and other ongoing issues of concern to the Palisades. Mike listened and assured us that while we all know it will be impossible to find someone to step into Norman’s shoes, he will do his best to find a good person to represent our interests. Chris stated that PPCC will arrange to meet with Norman’s successor and District Director Debbie Dyner Harris on a regular basis during the coming weeks and months. Mike will also be attending PPCC’s meeting on September 10, 2015 to tell us about what he’s been doing, to listen to constituents’ concerns and to answer questions. Chris is confident that PPCC will maintain a good working relationship with open lines of communication.

7.1.4.    Proposed La Cruz Parklet.

Update on presentation to Huntington Palisades Property Owners Corporation. Chris reported that PPCC’s transportation advisor Patti Post and she attended a board meeting of the Huntington Palisades Property Owners Corporation this past Tuesday. PRIDE and LADOT gave a presentation and answered questions about proposed new safety measures for the La Cruz/Alma Real Intersection that would potentially be installed in conjunction with the parklet. These include new stripings, crosswalks, lane delineators and the like. It is possible these improvements could be installed separate and apart from the parklet, but a source of funding would have to be secured. The Huntington board did not take a position on the parklet at the meeting. Before they do so they are asking PRIDE and/or LADOT to provide data on homeless use of parklets and they also intend to do a formal survey of the Huntington residents. If anyone has any ideas for how to obtain data on homeless use of parklets, let me know.

7.1.5.   16900-17000 Sunset Blvd.

Proposed Apartment Project. Coastal Development Permit appeal hearing 9/2/15. Chris reported that tentative plans for a reduced project will be presented by developer at the PPCC meeting on either 7/23 or 8/27 (TBD). The Coastal permit appeal hearing is Sept. 2. PPCC is still awaiting word from the developer’s attorney as to which date this summer he wishes to attend and present his plans.

7.1.6.    Short Term Residential Vacation Rentals.

Status update; new motion proposed by Councilmember Mike Bonin. http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635-S2_mot_06-02-2015.pdf. Re short term residential rentals. Chris reported that Mike Bonin has introduced a motion in council proposing certain regulatory measures. A link to the motion is in the agenda. Among other things, Mike is proposing that short-term rentals be allowed when the property is the primary residence of the host, but otherwise prohibited. The motion does not define “primary residence.” The Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Coalition does not support Mike’s motion, and has instead passed the following resolution: “LANCC supports legislation to eliminate or structure short-term rentals through public hearings and the Neighborhood Council system. This process would allow a properly drafted and enforceable citywide ordinance. We also support that all Hosts not only capture the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), but also the City’s Department of Finance coordinate an effort to track BTRCs to the TOT.” The Bonin motion has been referred to the PLUM committee with no date set for a hearing. PPCC may take this up at a future meeting.

7.1.7.    LADOT Moving Forward Together – Transit Service Analysis.

Update on 6/9/15 Workshop. http://www.ladottransit.com/movingforwardtogether/.  See attached letter approved by the Executive Committee. Chris reported that Pacific Palisades is fortunate to have a professional transportation expert who is also a current resident and former PPCC board member named Steve Lantz. Steve attended the workshop and briefly reports that this was an initial meeting to provide an update and to discuss the purpose of the study, which is to evaluate the performance of LADOT’s current transit services (that is the Commuter Express, DASH and CityRide) and to consider community requests for new services. Steve mentioned that in his opinion the Palisades needs connections to the new Expo Line in Santa Monica, and a DASH for the Palisades with the arrival of the Village/Caruso project, and a doubling of the CityRide reimbursement limits. Chris stated that there will be upcoming meetings and an opportunity for PPCC to discuss our transit needs and weigh in if we wish to. Patti Post and Steve will likely be making a presentation to us at one of our meetings in the near future on this topic, so again, stay tuned!

7.1.8.    Proposed Shell Station Mini-Mart.

Status update; additional preliminary community presentations. Chris reported that PPCC’s legal advisor Ron Dean attended the DRB meeting yesterday when the new owner and his architect made a preliminary presentation. Ron reports that several residents were there and concerns and suggestions were expressed by residents and by DRB members. Members of the press were there and everyone can read details about the meeting in future press reports. This is an ongoing matter and will likely be before the DRB again in the future. There are no plans at present for another presentation to PPCC. There will be a public presentation to the community by the owner on June 24, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. in the Palisades Branch Library.

7.1.9.    Proposed Motion to Oppose AB 57 (limiting local government authority to regulate cell towers).

Chris reported that this is bill passed in the Assembly and is now in the Senate. AB 57 would greatly limit local governments’ authority to regulate cell towers. It is a complicated subject and if anyone wants to know more details, please contact me. Chris stated that briefly, on an emergency basis, the Executive Committee yesterday unanimously approved a letter opposing this bill that was submitted to the Senate Committee that is now considering it. The deadline for comment was this morning. For this reason, PPCC will not be taking up the proposed motion in the agenda tonight. Chris said that she had distributed the PPCC letter to the board and to the press and a copy will be attached to the minutes. See letter below. We have also learned that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution this week opposing this bill. In Los Angeles, Mike Bonin introduced a resolution to oppose the bill. PPCC has learned that the motion will be heard next Friday. Other organizations citywide, including Brentwood Community Council, are submitting letters in opposition. We will continue to monitor its status. For More information: http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/793a8209-30cc-40f1-9f71-ed5f9154660b (opposition of California State Association of Counties, American Association of Planners, California Chapter, and Urban Counties Caucus); http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/aa02035b-46c0-41c1-a4be-e46ebef40d2f (opposition of League of California Cities); http://ab57.info (arguments in opposition by telecom law expert Jonathan Kramer). Board discussion and vote.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.

Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461.  Norman Kulla in attendance. Norman reported that Mike Bonin introduced a motion to alter the LAMC that makes it easier for law enforcement and sanitation to clear large bulky items. Discussion: (a) what is the transition plan to respond to Norman’s retirement? A field deputy has been hired from Councilmember LaBonge’s office but a formal announcement has not been made. (b) Mike’s motion is to streamline the process, i.e., build more housing and to stop housing the homeless on our streets.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month). Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom.  Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative. Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative.  Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative.  Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095.

Janet Turner in attendance. Janet announced that: (1) three companies have been selected to work on the VA Master Plan, (2) the senator offered a related amendment and commented that he is in favor of legalizing marijuana, and (3) the senator sent a letter disagreeing with forcing private sector companies to provide a back door allowing law enforcement to use back door technology on the principle that it is not safe for the public.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) Reza Akef (Area 8) – President Obama will be in town June 18, 2015 and traffic is planned to be impacted on area streets including Allenford , Mandeville, Amalfi and many other streets within Area 7.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives.

(1) Eric Dugdale for the Historical Society there is a member lunch on June 18, 2015, 12:30 p.m. along with a presentation regarding the local historical Indian presence. (2) Rick Lemmo for the Chamber of Commerce: Saturday June 13, 2015 the Chamber is hosting its “Bite Nite” which is open to the public and tickets are available to the public. (3) Gil Dembo on behalf of TCA – the City is auctioning off 6 lots on DePauw on June 25, 2015. Minimum bids are $1,350,000. Funds will go towards completion of the park.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Maryam Zar for the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homeless. There was a meeting on June 10, 2015 to address their three-year strategic plan. Main elements are to ensure community protection and safety, connecting homeless to services and housing and to engage the community in outreach and support. Fundraising was discussed. The Fundraising Chair is Barbara Overland who is seeking $500,000. Michael Soneff and Brian Deming are working on community messaging. pphtf.org is the new website and the FaceBook page remains a good place for information also. A Farmers Market presence and table are in the development process. A thank you to Norman Kulla was given. There was a clean up in the Huntington area which was a safety issue for all concerned and the Huntington HOA is supportive of the efforts of the Palisades Task Force. (2) Reza Akef commented that support by PPCC should be made public relative to Potrero Canyon and adherence to the ZI Bulletin for any purchasers at the upcoming City auction.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Nominating Committee – PPCC 2015/2016 Officer Elections.

Christina Spitz (Chair), Maryam Zar (Vice Chair), Jennifer Malaret (Secretary), Richard Cohen (Treasurer).  Board vote. Cathy Russell distributed the ballots to the counters, Ted Mackie and Susan Payne. Chris announced that PPCC’s accountant had been requested to attend but was not available. Ron Dean opined that this requirement of the bylaws had been met. There were 22 voting members in attendance. Ted and Susan collected the ballots. Cathy Russell read the results from 22 voting members: Chris Spitz (19 votes, 3 abstentions), Maryam Zar (20 votes, 2 abstentions), Jennifer Malaret (19 votes, 3 abstentions), and Richard Cohen (19 votes, 3 abstentions).

8.2.    Bylaws Committee – Jennifer Malaret (Chair).

Second Reading: the Committee unanimously recommends the proposed changes to Article IX (meetings). Jennifer stated that the language is the same as the most recent two PPCC agendas & readings except to codify in Section 2 (Schedule) the more than decade long practice of PPCC to hold only one meeting during four months of the year; to correct a typo in Section 4 (Order of Business); and to add a new heading at the beginning of Section 5.B (Distribution of Agenda). Discussion: Stuart Muller said that board members should be allowed to comment during general public comment. Richard Cohen spoke in favor of the amendment. Rick Lemmo spoke in favor of the amendment and noted that board members get to speak more than once already per the agenda and members do not get to take the benefit away from the public when they have the benefit of speaking from the table. Reza Akef spoke in favor of the amendment because board members have time to talk prior during the meeting. Board members should not be taking general comment time Action: Jennifer Malaret moved that the motion be adopted. Reza Akef seconded the motion. Vote: the motion passed with 20 in favor and 1 opposed.

9.    Old Business – None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    WRAC Recommended Motion Regarding Planning and Land Use Recommendations.

Chris read the motion and summarized that if this recommendation were adopted, all land use decisions (such as the Zoning Administrator’s determination on the bluffs project) would include a section specifically setting forth PPCC’s recommendation and if the recommendation is not followed then an explanation of why it was not followed must be provided within 30 days. Chris Spitz sponsored the motion. Barbara Kohn seconded the motion. Discussion: (1) a concern is that there would be an added wait time to be given and that the 30-day time period would prejudice the applicant. Chris responded that the meaning was unclear. (2) Barbara Kohn said that she understood the motion to require clarification of a variance whereas there may be no current requirement to do that. Part of the issue LA is facing is a staff shortage and the quest to quicken approvals is a staffing issue. (3) support for the motion was expressed to give local councils support and a voice in development. (4) support for the motion was made provided that the thirty days be stricken since the Mayor is trying to shorten approvals to 14 days, that no delays to the applicant were caused and that LA City has a personnel shortage. (5) Rick Mills asked about the effect of the PPCC motion and Chris explained it is a recommendation to Planning and to CD-11 but it is up to the City in terms of how they respond. (6) the idea is to give NCs and CCs greater consideration at hearings and that is important. However many times publication of a decision happens many months after the hearing. ” Action: Jennifer Malaret sponsored a friendly motion to amend the WRAC motion to address concerns expressed by the board. Barbara seconded the friendly amendment. A vote was called and the motion as amended passed unanimously. The passed and amended motion read as follows: “PPCC recommends that land use and planning-related recommendations shall be disclosed in all City determinations in a “standing” section of City Staff Reports and City Determinations called “Neighborhood Council/Community Council recommendations.” Along with those recommendations, an explanation is to be provided by the City decision maker if the NC/CC recommendations are NOT followed and provided that there is no additional delay to the applicant(s).”

10.2.    Spotlight on Organizations.

(1)  AYSO/Janet Anderson.  Janet reported that she is in her 7th year as regional commissioner and her 23rd year as a volunteer. The Palisades is Region 69 that is 40 years old and now has 48% female players. There is also an adult league. Numbers increase yet field space diminishes and the largest challenge is to find open field space. AYSO wants to provide world-class youth soccer programs that enrich lives. Everyone plays, there is open registration, positive coaching, good coaching and player development. AYSO only has 60 paid employees at the national office and otherwise is an all-volunteer organization. In 2013 the Palisades received the Region of the Year Award in Washington DC. Debbie Held accepted the award on the region’s behalf. This year over 500 children participated in the spring program. In the fall there are VIP, special needs and extra programs. Fall sign ups are underway. AYSO69.org. There is a need for volunteers and all are welcomed to come help. Locally there are nine (9) locations within the Palisades where AYSO plays. George Wolfberg has participated for 39 years and is a nationally ranked referee. (2) Historical Society/Eric Dugdale. pacificpalisadeshistory.org. Eric said that the organization has been very involved in archiving and preserving 60 years of paper product. The photo collection has been very enhanced. The organization is obligated to share the history and gives presentations and posts pictures around town including here at the library. Before the Palisades became a town but after the town was a Rancho there were many western films shot here years ago, i.e., in the 1920’s. It is $20 to become a member and there are over 3,500 photos available to the public. Some of those photos are more than 160 years old. Please friend the Historical Society on FaceBook. Programs are most often held at Theater Palisades but members also present at local schools. The organization gives an annual scholarship to a Palisades student with an interest in history. The society manages a display in the library and owns Founders Oak Island that means that they maintain that area for the public and pay the tax bill so that the old oaks remain and are maintained. There is an annual newsletter but regular updates are available on the website and on FaceBook.

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    American Cancer Society and their Discovery shops are having their 50th anniversary celebration so there will be 50% off of all of their goods. There are shops on Wilshire and in Toluca Lake.

11.2.    There is a sidewalk missing on Chautauqua south (Area 7).

11.3.    A resident would like more murals.

11.4.    Please support the 4th of July Parade and PAPA’s efforts to bring the community together. There will be a big band concert by “The Barristers” for $10 with proceeds to go to support the parade.

11.5.    There has been an increase in residential burglaries in this community and a resident would like to see a gated community and is concerned with the homeless. Richard Cohen spoke of CPAB and Sue Kohl spoke in favor of neighborhood watch.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:47 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.6 — LADOT Moving Forward Together – Transit Service Analysis

June 3, 2015

Mr. Phil Aker Via email: phil.aker@lacity.org; ladot@lacity.org

Supervising Transportation Planner II
Transit Development Section
Los Angeles Department of Transportation
100 S. Main St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re: Moving Forward Together – Pacific Palisades

Dear Mr. Aker:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) has been the voice of the community for more than forty years. As President of PPCC, I am pleased to help get the word out about LADOT’s transit service analysis and public meetings. As they are made available to us, PPCC can distribute study details and links to our email list and also post notices on social media.

Pacific Palisades is geographically isolated from other areas within the City of Los Angeles and we have already lost many of our public transit services over the years, including the Commuter Express Route 430 and Palisades DASH. With the upcoming projected completion for Phase 2 of the Expo Line (2016) and redevelopment of the Palisades Village area (2017) by Caruso Affiliated, it is most certainly time for LADOT, residents and affected stakeholders to look again at the transit needs of our community. Particularly with the Palisades Village redevelopment, ridership on a redesigned Palisades DASH could be substantially larger than it was in the past, and although the existing Big Blue Bus Route 9 will connect some of our community to the Expo Light Rail Line’s 4th Street Station, areas of the Pacific Palisades community that are west of the western terminus of that line will be without a convenient way to get to and from the Expo Line station. There will be no parking at the 4th Street Station, so Palisadians will have to drive to a more distant station if they want to park and ride. Once in their cars, they may not be willing to transfer to the LRT.

There are ongoing needs for transit service within our community. The descriptive material on Moving Forward Together indicates that LADOT will be identifying service expansion opportunities and potential new transit routes. PPCC urges you to review the transit needs of the 25,000 people in our community who have neither Commuter Express nor DASH services.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President,
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc: Councilmember Mike Bonin, 11th District (via email)

7.1.9 — OPPOSITION TO AB 57 (bill to limit local government authority to regulate cell towers).

June 10, 2015

Hon. Ben HuesoVia email: senator.hueso@senate.ca.gov
California State Senator, 40th Senate District
Chair, Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities & Communications

Re: AB 57 (Committee hearing date 6/16/15) – OPPOSE

Dear Senator Hueso:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (“PPCC”) has been the voice of the Palisades community since 1973. PPCC has been on public record for many years as strongly supporting enhanced local regulation of wireless telecommunications facilities (“WTF”— more commonly known as “cell towers”) in the public rights of way. PPCC opposes AB 57 because this bill will severely restrict the ability of local governments to regulate WTF and/or make local decisions about cell tower siting. PPCC opposes AB 57 based on all of the grounds set forth in the letters in opposition dated (1) May 6, 2015, by the California State Association of Counties, the American Planning Association (California Chapter) and the Urban Counties Caucus (http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/793a8209-30cc-40f1-9f71-ed5f9154660b), and (2) May 11, 2015, by the League of California Cities (http://blob.capitoltrack.com/15blobs/aa02035b-46c0-41c1-a4be-e46ebef40d2f), and specifically on the grounds that:

By “deeming approved” all applications for colocation or siting of new WTF if a city or
county fails to act on such applications within time periods established by the FCC, AB 57 goes beyond the requirements of federal law and unnecessarily and significantly impacts and constrains the authority of local governments to regulate the placement of WTF; and
Despite language to the contrary in AB 57, WTF are matters of municipal as well as statewide concern.

PPCC also brings to your attention the fact that substantial portions of Pacific Palisades are located within the Coastal zone and are thereby afforded important environmental protections under the California Coastal Act. Depending on location, new WTF within the Coastal zone are required to undergo additional review by local governments and/or the California Coastal Commission. PPCC is concerned that under AB 57, such required environmental review may be severely curtailed or effectively eliminated and significant protections afforded by the Coastal Act may be rendered meaningless.

In addition, PPCC notes that on June 9, 2015, (1) the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution in opposition to AB 57; and (2) a resolution in opposition was introduced in Los Angeles City Council by Councilmembers Bonin, Koretz and O’Farrell (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2015/15-0002-S62_reso_06-09-2015.pdf; vote not yet scheduled as of this writing).

PPCC urges you to vote NO on AB 57.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President,
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):
Senator Ben Allen, 26th Senate District
Senator Fran Pavley, 27th Senate District
Senator Bob Hertzberg, 18th Senate District
Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin, 11th Council District

ITEM 8.1.2 – BYLAWS COMMITTEE UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION AND SECOND READING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS ARTICLE IX (MEETINGS).
ARTICLE IX
MEETINGS
Sec. 1. MEETINGS SHALL BE PUBLIC. All PPCC and Board meetings shall be open to the public and to the press, except for confidential matters that relate to personnel issues or litigation.
Sec. 2. SCHEDULE. The regular meetings of the PPCC shall be on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month except during July, August, November and December when there shall be one regular meeting, or when the Board has voted to cancel one or more of such meetings. The Chair, or in the absence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair, may call Special Meetings of the PPCC as the Chair or Vice-Chair deems necessary.
Sec. 3. MINUTES. Minutes of each PPCC meeting shall be [deleted: sent] electronically available to [deleted: all] Board members and [deleted: their Alternates and to such others in the Community as the Board directs, and shall be available to] the public.
Sec. 4. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The Order of Business for the Board shall be as follows, subject to the Chair’s discretion to rearrange the order of agenda items:
1. Reading of the PPCC’s Mission from the Bylaws.
2.Introduction of the Board and Audience.
3.Certification of Quorum.
4.[Deleted: Reading and Adoption] Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
5.Consideration of the Agenda.
6.Treasurer’s Report.
7. Announcements and Concerns from Board Members.
8. Reports of Committees.
9.Old Business.
10.New Business.
11.General Public Comment
12.Adjournment
Sec. 5. AGENDAS.
Any member of the Board desiring to have an item included on the Agenda of a meeting shall make a request to the Chair at least ten days in advance of the meeting. The Chair shall place the matter on the Agenda. The member requesting that the item be placed on the Agenda shall furnish information concerning the request prior to the meeting, preferably by email. At the discretion of the Chair, an item requiring action by the Board shall be added to the agenda no later than four days prior to the meeting and the requestor shall at the discretion of the chair provide sufficient information regarding that item.
[Deleted: Posting and Mailing.] Distribution of Agenda. A copy of the Agenda shall be [deleted: posted in the Pacific Palisades Public Library and Post Office, on the PPCC Website and] distributed to the PPCC email list, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting except when a Special Meeting is called, in which case the Agenda will be [deleted: posted and] distributed 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Sec. 6. PUBLIC INPUT. Subject to the Chair’s discretion to limit the total amount of time allocated on particular issues and for each individual speaker, every member of the public attending a PPCC Meeting shall have the opportunity to directly address the Board on any agenda item [before or during the Board’s consideration of the item, and] at the appropriate time for such comment [deleted ,]. General Public Comment shall be reserved for non-Board members to speak on any item of interest to the public [deleted: that is] within the subject matter jurisdiction of the PPCC, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the [deleted: posted and] distributed agenda.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR JUNE 25th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Andrew Wolfberg, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Amy Kalp, Brenda Theveny, Donna Vaccarino, Richard Wulliger, Gilbert Dembo, George Wolfberg, Reza Akef, Cathy Russell, Sue Kohl and Rick McGeagh.

Voting Alternates:  Doug McCormick.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Barbara Marinacci, Andrew Sacks and Robin Meyers.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Barbara Kohn read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience. Andrew Wolfberg presided as President in the absence of Chris Spitz. Andrew called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Andrew certified that a quorum was present at 7:17 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Andrew deemed the June 11, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings. Note: PPCC summer meeting dates are only once per month on July 23, 2015 and August 27, 2015. July 23, 2015: Appointment of committees and advisors. Proposed CUPs (beverage) at 544 and 548 Palisades Drive. Plans received for mini mart/gourmet grocery with full takeout liquor sales, hours 9AM to 10PM and renewal of Chez Mimi’s expired CUB to accommodate new restaurant tenant (Highlands Plaza). Dafne Gokcen, planning consultant; owner and tenant. Tentative — Shell Station (Village) proposed CUP (use/hours/beverage. See President’s announcements below. September 10, 2015: Presentation by Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President (Andrew Wolfberg, presiding) considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of June 25, 2015. The total account balances equal $31,981.97. There were no significant transactions.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President (Andrew Wolfberg, presiding).

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  Andrew announced that: 1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf7

7.1.2.    16900-17000 Sunset Blvd.  Proposed Apartment Project. Andrew announced that the Coastal Development Permit (CDP) appeal hearing is scheduled for 9/2/15. Tentative plans for a reduced project may be presented at PPCC meeting on 8/27/15 but that date is to be determined.

7.1.3.    WRAC Support for Equivalent Treatment for CCs and NCs. See attached letter below.  Andrew reiterated that the WRAC leadership unanimously approved giving CCs the same preferential treatment as NCs in terms of additional time to speak at City hearings and there was a motion by CM Wesson to this effect. PPCC has no information as to when this motion will be heard (it is still pending in committees).

7.1.4.    WRAC Update.  Andrew stated that Ted Lieu will be attending the WRAC August 2015 meeting. Anyone with questions can submit them directly via email to janet.turner@mail.house.gov and info@pacpalicc.org.

7.1.5.    Thank You to Outgoing PPCC Vice President Andrew Wolfberg. Barbara Kohn thanked Andrew for his hard work and efforts in service to the community as PPCC Vice President during the 2014/2015 term.

7.1.6.    CD11 Senior Counsel Norman Kulla Retirement.  Andrew announced that on June 26th, 2015 there would be various ceremonies, i.e., at City Hall in the morning and at CD-11 WLA Offices 2 – 4 PM. The new CD-11 Deputy for WLA and Brentwood will be Sharon Shapiro.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore.

Email: 27995@lapd.lacity.org. Discussion: (1) Report of four home robberies in the Bel Air Bay neighborhood and expressed that area residents are concerned with the spike of recent crimes. (2) Area 8 traffic monitoring for Paul Revere, is it possible to get a representative out to educate parents? Officer Samuelson of West Los Angeles Traffic Division is responsible for that and SLO Moore will follow up with him closer to the school year. (3) What is the status of brush clearance between Sunset and Temescal? Homeowners are taking a more active role in clearing the brush. As a result more homeless are moving to the beach and that creates additional issues that need to be addressed. Citations can be issues for camping; however the camps cannot be removed and people cannot be forced off the beach when it is legal to be at the beach.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.

Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Norman Kulla, Senior Counsel. Email: norman.kulla@lacity.org. Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. (310) 575-8461. Norman Kulla in attendance. (1) Marge Gold (Village Green) thanked Norman for his service and presented him with a lovely landscape arrangement. (2) Potrero Canyon – 6 of the remaining 7 lots were auctioned today. Revenues generated should be $17 million from the 6 properties. (3) Sharon Shapiro was in attendance and introduced by Norman as the new counsel and representative to the Palisades. Sharon spoke and thanked Norman for his support in the transition. Questions: (1) AB57 – Mike Bonin did carry the resolution and got the opposition to the bill approved this past Friday.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative.

Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov.  (310) 450-0041. Tim Harter in attendance. (1) The state budget passed. (2) Elephant seals are washing up onto California shores because of the warm waters and there is a $1 million research line item. (3) The vaccination bill passed the assembly with amendments.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen.  Fernando R. Morales, District Representative. Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994 — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095 — Not in attendance.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives. ( 1) Barbara Kohn reported that at 211 North Alma Real there is a Coastal Development Permit application pending for a large home which is having a hearing at WLA Second Floor hearing room on Thursday July 9, 2015.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations.  (1) Palisades Beautiful (Donna Vaccarino) reported that Palisades Beautiful conducts monthly cleanups and occasional planting where volunteers are sought and welcome.

7.3.3.    Board Members, Other Reports.  Hospitality: Reza Akef thanked Brenda Theveny and Dick Wulliger and Sue Kohl for providing hospitality; a sign up sheet for the fall meetings will be distributed at a later date.

8.    Reports from Committees — None.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Shell Station/Proposed-Mini Mart Update on June 24, 2015 Community meeting. S

Sue Kohl read a report that she had sent out to the Alphabet Street residents stating that nearby residents met in the library to view enlarged photos of the site as is and what is proposed. The neighbors strongly voiced several concerns and challenged the Shell Station owner, Mr. Saheed Kohanoff and his architect to explain and/or to alter their existing plans. The Via condo homeowner group was represented by Jill Jones, HOA President. The 2 main concerns were that top the list are hours of operation and the sale of alcohol (beer and wine). Proposed hours now are a 24/7 operation. The neighbors want hours restricted from 6AM to 10PM. They were concerned with the noise of people slamming car doors, going in and out, etc. Some of their bedroom windows face the station. The owner expressed willingness to “work with them” on the hours but would not get any more specific. The state allows liquor sales until 2AM. Re: the sale of beer and wine: Neighbors feel that if someone needs to buy packaged liquor (not to be drunk but to be taken home or wherever) they can go to Ralphs or Gelsons or Vons. They see no need to sell in a mini-mart adjacent to a residential area. The current Mobil Station is in a commercial area and they feel that is very different. Also, neighbors brought up the issue of 4 citations being issued over the past several years for sales to minors at the Mobil station. The owner denied that any citations had ever been issued. The current plan calls for around 3 out of 14 refrigerator doors in the mini-mart to hold beer and wine. Out of all the concerns voiced, Sue reported that the owner seemed unwilling to discuss altering his plan for alcohol (beer and wine) sales where the owner is definite about wanting to sell alcohol. Before the operation can even begin, as part of the process of applying for a liquor license and the owner is required to post notices and send same to nearby neighbors. At that time, neighbors and other residents will have an opportunity to protest his being given the license. There will be information in the local newspapers about how to do that, and undoubtedly, there will be a large protest. Re: Size of the Store: The current plan calls for a building of around 2,700 square feet (3 times the size of the Mobil station). Neighbors want the building to be 600 feet. They feel the increased size will bring too much traffic and noise to the area. Additionally, the current drawings show a “tower” on a Mediterranean style building. According to the owner, it was included in order to be appealing architecturally. Neighbors want the tower removed to lower the building and the owner seemed open to accommodating that. Ingress and Egress: There was a lot of discussion about traffic flow on the premises and how patrons could get in and out. It is complicated by the fact that the building next door (housing the restaurant and office space) maintains 8 parking spaces in the back and has an easement to travel in and out on 20 feet of the alley behind the station. Deliveries and trash trucks also use the alley daily. Residents are concerned about people buying gas/food and not wanting to go west on Sunset (the only way possible if you exit the station on Sunset) but rather wanting to go back into the Village. All would need to turn their cars around and exit at the same alley, where children are walking and running, and where residents are coming in and out of their parking garage (noting that Via de La Paz serves as a main thoroughfare). The owner is willing to keep open a second driveway (between the alley and Sunset) to ease congestion at the alley, but again, size is an issue. According to the owner, a traffic study was completed which showed no impact whatsoever for the neighborhood. Andrew Wolfberg stated that this is not a discussion item this evening and that the matter will likely be agendized for further discussion at a latter PPCC meeting.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Rachel Zaiden, Westside Field Deputy. 313-974-3333, rzaiden@bos.lacounty.gov.

Presentation: (1) A new centralized office is being opened within West Los Angeles with a target date of the fall 2015. (2) Shiela is working on transportation, housing and homelessness as her top issues for Los Angeles. (3) The county approved a raise for in home support workers from roughly $9 to $11 per hours to be phased in over the next year and a half that mirrors, and is in response, the recent minimum wage increase in the City of Los Angeles. (4) The Assessor’s modernization project is underway to enhance collections and transparency. (5) The Board executed an agreement with MRCA to continue to provide residents with transportation arrangements for educational programs within the park. (6) The County’s minimum wage ordinance bill has been postponed until July. Kuehl favors the City of LA’s plan and encourages the County to follow suit and create a regional minimum wage ordinance. (7) Weekly updates are sent out; supervisorkuehl.com is where people can sign up for the letter. Discussion: (1) Will Rogers does not fall under the transportation program because it is a state park.

10.2.    Pedestrian Safety and Walkability on PCH: Best Practices, Options and Community Recommendations.

Presenting: California Walks (Tony Dang, Deputy Director and Caro Juaregui, Southern California Policy Manager). http://californiawalks.org. 323-605-5220. Presentation: Caro provided background on the various organizations involved with PCH safety and the Safety Walk Corridor grant. Assessment zones were identified along with areas of concerns within the McClure tunnel and through the Ventura County Line. Assessment Zone #1 (Temescal Canyon to Palisades Bowl) and the Area of Concern (c) Entrada Drive/West Channel Road/Chautauqua Blvd. are within the Palisades. Residents have made the department aware of safety issues at Potrero Canyon park and sidewalks within Santa Monica Canyon and the California Incline. California Walks is working on an existing conditions report (taking input, analyzing issues – 31 miles of PCH total) to produce a final recommendations report (target completion date: September 2015). Input has been received from Palisades Bowl, Palisades Charter High School and an open discussion at Will Rogers State Beach. This PPCC meeting is another opportunity for input. The state has a $125,000 grant and is hoping to tap into Malibu’s $20 million set aside for PCH safety improvements. Discussion: (1) Tim Harter asked for resident input from Palisades residents on issues that they see along PCH. (2) the City of Malibu just finished a study of safety measures along PCH and perhaps the Palisades community could get a copy of that study and compare ideas for their 22 mile stretch which may apply to the 2 mile stretch here. (3) the Palisades needs a bridge across PCH to Potrero Canyon. (4) parking and trash barrel deployment create incredible safety hazards along PCH). (5) PCH is a highway but is also a main street for residents so there needs to be education for speed limits (throughout the city and by the state). Tim Harter said that a PSA (public study announcement) which is on the City of Malibu’s website and the announcement plays on the Malibu city’s council, YouTube, government official’s websites, etc. (6) the best way to provide input is via email to carol@californiawalks.org. The sooner the better for input is great; there is no official cut off but the final workshops will be in the end of July. (7) can there be signage for the two underground tunnels that enable pedestrians to cross underneath PCH? (8) we need cooperation from CalTrans; Tim reported that there is a new Area 7 district director. CalTrans has the latest version of the existing conditions report. (9) The crosswalk near Tahitian Terrace needs to be improved. George Wolfberg said that there will be a signal activated by pedestrians in lieu of the existing flashing light perhaps by 2017. A slight break was taken and people had the opportunity to mark boards and provide feedback regarding preferred PCH improvements.

10.3.    Spotlight on Organizations.

(1)  Temescal Canyon Association (Gil Dembo).  Gil reported that TCA was founded in 1972 to prevent the development of a driving range within that canyon and then fought the extension of valley roads (Reseda) to get the state park area dedicated and improved. TCA constructed bridges at the Temescal waterfalls and other areas within Los Liones. TCA works to clear trails and put in the connector trails between Gateway Park and Will Rogers. TCA helped develop Los Liones from a dump into a beautiful state park.

(2)  Palisades Beautiful (Donna Vaccarino) chose to defer their report to another meeting. TCA has been active from preventing DS-104 from going into the park behind the fire station. The purpose of the organization is to enhance access to all recreation areas including Potrero Canyon and TCA is very interested in Potrero Canyon that will be a tremendous asset to the community. TCA funded the Los Liones mural and some smaller murals across from the high school and CVS wall. TCA has lead hikes throughout the Santa Monica mountains and has Tuesday night hikes during the summer. In the winter hikes are Sundays once each week. TCA is on the web and has over 400 existing members and encourages new members to join for a $5 membership fee. temcanyon.org.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

PAPA – Swing Dance is Saturday night at Mercer Hall, the “Barristers” are playing and the entrance fee is $10 to support the parade and high school.

Palisades BID (Business Improvement District) was approved by the City and signed by the Mayor with an 80% positive vote.

12.    Adjournment.  Andrew Wolfberg adjourned the meeting at 8.26 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.5 – WRAC LETTER IN SUPPORT OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT OF CCS AND NCS
Westside Regional Alliance of Councils
Bel Air-Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council Brentwood Community Council Del Rey Neighborhood Council
Palms Neighborhood Council South Robertson Neighborhoods Council Venice Neighborhood Council
Mar Vista Community Council Neighborhood Council of Westchester-Playa Pacific Palisades Community Council
West LA Neighborhood Council Westside Neighborhood Council Westwood Community Council Westwood Neighborhood Council
June 17, 2015
www.westsidecouncils.org
Honorable Members, Rules, Elections & Intergovernmental Relations Committee; Education & Neighborhoods Committee: Councilmembers Wesson, Huizar, LaBonge, Krekorian, Martinez, O’Farrell
Re: CF 15-0389; pending in the above Committees
Dear Councilmembers:
Via email
The Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC) is a coalition of 13 member Neighborhood and Community councils on the Westside of Los Angeles. Councilmember Wesson is proposing that Neighborhood Councils and Neighborhood Council Alliances (of whatever nature and status) be given preferential treatment (5 additional minutes for argument, before public comment) at City Council and other City agency meetings/hearings (CF 15-0389). WRAC supports Community Councils being afforded this same status.
Three Community Councils are active members of WRAC: Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC), Brentwood Community Council and Westwood Community Council. All three serve the same functions as Neighborhood Councils in their respective neighborhoods; all have open public board meetings and publicly distributed agendas; and all provide a forum for the discussion of community issues and serve as liaisons to government on matters of community concern. In addition, PPCC – which was established in 1973 and has been operating continuously for over 42 years — holds open, public elections for area representatives who represent all residential areas of the Palisades community.
As stated in a motion by Councilmember Bonin to provide community councils with the same level of notifications given to neighborhood councils on planning and land use matters (CF 13-1625 — unanimously approved by the full City Council on March 19, 2014): “[PPCC and BCC] provide a vital service to the City and they should be provided with the same level of notification offered to certified neighborhood councils on issues impacting the City . . . [T]heir role as advisory bodies to local government on issues specific to their communities is identical to that of a certified neighborhood council . . . They provide the same crucial function in vetting community issues and providing a respected and open forum for evaluating development proposals and land use matters.”
For these reasons, WRAC requests that Community Councils be given the same treatment as Neighborhood Councils and Neighborhood Council Alliances as proposed in CF 15-0389.
Sincerely,
Michael R. Newhouse, Chair Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC)
ccs (via email): Councilmembers Mike Bonin and Paul Koretz Grayce Liu, General Manager, Dept. of Neighborhood Empowerment Legislative Assistants Erika Pulst and Eric Villanueva (with request for filing in CF-0389)

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR JULY 23rd 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Donna Vaccarino, Stuart Muller, Janet Anderson, Peter Culhane, Gilbert Dembo, Rick Mills, Sue Kohl, Amy Kalp, Brenda Theveny and Cathy Russell.

Voting Alternates:  Eric Dugdale, Michael Soneff, Andrew Sacks, Brian Deming, and Susan Payne and Doug McCormick.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  David Kaplan, Schuyler Dietz, Diane Bleak, Barbara Marinacci and Ted Mackie.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Barbara Kohn read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:09 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the June 25, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Upcoming Meetings: August 27, 2015: (1) Proposed CUPs (beverage) at 544 and 548 Palisades Drive (plans for mini mart/gourmet grocery with full takeout liquor sales and renewal of expired restaurant CUB to accommodate new restaurant tenant; (2) Proposed Ralph’s Market CUP to allow “onsite instructional tastings” of alcoholic beverages. September 10, 2015: Presentation/Q&A by Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin, addressing his plans for the District and Palisades concerns.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of July 23, 2015. The total account balances equal $31,928.97. There were no significant transactions.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  Chris announced that: 1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    PPCC Informational Materials/Facebook.

Chris stated that community members are invited to review and take materials located on counter in meeting room and to view links on PPCC website: Government Contacts (list of contact information for LAPD, LAFD, CD11 and other governmental representatives); Emergency Preparedness (invaluable guide prepared by former PPCC Chair Flo Elfant); and Land Use Positions (summary of positions taken on projects/land use matters through 2015). Please Like PPCC on Facebook for up-to-date information about issues of community interest and concern!

7.1.3.    New PPCC Board Members.

Chris reported that there are new Organizational Representatives in the Education category: Lee Trask, Paul Revere Charter School (primary) and Todd Wadler, Village School (alternate).

7.1.4.    PPCC Board Membership – Open Seats.

Chris reported that there are open seats for 2nd Area Alternate Representatives in the following areas: 1 (Castellammare/Paseo Miramar); 2 (Highlands); 7 (SM & Rustic Canyons/Will Rogers); and 8 (Riviera/Polo Fields). PPCC is soliciting applications from interested persons, who should submit statements to info@pacpalicc.org (any length; reference residence and background). Deadline for submission: August 23, 2015.

7.1.5.    Appointment of PPCC committees and advisors, 2015-2016; see list attached below.

Chris announced the composition of the committees. Chris also stated that under PPCC’s bylaws the Executive Committee is the only mandated Standing Committee. The Three Chairs Committee is also mandated for the sole purpose of nominating candidates for Area Alternate Representatives. All other committees are strictly ad hoc working committees formed at the President’s discretion. Board member suggestions to the President for additional committees are welcome.

7.1.6.    AB 57 Update.

Chris announced that the bill would limit local governments’ ability to regulate cell towers. http://ab57.info. The bill passed as amended on 7/15 in Senate Governance & Finance Committee, despite opposition of Sen. Fran Pavley, Los Angeles City and County and numerous other governmental entities statewide. Hearing date in full Senate TBD.

7.1.7.    Request to afford PPCC additional time to speak at City Council and other City hearings; see letter attached below.

7.1.8.    LA City Planning Memorandum, July 1, 2015 (changes in process re issuance of CDPs).  http://planning.lacity.org/Documents/oza/coastalDevelopment.pdf.

7.1.9.    Archer School Project Update.

Chris reported that an agreement reached with Brentwood Homeowners and Archer Neighbors, with the assistance of Councilmember Mike Bonin (traffic concerns addressed). See http://brentwoodhomeowners.org/archer-bha-resolution/. The agreement was approved by the Council PLUM Committee on 6/30/15 with the hearing in full City Council TBD. For more information contact info@brentwoodhomeowners.org.

7.1.10.    La Cruz Parklet Update.

Chris reported that the Huntington association board passed a resolution declining to support the proposed La Cruz parklet in the location in front of the Garden Café, but has not considered or taken a position on any other location; an ongoing survey of Huntington residents’ opinion is to be completed by the end of July. Reminder: the PPCC Board passed the following motion on 9/11/14: “PPCC finds a consensus in favor of parklets in general but is opposed to the specific parklet proposed for the Alma Real and La Cruz intersection. Accordingly, PPCC requests that PRIDE withdraw its application and/or that the City reject or rescind its approval.” See http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2014.htm#11SEP14. Further discussion at PPCC may occur in future.

7.1.11.    17000 Sunset Blvd. apt. Project Update.

Chris stated that the appeal hearing on this project has been continued to December 2, 2015. We anticipate the developer will present revised plans to PPCC at some point prior to the hearing. PPCC’s position on current plans: a focused EIR is required before a permit is issued (multiple letters previously sent to the City). See prior PPCC minutes. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm.

7.1.12.    Village Shell Station update. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). See http://cityplanning.lacity.org/staffrpt/mnd/ENV-2015-421.pdf. Chris reported that the hearing date is TBD (comments may be submitted until the hearing). Further discussion at PPCC may occur in future.

7.1.13.    Pac Pali Task Force on Homelessness – Meeting on July 14, 2015.

Chris thanked Maryam Zar and all Task Force members participating in this important informational meeting, which included an array of public officials present to answer the community’s questions about law enforcement as it relates to local homeless. For more information about the Task Force, go to http://www.pp90272.org/Homeless.pdf.

7.1.14.    Ralphs Market/Gelson’s Onsite Instructional Tastings.

Chris reported that PPCC has learned that in addition to Ralphs Market, Gelson’s is also seeking permission for “onsite instructional tastings” of alcoholic beverages. More information will be provided at our next meeting.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives.

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore. Email:
27995@lapd.lacity.org — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.

Website: www.11thdistrict.com. Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy. Sharon.shapiro@lacity.org. Email: Anna Kozma, Constituent Advocate. Email: anna.kozma@lacity.org. Office Line: (310) 575-8461. Sharon reported that: (1) Highlands incident (death and large amount of weapons & ammunition found): law enforcement thanks the community for their support. (2) LAPD’s national night out is August 4, 2015 at Stoner Park. (3) CD-11 is hosting a meeting regarding a new 30 yearlong program for repair of sidewalks on July 28, 2015 from 6-8 PM at the Mar Vista Recreation Center. (4) Street Vending – community meetings are upcoming regarding how street vending is done in the City of Los Angeles. August 10, 2015 from 6-8 PM at CD-11’s WLA office. This issue came up from several councilmembers who wanted to address the topic in light of some communities where street vending takes place. Licensing and insurance are possible; the topic includes street entertainment. (5) Thank you to the Homeless Task Force Meeting. Councilman Bonin has written a piece in the Op Ed News and Sharon made hard copies available along with directing people to find the article on line.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, Daniel Tamm Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison (*attending on the 4th Thursday of each month).  Mayor’s website: www.lamayor.org. City Services webpage: http://www.lacity.org/CitywideServices/index.htm. MyLA Phone App: http://www.lacity.org//MyLA311/index.htm — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom.  Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative. Website: http://www.asmdc.org/bloom. Email: Stephanie.Cohen@asm.ca.gov. Tim Harter, Case Worker and Field Representative. Email: Tim.Harter@asm.ca.gov. (310) 450-0041 — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Fernando R. Morales, District Representative and Lila Kalaf in attendance.  Fernando introduced Lila Kalaf as the new District Representative for Pacific Palisades. Website: http://sd26.senate.ca.gov. Email: Lila Kalaf, Field Representative for Allen. lila.kalaf@sen.ca.gov. (310) 318-6994.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu.  Janet Turner District Representative. Website: https://lieu.house.gov. Email: janet.turner@mail.house.gov. (310) 652-3095. Janet Turner in attendance. See Section 10 below. In addition, there is another meeting scheduled with USPS and a questionnaire/survey has gone out where responses have been positive that service is improving.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) Jennifer Malaret: Citywide Sign Ordinance (Digital Billboards), Council File 11-1705. http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhall/la-me-billboard-ordinance-20150713-story.html/. Proposals under consideration by PLUM include efforts to allow digital signs outside of sign districts and for any amnesty for unpermitted signs and those altered without permits. Interested persons are encouraged to review the council file and contact the PLUM Committee (Chair – Jose Huizar, Members: Gill Cedillo and Mitch Englander) and LA City Planning Commission (Chair David Ambroz and Members), cpc@lacity.org.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives — None.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, chair).

Village Project update.  Report on Planning Director’s Determination Letter dated July 13, 2015 – DIR-2014-4096-DI/CEQA ENV-2014-4097-CE (status of buildings demolished due to required environmental remediation/soils extraction); board discussion (Q&A) only as needed. (Note: Determination Letter not yet posted on Planning Dept. website; interested persons may email info@pacpalicc.org.). Chris stated at the outset the decision had been for the Board to take no action at this time and this item would be a committee report only. Chris stated that there would be discussion allowed only to the extent there are questions about the determination letter, but not about the proposed project plans. As and when the plans are filed and become publicly available, there may be discussion at future public VPLUC and PPCC board meetings. Report: David Kaplan reported that on July 13, 2015 the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning issued a Directors Interpretation with respect to the applicant Caruso Affiliated’s request for an interpretation. This interpretation letter found that the exception contained in Section 5B ib, permitting rebuilding not subject to the Specific Plan, would also apply to the demolition of structures in order to perform remediation of contamination that poses unacceptable risks to human health or the environment. The VPLUC due to time constraints of the appeal and scheduled July 23 Board meeting did not have sufficient time to set a public meeting. Consequently the committee reviewed the determination and agreed via email to the following position: The committee reviewed this determination letter with this thought in mind: “What precisely does this determination mean to the PPCC and what precisely does this mean to the community?” The committee’s position is based on the fact that a large project will be built and that all or nearly all of the remaining buildings (well over 80% of the entire project) will be torn down and if so any replacement construction will all be subject to the Specific Plan. With that in mind David noted that:
(A) given the relatively small area affected by this determination;
(B) the limited impact the determination will have on the project as a whole; and
(C) most importantly because the legal analysis justifying the determination is arguably sound and unlikely in our judgment to be the subject of a successful appeal, we recommend to the board that no present action be taken.” David stated that with this information in mind if any member of the community feels sufficiently aggrieved by the determination, he, she or they have the right to appeal. Because the VPLUC felt that the large majority of residents have reacted positively to the entire concept of the project to date and because the determination seemed unlikely to be overturned we believe that the PPCC should refrain from taking any position. If however residents do appeal and ask their area representative to request that the Board of PPCC should refrain from taking any position on their appeal that may certainly be available for consideration by the Board at such time as the Chair determines or pursuant to the bylaws. Discussion: (1) Brenda Theveny said that to justify the exemption is it correct that the buildings pre-dated the specific plan and the set back should be the same as current standards. Chris and David stated that the exception is based on environmental considerations and noted that no plans have been seen yet and that whatever plan is submitted must be approved. Chris also reminded that the meeting discussion was not to be about the project plans. (2) Ted Weitz expressed other concerns about the letter including parking requirements and parking restrictions. Even if most of the project has to comply with modern day requirements and the Specific Plan then that still puts the community in a deficit relative to parking. The Specific Plan requires that you may not remove parking that is otherwise designated as such. That parking will be removed and will not be replaced other than with 1950 requirements and that will create a parking deficit. What if the first floor complies and the second floor does not? What if they move the exception to a different location? This exception sets a bad precedent because a business that a prior owner neglected somehow became so bad it had to be knocked down and then a contemporary developer gets a benefit. (5) Diane Bleak said that what was sold to the community has changed. There should be another meeting with the developer to hear what is presently going on. (6) Sue Kohl said that there has been talk about plans to provide substantial parking and no indication that what was presented at Palisades High School has now been changed. (7) Barbara Kohn stated that what should be discussed is why the exemption was granted. Under the Specific Plan a building can be demolished if a natural disaster has occurred and since a natural disaster caused contamination the developer has the right to demolish the building and the developer can rebuild the same height and size to the standards at the time of “what was”. (8) Brenda Theveny said that there is a problem with the interpretation of this being a natural disaster, it was a man made problem. Stuart Muller said that the toxics were a plume.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    WLA Veterans Administration presentation re new Master Plan/housing for homeless vets.

Presenting: Vince Kane, Special Assistant to VA Secretary Robert McDonald; Dr. Jonathan Sherin, National Expert on Veteran Mental Health; Dr. Sam Tsemberis, CEO and Founder of Pathways to Housing; Mike Huff, VA Press Relations; Cynthia Keeffe, Project Director, WLA VA Master Plan; Abraham Mercado, Director of West Los Angeles Outreach Plan. The public is welcome to submit questions in advance to Janet Turner, District Representative for U.S. Congressman Ted Lieu, janet.turner@mail.house.gov. Introductions: Janet Turner introduced the presenters listed above. Presentation, Vince Kane: There is a national goal to end veteran homeless. There is a greater need to do so in Los Angeles than in other communities because 10% of the homeless veteran population is here. One commitment is repurposing the 388-acre campus in WLA to be a vibrant community and home to the veterans including needed services. Four things are being worked on: (1) address illegal leases as identified by the Ninth District Court to ensure those using the land are veteran focused, (2) advancing a Master Plan (traffic studies, community input), (3) a new structure (checks and balances, VA oversight with three new senior executives), and (4) land use agreements for physical and social integration (housing and services for veterans) including changes in the homeless program to connect veterans and encourage them to reintegrate into the community. The bridge housing program has already been expanded. Presentation, Dr. Sherin: additional staff has been hired at the VA. Outreach efforts have been doubled within the last several months. Additional beds have been made available within the community. Efforts are underway throughout the entire county of LA to increase the stock of permanent housing. Currently the WLA VA campus is undergoing a planning process to be revitalized. The campus was donated as a home for veterans in the late 1800s and the goal of the campus is to be more than a medical campus so that it includes permanent housing prioritized for persons with chronic homelessness, multiple medical problems and female veterans particularly those with children. Veterans want a spiritual forum so there is an effort underfoot to restore the chapel. Also recreational facilities including a gym, pool, and tennis courts. Individual veterans and veteran families also want childcare and family oriented programs. Presentation Ms. Keeffe: Cynthia reviewed a large map and discussed the existing north and south campuses. The primary goal is to create a community on the north campus. Efforts are in the data gathering stage and scenarios are beginning to be developed. Every Tuesday 1:30-4:30, in August there is a planning meeting at the Welcome Center (257, North Campus) and those meetings are open to the public. These are working sessions to transform comments and ideas into images and spaces. There is a web page helphouselavets.com. Please go to the website to receive updates and notice of events. Presentation Mr. Mercado: the goal of the outreach team is to get everyone involved during a period of time that is not long and the group is looking for efficient efforts using the website. There is a feature that is an online tool kit with fact sheets and other materials that can be sent to local organizations. Call or Text HELP to: (310) 879-5773; email: hello@helphouselavets.com. Share your vision on social media using #HelpHouseLAVets. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/losangelesva. Twitter: @LosAngeles.VA. Questions/Community Input: (1) the master plan is only a suggestion so the concern is what happens when it gets to the politicians and VA organization. Waxman said permanent supportive housing was not an appropriate use for the WLA site so we need assurances from the politicians that the master plan will not be messed up. (2) Working with Garcetti who’s goal is to end homelessness for veterans in Los Angeles such that organizations and supportive people have cut veterans homelessness in half. By law the VA cannot give out the names of homeless people and that is a problem. Vince responded that the Mayor is being worked with along with federal funding(?). (3) US Vets and New Directions are not full; Vince responded that the intake process has changed and those facilities are full. (4) The project will take many years and has adequate funding been allocated for this project that will not be diverted for other uses? What is the assurance that this project will be completed in light of the VA’s past neglect. Vince responded that plan is designed to be the blue print for the budget that comes from the Congress and the White House. Local budgeting will be driven and informed by the plan. The project will be phased. (5) Two remodeled buildings have been dedicated (including the Welcome Center); the master plan should come up with the use of many other buildings on the campus. There should be a columbarium as part of the master plan. Cynthia said that this is part of the plan. (6) Will there be temporary housing to house veterans immediately? Vince said yes that is the bridge housing he spoke up where beds are being made available in the community and on the campus. 200 beds have been made available. In June close to 335 veterans were put into permanent housing. (7) Is there any consideration of extending the existing leases? The focus going forward is veteran focused. If the leases do not benefit veterans they will not be continued on campus. (8) If and when general homeless persons wander onto the campus what is the response? Emergency or humanitarian care will be given and there are persons/partners on site to do that. (9) How will the VA welcome younger veterans? Vince stated that younger veterans are being considered and are asking for education and employment opportunities. Recreation and services for families have been requested as well. (10) Are there requirements for veterans to remain in housing? How do you react when there are negative events? Vince said VA has adopted housing first which is a low barrier approach. There are some veterans who want services and not housing so it is an either or or both approach. (11) What happens to the dog park? Vince said it does not meet veteran criteria. Cynthia said there will be a phased approach (short, mid and long term). Getting housing is the short term. (12) How does HUD vouchers (Section 8 with case management) fit into the program? Vince said there were almost 6,000 vouchers awarded and they are in the process of being used (roughly 4,000 and 800 others are in the process of identifying veterans who need housing). The campus is a great place for projects that are funded through this program/these vouchers. The City and the County need to be lobbied to get market value for these vouchers increased. (13) There are veterans on our beaches with mental health problems. Do volunteers try to go through local organizations first to qualify homeless persons before they get to the VA? Vince said one effort is to get the entire community to use the same information. ASM Bloom sent representatives around to find “hot spots” of where homeless veterans were and that information was given to the VA so that bridge and emergency housing could and would provided. (14) What is the status of the records? Outreach workers are working on eligibility and this has been a challenge also in benefit claims. VA staff and benefits are working together. There is also VA services organizations and pro bono lawyers. (15) The VA as part of the federal government is exempt from land use laws. What protections are offered for the neighborhoods affected and adjacent including traffic and parking? Cynthia said that traffic is being considered and the highest and best use of the existing buildings is being considered. Circulation is being considered with the goal to be a finding of no significant impact. (16) Are there dental services at the VA and there should be. Yes but it depends on what category you are in. There are subsidized programs with Delta and other private companies. (17) What are the plans for the property along Barrington, i.e., Brentwood School, the City Park, the Post Office, etc.? To be repurposed. (18) This development will affect all of us because no one can drive in WLA anyway already. Will there be traffic studies released before the ground is broken? There is a process to get a no significant impact finding. (19) This is the most prized land in California and the VA has been a black hole for money. How are taxpayers protected? Vince said that transparency and accountability is and has been a concern but things are changing with new people, new leadership, new checks and balances and other regulations that are meant to mitigate this concern. (20) Chronic homelessness is not the vast majority of veterans. That is short term or episodic. Vince said permanent housing for all veterans is a goal. (21) The local Task Force goes out and finds homeless persons. Is there a contact person at the VA? Yes. What kind of outreach is in place now in the Palisades – are you here and if so where? The VA is organized with County teams and is engaging with adding peers such as “battle buddies” who help coordinate outreach. The VA is happy to coordinate with the local Task Force. The Palisades has homeless persons who are both veterans and those who are not; however the Task Force is grappling with funding. The VA has worked with HUD particularly stressing the need for funding. The models that are being used for veterans should be available for non-veterans. (22) There was a community effort to save 120 acres, not the VA, and the VA is missing a big opportunity if they do not work with the community. Do you plan on taking away the Brentwood School and the UCLA Brentwood Diamond? In past years the veterans interacted with users of these facilities? The VA recognizes the importance of neighbors and knows that neighbors want to participate. The lawyers are looking at what is veteran focused and are in communications with these entities. The plan is to exit leases that are not focused on veterans. (23) There was land donated for an Old Soldier’s Home (the civil war at the time). That land has a freeway through it and a lot of misuses. Perhaps we focus on the home part of it so perhaps that land could be given back to the estate. Vince said they want a home, community and the best possible medical care for veterans is the goal.

10.2.    Spotlight on Organizations: Palisades Beautiful/Donna Vaccarino.

Donna said that Palisades Beautiful (“PB”) was founded in 1974 and became a non-profit organization in 1976. The primary focus was planting parkway trees. The mission has been expanded to incorporate issues involving dynamics around urban growth and sustainability of the community. There are numerous projects championed by PB including the NEXT Garden (across from Palisades High School) where the last Saturday of every month is a working opportunity. PB supported the Community Planning Initiative for the Palisades. PB has taken on the Temescal Academy Garden (TAG) where there are four beds to teach kids the various stages of gardening. Two composting bins are being purchased. A new committee called “Go Green” is being formed and headed by Laura Mack with its first upcoming event on September 20, 2015 at the Women’s Club including good landscaping ideas and rain barrels. A Westside Expo is planned for topics on climate change and sustainability, along with a possible workshop at Paul Revere Charter School.

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    Is there any effort to speed up the incline as a result of the incline project?

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:49 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.5 – PPCC COMMITTEES/ADVISORS FOR 2015/2016 (as of July 2015)

Executive Committee:

Chris Spitz, President
Maryam Zar, Vice-President
Richard Cohen, Treasurer
Jennifer Malaret, Secretary
Barbara Kohn, President Emeritus
David Kaplan, Area Representative
Janet Anderson, Organizational Representative

Bylaws Committee:

Jennifer Malaret (co-chair)
Richard Cohen (co-chair)
George Wolfberg
Maryam Zar
Reza Akef
David Kaplan
Chris Spitz (non-voting)
Ron Dean (non-voting)

Three Chairs Committee:

Barbara Kohn (chair)
Richard Cohen
Steve Boyers
Chris Spitz (non-voting)

Village Project Land Use Committee:

David Kaplan (chair)
George Wolfberg
Sue Kohl
Rick Mills
Greg Sinaiko
Cathy Russell
Chris Spitz (non-voting)

Outreach Committee

Maryam Zar (co-chair)
Brian Deming (co-chair)
Gil Dembo
Schuyler Dietz
Bruce Schwartz
Chris Spitz (non-voting)

Playing Fields Committee*

Janet Anderson (chair)
George Wolfberg
Chris Spitz (non-voting)
*Additional members invited

Advisors:

Ron Dean, Legal
Schuyler Dietz, Youth
Patti Post, Transportation

Thanks to outgoing advisors Flo Elfant, Campbell Britton and Laura Mack.

ITEM 7.1.7 — LETTER REGARDING COUNCIL FILE 15-0389

July 13, 2015

Honorable Members, Rules, Elections & Intergovernmental Relations Committee; Education & Neighborhoods Committee: Councilmembers Wesson, Huizar, LaBonge, Krekorian, Martinez, O’Farrell (via email)
Re: Council File 15-0389 – pending in the above Committees

Dear Councilmembers:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) urges you to include PPCC on the same basis as neighborhood councils and neighborhood council alliances in being afforded additional time or other preferential treatment to speak before the City Council and City agencies, as proposed in the above-referenced Council File.

As you know, the Westside Regional Alliance of Councils (WRAC) supports affording PPCC, along with Brentwood Community Council (BCC) and Westwood Community Council (WWCC), additional time to speak before City agencies. http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2015/15-0389_misc_6-17-2015.pdf. WRAC’s position was noted in the June 25, 2015 report from the Dept. of Neighborhood Empowerment. http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2015/15-0389_rpt_DONE_06-25-2015.pdf.

As stated in Councilmember Bonin’s motion in CF 13-1625 — unanimously approved by the City Council on March 19, 2014:
“[PPCC and BCC] provide a vital service to the City and they should be provided with the same level of notification offered to certified neighborhood councils on issues impacting the City . . . [T]heir role as advisory bodies to local government on issues specific to their communities is identical to that of a certified neighborhood council . . . They provide the same crucial function in vetting community issues and providing a respected and open forum for evaluating development proposals and land use matters.” [Emphasis added.]
PPCC has elected not to receive funding from the City (taxpayer money) for its operations and for this reason is ineligible to be listed as a “certified neighborhood council.” In all other respects, PPCC serves the same function as neighborhood councils and compares favorably with – and in some cases even surpasses — other councils and council alliances in terms of longevity, openness, inclusiveness, leadership and advocacy. More specifically:

PPCC was formed in 1973 and to the best of our knowledge is the oldest continuously operating council of its type in Los Angeles.
PPCC supported the Charter movement and formation of neighborhood councils in the late 1990s/early 2000s; PPCC was the model for many neighborhood councils in Los Angeles and language from its bylaws is included in several other councils’ bylaws.
PPCC holds open, public board meetings twice a month for 8 months each year and once a month for the remaining 4 months, with the agenda distributed 3 days in advance of each meeting – more than any other council in Los Angeles; in contrast, some neighborhood councils meet only every other month and some council alliances (unlike WRAC) do not have bylaws, regular open meetings or even neighborhood council representation or membership.
PPCC holds open elections for 9 board seats – area and at-large representatives who represent all residential areas of Pacific Palisades; in contrast, there are neighborhood councils with fewer than 3 elected seats and some council alliances appear to have no elected positions.
PPCC maintains a close working relationship with our Council office (Council District 11 – Mike Bonin) and serves as liaison for Pacific Palisades with the City Council as well as with other City agencies (including the Mayor’s office, the City Attorney, LAPD, LAFD, and the Planning, Building & Safety and Recreation & Parks Depts.) on significant issues of community concern.
PPCC also maintains strong relationships with our federal, state and county representatives, including U.S. Congressman Ted Lieu, State Senator Ben Allen, State Assemblymember Richard Bloom and County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.
PPCC is a valued and equal member of WRAC and participates on the same basis as the other 12 member councils.
PPCC board members and officers have been leaders Citywide on several important legislative matters, including cell tower regulation (most recently the AGF Ordinance revision and Assembly Bill 57); the Community Care Facilities Ordinance (regulation of group homes in residential zones); the Murals Ordinance; the Sign Ordinance; and other significant planning legislation, including the Core Findings Ordinance.
PPCC board members and officers have served on neighborhood council alliances as well as other important coalitions and committees (municipal as well as regional), including PlanCheckNCLA (where until recently I served on the Steering Committee), the NC Budget Advocates, the PCH Task Force (which includes representatives of various city, county and state agencies), the Proposition K (Parks for Kids) Regional Volunteer Oversight Committee and the Los Angeles Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Working Group (coalition of community leaders Citywide formed in 2010 at the request of the City Attorney).

For all of these reasons, PPCC respectfully requests that you include PPCC on the same basis as neighborhood councils and neighborhood council alliances in connection with the proposal in CF 15-0389 to afford additional time or other preferential treatment to speak before the City Council or City agencies.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):
Councilmembers Mike Bonin and Paul Koretz
Grayce Liu, General Manager, Dept. of Neighborhood Empowerment
Board of Neighborhood Council Commissioners
Mike Newhouse, Chair, WRAC
Larry Watts, Chair, Brentwood Community Council
Steve Sann, Chair, Westwood Community Council
Legislative Assistants Erika Pulst and Eric Villanueva (with request for filing in CF 15-0389)

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR AUGUST 27th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Gil Dembo, Barbara Marinacci, Kelly Comras, Brenda Theveny, Richard Wulliger, Stuart Muller, Peter Culhane , Reza Akef, Rick Lemmo, Sue Kohl, Cathy Russell and Rick Mills.

Voting Alternates:  Howard Robinson and Geoff Shelden.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Brian Deming, Michael Soneff, George Wolfberg, Doug McCormick, Ted Mackie, David Kaplan and Carol Bruch.

Start of Business Meeting

1.     Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Richard Cohen read the Mission Statement.

2.     Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:05 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the July 23, 2015 minutes adopted as corrected. Upcoming meetings: 9/10, presentation/Q&A with Councilmember Mike Bonin; 9/24; presentation/discussion re Village Shell Station proposed CUB/CUP (use/hours/beverage) will likely be deferred until October.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of August 27, 2015. The total account balances equal $31,875.00 with no significant transactions reported.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9:00 p.m.; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf)

7.1.2.    Board Member Volunteers Needed Now/Sign Up Sheets.  Awards Event Committee (“AEC”), Playing Fields Committee, Hospitality Committee, and Website Maintenance Team. Chris explained and distributed each of the sign up sheets to the board.

7.1.3.    PPCC Fundraising – dues, donations, board member participation and additional fundraising options.

Chris stated that the Board has not discussed the topic of fundraising in quite some time. Chris stated that the Board would have a more extended discussion at a later date, but for now, she wanted to remind everyone of PPCC’s request that all board and community members participate by, at a minimum sending in your annual dues, which are $25 for individuals and $50 for businesses. Of course people can donate any amount they wish and all contributions are tax deductible as allowed by law. Chris explained that people can donate by going to the Pay Pal tab on the PPCC website, or send in a check or cash in the envelope that was passed out and available on the that side counter. PPCC needs to raise funds every year to cover its basic annual expenses, which typically run around $5,000. In the past PPCC has sent out dues and donation reminders with the newsletters that were mailed to all households. PPCC is not able to continuing sending out hard copies of newsletters as the cost has become prohibitive relative to the response rate. In the near future PPCC will be considering other fundraising options, such as emailed newsletters, website appeals, possible fundraising events and the like. In the meantime, please donate — and ask friends who may have been looking for a worthwhile charity to please donate as well! The issue will be discussed further at a later time.

7.1.4.    PPCC Website and Outreach Update.

Like Us on Facebook.com/pacpalicc. Chris thanked Ted Mackie, to whom we owe a tremendous debt for serving as creator and Webmaster of our current website for over 15 years! As PPCC has grown so has the need for an updated, more interactive website. Chris stated she was pleased to announce that Michael Soneff, At Large 2nd Alternate, had graciously agreed to donate his time and expertise and is working on building a new website for us! We are hoping it will be up and running in a month or so. As we have time at future meetings we’ll be discussing the new website features and Chris may be asking for opinions on things such as possible banner ads for community businesses or organizations as a fundraising opportunity. And as I’ve noted we will need a robust Website Maintenance Team – although if PPCC does raise enough money it may be able to hire someone to assist with these tasks. Stay tuned for further details! In the meantime, please don’t forget to Like Us on Facebook, at pacpalicc!

7.1.5.    PPCC Board Membership, Absences from Meetings (Bylaws Art X.3).

It is important for everyone to remember that the bylaws provide for consequences in the event of excessive unexplained board member absences from meetings (Bylaws Art X.3). I remind you all to let me know whenever you cannot attend and the reason why. I must also announce that Greg Sinaiko, Area 3 representative, is taking a 6-month leave of absence, with my concurrence, for personal reasons. His alternates Howard Robinson and Brian Deming will attend meetings in Greg’s absence.

7.1.6.    VPLUC Membership, Howard Robinson (Area 3 1st Alternate representative).  Chris was pleased to announce that Howard Robinson, Area 3 1st Alternate, has become a member of the Village Project Land Use Committee. Howard is a professional land use consultant and will bring this valuable expertise to the committee.

7.1.7.    La Cruz Parklet Update.

Chris reported that she had received an email from PRIDE president Geoff Shelden stating that the application for the parklet had been rescinded. Chris read a PRIDE email that stated the application would be withdrawn and that an alternative location would be sought. Chris read her email reply and expressed appreciation to PRIDE for continued updates and working cooperatively with the community to find an alternative location.

7.1.8.    Archer School Update.  Chris reported that the project was approved by City Council August 2, 2015.

7.1.9.    PPCC letter to City officials dated Aug. 7, 2015.

Chris said that this letter stated PPCC’s position on parks and sidewalks storage ordinances (approved unanimously by the Executive Committee pursuant to Bylaws Art. 5.3.B; further committee hearing 8/26/15). See attached letter. See also http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhall/la-me-street-vending-20141203-story.html. Sharon Shapiro would be providing an update on this topic later in the meeting.

7.1.10.    Short-Term Residential Housing Rentals — status of Bonin motion (PLUM committee hearing 8/25/15).

Prior PPCC discussion (no position taken): http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#14MAY15.
Motion: http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635-S2_mot_06-02-2015.pdf. Chris said that the City Council PLUM committee this week directed that 3 “listening sessions” take place in various areas of the City during the month of September to obtain more feedback from the communities on this issue. PPCC has been told there will be a session on the Westside and will keep everyone posted on the date. It is possible we’ll have a further discussion at a future PPCC meeting.

7.1.11.    Beekeeping as a new Accessory Use in all residential zones – status of proposed ordinance (PLUM committee hearing 8/25/15). Prior PPCC discussion (no position taken):
http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#23APR15. Ordinance: http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2012/12-0785_misc_1_06-15-2015.pdf Chris reported that the City Council PLUM committee this week approved the ordinance, which is now being forwarded to the City Attorney for review and finalizing. After that, PPCC has been told the PLUM committee will waive a further hearing and the matter will go straight to the full Council for a vote. PPCC has no plans at this time to discuss this matter again, but if anything changes we will let everyone know.

7.1.12.    AB 57 Update.

Chris reported that this bill would limit local government’s ability to regulate cell towers and is opposed by the City and County of Los Angeles and all other major California cities and counties, recently passed in the Senate as amended and has now passed again in the State Assembly. It will be going to Gov. Brown and the only way it could be derailed is via a veto, which is unlikely.

7.1.13.    New PPCC Advisor.

Chris stated that she was pleased to announce that she has appointed Sharon Kilbride as PPCC’s Advisor on Homelessness. Sharon is a long-time Santa Monica Canyon resident and community leader; she is a Marquez descendent; and is very active on the Task Force on Homelessness. She will serve as a liaison with the Task Force and PPCC.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore in attendance.

SLO Moore reported that: (1) There is a new trend to take handbags that have been placed on the backs of chairs in local residences. (2) Residential burglaries have increased with 2 male African American suspects committing these crimes in the afternoon. (3) Private Person Arrest – this tool can be used if a crime has been committed and the arresting person is the witness or the victim of the crime. The tool is for a misdemeanor not committed in the presence of LAPD. (4) License plate reader cameras – information is being put together and the purchase of these devices would help communities get information on vehicles coming in and out at various choke points and most traveled routes. In 2009 the cameras cost $12,000-$19,000. A private vendor would likely be the installer. Where the cameras would go depends on how the Palisades raises money; the City would not fund cameras in Pacific Palisades. Most HOAs and residents that SLO Moore has talked to are in favor of these cameras.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy.

Sharon reported that: (1) Short Term Rental Housing – Bonin feels strongly about tying rental activities into primary residences. Code enforcement would be an important aspect of this. (2) Storage in Public Rights of Way – Bonin considered feedback and changed his position slightly in regard to attended v. unattended items in the public rights of way (PROW). If unattended the City of LA lacks accessible, free and voluntary storage. If the items are attended they cannot be removed. Unattended items must be held for 90 days. Thus if there is free, accessible and voluntary storage available then Bonin supports enforcement and the filing of misdemeanor charges. Questions will be proximity and how close is a reasonable location, along with the question of how much stuff. (3) Sidewalk Vending – Bonin supports an opt-out procedure by local communities who do not want it. (4) LAPD has increased its efforts and presence on Will Rogers Beach and surrounding area parks. Discussion: (1) Power cabinets in the public right of way should be marked. (2) What is Bonin’s position on hosting the Olympics? Sharon stated that she is unaware of a formal position. (3) How is homeless storage handled when shopping carts are locked to fixtures? Sharon said that after 24 hours LAPD has the right to remove the cart and the belongings will be stored for 90 days; there was a discussion of what is a personal belonging or items that can be discarded and the issue of how much stuff can a single individual claim to own. (4) Pacific Palisades/Brentwood/WLA does not have a field representative from DWP and none has been in place for the last 6 months. This is a real problem because if a power line is buzzing or damaged then residents have to wait until someone from Westchester or nearby area to be located.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. Daniel Tamm, Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen. Lila Kalaf, District Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner, District Representative — Not in attendance. Chris read a written statement regarding Congressman Lieu’s attendance at the WRAC meeting where he discussed climate change, Veterans, billboard blight and funding for the purple line.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives — None.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives — None.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Maryam Zar provided an update on the August 25, 2015 Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness public meeting regarding the new partnership with OPCC and efforts to provide services to individuals struggling with homelessness in the Palisades. Maryam reported that the discussion was timely since enforcement efforts have been stepped up. To bring in a full service solution to the Palisades would require a minimum of $100,000 annually. Engagement on FaceBook by the community has increased as had awareness that LAPD alone is not the answer to these problems. On September 22, 2015 an initial fundraising event will be held at Palisades Charter Library. Doug McCormick distributed envelopes for donations and a copy of the minutes for the Task Force meeting. (2) Dick Wulliger announced that the Asilomar bluffs would now receive additional de-watering wells from the Department of Public Works. There will be hearing in the library on September 2, 2015 at 1 PM. Residents can also contact Dick if they want to submit comments in writing. George Wolfberg commented that the concept is similar to the drilling that has taken place along PCH including the incline.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Three Chairs Committee (Barbara Kohn, Chair).

Nominees for 2nd Alternate Area Representatives, Areas 1, 2, 7 and 8; election by Board. Report: Barbara thanked Richard Cohen and Steve Boyers for serving on the committee.  The committee met to review each application submitted and considered input from each affected elected Area representatives: Area 1, Linda Lefkowitz; Area 2, Alan Goldsmith; Area 7 Veslamoey Zwart, and Area 8; Elizabeth Shavelson. Barbara read a brief description of each candidate and stated that this group of individuals is extremely experienced and looking to volunteer. Barbara Kohn moved to approve this list of nominees. Richard Cohen seconded the motion. Action: the motion passed unanimously.

8.2.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Update re Village Project. David reported that there will be a public Committee meeting to discuss plans October 29, 2015, 3-5:30 pm in the Palisades branch library. The application may be viewed at: http://www.palisadesvillageca.com/. David stated that Caruso Affiliated would present their plans and project to the committee and encouraged board members and residents to attend. Barbara Kohn reported that she has been in touch with the City Attorney regarding Conflict of Interest rules in terms such that DRB members who also sit on PPCC are able to attend meetings provided that the meeting does not involve an action item on a project that is before the DRB.

8.3.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

MOTION TO AMEND BYLAWS ARTICLE VIII(1)(A), APPENDIX A AND RELATED PROVISIONS; http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf. This is the FIRST READING of the motion and proposed bylaws changes (see link in Sec. B below). The SECOND READING, discussion and vote shall take place, time allowing, at the September 10, 2015 or September 24, 2015 PPCC meeting. In the interim, all comments or questions should be directed to Richard Cohen RGCohen@aol.com or Jennifer Malaret malaret5@me.com. Presentation: Richard Cohen explained the purpose of the first reading and the second reading with the appropriate rules. Richard recalled the prior expressions of the Board and summarized the background below. Richard expressed that the committee was following the direction of the Board and agreed with that direction. Elimination of “standing seats” was the decision of the Board and the bylaws committee concluded that there was no way to do that without affecting the representation of those standing organizations. Simply because a standing organization may not be not happy does not mean there is fault by or with the actions of the committee or the drafting. In continuing to keep parity between elected seats and appointed organizational seats, and in looking at membership of area NCs and CCs, the committee felt that businesses in the Palisades were under-represented on PPCC. The reasons for this are many but particularly include the contemporary reality that the commercial center is being renovated and is hoped to have permanent and long lasting positive effects for the community. The first reading is as follows:

A. Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#12MAR15. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment:

1. The four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories.

2. Faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion.

3. A process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion.

B. Motion. The Bylaws Committee unanimously agrees that modifications to the existing Bylaws as directed by the Board should be made to facilitate all three areas of amendments. Such modifications would be approved now and become effective for the organizational term beginning on October 1, 2016. Adoption of these modifications does not prevent further modification to the effected provisions as may be approved by the Board during the interim period, i.e., the 2015 date upon which this motion is approved and the 2016 effective date. The Bylaws Committee unanimously recommends that the Board vote to adopt the modifications as set forth in the draft revised bylaws (redlined) document distributed concurrently with this agenda (linked as “ProposedRevisedBylawsSept.2015” in PPCC email message of Aug. 24, 2015).

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Group Housing in Residential Single Family R1 and R2 Zones, Community Care Facilities Ordinance (“CCFO”).

Jennifer Malaret. Report: Mar Vista residents have called upon Councilmember Bonin (City Council Ad-Hoc Committee Member, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2014.htm) to sponsor regulation of unlicensed group homes with seven or more residents. http://www.change.org/p/mike-bonin-fair-spacing-of-group-homes-in-neighborhoods-8df5a99e-e482-4c1c-a9eb-472c7135f782. However, Councilmember Bonin has expressed opposition to municipal regulation to limit group homes in low-density single-family zones. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2013.htm. For more than five years (http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2010.htm) PPCC has discussed these issues and passed several motions submitted to Councilmember Bonin and the City Council (1) in favor of amending the zoning code (LAMC) to regulate unlicensed CCFOs including sober living facilities, facilities for elderly persons and parolee/probationer homes and (2) against attempts in 2013 by members of the City Council to “Gut the Code” and allow transient boarders without restrictions in R1 and R2 zones including Pacific Palisades. In addition, LAPD Chief Charlie Beck issued a letter in support of protections for residential zones dated Aug. 14, 2012, which was never adopted by the City Council or Mayor. PPCC has continued to demand protections for residential single family neighborhoods including but not limited to: (1) prohibiting unlicensed and illegal boarding facilities, (2) prohibiting parolee/probationer facilities, (3) imposing concentration and distance limits on any drug, alcohol, sexual addiction, or prison release recovery facility from sensitive uses such as schools, parks and churches and (4) demanding public notice to property owners adjacent and surrounding proposed facilities that serve seven (7) or more residents intended to be legalized and operated “by right” in R1 and R2 zones. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2013.htm, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2012.htm, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2011.htm.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    [“Type 86” Liquor License Proposals.]

Presentations regarding new “type 86” liquor license/proposals to allow “onsite instructional tastings” of alcoholic beverages inside local supermarkets, hours 10am-9pm 7 days a week.

10.1.1.    Ralphs Market (CUP hearing date 9/2).

Presenting: Alex Campbell, Alcohol Licensing & Zoning Consultant, Art Rodriquez & Associates. Presentation: The license would be a type 86 and Ralphs already has a type 21. An 86 license is for instructional tasting of beer, wine and spirits. Ralphs will be focusing on wine. Tasting hours are from 10 AM to 9 PM. Ralphs generally does a 2-3 hour window in the late afternoon, weekday evenings or weekends. The vendor will bring 3-5 staff members to man the table, check IDs and temporary set up the area. An 86 license is temporary and vendors are independently approved. Locations are generally near the end cap of the liquor isle. Limits are determined by ABC and vary, i.e., 8 oz of beer, 4 ounces of wine and 3 ounces for spirits. Tastings are one item specific and limits are cumulative. Questions: (1) besides ID and limiting serving sides does the vendor have the right to refuse service to anyone? Yes that is an option and the vendors train with many professionals including LAPD. (2) What is the aggregate limit of tastings? Technically Ralphs could have a tasting per day and one vendor on site that day. Typically the stores do approximately once per week because daily tastings require a different permit and more infrastructure and staff. (3) If nearby stores have tastings on the same day then in theory residents could grocery store hop. True but it comes to the ability of vendors to refuse service. (4) Has an 86 license holder ever had a problem with a community or law enforcement and what was the problem and result? 86s are new and to his knowledge Alex did not know of any problems. (5) Ralphs is cluttered and this will add to the clutter of the store. Ralphs should be a first class store and to have tastings there Ralphs should clean up and enhance the store. Ralphs is planning remodels of 9 stores in LA that have applied for type 86 licenses. (6) Concerns were that remodeling would make the store alcohol centric and the Palisades store is very small so that is troubling along with the extended tasting hours. (7) The tastings encourage driving and alcohol and mixes the message to area schools that support the store and children who visit. (8) Is an additional CUP needed for an 86? Ralphs chose to go through the CUP process even though the procedure is not clear in many cities. The hearing for this store will be on September 2, 2015 at City Hall. (9) would this license allow the tasting of cannabis? No. (10) Will Ralph’s be selling fewer groceries if more store space is allocated for this? The City Attorney of LA determined there can be no alcohol stipulations but a balanced store in practicality still needs to be kept. Alcohol is more profitable but usually accounts for 6-7% of sales and any increase from tasting availability is not measurable. (11) Tastings would be appreciated and desired by residents who don’t know much about wines and would like guidance in their purchasing decisions.

10.1.2.   Gelson’s Market.

Scheduled to present: Valerie Sacks, Liquor License Specialists — Not in attendance. Chris Spitz noted that Gelson’s has now been told that they do not need to apply for a CUP for this use and there will be no hearing on the Gelson’s license. Ms. Sacks advised Chris that if the PPCC has any concerns she will attend a future meeting.

10.2.    [CUBs 544 and 548 Palisades Dr.]

Presentation regarding proposed CUBs (beverage) at 544 and 548 Palisades Drive.  Plans for mini mart/gourmet grocery with full takeout liquor sales, hours 9am-10pm and renewal of Chez Mimi’s expired CUB to accommodate new restaurant tenant “Roast” (Highlands Plaza). Presenting: Dafne Gokcen, Senior Planner, FE Design and Consulting; Christian Irwin, applicant/owner; Whitney Werner, “Roast” restaurant. Presentation/Restaurant: two businesses are taking over the former Chez Mimi space a majority of which is the restaurant and a small carve off piece is the market. For the restaurant the request is to merely continue the prior wine and beer license. Roast (Whitneys was the owner’s predecessor) began in Brentwood in 2012 and is now expanding into the Palisades. Proposed hours are 7 AM to 10 PM daily, consistent with what is in the rest of the center. Food can be purchased by the pound as well as off the menu. Labor Day weekend will be an open house. Questions re: Restaurant Application: (1) Are there outdoor speakers? Yes there were pre-existing speakers and there are decibel limits within the LA City code. (2) Concerns of the Highlands restaurant are litter, homeless persons looking for handouts, and will there be food delivery? The owner is aware of loitering issues and is happy to address concerns regarding trash with the company that provides refuse services for the center. Presentation/Market: 950 square feet with the concept of upscale international markets. There is no tenant identified yet. There is no on-site consumption or tastings proposed. Currently there are 3 licenses within the census tract and the 1 license taken is Ronny’s market. There are voluntary restrictions within the application including bottle size limits, security, no seating for on-site consumption, etc. Questions/Market: (1) the diagram shows alcohol in each shelving location. The idea is not to have full sized alcohol cabinets but a mix of goods and wines from different regions. (2) voluntary alcohol conditions cannot be enforced by the City but can be by the State and the owner pledged to put the conditions into the lease. (3) A CUB runs with the land and there is no operator nor is there a limit on square footage or limit on percentage alcohol sold. The 950 square foot is a hard limit so the market cannot expand and the property owner has a longer-term interest than any tenant. (4) Do you consider the parking adequate? There are 109 parking spaces that is a lot of parking. Issues have been employee parking and folks who meet at the center and go off to other activities and leave their cars in the lot. (5) What is the delivery detail? Hours are limited and truck sizes are limited. (6) Comments from the Board were made in support of the owner’s management and tenant mix in the current center.

10.3.    [Sidewalk Vending.]

Chris presented the topic of the current proposal in City Council to legalize sidewalk vending in Los Angeles. http://sidewalkvending.lacity.org. Qs: What is community opinion regarding sidewalk vending in Pacific Palisades? Should PPCC submit comments on the 11/25/14 Legislative Analyst’s Report (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2013/13-1493_rpt_cla_11-26-14.pdf) including to members of the Economic Development Committee, i.e., Price (Chair), Cedillo (Vice-Chair), Krekorian, Martinez, and Harris-Dawson? For example: (1) Should PPCC support establishing an “opt-in” or “opt-out” process for individual communities, as opposed to lifting of the current prohibition on a Citywide basis? (2) Should there be a distance limit from residential areas or sensitive uses such as parks, schools and church/religious properties? (3) What are the details of the efforts to work with the Public Works Department and Street Services to develop an enforcement program? (4) Should a detailed map displaying available areas for sidewalk vending be required and incorporated into any legislative effort? (5) Do we want no restrictions on sidewalk vending everywhere in our commercial districts? Or should there be the restrictions placed on this activity, and if so what? (6) Are there concerns about trash, noise, odors, density, etc.? (7) What about impacts on our existing local businesses (brick & mortar stores and restaurants, etc.)? (8) What does the Chamber or BID think? (9) Would this be contrary to our Specific Plan or Community Plan? (10) Will vendors’ carts end up somehow becoming a homeless magnet? (11) Are they likely to come here in the first place? (12) Should the City try this out as a pilot program only, or should it be restricted only to certain Special Districts or areas where sidewalk vending is desired? (11) What is Councilmember Mike Bonin’s position (not known at this point)? Discussion/Does PPCC Want to Take a Position on This: (1) Rick Lemmo stated that the Chamber of Commerce is absolutely opposed to this ordinance for the following reasons: it takes away rights of brick and mortar tenants because they lose what they spend money on (store fronts, windows, etc.); a sidewalk merchant can be anything like blankets and goods spread on the sidewalks; natural lanes created by the codes for sidewalks for people to get by and ADA access become compromised; to encourage business maybe there should be special districts for this; from the Chamber’s point of view there is no upside in the quality of life and commerce in the Palisades that would result from this ordinance. (2) Reza Akef said that residents of his area oppose an ice cream truck that is a similar concept that causes problems with trash and people collecting. (3) Gil Dembo said that CD11 should come out strongly against this ordinance and the use in this area is not appropriate. Sidewalk vending should take place in special districts. (4) Is opt-in by Council District, neighborhoods, local NC groups – i.e., what is the line and the smaller the district the better. Chris said in other matters it has been done by NC and CC groups. Action: Richard Cohen stated that he perceived concern amongst the PPCC board members. The best alternative is to establish districts only if an opt-in procedure is provided so the default position for communities is that street and sidewalk vending shall remain illegal. Any opt-in area should be as small as possible. Richard Cohen sponsored the following motion: “PPCC opposes legalization of vending on sidewalks and streets including within the public rights of way on a City-wide basis. PPCC supports the establishment of special sidewalk vending district programs only if opt-in procedures are written that allow Neighborhood Councils and Community Councils to approve within their affected areas any special district, the boundaries of such special district, and the number and concentration of vendors within that special district.” George Wolfberg seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    The Asilomar public meeting on September 2, 2015 is really important for residents to come to and get answers.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.9 — PPCC EC LETTER TO CITY OFFICIALS ON PARKS AND SIDEWALK STORAGE ORDINANCES

August 7, 2015

Hon. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti
Hon. Councilmember Mike Bonin; member, Homelessness and Poverty Committee
Hon. Councilmember Gilbert Cedillo; member, Homelessness and Poverty Committee
Los Angeles City Hall
200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012  Via email

Re: CF 14-1551 (SUPPORT in full immediate ordinance implementation); AND
CF 14-1656/1656-S1, S2 (OPPOSE in part Motions 5-A & 5-B; expected hearing
8/12/15 in Homelessness and Poverty Committee)

Dear Mayor Garcetti, Councilmember Bonin and Councilmember Cedillo:
Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broadly-based community organization and the voice of the Palisades since 1973. The Palisades community is alarmed by impacts on its quality of life from the unfortunate reality and growing presence of the population that is homeless within our geography. With these circumstances in mind, PPCC urges that (1) the new parks storage ordinance (LAMC section 63.44) be implemented as written without further delay and (2) proposed amendments to LAMC section 56.11; Motions 5-A & 5-B in CF 1656-S1, S2 be rejected, and that different amendments (described below) be considered/adopted in order to strengthen the ordinance for the City of Los Angeles and its affected residents.

(1) Immediately Implement the Parks Storage Ordinance (LAMC 63.44) As Written. The City Council has voiced no objection to the new version of LAMC 63.44 (which passed in Council by a vote of 12-1-2). Thus, LAMC 63.44 should be implemented immediately to facilitate the removal of persons illegally camping and/or storing personal items on City parks property. Particularly important in the Palisades is the increasing threat of fire resulting from active camping presently occurring in explosively dry chaparral exacerbated by extremely high drought conditions.

(2) Proposed Amendments to the Sidewalks Storage Ordinance (LAMC 56.11; Motions 5-A & 5-B) Should be Rejected and Additional Amendments Should be Considered/Adopted.

Do Not Remove the Phrase “personal items such as luggage, backpacks, clothing, documents and medication, and household items.” The resulting effect of deleting this phrase is that these categories of items could remain on sidewalks and parkways at all times, even after 24 hours’ notice is given. PPCC opposes deletion of this phrase because: (1) under the current language these personal items are specifically “protected from removal as long as they are removed within 24 hours,” i.e., ample time for the owner of property to claim and remove their possessions from the sidewalk or parkway; (2) the Mayor can rest assured that personal items, especially documents and medications, will not be destroyed or confiscated because the proposed existing LAMC 56.11 assures they will be cataloged and stored for a later retrieval; (3) LAPD and the Department of Sanitation would be unduly burdened in any legal challenge of segregating between “personal items” and these other items then not entitled to removal; and
(4) these exempted items when left on sidewalks and parkways for more than 24 hours arguably lead to permanent encampments, drug use, food waste, public defecation, urination and inebriation, the attraction of vermin, and other public nuisances.
.
B. Do Not Remove the Misdemeanor Violations of LAMC 56.11 (Motion 5-B). In some instances, campers will not remove their possessions when the penalty is only an infraction. While LAPD is not required to file a misdemeanor, they must have that option in instances when campers are recalcitrant.

C. Add a New Amendment That Provides For a 300 Feet Buffer Zone from Residences. PPCC recommends that another subsection be added to read: “Personal Property placed in Public Areas within 300 feet of a residence may be removed and impounded at any time without prior notice. Post-removal notice shall be provided as set forth in Section 56.11, Subsection 4(b) below.” The proximity of encampments to residences in the Palisades has caused a host of dangerous conditions and it is encumbent upon the City to establish appropriate measures to ensure quiet enjoyment, health and safety throughout the community.

D.Revise Language Relative to ADA Access. While PPCC supports the addition of a new subsection to enable immediate removal of property that interferes with safe passage on the sidewalk, including ADA access, we suggest that the language proposed in Motion 5-A be replaced with: “Property that interferes with sidewalk passability, including passage by the disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act, may be removed and impounded without prior notice. For the purposes of this section, a passage way of at least five feet, the distance to allow two disabled persons in wheelchairs or assisted by a walker to pass in opposite directions, shall be maintained at all times free of any personal property. Post-removal notice shall be provided as set forth in Section 56.11, Subsection 4(b) below.”

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these proposed amendments.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):
Hon. Mike Feuer, Los Angeles City Attorney
Hon. Councilmembers Huizar, Harris-Dawson, Price (members, Homelessness and Poverty Committee)
Charlie Beck, Chief, Los Angeles Police Department.
Tina Nieto, Captain, West Los Angeles Division, Los Angeles Police Department
Enrique Zaldivar, Director, Bureau of Sanitation

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 10th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Nancy Niles, Donna Vaccarino, Richard Wulliger, Stuart Muller, Gilbert Dembo, George Wolfberg, Sarah Conner, Reza Akef, Rick Lemmo, Cathy Russell, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills, Gilbert Dembo, George Wolfberg,

Voting Alternates:  Doug McCormick, Alan Goldsmith, Barbara Marinacci.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Eric Dugdale, Schuyler Dietz, Linda Lefkowitz, David Kaplan, Carol Bruch, Rick McGeagh, Quentin Fleming, Kevin Niles, Jessica Simon, Michael Soneff, Ted Mackie.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Chris Spitz read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:06 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings. Chris deemed the August 27, 2015 minutes approved as corrected. Upcoming meetings: 9/24, (tentative) discussion re Mike Bonin Motion/Short Term Residential Vacation Rentals. Task Force on Homelessness presentation on their fundraising efforts. 10/8, presentation/discussion re Village Shell Station proposed plans, CUB/CUP.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of September 10, 2015. The total account balances equal $31,744.97. There were no monetarily significant transactions; however a number of dues payments had been received.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9:00 p.m.; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf)

7.1.2.    Citizen of the Year/Sparkplug Awards Event – December 10, 2015, Gladstone’s.

Chris announced that board and community members are requested to begin considering nominations of qualified individuals for Citizen of the Year and Sparkplug honors. Further details will be provided on 9/24/15 and are available on the PPCC website. Chris announced members of the committee (listed below).

7.1.3.    Committee Membership – Awards Selection Committee, Awards Event Committee and Playing Fields Committee.  Chris announced the members of each committee (listed below).

7.1.4.    Welcome New Board Members.

Pacific Palisades Residents Association (PPRA), primary representative: Sarah Rena Conner; primary representative: Jessica Simon, alternate representative. Chris thanked past PPRA representative Brenda Theveny for her service.

7.1.5.    PPCC Website, Fundraising, Outreach Update.

Chris made the following announcements: (1) submit tax-deductible dues/donations (suggested amount: $25 individual/family, $50 business) to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades 90272 or via Pay Pal Tab on PPCC website. (2) Like Us on Facebook at pacpalicc. Chris thanked Michael Soneff for his work on the website.

7.1.6.    Congress of Neighborhood Councils, Saturday, September 26, 2015. http://nccongressla.com. Registration deadline: September 15, 2015. Chris stated that all board members and interested residents are invited to participate. Parking is free for registered attendees.

7.1.7.    Sidewalk and Street Vending Update. See attached letter.
.
7.1.8.    Short-Term Residential Vacation Rentals.

Status Update. Chris reported that the Housing Committee on 9/2/15 approved recent PLUM Committee decision to direct Planning Dept. to seek further input from the community regarding proposals in Councilmember Bonin’s Motion to allow such rentals under certain conditions; http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635-S2_mot_06-02-2015.pdf. “Listening sessions” at various locations are expected to be scheduled in September or October (dates TBD). PPCC will tentatively discuss on 9/24/15. Prior PPCC discussion on 5/14/15; http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#14MAY15 (no position taken). Brentwood Homeowners Association will be sponsoring a meeting to take place on September 19, 2015 (Saturday).

7.1.9.    Beekeeping as a New Accessory Use in all Residential Zones.

Status update. Chris reported that the City Council on 9/1/15 directed the draft ordinance to be forwarded to the City Attorney for review and final drafting; following the City Attorney’s review the ordinance is expected to be waived in PLUM Committee and submitted to the full Council for a final vote (date TBD). PPCC discussion on 4/23/15; http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#23APR15 (no position taken).

7.1.10.    17000 Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.

Status update. Chris reported that the developer is no longer expected to present revised plans to PPCC prior to the scheduled Coastal permit appeal hearing (12/2/15); PPCC has been told that any request for further rescheduling must be made to the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission at the time of the hearing. PPCC position on current plans: a focused EIR is required before a permit is issued; see PPCC minutes of 1/8/15, item 7.1.3, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#08JAN15.

7.1.11.    909 Greentree/864 Brooktree (Beglari).

Status update. Chris stated that the owners are seeking permission from the City for a reduced front yard setback (ZA hearing 9/17/15 on Beglari application for adjustment in required setback). Background: litigation involving the issue of violation of LAMC front yard setback requirements at this property extended for over a 10 year period; a contempt order was issued at one point against the City; the City was ordered to revoke improperly issued building permits and a certificate of occupancy and to issue no more permits unless the property is brought into compliance with the Code; three appellate court decisions (most recently in 2013) were issued affirming lower court rulings against the owners and/or the City. The current ZIMAS property entry includes a prominent warning that no action is to be taken on any request without consultation with the City Attorney (as of agenda distribution the City Attorney’s position is unknown). Prior PPCC positions: supported enforcement of order requiring revocation of previously issued permits and opposed a subsequent variance request by the owners (minutes of various meetings in 2006-2009, summarized at: http://www.pp90272.org/LandUseAugust.pdf, p. 2, footnote 4). PPCC requested information for purposes of this meeting; however the City Attorney declined, stating attorney client privilege. Chris noted that Ronald Oster (resident) was in attendance to answer questions. (1) Are the owners living in the residence? Yes. Orders are not complied with and other application(s) are filed with different courts. The owners are not willing to answer questions. There are no new facts, just different courts and different administrative hearings. (2) Are the owners legally able to sell the home? No. The lender had initiated foreclosure yet has not followed through. (3) The new application is for 7,200 square feet but the earlier cases may have involved less square footage.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11, Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy — Not in attendance.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.  Daniel Tamm, Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom.  Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen.  Lila Kalaf, District Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu.  Janet Turner, District Representative — Not in attendance.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) Richard Cohen reported that the West Los Angeles Police Advisory Board has been reconstituted with the officially new captain and dispatcher. Richard was in attendance along with Haldis Toppel and Amy Kalp. The Palisades Patrol car is intended to be dispatched every day 24/7 pending other obligations within the city. (2) Barbara Kohn is organizing a community “Shred-It” Day and asked if there was interest for such an event.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives – Report on Behalf of Organizations — None.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Donna Vaccarino promoted the Water Wise Workshop at the Women’s Club on September 20, 2015 in the afternoon. There will be wonderful speakers, TreePeople, SurfRider Foundation, etc. Rain barrels are available for purchase and pick up at the meeting for anyone who preregisters. Donna stated that rebates are available through the LADWP rebate program. Residents can reference the title of the program, coordinated with DWP and not through LADBS, i.e., the SoCal Water Smart – Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. See also https://www.RainBarrelsIntl.com. (2) Reza Akef suggested that before installing rain barrels residents should check with LADBS to see if their property qualifies for a rain barrel purchase and/or rebate.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Village Project Public Committee Meeting to discuss plans.  David reported that there would be a public meeting on October 29, 2015, 6:00- 9:00 pm at the U.S. Bank Building on Sunset Boulevard. The application may be viewed at: http://www.palisadesvillageca.com/. Contact dkaplan6@aol.com with any questions. Board members, residents and any interested parties are welcome to attend. Please bring your questions and comments. Barbara Kohn reiterated that DRB members could attend this meeting as long as no action could be taken. This meeting will be prior to presentations to the DRB. David reminded the audience that the committee was not empowered to make decisions but is authorized to review the matter and, if appropriate, make recommendations to the full PPCC board. Those recommendations may or may not be agendized and/or acted upon at a later date.

8.2.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

MOTION TO AMEND BYLAWS ARTICLE VIII(1)(A), APPENDIX A AND RELATED PROVISIONS; http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf. SECOND READING of the motion and proposed bylaws changes (see Sec. B below); NOW REVISED ON THE ADVICE OF PPCC’S LEGAL COUNCIL THIS ITEM IS NOW THE FIRST READING. Presentation: Chris Spitz stated that this item will be deferred until later in the evening. Chris stated that we have learned that one or more persons may object to the process on the grounds that at the time of the First Reading we did not have a verbatim verbal (oral) reading of the proposed amendments. Although this has not been the custom or practice during this President’s time on the Council, PPCC’s legal advisor Ron Dean advises that out of an abundance of caution PPCC should have a verbatim verbal (oral) reading tonight, which will constitute the First verbal (oral) reading. There will be a Second verbal (oral) reading at the next meeting, at which point, time permitting, we will have formal introduction of the motion and discussion. Discussion will continue as long as it takes for Board and community members to weigh in. Richard Cohen, Bylaws Committee Co-Chair stated that for the past year our President has pushed forward an initiative to expand the reach and inclusiveness of the Community Council (Farmers Market, election candidates, and soliciting ideas for bylaws changes from anybody with ideas to share). He stated that today we deal with the outcome of this effort to inject new ideas into the bylaws. To be clear, the ideas that were proposed came from board members and others – not from the Executive Committee or the Bylaws Committee. Recognizing that the traditional process of referring proposed bylaws changes to the Bylaws Committee might result in rejection of these ideas, the leadership presented a list of proposed changes to the board for vetting by the entire board as a group. This happened on March 12, 2015 and, per the minutes:

*Should organizational members be eliminated altogether? NO.
*If organizations remain on the board should they become NON-VOTING members? NO.
*If organizations remain on the board, should the organizational membership list and categories be re-evaluated? YES
*If organizations remain on the board, should “standing seats” be eliminated such that all seats within a category rotate at least once? YES (to be determined/was included in the question above).
*If organizations remain on the board should membership become open to faith-based churches, temples and organizations? YES
*If organizations stay on the board should the bylaws contain an application process for interested organizations to seek membership on PPCC? YES

Richard reported that the bylaws committee went to work to draft changes to the bylaws to reflect these expressed wishes. Needless to say, these changes would adversely affect the representation of those organizations that currently enjoy standing seats. These are the Chamber, Historical Society, TCA and PPRA. Also, because the categories had to be adjusted to eliminate solo organizations and to accommodate a new Faith Based category the Cultural and Civic groups had members added, as did Environmental. These changes were necessary if the board’s desired changes were to be implemented and the total number of board seats to remain the same. Richard continued to explain about that latter issue. Currently there are 23 voting seats on the board. There are 9 elected area and at large reps plus 9 organizations plus 5 officers. Richard recalled that this balance of elected and organizational reps has been a tradition of the Council and the Bylaws Committee did not have a mandate to change this. In fact, changing the number of elected reps would require redefining the area map, a monumental task that would surely confuse the community. Richard stated that these changes are not about the value, history or wonderfulness of any organization. For the purpose of considering these changes Richard would like board members to concede that all of the organizations are wonderful and deserving and stated that this is no time to be arguing about which organizations are more worthy than others. Richard noted that if these changes are defeated – and if the board decides not to eliminate single seat categories – then he thought we should consider a few additional issues. In considering the application process for potential new organizations PPCC faces the issue of the worthiness of new applicants. Richard suggested that for this process PPCC should have objective requirements – a minimum number of members, perhaps openness of governance, nondiscrimination, evidence of registration status with governing authorities, and a scope of work that benefits the entire community. Richard asked the board to consider if PPCC had such standards for new applicants should the organization apply these same standards to allow existing organizations continuing standing on the board. If so then PPCC may have some difficult decisions about what current organization continue to be worthy. Finally, there has been some incoming criticism over the process they Bylaws Committee has followed. Richard assured the board that the process has been entirely done by the bylaws. More than that, Richard said he had met personally or spoken on the phone or corresponded with more than a dozen representatives of affected organizations. Chris and Jennifer have likewise answered all questions and explained the reasoning behind all of the changes to anyone who asked. The process has been open and proper. Richard stated nevertheless there are organizations who feel that they are harmed by this and oppose the changes. That’s understandable. But remember, if we keep the general outline of the balance of the elected and organizational reps then any attempt to redo this work will only surface a different group of aggrieved organizations. These changes cannot be made with unanimous consent because of the nature of the changes. Richard said that PPCC could not eliminate solo seats without the potential for those organizations objecting. The Bylaws Committee felt that these changes are in the best interest of the Council. But they are changes initiated by you, the board, not by us, the leadership. If the board doesn’t want the changes, so be it. If a board member does, understand that it will make some people unhappy. But that fact is not a reflection of any flaw in the work the Bylaws Committee has done for the Board’s consideration.

Finally, because certain organizations have claimed that every word of the motion and red-line document needed to be verbalized (orated) to constitute a first reading Richard stated that he would read every word of the motion and of the red-lined document. Richard proceeded to do so. The red-lined document was read as if it would be constituted if changed including references to and paraphrasing of the language being revised or omitted.

A. Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#12MAR15. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment:

1. The four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories.

2.Faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion.

3. A process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion.

B. Motion. The Bylaws Committee unanimously agrees that modifications to the existing Bylaws as directed by the Board should be made to facilitate all three areas of amendments. Such modifications would be approved now and become effective for the organizational term beginning on October 1, 2016. Adoption of these modifications does not prevent further modification to the effected provisions as may be approved by the Board during the interim period, i.e., the 2015 date upon which this motion is approved and the 2016 effective date. The Bylaws Committee unanimously recommends that the Board vote to adopt the modifications as set forth in the draft revised bylaws (redlined) document distributed concurrently with this agenda (linked as “ProposedRevisedBylawsSept.2015” in PPCC email messages of September 7, 2015 and August 24, 2015) and further, to authorize the Bylaws Committee to correct any typos or informalities that may be discovered during conversion of the final draft.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Citywide Sign Ordinance – Digital Off-Site Signage Options.

CF 11-705, 08-2020, 08-3386-S1. (Jennifer Malaret).  A City Planning Commission (CPC) hearing was recently scheduled for 9/24/15 (Van Nuys City Hall) but the new staff report and most recent draft ordinance will be not be made available to the public before on or about September 17. Background: This complex ordinance has been in the legislative process for over 6 years and PPCC Board members, along with other stakeholders throughout the City (particularly in CD5 & CD11) have spent thousands of hours on this matter. The topic is the subject of several State court cases and heavy industry lobbying that has been well reported in the LA Times and other media sources. In sum, the Sign Ordinance proposes to amend the Los Angeles Municipal Code to enact new criteria for sign districts, deviations from sign regulations, administrative civil penalties and other measures to control the visual environment. PPCC Process/Concerns: Beginning in 2011, PPCC became a member of the Citywide Sign Ordinance Coalition. On 9/8/11 and 9/22/11, the Board passed two lengthy and detailed motions expressing the following concerns and objections to the then-drafted ordinance: (1) advertising in city parks and recreational facilities, (2) negative impacts on private and public school campuses, (3) spillover effects, traffic safety, energy use, and aggregate impacts of new digital displays, (4) negative impacts on scenic ridgelines and open space, (5) negative impacts on county beaches and the California coastline, (6) exceptions from regulation in specific plan areas, (7) allowances for adjustments permitted without a public hearing and appeals process, (8) exemption of signs in public rights of way (PROW), (9) the ability of property owners to retain their right of private action. During 2012, PPCC attended PLUM Committee hearings and in 2013 participated in the Planning Department’s Visioning Group workshops. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2011.htm, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2012.htm, http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2013.htm.
Proposed Motion – PPCC Seeks Delay in CPC Hearing Date to Allow for Public Participation In, and Comment On, the Current Citywide Sign Ordinance.
A. Background. The CPC’s standing rules with respect to responses to a staff report substantially limit responses to no more than ten pages, twenty copies of which must be delivered to the Commission no later than 48 hours prior to the meeting (see “City Planning Commission Policy for Submittal of Written Materials on Agendized Items” paragraph (b)). Under the currently proposed schedule, if the community is fortunate enough to have the staff report by September 17, community members will have only two working days to file their written responses, or will be limited to two-page letters. There is simply insufficient time for community members to review and address the many complexities contained within the ordinance and express those views to the CPC under the CPC’s rules and the net result will undoubtedly be that community input on the ordinance will be substantially burdened.
B. Motion. PPCC hereby requests that more time be provided between issuance of the staff report and the CPC hearing, i.e., were the Planning Department to release its staff report on or about September 17 as currently anticipated, then the ordinance should be scheduled for public hearing before the CPC on October 8, but in no event earlier than two weeks following eventual release of the report.

Jennifer Malaret sponsored the motion. Reza Akef seconded the motion. The motion passed with one abstention.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation/Q&A with Councilmember Mike Bonin, Council District 11.

Mike Bonin thanked the board and residents for being in attendance and their interest in community governance. Mike acknowledged that PPCC has been in existence longer than any other council in his district and that PPCC served as the NC model. Topics that Councilmember Bonin spoke on included: (1) Homelessness. Homelessness has grown dramatically throughout Los Angeles; statistics support that growth and Mike thanked Maryam Zar and the rest of the Task Force for their thoughtful and engaged effort on the matter of homelessness. Palisades for the first time conducted a census during the last homeless count. Mike said that the City has failed homeless persons who sleep on the sidewalks because that is difficult for everyone, i.e., the people who are not getting services and the people who don’t like those impacts on their neighborhoods. However the courts have tied the City’s hands by requiring storage, shelter and limiting efforts to break up homeless encampments. Mike is working with the Mayor to determine a broad framework to address homelessness (city, county and private sector needs). Mike is interested in the unsheltered homeless population (17,000-19,000 persons). Los Angeles has one of the highest percentages of unsheltered homeless in part because of the weather but also because the City has failed to provide adequate shelter. Mike is trying to change the civic dialogue to provide short term resources so that options are available between the sidewalks and permanent supportive housing. Mike is sponsoring a motion to open the winter shelter program one month earlier (November) in anticipation of El Nino. (2) Olympics. The City leadership and many individuals are very supportive of the Olympic Games coming back to Los Angeles. The City could benefit from revenues but Mike is concerned were the General Fund to run into a deficit. Last week the City agreed to make a bid and if the City gets the bid then the City Council gets to weigh in on the bid. Major issues are: (1) the security budget and whether the federal government would be paying for that, and (2) making sure the City of LA taxpayers don’t pay for costs if games are held in adjacent cities. (3) Sidewalks. The City of LA just settled a lawsuit with the lawyers representing the disabled and $31 million in funds are available for repair. The City will repair sidewalk damages caused by the City and by trees in the public rights of way. Once sidewalks are repaired then the obligation reverts back to property owners. The City is looking for input on what streets need attention or any recommendations for how the City should be prioritizing. (4) LAPD/LAFD. Mike has been concerned about the loss of resources at Station 69 and for LAFD to have greater resources over all. There have been increases in population since the 1970’s and the LAFD is smaller. While recruit classes have increased there are many LAFD fighters who are retiring. Mike hopes that CD11 is high on the list for restoration. The ambulance plan for the Palisades and additional staffing are being paid attention to. LAPD is a matter of concern in terms of how the Chief and Mayor are deploying. In the past deployment was based by “cops on dots”, i.e., deployment happens to where the crime is taking place. That means that the Palisades has been under-resourced. Several months ago there have been moves to take cops out of street patrol and putting them into elite large crime prevention. We don’t know if those folks are coming back onto patrol or going off into different areas. Questions: (1) Why can’t we have a thoughtful accountable approach on this issue? Make beekeepers insured, licensed and responsible. Without teeth in the ordinance it is dangerous. Mike talked about Rosendahl’s predecessor motion to legalize urban beekeeping in Los Angeles. That proposal recently came before the CPC and PLUM. There have been a handful of folks representing concern but overwhelmingly the testimony has been in favor of the ordinance as drafted, say 9-1 in favor. Testimony before the committee was in favor of the ordinance. The ordinance before the council is effectively modeled after Santa Monica and other cities. (2) What is the status of the 17000 Sunset Blvd. project from the Gabay development team? Mike’s understanding is that the project is being revised, the project as proposed meets the zoning, however Mike is aware of residents’ concerns such that the proposal is being revised and while the project is the same size but the number of units is being cut in half which also will reduce traffic. (3) Potrero Canyon Park – what is the status of the foot bridge across PCH? How can the community help make the bridge a reality? Mike said the bridge is in the plans but is not currently funded. Not all of the lot sales have gone through but even when they have there will be additional funding and many jurisdictional issues have to be addressed. (4) Is there any plan to better coordinate the efforts of county agencies to work with LAPD? Mike said that he is working with Supervisor Kuehl and efforts are being made to increase training on mental health issues. LAPD is being paired with county teams to interface with the homeless and resources for emergency response have been increased. (5) Overdevelopment in the Palisades and Brentwood including Caruso, Archer and Mount St. Mary’s is a concern particularly with regard to traffic caused by the overlapping construction schedules. Mike said that Archer is the only one of those projects that has been approved. Traffic impacts from the Caruso project are unknown until this fall when those plans are submitted. Currently Archer mitigates traffic more than any other institution along Sunset Boulevard. When that project is done there will be 70% carpooling and bussing and other conditions exist which are incredibly strict. Brentwood School has a proposal to revamp its campus as well and they have a bigger impact on Sunset traffic. Mike wants the school to collaborate on sharing bussing and carpooling. Mike would have preferred the construction window for Archer to be longer than it is however the community wanted a condensed three year time frame (rather than five). The biggest impact is the hauling so the performance art center was downsized and hauling will be done while school is not in session (so hauling won’t be added to usual school traffic). (6) Why do you continue to pursue a skating rink in Venice when it has been voted down four times? Mike said because Venice Beach needs upgrades and he wants good activity to drive out bad activity. There is ice skating in Santa Monica and at Pershing Square during the holiday. Mike has proposed putting an ice rink near Venice Beach during the holidays and he believes in trying something different. (7) When will Palisades Drive be repaved? Mike said it cannot be done in one year due to its length but is on the schedule for having one of the worst parts done. (8) What is your position on sanctuary cities? Mike said that LA deemed itself to be a sanctuary city in the 1980’s for Central Americans under religious prosecution. The City/LAPD does not want to be the arm for ICE enforcement. Mike strongly supports LAPD not becoming the enforcer against immigrants because were they to start doing so crime would increase and victims would not come forward. If a person is convicted of a felony then they can be deported. (9) There is no north/south access in areas surrounding Jefferson, Walgrove and Barrington. Has the City thought of ideas to alleviate that traffic much of which is generated by Santa Monica? Mike said that the question was good and the answer is complicated. Mike gave a narration of the job and housing situation in West Los Angeles. If there were more housing in WLA it would be closer to jobs and reduce traffic but there is an affordability issue in that. More affordable housing would help combat traffic. Neighborhoods need to be re-planned without major commercial centers and more walkable neighborhoods. Los Angeles needs more transportation options (not cars, but more bikes, shuttles, etc.). (10) There are community concerns with Paul Revere Charter School – increased enrollment, there are no conditional use permits for public schools, ambulance emergency tests failed, busses cannot get down the streets, parents park on yards and in private driveways and other problems that we need help addressing. Mike said that cities are not allowed to place zoning restrictions on public schools; they do their own environmental impact reports and make their own decisions. Since there is nothing the City can mandate there needs to be cooperative sessions. (11) When are the bicycle lanes and secured sidewalks going to be constructed in Pacific Palisades? The sidewalks start over the next year. The Mayor’s “Zero” Program (for zero traffic fatalities) is due to be phased in gradually. In terms of bicycle lanes the Mobility Plan for LA was just released and every project within it needs to be analyzed and vetted by the community. (12) What is your view on private persons arrests for the homeless? Mike stated that he was concerned were that to have been any advice given to the task force or residents. (13) Access to you is not available – why should residents have to go to meetings, email, call and reach out to never hear anything or hear back? Mike said that he does various outreach events and he goes through scheduling requests with Marietta and if after much effort a resident has not gotten through then that is an issue. (14) What is the status of the DWP Substation and there have been brown outs that have been occurring? Mike said the lack of reporting is not something the community should be concerned with. The DWP has a new general manager and there are other issues she has been dealing with. (15) Why are there no curbs to allow disabled persons to get up onto a sidewalk? Mike said the lawsuit was as a result of an ADA claim so part of the settlement is that the repairs have to be done to make the sidewalk ADA accessible.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:01 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.3 — COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

Awards Selection Committee:
Jennifer Malaret, Chair
Gil Dembo
Rick Mills
Randy Young (past Citizen of the Year)
Andy Frew (past Community Service Award recipient)

Awards Event Committee:
Peter Culhane, Chair
Maryam Zar
Sue Kohl
Barbara Kohn
Brian Deming
Cathy Russell
Stuart Muller
Gil Dembo

Playing Fields Committee:
Janet Anderson, Chair
George Wolfberg
Barbara Marinacci
Stuart Muller

ITEM 7.1.7 — PPCC LETTER TO CITY OFFICIALS ON PROPOSALS TO ALLOW SIDEWALK AND STREET VENDING

August 31, 2015

Hon. Eric Garcetti, Mayor
Hon. Curren D. Price, Jr.; Chair, Economic Development Committee
Hon. Gilbert Cedillo; Vice Chair, Economic Development Committee
Hon. Paul Krekorian, Member, Economic Development Committee
Hon. Nury Martinez, Member, Economic Development Committee
Hon. Marqueece Harris-Dawson, Member, Economic Development Committee
Los Angeles City Hall
200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Via email

Re: CF 13-1493 – OPPOSE Amendments to LAMC Sec. 42.00 to Legalize Vending on City Sidewalks and Streets Including Public Rights of Way; SUPPORT ONLY WITH CONDITIONS the Establishment of Special Sidewalk Vending District Programs

Dear Mayor Garcetti and Councilmembers Price, Cedillo, Krekorian, Martinez and Harris-Dawson:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broadly-based community organization and the voice of the Palisades since 1973. At its regular meeting on August 27, 2015, PPCC’s board discussed the proposed models for sidewalk and street vending and unanimously voted to approve the following motion:

“PPCC opposes legalization of vending on sidewalks and streets including within the public rights of way on a City-wide basis. PPCC supports the establishment of special sidewalk vending district programs only if opt-in procedures are written that allow Neighborhood Councils and Community Councils to approve within their affected areas any special district, the boundaries of such special district, and the number and concentration of vendors within that special district.”
(A) Vending on City Sidewalks and Streets, Including the Public Rights of Way, Should Remain Illegal.
PPCC’s opposition is based primarily on the following concerns:
negative impacts on existing “brick and mortar” businesses and commercial areas, such as sanitation, security, staining of streets and sidewalks, parking and loitering,
negative impacts on adjacent and surrounding residential neighborhoods, such as trash, noise, odors and spillover vending,
compromise/reduction of sidewalks and ADA access,
impacts on/increase of the growing homeless population,
conflicts with our Community and Specific Plans, and
lack of guidelines for enforcement by the Public Works Department/Street Services (licenses, permits, inspections, fines, removal).
(B) Special Sidewalk Vending District Programs Should Be Established Only with Special Conditions.

PPCC supports the establishment of special sidewalk vending district programs only if:

opt-in procedures are written that allow Neighborhood Councils and
Community Councils to approve within their affected areas any special district, the boundaries of such special district, and the number and concentration of vendors within that special district;
distance limits from residential areas or sensitive uses, such as parks, schools and church/religious properties, are incorporated; and
a detailed map displaying available areas for vending is incorporated into any legislative effort.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposals for legalization of sidewalk and street vending in Los Angeles.

Sincerely,
Christina Spitz
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):
Hon. Mike Bonin, Councilmember, 11th District
Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant, Economic Development Committee (with request for filing in CF 13-1493)

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 24th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Cathy Russell, Rick Mills, Janet Anderson, Reza Akef, Sarah Rena Conner, George Wolfberg, Eric Dugdale, Stuart Muller, Gilbert Dembo, Donna Vaccarino, Kelly Comras, Linda Lefkowitz and Nancy Niles. Partial Meeting: Peter Culhane.

Voting Alternates:  Robin Meyers, Brian Deming, Susan Payne, Diane Bleak, Barbara Marinacci and Lee Trask.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Schuyler Dietz, Bruce Schwartz, Ted Mackie, Carol Bruch, Doug McCormick and Kevin Niles and Michael Soneff.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Reza Akef read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:04 p.m.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the September 10, 2015 minutes approved as corrected. Upcoming meetings: 10/8, presentation/discussion regarding the Village Shell Station proposed CUB/CUP (use/hours/beverage). Presentation by the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness on the launch of its new fundraising drive. 10/22, (tentative) presentation/Q&A with Assemblymember Richard Bloom.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of September 24, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,238.59. There were no significant expenditures. Dues payments have been received and Richard thanked board members and the public who have financially supported PPCC.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9:00 p.m.; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf).

7.1.2.    Start of PPCC Fiscal Year Oct. 1.

Organizational Members for 2015-2016, beginning on October 1, 2015. See attached list below. Chris thanked the two organizational members who are leaving the Board as of Sept. 30: Amy Kalp, Friends of the Library; Lee Trask, Paul Revere. Chris also stated that she wanted to take this opportunity to note that for the first time in her experience on PPCC — and she believes for the first time ever — all primary and alternate seats, both area and organizational representatives, are now filled. Chris thanked everyone who has stepped up to the plate to volunteer for service on the PPCC board for the benefit of the community. Chris stated that when she first stepped into the office of Chair, building on the efforts of PPCC Chair Emeritus Barbara Kohn, she sought to bring more awareness and participation onto the council. Over and over again, at the Farmers’ Market outreach, in private conversations and even in public discussion at our meetings, Chris heard residents complain that PPCC seemed like a hidebound group of insiders with perpetual seats, little or no engagement with younger members of the community, few opportunities for participation and no vision for the future. Chris stated that she has tried to the best of her ability to change that perception, and slowly but surely that is occurring. Chris said that we will have a debate later this evening on whether changes in PPCC’s organizational structure would be a good thing for the council going forward. Change is difficult to come by, but Chris stated that she welcomed that debate and a full airing of what our members believe would be best for this organization as we look to the future.

7.1.3.    Citizen of the Year/Sparkplug Awards Event – December 10, 2015, Gladstone’s.

Chris stated that nominations now open for qualified individuals for Citizen of the Year and Sparkplug honors. Deadline for submission of nominations: October 31. For information about nomination requirements, go to: http://www.pp90272.org/sparkplug.htm. Chris reported that nominations should be submitted to info@pacpalicc.org. Chris summarized the requirements for the Citizen award and for the Golden Sparkplug award.

7.1.4.    Citywide Sign Ordinance Update.

See attached letter. Chris reported that the CPC hearing was not delayed and was held today in Van Nuys City Hall. Jennifer Malaret reported that the hearing was generally very favorable for the community and no action was taken to pass the draft ordinance to PLUM. On the big picture issues, President Ambroz summarized the policy direction they are going: (1) No on amnesty of illegal and unpermitted signs, and they seem to not want to allow signs whose status is not known to be legal to satisfy takedown requirements. (2) No on grandfathering districts other than the two previously reviewed by the CPC in 2009. (3) Increase takedown (2:1 for static to static, at least 4:1 and maybe 8:1 on static to digital), and no community benefits in lieu of takedown. (4) Lowered brightness consistent with the Broadway Sign District just reviewed. (5) No to freeway facing signs. (6) No CUP process for digital or other off-site signage outside of sign districts. The commissioners universally expressed their shock and dismay that the City is failing to do any sign enforcement. Likely the item will return to CPC perhaps as quickly as October.

7.1.5.    PPCC Website, Fundraising, Outreach Update.

Submit tax deductible dues/donations (suggested amount: $25 individual/family, $50 business) to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades 90272 or via Pay Pal tab on PPCC website. Like Us on Facebook at pacpalicc. Chris reported that work on the new website is continuing, PPCC is continuing to do outreach, and that she continues to ask board and community members to submit their tax deductible dues or donations. Envelopes are on the counter for your convenience. And don’t forget to Like Us on Facebook.

7.1.6.    Congress of Neighborhood Councils, Sat., September 26.  http://nccongressla.com. Chris thanked those board members and residents planning to participate.

7.1.7.    909 Greentree/864 Brooktree (Beglari).

Status update. Chris reported that PPCC has been advised that the Planning Department has determined that “no changes to material circumstances have been presented in the current application” and thus the Beglaris’ application for an adjustment has been terminated. Sentencing in the misdemeanor action against the Beglaris has been continued to October 9, 2015.

7.1.8.    New Announcement.

Chris stated, as she has previously advised the board, PPCC learned for the first time on Tuesday this week that the FAA is proposing a new flight path over the Palisades for flights going to Long Beach Airport, as part of a larger proposal for flights within the Los Angeles Metroplex. PPCC is awaiting more details, but for now PPCC has requested that the FAA extend the comment period for the Palisades community because PPCC did not have prior notice. PPCC has also requested that the FAA conduct public meetings or workshops in the Palisades so that we can obtain more information on what is planned. Chris said that PPCC’s letter to the FAA will be attached to the meeting minutes but if anyone wants to see a copy to let her know. Chris stated that the City Council has also requested an extension of the comment period and additional meetings for affected communities. Hopefully Congressman Ted Lieu will be doing the same. Chris said that if representatives are here this evening they can provide an update. See attached letter below.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”).

SLO Officer Moore stated that (1) Vehicle burglaries have increased in the Palisades and he reminded residents to “lock it, hide it, keep it.”, (2) Homeless persons in residential areas. To get police response residents have to describe the activity that is taking place, i.e., sidewalks being blocked, trespassing, checking handles or damage to automobiles. Comments: (1) What can be done for drivers ignoring stop signs on busses? SLO Moore stated that drivers need to stop and wait for the bus to load and unload. Drivers can be cited for honking their horns in anger because horn use is for an emergency or to notify other drivers of a hazard. Bus companies should come to LAPD about the issue and SLO Moore will remind his officers to be alert to this concern. (2) Dirt bike riders are riding in Potrero Canyon and those riders come up through adjacent city streets. What is the best way to report this activity other than 911 or requiring residents to physically go to the station to file a report? SLO Moore and his officers are aware of this activity and enforcement measures are being worked on. (3) Administrative Citation Enforcement Program (“ACE”), has it been rolled out citywide. SLO Moore was not ready to comment, but officer training programs have begun. (4) Saturday and Sunday motorcycle and automobile racing is taking place along Sunset Boulevard and Palisades Drive. SLO Moore stated that speeding on Sunset is an on-going problem for LAPD. (5) What are the latest trends to address residential burglaries? There is a doorbell replacement called ring.com that allows residents to respond to their doorbell via their smartphone and with the cloud upgrade that service will take a video of who is at the door.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office.  Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy — Not in attendance.

7.2.3.    Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.  Daniel Tamm, Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom.  Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen.  Lila Kalaf, District Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu.

Janet Turner, District Representative.  Janet reported that (1) FAA flight changes – the Congressman has sent a letter asking about changes for the Palisades, if a briefing could take place or the deadline for comment could be extended. The plan is going through an environmental assessment. While the office has been aware of the plan since the beginning of the year it has been difficult to ascertain what actual flight plans are proposed and which areas could be notably affected. Discussion: All airlines flying over or near the Palisades should be evaluated. Altitude is an issue. (2) The WLA Master Plan is moving along. On October 16, 2015 the first draft will be released with a 45-day public comment period to follow. (3) Postmaster Update. Janet said that in response to her poll, 80% of the residents responded that they were getting their mail satisfactorily by 6 p.m. at night. Residents have complained that they are not getting all of their mail and that there may be a problem with forwarded mail. Congressman Lieu’s office has asked for extra training with new hires. (4) Thank you to Congressman Lieu for appearing at synagogue this past week in the Palisades.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives – None.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives.

(1) Susan Payne reported that the Will Rogers Polo Event is October 4, 2015 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. and is free to the public with the exception of the parking charge. (2) Bruce Schwartz reported that Kurt Toppel is the new President of PRIDE.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports.

(1) Donna Vaccarino said that the Save the Drop event went very well. There was a rain barrel raffle and 75-80 persons attended. (2) Barbara Kohn reported that: she is organizing a Shred-It Event hoped to take place for four hours and open to the public. HOAs and residents are asked to financially contribute towards the $1,000 cost needed to have this shred-it event in the Palisades. Sign Enforcement – the DRB is continuing efforts for enforcement. Residents Against Noise had previously been formed to provide comment to FAA Flight patterns. Barbara Kohn was re-appointed by Mike Bonin to the regional committee involved in overseeing allocation and disbursements of Prop K funds; she is the only CD-11 representative for the area north of the 10 Freeway.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Village Project Public Committee Meeting to discuss Caruso Affiliated’s application. October 29, 2015, 6pm in the old U.S. Bank Building. The application may be viewed at: http://www.palisadesvillageca.com/. Contact dkaplan6@aol.com with any questions. All interested board and community members are welcome.

8.2.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

MOTION TO AMEND BYLAWS ARTICLE VIII(1)(A), APPENDIX A AND RELATED PROVISIONS; http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf. SECOND (ORAL AND WRITTEN) READING of the motion and proposed bylaws changes (see Sec. B below). Introduction: Chris stated that before Committee Co-Chair Richard Cohen begins the second oral reading and we have formal introduction of the motion she wished to make a few prefatory remarks. Chris stated: “As the board is aware, on March 12, for the first time that I know of, a PPCC bylaws committee actually asked for direction from the board before beginning work on bylaws amendments. The board gave direction as indicated by an informal vote of its members, and as indicated, there was no discussion at the time. However, as reflected in the minutes, I stated that if anyone wished to agendize these issues for further discussion pursuant to the bylaws, this would be done. No one asked me to agendize these issues. I also clearly stated that we would have full discussion of all proposed bylaws amendments before any vote. That is exactly what we will now be doing. I hope and expect that this will be a robust discussion, without rancor, on the merits of the proposals.” Reading: Richard Cohen read the motion. Richard stated that Donna Vaccarino had asked for a reading of the redlined changes and the words deleted. Richard proceeded to read both. Action/Motion: Richard brought the motion unanimously recommended by the bylaws committee. Reza Akef seconded the motion. Motion: Maryam Zar moved that any vote on the motion be by a written and confidential ballot. Cathy Russell seconded the motion. Chris Spitz read the following statement: “Our governing rules provide that we follow Roberts Rules of Order unless otherwise provided in our bylaws. Roberts Rules permits voting by written confidential ballot per a majority vote of board members. The authorities state that it can be used for sensitive, controversial or divisive motions. Our own bylaws call for written ballots in the case of officer elections and Code of Conduct hearings; per our legal advisor nothing in the bylaws prohibits voting by written ballot in other circumstances.” Second. Chris stated that there is no debate on motion for a written confidential ballot. A vote was taken and the motion passed. Discussion on Proposed Bylaws Amendments/Motion: (1) Donna Vaccarino opposed the motion on grounds of process (the direction of the board vote), insufficient outreach by the bylaws committee, and opposition to faith-based groups joining the board due to separation of church and state and lack of inclusion (other races such as Native Americans, atheists, etc.). Donna stated that the motion should be withdrawn and the bylaws committee should do more outreach to existing organizational board members. (2) Reza Akef supported the motion and PPCC’s process on the following grounds: (i) the current structure marginalizes the voice of elected representatives and residents by organizations and groups that don’t have transparency and have a host of other negative issues (for example, one person being the face of three organizations epitomizes the problem in making complaints that there is not enough outreach, etc.), (ii) the standing seats with the same perpetual does not make the PPCC a true community council; (iii) the other groups suggested do not exist in the Palisades, nor does an organized Muslim group; Reza supported the inclusion of faith based groups on the grounds of trying to include, not exclude. (3) Sarah Conner stated that she supports the addition of faith based groups but opposes the motion because she wants more analysis of what groups should participate, i.e., her group “Save the Bluffs” has 800 members on Face Book. Sarah also opposed having PPRA share a category with TCA because (i) PPRA has different issues then TCA, noting that PPRA has been active in the community since the 1970’s and (ii) PPRA feels like its voice and seat are being excluded for not a fair or stated reason. (4) Maryam Zar supported the motion and process, with further comment that voting by written ballot has nothing to do with the process of the proposed amendments. Maryam supported the bylaws motion by clarifying that PPRA’s voice is not being eliminated because it is in a two-group category that gives it a de-facto standing seat on the board. Maryam supported the process behind the motion by noting that the direction of the board vote was very clear and the bylaws committee (a very diverse and educated group) worked hard to achieve broader representation and rotation of organizations such that more people could participate on PPCC. (5) Randy Young opposed the motion because standing seats should be maintained because they are the ones with a memory, are fine people and PPCC is lucky to have them permanently on the board. Action: Gil Dembo called the question. There was a second. Susan Payne moved to postpone the vote to the next meeting because the Chamber of Commerce did not have the ability to consult with their organization. Chris stated that the Chamber’s motion for a postponement must be automatically granted pursuant to the terms of the bylaws. (6) Board members stated that more discussion should take place on the proposed bylaws amendments/motion and additional discussion ensued. (7) Barbara Kohn opposed the motion on grounds of process and stated that discussion had been insufficient. (8) Jennifer Malaret supported the motion and the process of bylaws revisions particularly because under prior Chairs the process to amend the bylaws had been done wholly behind closed doors and readings were far more informal. PPCC is trying something new, that being presenting bylaws revisions part-by-part and in order of temporal importance, and is looking at what is best for the organization’s future. Fundamental to the process is a acknowledgement by everyone that displeasure has been expressed by sitting board members and residents about the organizational membership of the PPCC where all are appointed and almost a majority enjoy standing or “solo” seats. PPCC accepted the criticism and the bylaws committee took the ideas to heart. Chris also decided to incorporate ideas from those who previously were not part of the process to answer the question of what is the best course for PPCC going forward.

A. Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#12MAR15. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment:

1. The four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories.

2. Faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion.

3. A process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion.

B. Motion. The Bylaws Committee unanimously agrees that modifications to the existing Bylaws as directed by the Board should be made to facilitate all three areas of amendments. Such modifications would be approved now and become effective for the organizational term beginning on October 1, 2016. Adoption of these modifications does not prevent further modification to the effected provisions as may be approved by the Board during the interim period, i.e., the 2015 date upon which this motion is approved and the 2016 effective date. The Bylaws Committee unanimously recommends that the Board vote to adopt the modifications as set forth in the draft revised bylaws (redlined) document distributed concurrently with this agenda (linked as “ProposedRevisedBylawsSept.2015” in PPCC email messages of September 21, 2015, September 7, 2015 and August 24, 2015) and further, to authorize the Bylaws Committee to correct any typos or informalities that may be discovered during conversion of the final draft.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Discussion of Councilmember Mike Bonin Motion Regarding Short Term Residential Vacation Rentals (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635-S2_mot_06-02-2015.pdf).

Prior PPCC discussion 5/14/15 (http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#14MAY15; no position taken). Discussion Topics: Should short-term vacation rentals (“STVR”s) be allowed under any circumstances in R1 zones? Is there a distinction between occasional home-sharing and using a unit or dwelling to effectively operate as a hotel or business? Should STVRs be allowed only when the unit or dwelling is the “primary residence” of the property owner? If so, how should “primary residence” be defined? Should the property owner be required to provide proof that they physically inhabit the residence? Should there be time/duration limits, geographic concentration limits, restrictions on the number of rooms that can be rented out, or any other restrictions on STVRs? Should STVRs be allowed only in or immediately adjacent to higher-density zones (e.g., R-3, R-4, C or A)? Should the presence of the property owner or an “on-site manager” be required at all times? Are there special concerns about allowing STVRs in hillside areas, very high fire hazard severity zones, areas with limited parking and/or narrow streets, or in any other locations? Is it reasonable to be concerned about property values if STVRs are allowed? If allowed, should prior notice to adjacent property owners and the right to object be required and/or provided for? Should Transient Occupancy Taxes be imposed on property owners who host STVRs? Do those taxes go into the General Fund or are they in any way returned to benefit the communities in which STVRs become legalized? Should taxes and fees related to STVRs be used to fund a dedicated oversight entity or compliance unit? Should there be identifying information of STVRs for emergency responders (LAFD, LAPD?)? Should fire and public health inspections be required for STVRs? Should STVR owners be required to pay legal wages to their helpers? Should best practices of other major cities be researched and adapted to develop the most effective controls/enforcement processes and to protect quality of life in our residential neighborhoods? See position statements/motions on file regarding this matter from Eagle Rock NC (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635_cis_5-25-15.pdf) and from three Westside NCs: Bel Air-Beverly Crest NC (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635-S2_cis_8-21-15.pdf), Venice NC (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635_cis_1-28-15.pdf) and West Los Angeles NC (http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2014/14-1635_cis_8-17-15.pdf). (Note: no other Westside councils have submitted position statements). Meeting/Notice: The first community “listening session” will be held on Tuesday, September 29, 2015, Mar Vista Park Auditorium, 11430 Woodbine St. Los Angeles CA, 90066, 6:30pm – 8:30pm. PPCC strongly encourages board and community members to attend and provide feedback to the Planning Department as they are working to prepare draft regulations regarding short-term rentals. Interested individuals should also submit letters/comments directly to Council File No. 14-1635 (contact Chris Spitz for more information). Introduction: Chris stated that she would like to take a moment and set the table for this discussion. PPCC previously discussed the issue of Short Term Residential Rentals – or STVRs – on May 14, 2015 before Councilmember Bonin’s current motion was introduced. PPCC did not take a position but learned, among other things, that residential rentals for less than 30 days are currently not allowed; that enforcement is difficult or even non-existent because the STVR media platforms don’t have identifying information about the properties, such as street addresses; that safety is a concern without required fire and public health inspections; that Councilmember Bonin was concerned about loss of affordable housing stock but that the concern in the Palisades is first with impacts on our quality of life; that STVRs are a business but that taxes aren’t imposed nor is there any requirement that the operators pay legal wages to workers as legitimate businesses do; that the Councilmember favors imposition of Transient Occupancy or hotel taxes; and that here in the Palisades there are STVRs, including an example given of a home in the Highlands being rented out for proms and weddings. There are now dozens of STVR platforms, including the familiar ones such as Airbnb, HomeAway and VRBO. It is difficult to know how many currently operate in the Palisades at any given time but just looking at these three platforms in a snapshot in time this week, there appeared to be at least 145 STVRs listed for rent in residential areas where they are not permitted (there may be some duplication but this gives everyone a baseline idea; Chris noted that there are two such rentals on her street alone, including one entire home that has been rented out for some time as an STVR for $5,300 per week and continues to be listed). Mike Bonin’s current motion that was linked in our agenda calls for allowing STVRs in residential areas if the property is the principal residence of the owner. The term is not defined. The motion also calls for Transient Occupancy taxes to be imposed, with no proposed details as to enforcement, assessment, how the funds would be used, etc. The motion is currently pending in City Council committee but the Planning Dept. is holding “listening sessions” to get input on the proposal to allow STVRs. The Westside session will be on Sept. 29 as indicated in our meeting agenda. Board members Barbara Kohn and Linda Lefkowitz also attended a locally organized Westside community meeting about this issue last Saturday and Chris stated that if they had information they would be appreciated. Chris opened the matter for discussion and stated that if during discussion anyone would like to make a motion that the board take a position on the matter, they were free to do so. Discussion: (1) Brian Deming reported that in Area 3 residents in a multi-family building revolted against a unit owner who was operating a STVR. Residents banned the activity because of the wear and tear on the building, pool area, lobby and impact on quiet enjoyment for permanent residents. (2) Carol Bruch reported problems with that activity in Edgewater Towers that created security issues. (3) Peter Culhane reported that there is a property in the Highlands who rents her home for weddings and other events along with converting her garage into three bedrooms. The activity is a problem in the Highlands. (4) Barbara Kohn stated that PPCC is interested in protecting R zones it needs to take a strong position against the Bonin motion. It is up to residents to express opinions and take a position. Barbara said that efforts to legalize this activity is happening fast, some are seeking to compromise but this activity impacts on all R zones. (5) Linda Lefkowitz said that the ordinance provides for a tax and the City’s budget being what it is invites legalization of the activity although it is not clear who collects the tax or where it goes. The trend is towards mixed-use neighborhoods. Interested persons can go on line to see the locations where there are extra cars, people who are not interested in the community, etc. (6) Gil Dembo said this is a problem across the country and we should object not only to Bonin but all the councilmembers and the Mayor. It affects the life of residents throughout the City, i.e., the Venice Canals. (7) Lachman Lane – there is a house being rented for more then $10,000 per week to three families and it brings cars and noise. Action/Motion: Barbara Kohn sponsored the following motion: PPCC is opposed to the motion sponsored by Gil Cedillo Mike Bonin, with the concerns set forth in this agenda.” Gil Dembo seconded the motion. Discussion: Sarah Conner said residents have contacted her concerned with this activity and she supports the motion. Micheal Soneff said that the activity is positive for young people who cannot afford hotels and find safe and clean housing. It also gives landlords the ability to try out prospective tenants. These rentals are a valuable service and perhaps from the Chamber’s prospective transient users bring money into commercial services. Richard Cohen commented that this is illegal in the City and there is no enforcement. When you move to relax that ordinance the problems are likely to become worse and not better. The situation in the Palisades with houses renting for $10,000 per week has nothing to do with helping people. Stuart Muller said that this activity is not a unique or new thing, it happens all over Europe; however Stuart stated he was against the activity. Rick Mills said that it comes down to the details and how the laws are enforced. Because there is no enforcement the activity is happening without control and funding for enforcement would have some value. Schyler Dietz supports the activity. Diane Bleak stated that people invested in their homes and did so to raise their children in a communal neighborhood and transient residents splinter the neighborhoods and cause anxiety with added strangers and nuisances. Carol Bruch stated that the term “primary residence” does not mean that the property owner needs to be present. A resident commented that it helps elderly people who want to stay in their homes and is a good activity. Reza Akef commented that rentals for party houses have caused traffic and trash in the Riviera and R1 and R2 zones are really designed for permanent residents and families. If there is an emergency there are no additional safety precautions for landlords or information that goes to emergency responders. Barbara Kohn stated that this is a commercial activity akin to a hotel taking place to next-door residential property owners but for the four specific commercial areas in Pacific Palisades. Action/Motion: the vote was called and the motion passed.

10.    New Business – None.

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    Palisades Turkey Trot.

Now in its third year, the race will take place again in 2015. The run is a 5K starting at Palisades Charter High School and the route is around the El Medio Bluffs. Proceeds benefit Hearts with Hope, a UCLA medical charity. There will also be a food drive for the Los Angeles Food Bank. For more information see paliturkeytrot.com or contact (310) 251-3505. Comments: in the early morning people are sensitive to sound, however the high school does not plug in their speakers. Also consideration is underway to expand the route through Temescal Canyon to add miles to the course. LA’s Department of Recreation and Parks would need to be contacted.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:04 p.m.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.2 — PPCC ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERS 2015/2016

Business and Commerce:
Chamber of Commerce: Rick Lemmo
Alt. Susan Payne

Cultural/Ethics/Aesthetics:
Garden Club: Barbara Marinacci
Alt. Palisades Beautiful: Laura Mack

Education:
Village School: Todd Wadler
Alt. Canyon Elementary School: Dustin Hall

Historian:
Historical Society: Dick Wulliger
Alt. Eric Dugdale

Civic Organizations:
PRIDE: Bruce Schwartz
Alt. Civic League: Donna Vaccarino

Recreation:
AYSO: Janet Anderson
Alt. Pacific Palisades Baseball Association: Rick McGeagh

Environment:
Temescal Canyon Association: Gil Dembo
Alt. Ted Mackie

Service Clubs:
Pacific Palisades Women’s Club: Nancy Niles
Alt. Rotary Club: Kevin Niles

Residents Association:
Pacific Palisades Residents Association: Sarah Rena Conner
Alt. Jessica Simon

ITEM 7.1.4 – CITYWIDE SIGN ORDINANCE

September 14, 2015

Hon. Councilmember Mike Bonin, mike.bonin@lacity.org
Hon. Councilmember Paul Koretz, paul.koretz@lacity.org
Mr. Michael LoGrande, Department of City Planning, Michael.logrande@lacity.org
Mr. Tom Rothmann, Department of City Planning, tom.rothman@lacity.org
Ms. Phyllis Nathanson, Department of City Planning, Phyllis.nathanson@lacity.org
Los Angeles City Hall
200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Via Email

Re: CF 11-1705, 08-2020, 08-3386-S1; CITYWIDE Sign Ordinance; PPCC Seeks Delay in CPC Hearing Date to Allow for Public Participation

Hon. Councilmembers and City Planning Department Officials:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broadly based community organization and the voice of the Palisades since 1973. At its regular meeting on September 10, 2015 PPCC’s board discussed the expected release of the staff report on the above referenced matter (on or about September 17, 2015) and the scheduling of the related CPC hearing only one week later. The board of PPCC passed the following motion:

“A. Background. The CPC’s standing rules with respect to responses to a staff report substantially limit responses to no more than ten pages, twenty copies of which must be delivered to the Commission no later than 48 hours prior to the meeting (see “City Planning Commission Policy for Submittal of Written Materials on Agendized Items” paragraph (b)). Under the currently proposed schedule, if the community is fortunate enough to have the staff report by September 17, community members will have only two working days to file their written responses, or will be limited to two-page letters. There is simply insufficient time for community members to review and address the many complexities contained within the ordinance and express those views to the CPC under the CPC’s rules and the net result will undoubtedly be that community input on the ordinance will be substantially burdened.
B. Motion. PPCC hereby requests that more time be provided between issuance of the staff report and the CPC hearing, i.e., were the Planning Department to release its staff report on or about September 17 as currently anticipated, then the ordinance should be scheduled for public hearing before the CPC on October 8, but in no event earlier than two weeks following eventual release of the report.”

PPCC remains concerned with the substance of the yet-to-be-released staff report relative to: (1) advertising in city parks and recreational facilities, (2) negative impacts on private and public school campuses, (3) spillover effects, traffic safety, energy use, and aggregate impacts of new digital displays, (4) negative impacts on scenic ridgelines and open space, (5) negative impacts on county beaches and the California coastline, (6) exceptions from regulation in specific plan areas, (7) allowances for adjustments permitted without a public hearing and appeals process, (8) exemption of signs in public rights of way (PROW), (9) the ability of property owners to retain their right of private action.
This complex ordinance has been in the legislative process for over 6 years and PPCC, along with residents and city leaders particularly from CD11 and CD5, have spent thousands of hours on this matter. There is no reason to not allow NCs, CCs and stakeholders a reasonable time period (something more than a week and 60 days) to review the staff report and engage in a meaningful public discussion.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President,
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc:
Debbie Dyner-Harris, District Director, CD11, debbie.dynerharris@lacity.org
Sharon Dickinson, Legislative Assistant, PLUM Committee, sharon.dickinson@lacity.org, with request for filing in CF 11-170

ITEM 7.1.8 – DRAFT EA/SO CAL METROPLEXNEXTGEN/REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD AND ADDITIONAL PUBLIC MEETINGS/ OUTREACH

September 22, 2015

SoCal Metroplex EA FAA
Western Service Center – Operations Support Group
1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057

Via Email: 9-ANM-SoCalOAPM@faa.gov

Re: Draft Environmental Assessment (EA)/Southern California Metroplex Next Generation Air
Transportation System (NextGen); Request for Extension of Draft EA Comment Period and
For Public Meetings/Workshops and Further Outreach in Pacific Palisades

Dear Federal Aviation Administration:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broadly-based community organization and the voice of the Palisades community since 1973.

PPCC learned today, for the first time, that as part of the Southern California NextGen system the FAA is proposing a new approach procedure for flights going to Long Beach Airport which will include a flight path over Pacific Palisades before heading south to Long Beach. This new proposal may result in significant negative impacts and is a matter of great concern to the Palisades community, which had no prior notice of this new proposal and insufficient time to study the matter and submit comments on the draft EA prior to the current deadline of October 8.

PPCC supports the resolution sponsored by Councilmember Mike Bonin, passed unanimously by the Los Angeles City Council on September 15, 2015, with the concurrence of Mayor Eric Garcetti (Council File 15-0002-s99), calling for additional time for impacted community stakeholders to “study the full slate of Metroplex documents” and for the FAA to perform “additional, comprehensive public outreach to all potentially affected areas.”

We accordingly request that the FAA hold additional public meetings/workshops and conduct outreach in Pacific Palisades, and that the draft EA comment period be further extended to allow sufficient time for the Palisades community to fully study the proposal for a new flight path over Pacific Palisades and submit comment before any final determination is made.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc:
Hon. Ted Lieu, United States Congressman
Hon. Mike Bonin, Los Angeles City Councilmember

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 8th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Nancy Niles, Bruce Schwartz, Kelly Comras, Richard Wulliger, Stuart Muller, Sarah Conner, George Wolfberg, Howard Robinson, Rick Lemmo, Rick Mills, Barbara Marinacci, Todd Wadler, Reza Akef and Peter Culhane.

Voting Alternates:  Robin Meyers, Rick McGeagh, Ted Mackie and Steve Boyers.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Kevin Niles, Eric Dugdale, Susan Payne, Michael Soneff, Quentin Fleming, Brian Deming, Laura Mack, Donna Vaccarino, Ron Dean, Dustin Hall and David Kaplan.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Chris Spitz read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Introduction of the Board.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:03 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  The President deemed approval of the September 24, 2015 minutes as corrected. Upcoming meetings: Regular Public Board Meetings, 7pm, Palisades branch library: 10/22, presentation/Q&A with California State Assemblymember Richard Bloom; presentation by Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homeless regarding fundraising and partnership with OPCC. 11/12, presentation/Q&A with Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer. Special Public Board Meeting: 11/18, 6:30pm, Palisades Recreation Center “big gym”: VPLUC report and presentation/discussion/possible action by PPCC re Caruso Affiliated Village Project application and plans.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Richard Cohen reported the financial status as of October 8, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,775.59. Richard thanked the community and board members for contributing their dues and donations.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.  Oral announcements were waived, due to time constraints. No written reports were submitted other than the President’s announcements.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9:00 p.m.; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf).

7.1.2.    Start of Fiscal Year Oct. 1.  Welcome new Organizational Members for 2015-2016: Todd Wadler (Village School/primary), Dustin Hall (Canyon School/alternate) and Laura Mack (Palisades Beautiful/alternate).

7.1.3.    Citizen of the Year/Sparkplug Awards Event – December 10, 2015, Gladstone’s.  Nominations now open for qualified individuals for Citizen of the Year and Sparkplug honors. Deadline for submission of nominations: October 31. Submit nominations to info@pacpalicc.org. For information about nomination requirements, go to http://www.pp90272.org and scroll down to Press Release re Citizen and Sparkplug Awards.

7.1.4.    PPCC Website, Fundraising, Outreach Update.  Submit tax deductible dues/donations (suggested amount: $25 individual/family, $50 business) to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades 90272 or via Pay Pal at www.pp90272.org. Like Us on Facebook at pacpalicc.

7.1.5.    Short Term Residential Vacation Rentals (STVRs) Update.  The first Planning Dept. “listening session” took place on September 29 in Mar Vista. Hundreds of citizens from throughout the City attended and gave input, with the majority expressing support for legalization of STVRs. The Planning Dept. will prepare a draft ordinance with input received from community members, which will eventually be considered by the City Council. See PPCC letter below. Interested board members and residents are encouraged to take CD-11’s online survey using the link found in Councilmember Bonin’s newsletter found at http://www.11thdistrict.com/october_2015_neighborhoods_first_newsletter.

7.1.6.    Councilmember Bonin Baby Gift.  PPCC presented Mike Bonin with a beautiful baby gift basket for his new son. We received a lovely handwritten thank you note from the Councilmember expressing his appreciation to PPCC. Thanks to Maryam Zar for organizing and delivering the gift basket.

7.1.7.    FAA Flight Path Matter (Metroplex).  Congressman Lieu has written to the FAA requesting specific information on flight paths and an additional community meeting. Contact Chris Spitz for more information. info@pacpalicc.org.

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).  Oral and written announcements were waived due to time constraints.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.  Oral announcements were waived, due to time constraints. No reports were submitted in writing.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Report made in writing due to time constraints: Public Committee Meeting re Caruso Affiliated Village Project application and plans: October 29, 2015, 6 pm in the old U.S. Bank building. All interested Board and community members are welcome. A Special Public PPCC Board Meeting will be held on November 18, 2015, 6:30pm in the Palisades Recreation Center “big gym,” for a VPLUC report and presentation/discussion/possible action by PPCC on the Village Project application and plans. Note: Special Board Meetings are authorized pursuant to PPCC Bylaws Art. IX.2.

8.1.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

2nd reading of motion and proposed bylaws changes (org. membership) (continuation of discussion from 9/24/15 board meeting). Discussion and vote. Introduction: Chris Spitz narrated background information from the last meeting. Chris indicated that speakers would be called on and efforts would be made to allow persons who had not spoken to speak and to allow everyone to speak. (1) George Wolfberg objected to personal comments made at the last meeting because reports from the bylaws committee represent the unanimous agreement by all members after many hours of consideration, discussion, and give and take. PPCC has an unstated guideline whereby disrespecting one committee member disrespects all; or stated another way board members may disagree but should not be disagreeable in the process. George stated that he appreciated the energy, passion and caring attention showed by the board to the proposed bylaws changes. George noted that the process was appropriate and that if the board members do not like the proposal they are free to vote against some or all of the changes to Attachment “A”. However, as background, George articulated the following supporting facts in support of the motion: (1) PPCC’s Chair is responsible for making sure board seats are filled and that Chris has succeeded in filling a record number of positions and alternates. (2) From time to time organizations have been unable to find people to serve on the board, notably The Friends of Library and Garden Club. The Civic League representative was a frequent no-show and during his own tenure as Chair, his Secretary attended only one board meeting. In the past, PPCC attendance by the Chamber and PPRA has been less than desired and the schools have historically lacked representatives from year to year (George noted that currently the schools, Chamber, Civic League, Garden Club and Library have had robust representation). (3) In Dec 2006, after a 12-year absence, PPRA applied for reinstatement to the board. The resulting board contained five categories with only one member: Business and Commerce (Chamber), Historian (Historical Society), Civic Organizations (Civic League), Environment (Temescal Canyon Association), Residents Association (PPRA) while the Cultural, Education, Recreation and Service Clubs each had multiple members. At the time the 2005-06 Bylaws committee noted issues with Attachment “A”, reporting: “Should the organization structure set forth in Appendix A be subject to periodic review in light of changed conditions over time? For example, it was noted that some categories have only one representative while others have seven or more, perhaps resulting in the failure of the education organizations to actively participate. Was this because by the time a particular school comes up for its membership year, the historical relationship with the PPCC had evaporated? Or does the PPCC meeting night conflict with too many school activities?” George stated that when PPRA was being considered for reinstatement to PPCC board in 2006 after a 12 year absence there was much sentiment against giving PPRA its own single member category and several titles for an appropriate category were floated. The result was a 24 voting member board. (4) Eventually, in 2014, the vote was taken away from the Youth Representative reducing voting membership to 23 members. (2) Eric Dugdale recalled the positive historical contributions of organizational groups and residents. Organizational groups have members from across all geographical areas. The Historical Society opposed being grouped with ‘cultural’ because it works on environmental matters. They are digitizing over 10,000 documents so that brings something more than just cultural to PPCC. Standing members should not be modified lightly and they are not subject to political influence. There are other groups that may want to join the council and that is not particularly proposed here. Eric advocated a no vote and having the motion sent back to committee. (3) Adam Glazer, Chamber of Commerce President and Board Chair. The Chamber thanked the bylaws committee for its work and the current engagement of council members and the community. Adam stated that the Chamber supports the motion as written because short term desires of individual organizations should be set aside for the long term goals of the council. The Chamber will vote to support the recommendations to realign the organizational representation and their service terms. (4) Shirley Haggstrom objected to reducing the representation of TCA and the Historical Society based on their good works and historical involvements in the community and on the PPCC Board. Shirley stated that these organizations should retain their standing seats. Standing seats are necessary to retain the value of institutional memory on the PPCC board. Shirley said a no vote should be taken to keep the foundation of PPCC intact and noted that there are other measures such as adding more seats. (5) Marge Gold thanked the council for its hard work and noted that the council is strong now as a result of its additional representation. Marge urged a no vote because it would eliminate standing seats for organizations that do good work and go to court. Marge suggested that seats be added for the BID and for the homeless task force. (6) Elliot Zorensky stated that all tenants should be able to vote for seats on the council. Elliot stated that grouping the Chamber with the BID ( landlords) does not work because they may have diverse interests. (7) Richard Blumenberg stated that the Civic League opposes the bylaws change because they are in a two organization category and do not want to be in a three organization category. The Civic League opposes the appointment of faith-based representatives and an appointed business representative at the expense of standing organizations rather the number of voting seats should be increased. (8) Barbara Kohn wanted to sponsor a motion to sever the bylaws committee motion. Chris Spitz responded that Roberts Rules Sec. 24 prevented division of complicated bylaws amendments motions with intertwining provisions and noted that if members objected to parts of the motion then they can vote no and if 2/3rds vote of approval is not attained the matter would be returned to committee. Richard Cohen stated that the examples given do not go to the motion to sever rather these are debatable issues. No second was made. Barbara stated that she reserved the right to respond to the inaccuracies in the statements made by George Wolfberg. (9) Sarah Conner expressed that PPRA is a multi generational building block for the PPCC and residents in the Palisades and should retain its standing seat to serve Palisadians who care about the Palisades. There has not been a good reason given to take away PPRA’s standing seat. (10) Rick Lemmo thanked the bylaws committee for presenting at the Chamber meeting and expressed that the support for the motion is to help PPCC as an organization and the community to move into the future. Relative to the BID, either group can make a good argument in support of the business community and for why neither should be in rotation but including both organizations broadens representation. Kelly Comras and Rick Lemmo discussed the process of the Chamber’s decision-making process. (11) Reza Akef read an email received from an organization on PPCC stating that a standing seat is not necessary to the good work of an organization or the council. Times have changed and there is nothing that makes the historical contributions of four organizations more important then the contributions of other/current organizations and residents. The bylaws changes do not take away the ability of organizations to have a seat, participate and contribute. (12) Donna Vaccarino objected to the process from which the bylaws motion came about. Proper discourse has not been allowed. Straw polls are not a product of discussion and debate within the community itself. Donna thought the motion should be sent back to committee with an outside facilitator so the issue of what fair representation is can be examined. (13) Michael Soneff stated that the motion does not deal with the real problem and that is which organizations should be at the table rather than to simply reorganize defunct organizations that do not participate. (14) Richard Cohen stated that the process was done entirely by the bylaws and with the guidance of PPCC’s legal advisor so attacks on the process are totally misplaced. There is no rush to a decision, the process has been underway for seven months. The language in the motion will be corrected to state clearly that the appointment of the business representative appointed by the Chair will be subject to approval by the Board. The bylaws committee did not take up the issue of the wonderful nature of any organization. Being part of a rotation does not diminish in any way the ability of an organization to do its wonderful work. Within a category members do not need to have identical views. (15) Stuart Muller objected to the process because bylaws committee meetings are not open to the public and that the topic has not been open to appropriate discourse.
Vote: 23 voting members were present. The yes votes were 12 and no votes 11. The motion failed.

A. Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#12MAR15. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment:

1. The four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories.

2. Faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion.

3. A process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion.

B. Motion. The Bylaws Committee unanimously agrees that modifications to the existing Bylaws as directed by the Board should be made to facilitate all three areas of amendments. Such modifications would be approved now and become effective for the organizational term beginning on October 1, 2016. Adoption of these modifications does not prevent further modification to the effected provisions as may be approved by the Board during the interim period, i.e., the 2015 date upon which this motion is approved and the 2016 effective date. The Bylaws Committee unanimously recommends that the Board vote to adopt the modifications as set forth in the draft revised bylaws (redlined) document distributed concurrently with this agenda (linked as “ProposedRevisedBylawsSept.2015” in PPCC email messages of September 21, 2015, September 7, 2015 and August 24, 2015) and further, to authorize the Bylaws Committee to correct any typos or informalities that may be discovered during conversion of the final draft.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Presentation/discussion/possible action by PPCC re the Village Shell Station proposed CUB/CUP (use/hours/beverage).

Presenting: Saheed and Michael Kohanoff, owner/applicant/s; King Woods, land use consultant; Richard Finkel, architect; Neill Brower, land use attorney. Mel Kimman, Vice President, Via de la Paz HOA. Presentation/Owner: the owner and operator has been in the community for 25 years. A reduction in operating hours is something that, should the community desire, the owner is willing to consider. Richard Finkel stated that the plan had been adjusted in response to community concerns and the driveway has been moved off the corner. The project is over parked and is under the height limitations. No variances are being sought. DOT has reviewed the traffic study and found that there are no negative impacts. Trees and landscaping have been added. The tower design at the center has been taken down in response to concerns of the residents. CUP/CUB is being sought because of the sale of beer and wine. There is no hearing scheduled although one may be done after DRB approval and in approximately 8 weeks. Presentation/HOA: 107 residents are members of the HOA. The use of the property is the most important part. (1) the radius of the proposed use from the current location does not impact R zones but for one lot. Here the R zone is adjacent so many more neighbors are impacted by the sale of liquor. (2) a mini mart use will not serve residents, rather it will bring in users and cater to transient customers. (3) HOA supports the current hours of the gas station. (4) No liquor sales because there are adjacent grocery stores and restaurants. (5) the size of the building will affect the traffic ease of getting around and a turnaround must be done on the gas station property for those seeking to stay in the village (no U turns at Temescal). Questions: (1) What is the current status of conditions in terms of discussion with the City Attorney/zoning administrators and the ABC? Conditions have to be imposed by ABC. A conditional use permit does not give you the right to sell beer and wine, an owner still needs a license from ABC to sell alcohol. (2) Can the city regulate the hour of operation after alcohol sales have already stopped? The City has the right to say an owner cannot have a 24-hour operation and the City has the right of enforcement through the Department of Building and Safety. Twenty-four hour operation requires a conditional use process (as do operations past 11 p.m.). Hours requested now are 6 am to 2 am daily. (3) Sandy Eddy stated that a liquor license cannot be transferred from one location to another. Since a new license has to be obtained the new location should have the same hours and size of what business is there now. Over 280 opposing signatures have been obtained. Main points of opposition are alcohol sales, operating hours and size. (4) John Murdock the attorney for an adjacent building owner stated that there is a problem because the driveway will negatively impact ingress and egress to his client’s building. In 2007 similar findings for an expanded food mart could not be made. The project is not by-right because it requires permit. The current building proposed is a huge increase over what is there now. In addition there are concerns about the design. (5) Ron Dean said the traffic study does not change the grade but that doesn’t mean traffic won’t change, the categories are very broad. Mini marts are an encouragement for homeless to purchase things late at night. Ron urged the PPCC to reject the proposal. (6) The planning is poor, i.e., having this use so close to residences. The owner has been cited in the past for violating conduct regarding alcohol sales. The price paid was for a property that did not allow alcohol sales so this is an attempt to maximize profits at the expense of the community. (7) A mother spoke concerned about foot traffic and expressed that alcohol sales at night serve no good purpose. (8) Ted Weitz asked if this use at this location is good for the community. A mini mart’s top selling items are typically tobacco, beer and lottery tickets. Mini marts are quasi-public spaces because owners do not turn away kids and loiterers and police don’t come onto a property without a formal complaint. Kids walk by this location getting to local schools, particularly Palisades Charter High School. (9) A representative from Sunrise Assisted Living expressed concerns with the alleyway that they use to remove trash and also that has back doors to some of the units. (10) A concern was expressed about Prop 65 and the chemicals and materials used during construction. How does the owner guarantee that further harm won’t be caused to residents who live within seventy-five feet of this property? (11) Paul Glasgall opposed the 24 hour use because it may become a magnet for a bad ilk similar to problems that have taken place at other all night businesses throughout the City of LA. (12) the owner of the Ritrovo building spoke against the proposal because it impedes trash pick up and delivery for his building. Trucks backing up will not be able to see. (13) Reza Akef spoke in support of late night and early morning operating hours though not in favor of alcohol sales. What happened in 2007 does not apply to this current application. It is not fair for one property to have to assure trash take out and turn arounds for adjacent buildings. (14) Michael Kohanoff stated that he has served the community well for the past 25 years. His business license has never been suspended. He is not asking for two to three floors or subterranean building like other adjacent and area property owners. This is a simple request where he is moving his existing business one block over. In the past the current location used to have a 24-hour business and the current 24 hour business he has at the Mobil station does not cause any problems for the community. The private patrol companies patronize his business and provide additional security for his location and the community. The previous car wash was not denied based on size but because a zoning change was needed. A convenience store is not a criminal business and there are good businesses in Beverly Hills, Santa Monica and other areas of the City of Los Angeles. His current business does not have homeless issues and the way that he does business does not attract additional homeless persons to the area. Richard Cohen sponsored the following motion: “PPCC requests that the owner of the proposed project revise the application and reconsider his development in consultation with affected neighboring residents and businesses.” Sarah Conner seconded the motion. Discussion: Howard Robinson suggested that the board give direction such as being against 24 hour operations, alcohol sold past 2 a.m., etc. The motion passed.

10.    New Business – None.

11.    General Public Comment.  [None recorded.]

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:06 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.5 – PPCC LETTER IN OPPOSITION TO COUNCILMEMBER BONIN’S MOTION ON THE LEGALIZATION OF SHORT TERM RENTALS IN R ZONES

September 28, 2015

Councilmembers Jose Huizar (Chair, PLUM Committee and member, Housing Committee),
Marqueece Harris-Dawson (Vice-Chair, PLUM Committee and member, Housing
Committee), Gil Cedillo (Chair, Housing Committee and member, PLUM Committee), Felipe
Fuentes (Vice-Chair, Housing Committee and member, PLUM Committee), Mitchell
Englander (member, PLUM Committee) and Curren D. Price, Jr. (member, Housing
Committee)
Councilmembers Mike Bonin, Herb J. Wesson, Jr. and Paul Koretz (respectively, co-sponsors
and second of “Short Term Rentals” Motion in CF-14-1635-S2)
Los Angeles City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Via Email

Re: OPPOSED – CF 14-1635-S2, “Short-Term Rentals / Transient Occupancy Tax / City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund” Motion

Honorable Councilmembers:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broadly based community organization and the voice of the Palisades since 1973. At its regular meetings on May 15 and September 24, 2015, PPCC’s board discussed short-term rentals in existing residential (“R”) zones where that activity is presently illegal throughout the City of Los Angeles. On September 24th, PPCC passed the following motion:

“PPCC opposes the Motion in CF 14-1635-S2, sponsored by Mike Bonin and Herb J. Wesson, Jr. PPCC opposes any change in the current zoning laws regarding short-term rentals.”

PPPC urges that you consider the following four (4) points of concern:

1. The City’s current regulations in fact do “anticipate” and “effectively” regulate short-term rentals. They are illegal in R zones for very good reasons. Pacific Palisades is comprised of cohesive residential neighborhoods with strategically located commercial zones. Our residential neighborhoods were never intended to accommodate hotel-like environments with transient occupancy by strangers and the noise, parking, traffic, litter and other activities not usual and customary. Safety of neighborhoods is threatened every time alarm and gate codes are given to strangers, Neighborhood Watch programs (founded on residents knowing their neighbors) are compromised and emergency responders are placed at-risk by having to respond to increased and unknown numbers of people coming and going out of what were meant to be single dwelling units. Furthermore, the Palisades has hillside areas, very high fire hazard severity zones, and areas with limited parking and narrow streets; these factors lead to increased risk for residents and short term renters alike — particularly since the Bonin/Wesson Motion does not call for fire and public health inspections or compliance.

2. The answer to technology, innovation, and the way that some people want to travel, make friends or make ends meet is not a blanket commercialization of the City’s neighborhoods, including Pacific Palisades. In response to allegations that the City does not have the resources or will to enforce existing zoning, PPCC suggests that the existing LAMC be amended to allow property owners a private right of action, with recovery of attorney’s fees, in response to the illegal operation of short-term rentals in residential zones. This amendment would help those Palisadians who told PPCC of negative impacts already occurring from short-term rentals in the Marquez Knolls, Palisades Highlands, Edgewater Towers, Via Mesa Bluffs, Riviera, and along the Sunset Boulevard corridor.

3. The way to preserve rental housing and protect the character of residential neighborhoods is not to legalize short-term rentals and collect a transient occupancy tax in order to pay for “crucial,” yet undefined, city services. PPCC is very concerned that residential zones will be negatively impacted as a “money grab” for the City. We are concerned that the City will be drawn to this proposal to achieve additional tax revenues, at the expense of degraded residential property values. It is reasonable for homeowners who are rightly concerned about property values and quality of life to be given, at a minimum, the right to prior notice of any application submitted and appeal of any short-term rental permit issued. Any ordinance should also require an inclusive and specific definition of the “hosts” that would pay the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), who collects the tax, how the tax would be assessed, where that tax goes and the remedy/enforcement against defaulters. Finally, any ordinance must require that the applicant, property owner and operator (if distinct) pay legal wages, abide by hotel employee protections, and register with California’s Employment Development Department.

4. The directive to authorize a “host” to rent “all or part” of their “primary residence” to short-term “visitors,” permitting “someone” to rent a “spare room,” a “back house,” or even their own home while they are “out of town,” is untenable. At minimum this ideal should apply to renting “part” of a primary residence that would support a true ideal of “home-sharing” in R zones. In addition, PPCC is well versed on legal challenges that likely will arise should the ordinance attempt to define terms such as “primary residence” or “spare room.” Limiting rentals to one or more rooms only when “hosts” “live” on the property is not realistically enforceable; what proof would be provided and deemed sufficient? What time and duration limits would be placed on the “hosts'” ability to travel “out of town” and what proof would be provided and deemed sufficient? None of these measures would prevent the adverse impacts (noise, cars, safety, parties) that accompany short-term rental activity in residential zones. PPCC is well aware of too many areas in which City enforcement falls woefully short. The vague words employed in the Bonin/Wesson Motion, if incorporated in any ordinance (e.g., “primary residence”), will likely lead to less, not more, enforcement and lack of protection for residential zones.

PPCC is extremely concerned about an increasing assault on low-density and in particular R-1 zoning by regulation and planning measures which erode traditional protections long relied-upon by homeowners. With respect and great urgency, we request that instead of legalizing short-term rentals, the City should take firm steps to enforce existing law.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):

Hon. Eric Garcetti, Mayor, City of Los Angeles
Michael LoGrande, Director of Planning, Department of City Planning
Tom Rothmann, Senior City Planner, Department of City Planning
Raymond Chan, General Manager, Department of Building & Safety
Lincoln Lee, Chief, Code Enforcement Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
Larry Galstian, Chief, Inspection Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
David Lara, Assistant Chief, Inspection Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
Sharon Dickinson, Legislative Assistant, City Council PLUM Committee –
with request for filing in CF 14-1635-S2

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 22nd 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Barbara Marinacci, Kelly Comras, Stuart Muller, Reza Akef, Sue Kohl, Gil Dembo, Todd Wadler, Cathy Russell, Bruce Schwartz, Eric Dugdale and Nancy Niles.

Voting Alternates:  Eric Dugdale, Susan Payne, Quentin Fleming, Jessica Simon, Diane Bleak and Carol Bruch.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Donna Vaccarino, Laura Mack and Schuyler Dietz.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Reza Akef read the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:08 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the October 8, 2015 minutes approved as corrected. Upcoming meetings: Regular Public Board Meeting, 11/12, 7pm, Palisades branch library. Presentation/Q&A with Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer. Special Public Board Meeting: 11/18, 6:30pm, Palisades Recreation Center “big gym.” Topic: Caruso Affiliated Village Project land use application and plans.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Chris reported the financial status as of October 22, 2015. The total account balances equal $32,812.59 including $125 of dues received since the last meeting.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9:00 p.m.; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/BYLAWS%20JULY%202015.pdf).

7.1.2.    Citizen of the Year/Sparkplug Awards Event – December 10, 2015, Gladstone’s.

Chris announced that nominations are now open for qualified individuals for Citizen of the Year and Sparkplug honors. Deadline for submission of nominations: October 31. Submit nominations to info@pacpalicc.org. For information about nomination requirements, go to http://www.pp90272.org and scroll down to Press Release re Citizen and Sparkplug Awards.

7.1.3.    PPCC Website, Fundraising, Outreach Update.  Chris reported that tax deductible dues/donations (suggested amount: $25 individual/family, $50 business) could be submitted to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades 90272 or via Pay Pal tab on PPCC website. Like Us on Facebook at pacpalicc.

7.1.4.    Village Shell Station Update.  Chris reported that a letter has been submitted advising City officials of PPCC’s position. See attached letter below.

7.1.5.    AB 57 Update.  Chris reported that this legislation (which limits local governments’ ability to regulate cell facilities and was opposed by LA City and County as well as numerous other governmental entities and organizations statewide) was signed into law by Governor Brown on Oct. 9, 2015 and will go into effect as of Jan. 1, 2016.

7.1.6.    AGF (Above Ground Facilities) Ordinance Revision Update.

Chris reported that PPCC has long supported revision of the City’s regulations involving cell towers and other facilities located in the public right of way. Three years ago the City Council unanimously directed that a revised ordinance be drafted (including elimination of the “utility pole exemption”). A revised ordinance was drafted but has been under review by the City Attorney for almost a year (due to a November 2014 FCC directive and more recently the AB 57 legislation); the review is still pending but the Council File related to this matter (CF 09-2645) expired as of October 8, 2015. The City Attorney’s office advises that it expects to complete the required review and have a new revised ordinance to City Council within approximately 30 days; Councilmember Bonin is following up to extend the Council File or, as necessary, make a motion to officially bring the matter back within the Council’s purview.

7.1.7.    Sign Ordinance Update.

Chris reported that the City Planning Commission (CPC) considered proposed revisions of the ordinance on 9/24 but did not take a position and continued the matter until 10/22. For a summary of the CPC discussion go to: http://banbillboardblight.org/just-say-no-city-planning-commission-doesnt-like-amnesty-more-digital-billboards-grandfathering/. See also http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#24SEP15 (item 7.1.4). For information about past PPCC positions, go to: http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#24SEP15
(item 9.1). See attached letter to City officials authorized by the Executive Committee.

7.1.8.    Short Term Rentals (STRs) Update.

Chris reported that community “listening sessions” (pursuant to the Mike Bonin motion to legalize STRs) have concluded and the City Planning Department is now drafting an ordinance to change the zoning code to allow STRs in R zones (despite the position taken by PPCC and other councils, including BCC, that the zoning code should not be changed to allow STRs in R zones). See Item 10.3 below (motion recommended by the Westside Regional Alliance of Councils Land Use & Planning Committee (WRAC-LUPC) and sponsored (as amended) in PPCC by the Executive Committee and George Wolfberg, PPCC representative to WRAC-LUPC).

7.1.9.    Backyard Beekeeping Ordinance Update.  Chris reported that the ordinance permitting backyard beekeeping as an accessory use in R zones passed as written in City Council on 10/14/15.

7.1.10.    FAA Flight Path Matter (Metroplex).

Chris reported that per PPCC request and at the urging of Congressman Lieu, FAA officials would attend a PPCC meeting (tentatively on 1/14) to provide a briefing and answer questions related to the proposed flight path over the Palisades. In the interim, questions about the Metroplex proposal should be directed to Congressman Lieu’s District Representative Janet Turner (janet.turner@mail.house.gov).

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore — Not in attendance.

7.2.2.    Los Angeles City Council, District 11; Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Office. Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy — Not in attendance.

7.2.3. Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. Daniel Tamm, Westside Area Representative, Mayor’s Interfaith Liaison — Not in attendance.

7.2.4.    California State Assembly, Office of Assemblymember Richard Bloom.  Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative. See Item 10.1 below.

7.2.5.    California State Senate, Office of State Senator Ben Allen.  Lila Kalaf, District Representative — Not in attendance.

7.2.6.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu.  Janet Turner, District Representative — Not in our attendance.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

Stuart Muller reported on two projects, the Clearwater Mural of the Palisades and Plaza Restoration (PRIDE/Chamber) and the Street Median Improvement (Bowdoin Street between Radcliffe Avenue and Temescal Canyon Road, to complement the in-process Suisman / PaliHi Temescal Canyon Road/Bowdoin Street intersection improvement effort). Stuart passed out proposed bylaws amendments that he stated had been previously considered and unanimously rejected by the Chair and the bylaws committee.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Public committee meeting re Caruso Affiliated Village land use application and plans: October 29, 2015, 6 PM. Chris reported that there has been a change of venue tentatively to the Big Gym at the Palisades Recreation Center at 7:30 PM rather than in the old U.S. Bank building on Sunset Blvd. Chris reported that another venue is being worked on and there will be a possible time change as well. Final plans will be announced via email and social media. Chris reported that all interested Board and community members are welcome. Note: The meeting’s purpose is to obtain information about the proposals in order for the committee to report back to the Board; no action will be taken at the committee meeting. An agenda will be distributed in advance of the meeting via the PPCC email list and posted on the PPCC website. A special public PPCC Board meeting will also be held on November 18, 2015, 6:30pm in the Palisades Recreation Center “Big Gym,” for the VPLUC report, remarks by the applicant, questions and comment by the Board and public comment by community members. Note: Special Board meetings are authorized pursuant to PPCC Bylaws Art. IX.2. Contact dkaplan6@gmail.com or info@pacpalicc.org with any questions.

9.    Old Business — None.

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation/Q&A with California State Assemblymember Richard Bloom.

Richard Bloom reported that he is a year and half into his term of which could be twelve years under term limits. ASM Bloom listed the various committees he serves on including both formal select committees, the latter of which deal with smaller and “not so small” issues in California. (1) the budget was in on time for the third year in a row with no deficit and the state is doing reasonably well and better than when ASM Bloom started. All programs and services are funded along with the every day functions of government (schools, safety, childcare, infrastructure). Total reserves are a record $4.6 billion of which $3.5 billion is a rainy day fund. K-12 funding is a priority as is increasing California student enrollment (including at the university level which has been a bone of contention between the legislature and the governor). (2) Health care services for the developmentally disabled and threatened cuts in provider programs are of grave concern. (3) Transportation funding has been on the decline for years because mileage improvement causes a decline in gas tax revenue so road infrastructure cannot be kept up with. (4) The Governor called two special sessions on health care and transportation, neither of which had an immediate impact nor (?) will be revisited in January 2016. The health care funding system is out of compliance with federal law and that shortfall must be addressed. Transportation maintenance needs are vast with $5.7 billion per year needed and $2.3 billion available hence declining roadways. (5) Extension of California’s cap and trade, climate change, renewable energy – these topics are being addressed along with reducing fossil fuels and doubling energy efficiency for building stock which are difficult goals but goals that are important to the governor and long term planning. SB50 was signed into law, so last year was the first year to receive funding to reduce green house gas. Continued cap and trade auctions should provide up to $3 billion in the future to allocate. (6) The drought – the low snowpack and water crisis brings health and safety concerns. Last year there was a bond measure passed and funds were allocated this year towards efforts and projects to help the drought. (7) Legislative successes included 13 bills that made it to the governor’s desk all of which were signed, one in particular was the ban on micro-beads to prevent plastic pollution in our waterways and marine environment. Discussion: (1) AB57 was opposed by PPCC and WRAC because it limits the ability of municipalities to regulate cell towers and ASM Bloom voted to oppose as well. ASM Bloom thanked PPCC and the area NCs and CCs for their communication regarding their opposition on this issue. (2) The bullet train, what are the plans to go forward? ASM Bloom stated that the project is badly needed and is slated for completion in 2024 if not before. High-speed rail does come under ASM Bloom’s budget committee and he has received a request for information geared towards a study regarding interest in private investment in the project. (3) The governor vetoed tax credits for seismic retrofit. Will that be incorporated into the 2016 budget? ASM Bloom stated that the governor does try to keep his budget commitments. (4) MRCA red light cameras and the legislation introduced to remove them in the Palisades. How can this legislation move forward? ASM Bloom is familiar with the MRCA and there is conversation about this topic underway and he would support a bill in concept. The reality is that the cameras generate a lot of revenue and there is a budgetary issue. SB218 failed in the Senate but is expected to be considered in 2016, i.e., it is a two-year bill. (5) Mandatory registration of properties previously fish and game exempt are now being charged thousands of dollars in fees where there is no appeal process that does not require appeal fees similar to those being imposed. ASM directed this topic to Tim Pershing in his office. (6) Money allocated back to the school system is a positive but how much money is being spent on every child? Is the surplus translating into programs and enrichment for the children, i.e., does added money mean added spending per kid? ASM Bloom did not have those specifics but noted that the governor’s program is far more flexible in how money is spent on children in schools. (7) There was a concern with the number of liquor stores per square miles in Koreatown. Who determines how many of these businesses are within a geographical area? ASM Bloom stated that there are not state imposed limits but this is a matter of municipal regulation. (8) Micro-beads in the Santa Monica Bay are concerning and ASM Bloom explained the process whereby people wash and products go through the drains and sewer systems. (9) Hyperion Plant, concerns about the recent overflow of medical waste and the danger of spills during the upcoming El Nino. (10) When citations are issued in a community can a percentage of the revenues be targeted towards the community in which the fines are being paid? (11) Homelessness is not a local problem, it is a major problem for the City, State and Federal Government. OPCC has a policy of tolerance. Before the Palisades go further with services there has to be enforcement. The speaker recommends waiting for the City of LA to do enforcement rather than to have PPCC engaged. (12) Future plans for the Task Force should include mental health and drug addiction services. Former homeless people can pair with mental health experts and PPCC does have a wellness program. OPCC has success metrics.

10.2.    Presentation/Q&A with the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (PPTFH) regarding fundraising and important partnership with OPCC.

Barbara Overland, PPTFH head of fundraising and Sharon Kilbride, PPTFH rep to PPCC and PPCC advisor on homelessness, as well as Brian Deming (PPCC Area 3 Second Alternate) and Kim Clary were present to speak about the work of the Task Force, its progress, its achievements and the road ahead. Presentation: Maryam introduced the Task Force Members in attendance. There will be a Farmer’s Market presence every Sunday 10 am – noon starting in November 2015. On 10-27-2015 in the Marquez Auditorium 6:30 – 8:30 pm will be the next meeting with Councilmember Bonin. At that time there will be a fundraising launch. Barbara Overland spoke as to the effort and how excited the Task Force is to get OPCC out and into our neighborhood. The immediate goal is to raise $125,000 by the end of the year and long term for a five-year commitment would require $500,000. Currently $71,000 has been raised including a recent $25,000 gift from the American Legion and a generous donation from the Rotary Club as well. Presentations have been made to organizations and top producing real estate brokers. Future requests will be made to foundations, celebrities, and HOAs. Donations can be made via check, via the OPCC website and the GoFund Page. By donating together we will create a sense of pride in supporting our community in a compassionate and sensitive way. No other community has stepped up to put resources towards the homeless issue like the Palisades has so our area can be a model for other areas of the City. Sharon Kilbride gave a beaches and bluff report regarding (1) recent activity to identify the identity of homeless persons and incidents of positive and negative activity (2) tents from Will Rogers beach were removed and efforts are underway to update signage on the lifeguard towers, (3) fire signs and fire activities including within Potrero Canyon. Fines can now be imposed as a result of installed signage. (4) Department of Mental Health has been making contact with homeless individuals. General services and medical relief are being provided. Discussion: (1) Nancy Niles presented a $1,200 check from the Rotary Club in support of the Task Force. (2) What is the enforcement plan for the fire risk signs? Can the LAPD report homeless citations in their crime reports – especially against fire prevention? The Task Force has been asking for a report that would be separate from what is released to the community and it is hoped that this information could be disseminated to the community. The fundraising for the Task Force is a package deal such that fire concerns go part and parcel with services and education of the community not to support panhandling. Signage starts with a deterrent effect. Actual enforcement is an issue because our resources are allocated by statistics as related to the rest of the county/city. LAFD has been very responsive and the ordinance is really needed to address evidence of a fire. With evidence of a fire persons can be given 72 hours notice to vacate and campsites can be removed immediately. As the Task Force matures it is hoped that private security can supplement resources that the City can provide. (3) the City of Beverly Hills has signs encouraging people to support the cause and not support panhandling because there are people in the Palisades who really want to enable the homeless and make them very comfortable. Funding was offered for this signage. The Task Force is accepting funding for OPCC’s efforts and is in the process of becoming a 501c3 that can take donations directly which would include such educational efforts.

10.3.    WRAC-LUPC STRs Motion.

Recommended by WRAC-LUPC; to be considered by WRAC leadership on 10/21/15; sponsored (as amended) in PPCC by the Executive Committee and George Wolfberg, PPCC representative to WRAC-LUPC. Maryam Zar seconded the motion. Presentation: Chris reminded the board that it previously took a position opposing the Wesson-Bonin motion in favoring of legalizing STRs. Recent listening sessions had comments overwhelmingly in favor of the Wesson-Bonin motion. Chris explained that this motion is an attempt to allow PPCC to weigh in with comments about what should be in the ordinance that is being drafted because it is a certainty that Planning is drafting a motion. Discussion: Maryam spoke in support of the ordinance so that PPCC’s concerns can be taken into consideration by Planning. Carol Bruch stated that if others are renting their homes then poor people should be able to rent as well. Quentin Fleming and Carol offered a friendly amendment to strengthen the introduction and the board agreed that such drafting must include 30 days. The motion passed. See attached and approved motion (text in boldface edited/added by the Executive Committee, referencing PPCC’s strong opposition to legalization of STRs and including definition of “primary residence” from the San Francisco STRs Ordinance and the friendly amendment).

11.    General Public Comment.

11.1.    Brenda Theveny stated that she has been on PPRA for more than 20 years. Brenda wanted to respond to a comment that PPRA’s attendance has been less than desired. Since 2006 PPRA has had several personal representatives on the board and a review of the minutes will show that PPRA’s attendance has been regular and on par with other organizations.

11.2.    Sue Pascoe reported on a Palisadian working in an orphanage in Nepal. Please go to CNN and vote for Maggie Doyne.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:58 PM.

ATTACHMENTS

ITEM 7.1.4 — PPCC LETTER RE SHELL STATION MATTER

October 13, 2015
Hon. Mike Bonin, Councilmember, 11th District
200 N. Spring St. #475
Los Angeles, CA 90012            Via email

Department of City Planning/Office of Zoning Administration
200 N. Spring St., 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re: Case No. ZA-2015-420-CUP-DRB-SPP/15401 W. Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 – Request for Revisions; Opposition to the Current Application as Written

Dear Councilmember Bonin and City Planning Department Officials:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broad-based community organization and voice of the Palisades since 1973.

On March 26 and October 8, 2015, PPCC held public forums on the above-captioned matter. The applicant, Mr. Saeed Kohanoff, and his representatives presented information on his proposed development of a gas station accompanied by a mini-mart with beer and wine sales in place of an existing automotive center. A large number of neighboring residents and property owners, as well as tenants, attended and participated. At the conclusion of the October 8th discussion, the PPCC board overwhelmingly approved the following motion:

“PPCC requests that the owner of the proposed project revise his application and reconsider his development in consultation with affected neighboring residents and businesses.”

During both well-attended PPCC meetings, it became clear that certain key elements of the application were problematic for neighbors and raised concerns for members of the community at large. These are:

1. Hours of operation
2. Hours and/or allowance of beer and wine sales
3. The size of the building housing the mini-mart
4. The placement and orientation of the mini-mart
5. Possible adverse effects of the project on traffic flow

PPCC believes it is possible with negotiation and compromise on the above issues that the development could precede without undue adverse impacts on the community. Accordingly, PPCC requests that the current application not be approved as written and that the owner revise his application in consultation with the neighboring residents and businesses.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz, President
Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):

Ms. Lynda J. Smith, City Planner, Department of City Planning
Mr. Saeed Kohanoff, Applicant
Mr. Mel Kimman, Vice-President, Via de la Paz HOA

ITEM 7.1.7 – PPCC LETTER RE SIGN ORDINANCE

October 19, 2015

Hon. Members, City Planning Commission, cpc@lacity.org
Hon. Eric Garcetti, Mayor, City of Los Angeles, mayor.garcetti@lacity.org
Hon. Mike Bonin, Councilmember, 11th District, mike.bonin@lacity.org
Hon. Paul Koretz, Councilmember, 5th District, paul.koretz@lacity.org
Hon. Jose Huizar, Councilmember, 14th District and Chair, PLUM, councilmember.huizar@lacity.org
Mr. Michael LoGrande, Director, Department of City Planning, michael.logrande@lacity.org
Los Angeles City Hall
200 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012 Via Email

Re: CPC-2015-3059-CA; related Council Files, 11-1705, 11-0274, 08-2020, 08-3386-S1, 12-1611; CITYWIDE Sign Ordinance; OPPOSED

Hon. City Planning Commission Members, Mayor Garcetti, Councilmembers and Director LoGrande:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broad-based community organization and voice of the Palisades since 1973. Incorporating the statements and information within PPCC’s September 14, 2015 letter, and in light of the upcoming October 22, 2015 hearing on this matter, PPCC’s Executive Board unanimously states its opposition to the current draft ordinance and objects to the insufficient time (in violation of the Planning Department’s Public Participation Policy) given to NCs, CCs and stakeholders to comment. Specifically, at this time, PPCC OPPOSES the draft ordinance because it does not:

Expressly prohibit digital billboards on public property including city parkland and facilities.
Expressly prohibit freeway facing digital billboards and all digital signs that would have
negative impacts on scenic ridgelines, open space, county beaches and the California
coastline.
Expressly prohibit all digital signs outside of sign districts.
Stop amnesty for illegal billboards.
Preserve the spirit of the 2009 agreement which was to reduce the square footage of digital billboards throughout the City; hence takedown requirements cannot be eliminated within grandfathered sign districts and should be strong, i.e., a mandatory takedown requirement of at least 8:1 (static to digital) and 4:1 (static to static) in the community areas where new signs are being placed. Any “community benefits” must be in addition to mandatory square footage takedowns, not instead of them.
Grandfather in only the two districts originally grandfathered in by the CPC in 2009 (not the now proposed to be grandfathered)
Include a private right of action for adversely affected property owners and residents against illegal billboards.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council

cc (via email):
Tom Rothmann, Sr. City Planner, Department of City Planning, tom.rothmann@lacity.org
Phyllis Nathanson, Planning Associate, Department of City Planning, phyllis.nathanson@lacity.org
Debbie Dyner-Harris, District Director, CD11, debbie.dynerharris@lacity.org
Tricia Keane, Planning Director, CD11, tricia.keane@lacity.org
Sharon Dickinson, Legislative Assistant, PLUM Committee, sharon.dickinson@lacity.org, with
request for filing in CF 11-1705

ITEM 10.3 — WRAC RECOMMENDED SHORT TERM RENTALS MOTION (AS AMENDED BY PPCC)

Whereas under the City of Los Angeles present zoning code, short-term rentals [defined per the attached Alan Bell memo dated 4-19-2014 as “all or any portions of residential buildings that are designed or used for occupancy for a period of 30 calendar days or less”] are in fact prohibited in the following zones:
Agricultural zones
R1 and other single family zones
R2, RD, lower multiple residential zones R3 and RAS3 [accessory services zone]
Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) strongly opposes short-term rentals in all residentially zoned areas. PPCC understands, however, that efforts to draft an ordinance to legalize short-term rentals are underway. Such drafting must include, at minimum, language to effectuate the following:

No rent stabilized units “RSO” shall be allowed to rent short term.
Only owner-occupied primary residences shall be permitted to host for short term rentals, and only one unit shall be permitted per host.
There shall be a cap of 30 nights per calendar year per host for short-term rentals.
Prior to listing, at their own expense hosts shall be responsible for verifying that their properties comply with the Los Angeles Building and Safety code and for making all necessary repairs.
All hosts shall obtain a City permit and a permanent registration number. The condition of receiving a City permit and permanent registration number shall be the following: proof of primary residence plus liability insurance for this specific use including any rider that may be necessary for a non-conforming use on the property. “Primary residence” shall be defined as the usual place of return for housing as documented by at least two of the following: motor vehicle registration, driver license, voter registration, tax documents showing the unit as the host’s residence for the purposes of a homeowner’s tax exemption, or a utility bill. A person may have only one primary residence.
Upon filing for a short-term rentals permit, hosts shall notify property owners within 500 feet of each property line of the land upon which the unit is located.
All hosts shall include their permanent City registration number on all advertised listings in all media.
All hosts shall register with the City Department of Finance and remit transient occupancy taxes “TOT” including any and all back taxes owed. Short-term rental TOT receipts shall not go into the general fund but shall be used to create a special enforcement/compliance unit charged exclusively with enforcing regulation of short-term rentals. An example of this kind of compliance unit is the LAHD inspection program for multifamily units.
Hosts shall be required to pay those who work to enable the hosts’ short term rentals the City’s legal minimum wage, abide by hotel employee protections and register with the State Employment Development Department.
Hosts shall disclose such information as the City deems required for enforcement. Examples of this information shall include the type of rental whether one room or whole house, how many nights per year, how many guests and the like.
Hosts who refuse to register or disclose information necessary for enforcement shall be prohibited from operating in the City and face such penalties and fines as may be deemed appropriate by the City under the new ordinance.
Platforms shall only list City registered units and display the relevant registration number in each listing.
Platforms shall disclose information deemed necessary by the City for enforcement and for collection of back taxes and shall be held accountable, including fines and other penalties as may be deemed appropriate by the City, for any unregistered online listings appearing upon the platforms’ website.
The ordinance shall establish a right of appeal by adversely affected residents of the issuance of a short-term rental permit.
The ordinance shall establish a private right of action by adversely affected residents in the community.
Adopted by Pacific Palisades Community Council as of 10/22/15

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 12th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Barbara Kohn, Barbara Marinacci, Janet Anderson, Richard Wulliger, Gilbert Dembo, Sarah Rena Conner, Reza Akef, George Wolfberg, Sue Kohl, Nancy Niles, Cathy Russell, Rick Mills and Bruce Schwartz.

Voting Alternates:  Dustin Hall, David Kaplan, Linda Lefkowitz, Howard Robinson and Diane Bleak.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Donna Vaccarino, David Peterson, Schuyler Dietz, Carol Bruch and Ted Mackie.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  The Chair deferred reading the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board and Audience.  The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Introduction of the Board and audience.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  The Chair certified that a quorum was present at 7:04 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  The Chair deemed the minutes of October 22, 2015 approved as corrected. Upcoming meetings: Special PPCC Public Board Meeting: 11/18/15, 6:30pm, Palisades Recreation Center “big” gym. Presentation of VPLUC report and public comment regarding Caruso Affiliated Village Project land use application. PPCC Holiday Dinner/Citizen of the Year, Golden Sparkplugs and Pride of the Palisades Awards Event: 12/10/15, 6:30pm, Gladstone’s Restaurant. Regular PPCC Public Board Meeting: 1/14/16. Briefing by FAA officials regarding new flight path over Pacific Palisades (Metroplex plan).

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  The President considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  The Chair deferred the Treasurer’s Report.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.

7.1.1.    Meeting Ground Rules.  1) Due to library rules, the meeting must end promptly at 9 pm; as needed, the President will stay after the meeting to answer questions. 2) The President conducts meeting order and may rearrange order of discussion at her discretion. 3) Board members and audience shall only speak when called upon by the President; there shall be no interruptions except to make a point of order. 4) The President’s role in maintaining meeting order shall be honored. 5) All discussion shall be civil, respectful and courteous. (PPCC Bylaws, http://www.pp90272.org/Bylaws22Feb15.pdf.)

7.1.2.    PPCC Website, Fundraising, Outreach Update.  Submit tax deductible dues/donations (suggested amount: $25 individual/family, $50 business) to PPCC at P.O. Box 1131, Pacific Palisades 90272 or via Pay Pal tab on PPCC website. Like Us on Facebook at pacpalicc.

7.1.3.    Short Term Rentals Update.  See letter and motion attached below. Interested board members and residents are encouraged to take CD-11’s online survey using the link found in Councilmember Bonin’s newsletter found at http://www.11thdistrict.com/october_2015_neighborhoods_first_newsletter.

7.1.4.    Sign Ordinance Update.  On 10/22/15 the City Planning Commission rejected more lenient regulations proposed by the Planning Department and unanimously approved stricter rules, including “takedown measures” and denial of amnesty for unpermitted billboards; matter to considered by the City Council (date TBD). See minutes of 9/24/15 and 10/22/15 for past PPCC positions.

7.1.5.    Sidewalk Vending Ordinance Update.  On 10/27/15 the Council Economic Development Committee approved legalization of sidewalk vending and recommended establishment of non-vending zones; matter transferred to the Public Works Committee; Councilmember Bonin position: in favor of sidewalk vending but against blanket Citywide legalization, i.e., should be a matter for local community determination. See minutes of 9/10/15 for PPCC position (sidewalk vending should only be allowed on an “opt-in” basis for communities that want this activity).

7.1.6.    Above Ground Facilities (AGF) Ordinance Revision Update.  Council File 09-2645 pertaining to this matter had expired but is now extended until 2017 pursuant to recent motion by Councilmember Bonin. The City Attorney’s review of draft revised ordinance is still ongoing. PPCC strongly supports revision of the local ordinance regulating cell towers and other facilities in the public right of way.

7.1.7.    16900-17000 Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.  Coastal Development Permit appeal hearing set for 12/2/15 before the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission. See minutes of 1/8/15 for PPCC position (i.e., a focused EIR is required before a Coastal Development Permit is issued).

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf).

7.2.1.    Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) – SLO Officer Moore, Captain Tina Nieto.

SLO Moore reported that (1) LAPD did a homeless task force sweep this morning and three persons were physically arrested (repeat offenders). An encampment that was on the beach was removed. A sweep was done through the Via Bluffs area and located 8 active camps and 7 inactive camps with two persons found at the time, one warned and the other taken to jail. The Captain reported that extra resources, 10 officers, were committed to Pacific Palisades for this effort. With the signage and recent fires, LAPD is able to make arrests. The Captain told residents the homeless are here because people give them money and while it is personal choice to do that or not, giving money does encourage the homeless to congregate here. Phone calls to private security companies work but calls need to be made to LAPD else the radio call is not made and not counted towards LAPD’s counts. (2) The possible robbery call did involve two transients, one of whom had a loaded fire arm and he (Ted Hopkins) was arrested.

7.2.2.    United States Congress, Office of Congressman Ted Lieu. Janet Turner, District Representative.

Janet Turner in attendance.  (1) LAX flight path. Janet attended a
meeting at LAX today and a presentation was made with information regarding flights over Santa Monica Canyon, typically numbering in the 60s and recently having more than 100 planes now passing over the canyon on their way to a “beacon” turn over Santa Monica Municipal Airport. Janet opined that a heat wave and heat inversions can make sound louder while humidity can increase how far sound travels.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors.

7.3.1.    Officers/Area Representatives.

(1) George Wolfberg (At-Large); status of airplane noise in SM Canyon and elsewhere in Palisades. There will be a briefing January 14, 2015 to do with what flight paths are being used. The briefing will be about the big jets (not helicopters) that come down the coast and how turnarounds will be achieved near Santa Monica Canyon. George reported that the noise has increased over the last five weeks or more for Santa Monica Canyon residents. Meetings on the topics have begun and George Wolfberg and Janet Turner have been attending, including a meeting today at LAX. Noise has increased over Mar Vista as well. Questions: (1) were changes in aircraft discussed, i.e., more military aircraft over the Pacific? Yes, but those changes are very temporary, 1-2 weeks. (2) today’s WSJ reported this as a nationwide problem with other Cities having already sued the government. (3) Chris reminded everyone that the FAA would be presenting at PPCC’s 1/14/16 meeting on this topic.

7.3.2.    Organizational Representatives.  (1) Nancy Niles, PP Woman’s Club, announced the annual Home tour on Sunday November 22, 2015. There will be two-day boutique at Palisades Charter High School, open to the public on November 21st and 22nd. For tickets www.ThePPWC.org or call 310-454-9012.

7.3.3.    PPCC Advisors — None.

7.3.4.    Board Members, Other Reports — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    2015 Awards Selection Committee (Jennifer Malaret, Chair; Rick Mills, Gil Dembo, Andy Frew, Randy Young, members).

Chris announced that the 2015 PPCC Awards Selection Committee had selected the following PPCC Awards Honorees for 2015 and made the following comments:

Citizen of the Year:  Sharon Kilbride.
Sharon is a life-long resident of Santa Monica Canyon and a descendant of the original Marquez and Reyes families. She has long volunteered her services towards historic preservation, education and beautification. She is the community’s liaison with Cal Trans, volunteers on an ongoing basis to effectuate PCH tunnel safety – including sand removal and flood control — and works tirelessly to provide safe and clean access to the beach and bike path for Palisadians as well as members of the greater Los Angeles area. Most recently, she has worked regularly with LAPD and LA County mental health representatives to try and find humane and safe solutions to the problems of homelessness, including accompanying LAPD officers on beach patrol when tent encampments were removed and causing LA County Beaches and Harbors to post signs on the beach prohibiting camping. Sharon truly deserves to be honored as our Citizen of the Year 2015!

Golden Sparkplugs:
Laurel Garver – for her work in creating and maintaining the Library Book Store, which has resulted in a book store in the Palisades open 6 days a week for benefit of the community at large, with all proceeds donated to the Palisades Branch Library to help purchase books, CDs, research materials and many other items which the Library would not otherwise be able to offer to the public.
Laurie Sale – for spearheading formation and now serving as Director of the new Palisades Business Improvement District, an important organization made up of property owners in the Village area who pay assessments to the City which in turn result in money that may only be used for projects that specifically benefit properties in the BID, including beautification, cleaning, trash removal, pedestrian-use improvements and the like – projects which in turn will benefit all of us in the Palisades.
Doug Suisman – for leading a three-phase renovation of the campus at Palisades Charter High School, including adding aesthetically pleasing new design elements and landscaping at the main entrance and along Bowdoin St. which have improved traffic flow and safety for thousands of students who access the campus. For more information about Doug’s and his committee’s work at Pali High, go to paligateway.com.

Pride of the Palisades:
Under PPCC’s Awards Guidelines, this special discretionary award may be given from time to time under extraordinary circumstances, as determined by the Awards Selection Committee. This year, the Committee felt that it was particularly important to honor the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (known as PPTFH), whose leaders have worked so diligently for many months, first as a PPCC committee which grew out of our board meeting discussions, and now as a significant stand-alone group which is tackling head-on the growing problem of homelessness in our community. We salute PPTFH and in particular its Leadership Committee – Maryam Zar, Doug McCormick, Bruce Schwartz, Brian Deming, Michael Soneff, Sharon Kilbride, Sharon Browning, Barbara Overland, Kim Clary, David Morena and Robin Degtjarewsky, along with special leadership support from Stephanie Cohen, Field Representative to Assemblymember Bloom and Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy to Councilmember Bonin — for their ongoing work on this important issue, including partnering with OPCC to provide services to the homeless as well as working with public officials to achieve enhanced enforcement of homeless encampments in order to protect public safety.

Chris stated that PPCC congratulates all of the Honorees whose volunteer efforts have greatly contributed to the betterment of the Palisades. PPCC also invites all interested community members to join PPCC in presenting the Awards at PPCC’s Holiday Dinner and Awards event to take place on December 10, 6:30pm at Gladstone’s. Stay tuned for more details to come shortly!

8.2.    Awards Event Committee (Peter Culhane, Chair; subcommittee chairs Maryam Zar and Sue Kohl).

Citizen of the Year, Golden Sparkplugs and Pride of the Palisades Awards Event – December 10, 2015, 6:30pm, Gladstones Restaurant. Chris announced that details and information about how to RSVP to be distributed shortly via evites/email and social media. All Board members are encouraged to attend this special PPCC Holiday Dinner and Awards Event and RSVP early!

8.3.    VPLUC (David Kaplan, Chair).

Update regarding 10/29/15 Committee meeting. David announced that there will be a special Board meeting 11/18/15, 6:30 pm, Palisades Recreation Center “big” gym (presentation of VPLUC report to the Board and additional public comment).

8.4.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

First reading, oral and written, of Motions 1(A) and (2) regarding proposed bylaws changes (organizational membership, meetings). George Wolfberg, committee member, read the following motions and red-lined document distributed with the agenda:
MOTION 1(A):
Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment: (1) the four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories. (2) faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion, and (3) a process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion. On October 8, 2015 a motion to facilitate all three areas of these amendments garnered a majority of favorable board member votes but failed to pass because it did not receive the two-thirds majority vote required by PPCC’s Bylaws (“Organization Representatives Motion #1).

Motion 1(A). The Bylaws Committee recommends that the Board vote to adopt the proposed amendments distributed with the agenda, referred to as “Organization Representatives Motion #1(A)”. The proposed amendments are now limited to: (1) improving calendaring of the process by which organization representatives and their alternates are selected, (2) providing a procedure for membership application by existing and new organizations, and (3) non-substantive corrective and clarifying language regarding vacancies and other matters.

*MOTION 2: The Bylaws Committee recommends that, to expedite and preserve efficiency at PPCC’s scheduled and public meetings, Article XII, Sec. 2(B) (Amendments) be amended as follows: “No amendment or new Bylaw may be voted upon until the entire text [delete “it”] has been distributed with [delete “read at”] the agenda for two consecutive Board [delete “council”] meetings.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Proposed BMO/BHO Amendments (“Draft BMO/BHO Ordinance”); CF 14-0656.

Motion for the Department of City Planning (“DCP”), with assistance from the Department of Building and Safety (“LADBS”) to prepared proposed amendments to the regulations established by the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO) and the Baseline Hillside Ordinance (BHO) (collectively and commonly referred to as the “Anti-Mansionization Ordinances”). See prior Minutes http://www.pp90272.org/minutes2015.htm#14MAY15 (no position taken).

Background:  The Draft BMO/BHO is being circulated by the City of Los Angeles for comment. These amendments are intended to address what some feel has been “a proliferation of out of scale development” in single family neighborhoods” which “has demonstrated a need to update the current rules.” These amendments will not rezone property, however they will further restrict building on property in Pacific Palisades zoned R1, RS, RE or RA that is located in Hillside Areas in all non-Hillside Areas outside of the Coastal Zone. The City plans to hold future “open houses” and staff hearings, as well as an eventual hearing in the City Planning Commission (all dates TBD). To receive updates directly from the Planning Department, email neighborhoodconservation@lacity.org and type “Add Me to BMO/BHO Notification List” in the subject line. To submit written comments on this proposed zoning code amendment contact Christine Saponara at NeighborhoodConservation@lacity.org. Presentation: Jennifer Malaret opened the discussion by noting the intent of the agenda was to present information to residents about the draft ordinance now proposing to change the existing BMO and BHO regulations. Discussion: (1) Donna Vaccarino stated that the majority of houses built in the Palisades are by developers and are flipped. People have demanded and asked the city for change. The Civic League has guidelines to mitigate development and the Civic League feels that this ordinance is over-reaching as to development. A smaller 5,200 square foot lot with a 2,400 square foot lot would be changed to a .45 development so the maximum house would be 2,400 including the garage leaving only 2,000 square feet of living area. So if a resident chose to add an extra bedroom or bath many would not be able to do so. The type of bonuses the Civic League looks at are second floor set backs in the front and an increase of side yards so total square footage without articulation is not a good thing. The ordinance that is before us is not well written and hopefully there will be a second draft. What would the Civic League suggest the maximum square footage be on a 5,200 square foot lot? 60% (2) Reza Akef suggested that homes are built following the building code and this ordinance takes away the ability to construct a home to an owner’s aesthetic pleasure. In CD5 and CD10 people are upset about homes losing their traditional feel and they are pushing for Citywide change. The proposed ordinance is aesthetic regulation/removal of choice or will diminish property values due to restricted size. (3) The modern family has more kids who want their own bathroom and offices, theaters and other uses that require square footage. (4) Development in the Palisades has increased property values where a lot bought 15 years ago for less than a million is now worth more than $2.5 million in Pacific Palisades. This ordinance caps values over time and will then limit tax revenue over time. The ordinance takes away roughly 1/3 of your value and buildable square footage. People in town are buying small homes on land value property because over time they want to build the house that their neighbor built. (5) a resident with a small house spoke against the ordinance because it would limit her property value and what she can leave to her kids, plus it would be fundamentally unfair for them not to be able to build what their neighbors have built. (6) Brenda Theveny stated that basement square footage is living space and should be included in FAR. Quality of life is not based solely on property value. Square footage should be limited based on lot size. (7) Haldis Toppel said that houses should not be able to build out to the lot lines and the amendment to include courtyard space in the FAR. (8) Rick Mills supports reasonable limitations on design by Tract 9300 and there should be design and building envelope standards on homes in R1 neighborhoods. (9) What happens in an earthquake, fire or flood and the property is destroyed? Can you rebuild the same large house you had before or will you be limited? (10) Howard Robinson doesn’t understand why basements would be included in FAR – who cares what is underground, what is size and bulk? Richard Blumenberg said in Hillside Areas that basements sometimes daylight out and can be seen. Jennifer Malaret stated that in Hillside Areas counting basements and garage space in FAR may not make sense because garage space should be encouraged due to often narrow and windy streets where residents don’t like to see street parking and it is often unsafe. Donna Vaccarino said how basements are used is important as to whether the space should be included. (11) Reza Akef stated that the first 2,000 square feet includes 2 parking spots with an additional space for each 1,200 square feet.

Key Provisions/Discussion Items: Intended as a guideline for discussion and potential action item on the question presented in whole, or in part, “Does the PPCC agree (roughly in sequential order of the draft ordinance) that:

Purpose: The fundamental premise of the ordinance is correct, i.e., that there has been “a proliferation of out of scale development in single family neighborhoods” which “has demonstrated a need to update the current rules”?

Size: Basements (“excavation[s] under the footprint of [a] structure”) should be included in FAR calculations for properties subject to the BHO? Note: basements not located in the Hillside Area or Coastal Zone are exempt from FAR calculations.

Height: The appropriate way to measure height/grade in Hillside Areas is the “[insert: Grade]Elevation, [insert: at the perimeter of the building] of the finished or natural surface of the ground, whichever is lower, or the finished surface of the ground . . .”?

Size: Garages should now be counted towards FAR – i.e., should there be a change to the exemption for covered parking (now 200 square feet per required covered space is not counted towards FAR) such that to (a) a total of 200 square feet would be exempted in non-Hillside Areas and Coastal Zones only if the garage is detached and is in compliance with the location for accessory use buildings and (b) in Hillside Areas a total of 200 square feet per required parking area not exceed 400 square feet would be exempted, detached or not.

Size: The existing exemption for covered porches, patios and breezeways should be eliminated such that this square footage is now calculated towards FAR?

Size: The existing exemption for “Over-In-Height Ceilings” (generally speaking those less than 14 feet) should be eliminated and such square footage now calculated towards FAR?

Size: The allowed Maximum Residential Floor Area should be reduced in non-Hillside Areas that are out of the Coastal Zone and restricted by lot size, i.e., 20,000+ sq.ft. lot size;19,999 – 15,000 sq.ft. lot size; 14,999 – 9,000 sq.ft. lot size, 8,999 – 7,500 sq.ft. lot size, 7,499 sq.ft. lot size and below? [Note: please reference the Ordinance for proposed percentages and square footage ‘whichever is greater’ maximums].

Size: “Bonus Options” for additional Residential Floor Area in non-Hillside and Hillside Areas should be limited, including the reduction of the proportional stories option and, in sum, the elimination of Bonus Options for (a) architectural setbacks, (b) cumulative side yard setbacks, (c) minimal grading and, (d) in the case of new construction, substantial compliance with the requirements for the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED) at the certified level or higher?

Size: For R-1 lots in a Hillside Area or Coastal Zone there should be a uniform reduction of -.05 in each corresponding slope band used to calculate the allowed Residential Floor Area?

Setbacks: A minimum front yard set back of no less than 5 feet should be codified?

Size/Garage: in a Hillside Area outside of the Coastal Zone a garage in the front yard now needs to be “detached” to be allowed (under the same conditions that the current ordinance allows a private garage previously attached or detached)?

Size: the Guaranteed Minimum Residential Floor Area of 1,000 square feet should be eliminated?

Zoning Administrator’s Authority: the Zoning Administrator’s Authority should be expanded to approve additions made after August 1, 2010 to “Buildings” (strike: “One Family Dwelling”) under the stated conditions?

Size: In Hillside Areas, the calculation for the Maximum Envelope Height should be changed such that it originates from the “adjacent Hillside Area Grade” rather than the “lowest Grade within 5 horizontal feet” of the exterior walls of a Building or Structure?”

10.    New Business.

10.1.    Presentation/Q&A:  Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer.

Mike introduced his staff in attendance: Janette Flinthoff a Palisades resident and attorney who assists with funding grants. Laura Schwartz, prosecutor. Veronica de la Cruz-Robles, neighborhood prosecutor for Pacific Palisades and two other attorneys Mrya and Alma. Tom Peters, a local Palisadian who is now in charge of the CA’s civil branch. Purpose: the CA’s office advises the Mayor and City Council on issues that have a legal dimension. The office is involved in ultimately every issue in the City. The CA defends the City when it is sued. Mike wants his office to solve problems such as resolving cases against the City, water issues related to the Owens Valley, patient dumping on Skid Row, and banks for predatory lending. The office prosecutes criminal cases such as child abuse, drunk driving, vandalism, petty theft and graffiti. The CA needs to find solutions other than sanctions so it has innovative programs such as the Neighborhood Justice Program. The CA takes low-level offenders and tries to figure out how the community could work with a person to lesson the likelihood that he/she will commit the crime in the future. The office wants to solve problems whether they are large such as the water supply for Los Angeles or turning one person’s life around who can work through the neighborhood justice program. Questions: (1) Can the CA still impose alcohol conditions for CUBs and is this 100 percent black and white or tell us about the nexus needed? Mike said that the state regulates alcohol sales in CA and the state entity performs a control function. Land use questions arise in individual proposals and cities do have a role to play in evaluating if the development can move forward and under what conditions. The state preempts cities from saying yes or no as to whether alcohol can be sold. There are issues such as noise and nuisances that Cities do have control of. Does the state preemption apply if local planning persons are attempting to link alcohol sales to something that residents cannot control like traffic or parking not accommodated? (2) How is the City moving into the next ten years, hotels and taxi-cabs pay the city millions in taxes and now we have AirBnb and Uber? The CA does not determine City policy; work is underway to create a taxing structure for short term rentals (STRs) and the CA does not know in what direction the Mayor and City Council are going to go. Transportation, i.e., Uber v. taxis, is on-going and the Mayor is in favor of these “new economy engines” while some City Council members are against the new business models. (3) What is the cost of litigation for LA City involving non-conforming development and is this a waste of money when the City has failed to enforce its own land use laws? Mike said that voters and planners have to think about land use, however litigation arises because of motives of owners or developers. There may be a time when the City supports development despite risks associated with it. The CA would like to be involved proactively in cases where there are contested developments that place the City at risk. The CA has an individual, Kelly Limporter, who is in charge of risk management – land use, street trees, sidewalks, LAPD, employment litigation, etc. (4) Are you going to change my R-1 zone to multi-use? The CA can’t do that, such a change would be up to City Planning and the City Council. (5) Would the City be willing to sue LAUSD for nuisance in regard to traffic and safety issues for the kids and residents who suffer around Paul Revere Charter School? The CA said litigation is a last resort and Paul Revere is not alone in having issues with traffic safety. LAUSD, Bonin and DOT should be deeply engaged. When constructive dialogue fails the CA would be willing to get involved in dialogue and Mike has been talking to LAUSD about issues such as where gang members are intimidating children and parents trying to get to school. (6) A resident demanded a meeting with the CA regarding the recent homeless fires and was upset that the City had not paid or installed signage. Who is going to enforce people who are there and what happens to their stuff? Mike said that LAPD and LAFD are going to enforce. LAPD has a challenge with their stuff and there will be a way to figure out how to handle it and the CA will help with prosecutions where they are needed. A resident spoke on how action that the City is saying will be taken and it is not being taken. Mike said that the CA will provide legal advice and will prosecute. Maryam Zar gave a summary of the fire event this past weekend and reiterated that signage is now installed enabling LAPD to remove persons without notice. Sanitation needs to come in with LAPD to assist with removal of homeless encampments. LAPD has promised more resources including air support to help monitor the bluffs before and during enforcement. (7) Why doesn’t the CA use gang injunction techniques regarding the homeless? The situations are different but there is one similarity – i.e., ‘stay away’ orders as part of the prosecution. Depending on the severity of the offense stay aways could be part of prosecution here. (8) A resident expressed anger about the homeless problem and the lack of response from the City. Mike said that making living on the bluff unlawful to begin with is the start of removing homeless persons, so what happens to the person who does not leave or starts a fire? Typically, someone who starts a fire is charged with a felony. An arrest for being where you shouldn’t be does not carry a severe penalty. Generally, the CA tries to solve underlying problems that vary from a stay away order and jail time to resources for homeless persons to go elsewhere and systematic enforcement when they come back. Enforcement is LAPD or Park Rangers assisted by LAFD, and the CA’s office once there is an arrest made.

11.    General Public Comment – None.

12.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:07 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.3 – PPCC LETTER AND MOTION REGARDING SHORT TERM RENTALS

October 27, 2015

Councilmembers Jose Huizar (Chair, PLUM Committee and member, Housing Committee),
Marqueece Harris-Dawson (Vice-Chair, PLUM Committee and member, Housing Committee),
Gil Cedillo (Chair, Housing Committee and member, PLUM Committee), Felipe Fuentes
(Vice-Chair, Housing Committee and member, PLUM Committee), Mitchell Englander
(member, PLUM Committee) and Curren D. Price, Jr. (member, Housing Committee)
Councilmembers Mike Bonin, Herb J. Wesson, Jr. and Paul Koretz (respectively, co-sponsors and
second of “Short Term Rentals” Motion in CF-14-1635-S2)
Los Angeles City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012             Via Email

Re: OPPOSED – CF 14-1635-S2, “Short-Term Rentals / Transient Occupancy Tax / City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund” Motion

Honorable Councilmembers:

Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) is the most broad-based community organization and the voice of the Palisades since 1973. As explained in PPCC’s letter of September 28, 2015 (on file in the above-referenced Council File), PPCC opposes the Motion by Councilmembers Bonin and Wesson and opposes any change in the current zoning laws regarding short-term rentals.

PPCC now understands that an ordinance is being drafted that would legalize short-term rentals in residential zones. In light of this fact, at its regular meeting on October 22, 2015 PPCC’s board passed the motion attached to this letter (recommended to all member councils by the leadership of the Westside Regional Alliance of Councils, as amended by PPCC – “WRAC-Recommended Motion”). PPCC remains strongly opposed to legalization of short-term rentals and emphasizes that any ordinance now being drafted must, at a minimum, include language to effectuate all of the regulatory measures set forth in the WRAC-Recommended Motion.
We reiterate the position expressed in our letter of September 28: PPCC is extremely concerned about an increasing assault on low-density and in particular R-1 zoning by regulation and planning measures which erode traditional protections long relied-upon by homeowners. With respect and great urgency, we request that instead of legalizing short-term rentals, the City should take firm steps to enforce existing law.

Sincerely,

Christina Spitz
President, Pacific Palisades Community Council

Attachment: WRAC-Recommended Short Term Rentals Motion (as amended by PPCC), adopted 10/22/15

CC’s (via email):

Hon. Eric Garcetti, Mayor, City of Los Angeles
Michael LoGrande, Director of Planning, Department of City Planning
Tom Rothmann, Senior City Planner, Department of City Planning
Raymond Chan, General Manager, Department of Building & Safety
Lincoln Lee, Chief, Code Enforcement Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
Larry Galstian, Chief, Inspection Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
David Lara, Assistant Chief, Inspection Bureau, Department of Building & Safety
Sharon Dickinson, Legislative Assistant, City Council PLUM Committee –
with request for filing in CF 14-1635-S2

WRAC-RECOMMENDED SHORT TERM RENTALS MOTION (AS AMENDED BY PPCC)

Whereas under the City of Los Angeles present zoning code, short-term rentals [defined per the attached Alan Bell memo dated 4-19-2014 as “all or any portions of residential buildings that are designed or used for occupancy for a period of 30 calendar days or less”] are in fact prohibited in the following zones:
Agricultural zones
R1 and other single family zones
R2, RD, lower multiple residential zones R3 and RAS3 [accessory services zone]
Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) strongly opposes short-term rentals in all residentially zoned areas. PPCC understands, however, that efforts to draft an ordinance to legalize short-term rentals are underway. Such drafting must include, at minimum, language to effectuate the following:

No rent stabilized units “RSO” shall be allowed to rent short term.
Only owner-occupied primary residences shall be permitted to host for short term rentals, and only one unit shall be permitted per host.
There shall be a cap of 30 nights per calendar year per host for short-term rentals.
Prior to listing, at their own expense hosts shall be responsible for verifying that their properties comply with the Los Angeles Building and Safety code and for making all necessary repairs.
All hosts shall obtain a City permit and a permanent registration number. The condition of receiving a City permit and permanent registration number shall be the following: proof of primary residence plus liability insurance for this specific use including any rider that may be necessary for a non-conforming use on the property. “Primary residence” shall be defined as the usual place of return for housing as documented by at least two of the following: motor vehicle registration, driver license, voter registration, tax documents showing the unit as the host’s residence for the purposes of a homeowner’s tax exemption, or a utility bill. A person may have only one primary residence.
Upon filing for a short-term rentals permit, hosts shall notify property owners within 500 feet of each property line of the land upon which the unit is located.
All hosts shall include their permanent City registration number on all advertised listings in all media.
All hosts shall register with the City Department of Finance and remit transient occupancy taxes “TOT” including any and all back taxes owed. Short-term rental TOT receipts shall not go into the general fund but shall be used to create a special enforcement/compliance unit charged exclusively with enforcing regulation of short-term rentals. An example of this kind of compliance unit is the LAHD inspection program for multifamily units.
Hosts shall be required to pay those who work to enable the hosts’ short term rentals the City’s legal minimum wage, abide by hotel employee protections and register with the State Employment Development Department.
Hosts shall disclose such information as the City deems required for enforcement. Examples of this information shall include the type of rental whether one room or whole house, how many nights per year, how many guests and the like.
Hosts who refuse to register or disclose information necessary for enforcement shall be prohibited from operating in the City and face such penalties and fines as may be deemed appropriate by the City under the new ordinance.
Platforms shall only list City registered units and display the relevant registration number in each listing.
Platforms shall disclose information deemed necessary by the City for enforcement and for collection of back taxes and shall be held accountable, including fines and other penalties as may be deemed appropriate by the City, for any unregistered online listings appearing upon the platforms’ website.
The ordinance shall establish a right of appeal by adversely affected residents of the issuance of a short-term rental permit.
The ordinance shall establish a private right of action by adversely affected residents in the community.
Adopted by Pacific Palisades Community Council as of 10/22/15

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 18th 2015

[Special Meeting to address the Caruso Village Project]

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Janet Anderson, Sue Kohl, Rick Mills, George Wolfberg, Cathy Russell, Reza Akef, Bruce Schwartz, Nancy Niles, Gil Dembo and Todd Wadler.

Voting Alternates:  David Kaplan, Linda Lefkowitz, Susan Payne, Eric Dugdale, Alan Goldsmith and Laura Mack.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Schuyler Dietz and Ron Dean.

Start of Business Meeting.  Chris called the meeting to order at 6:38 pm.

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Chris Spitz read the Mission Statement.

2.    Chair’s Statement and Introduction.  Chris welcomed everyone to this special meeting of the PPCC Board to address the Caruso Affiliated/Village Project land use application. She explained that the Village Project Land Use Committee had prepared a preliminary report to the Board on the subject of the land use application and that David Kaplan, the Committee Chair, would deliver the report. She further explained that after the report there would be remarks from Mr. Rick Caruso. Questions and comments from Board members would follow Mr. Caruso’s remarks and after that there would be public comment. Chris stated that she would explain the ground rules for the public comment period later in the meeting. She noted that everyone in the audience who wished to comment was asked to fill out a Speaker Card. She then introduced Andy Frew as the public comment “timer” tonight. Board members also made their introductions. Chris further acknowledged and thanked Mr. Caruso and his team for attending, and the Rec. Ctr. staff and in particular Park Director Erich Haas for hosting the meeting and setting up the room. Thanks as well to the Chamber of Commerce and Movies in the Park for the additional microphones and audio equipment.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 6:40 pm.

4.    Meeting Topic:

Village Project / Caruso Affiliated Land Use Application/Plans (“the Application”).  The Application may be viewed at: http://www.palisadesvillageca.com/ (See FAQs, Sec. 9). Background: Chris stated that out of necessity, time for individual comments will be limited. Those who wish to submit additional comments may email their respective PPCC Area Representative, as indicated below, with a cc to info@pacpalicc.org. No action will be taken on November 18, 2015. PPCC may or may not take a position after further discussion; any future position, if taken, would be advisory only to City officials. The City, not PPCC, is the decision-making entity with respect to the Application.

(1)  Village Project Land Use Committee (VPLUC) Report.

VPLUC Chair David Kaplan. David Kaplan read the report. The report is located on PPCC’s website. Chris commended the committee for their hard work and efforts going forward.

(2)  Response/Update.

The applicant/Caruso Affiliated (“CA”), Rick Caruso. Rick talked about the multiple meetings CA has had with the community. It has been the community that pushed and designed the project. The residents said they wanted the theater back, a park open to the public, more parking and a specialty market. With that input CA began its designs. CA believes it can build more than 200,000 square feet but under any scenario it is building less than what it is entitled to. Parking meets Code. CA is suggesting that Swarthmore become a one-way street with a mandatory right turn at Monument. The one-way street encourages a family friendly pedestrian serving area by slowing down traffic, encouraging walking and easy to cross. With the one-way street the Swarthmore parking will be in addition to Code, angled parking is easier to maneuver and adds 9 spaces. Sidewalks can be widened and cafes/seating can be added on Swarthmore. CA will go back to a two-way street if that is what the residents want but thinks that a one-way street is more beneficial. The Farmer’s Market will continue. The specialty grocer is accessed on the Sunset side and accessed from the two level underground parking. The entrance is off the alley that is why the widening of the alley is being proposed, i.e., traffic circulation will be taken away from Monument. The theater is located where it is due to sloping along Albright so the theater can be tucked underground and not visually be seen as a big box. The sign is the original design and has been reduced from 40 feet and is now back down to 30 feet which complies with the Specific Plan. The current Specific Plan requires floor to ceiling not be greater than 27 feet and CA complies with that; no more then 2 stories and CA complies with that; the exception is to have height beyond 30 feet for architectural articulation and the maximum for architectural elements should be no more then 4 feet above the Specific Plan. If the community does not want the variance, then 30 feet works also and CA will build flatter buildings. Residential is 8 apartments to be on the second floor at Swarthmore and Sunset. The amount of stores will vary with smaller, curated, community based stores desired. 60-70 stores would be possible if very small but likely many of the stores will be combined due to building codes requiring bathrooms and access. National tenants are not being sought. Restaurants should span from quick formats to restaurant dining. Good restaurants want to serve alcohol and one of those licenses will go to the theater. The theater has 300 seats and screens, very small and roughly the same size as the theater which used to be in the Palisades.

(3)  Questions/Comments, PPCC Board members.

(1) Alan Goldsmith wondered what the gross rents per square foot will be and is concerned about national tenants. CA does not publicize rental rates and national tenants are not supported by the area or project size. CA is giving first priority to existing retailers. (2) Gil Dembo spoke in support of CA taking control of the project as one cohesive development, prioritizing that rather than maximizing revenue. (3) Nancy Niles asked about having Swarthmore become a pedestrian only street. Rick rejected that idea because convenient parking supports the businesses; however, he suggested that from a programming standpoint the street may be closed down for holidays and perhaps on Sundays were the community wanting to expand the Farmer’s Market feeling. (4) Eric Dugdale spoke in favor of CA as the developer, but stressed that the project is being done without an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Eric stated concern with the toxic remediation given the source of contaminants (dry cleaners) and compared a plume also caused by a dry cleaner down in Marina del Rey. Eric wants residents to be aware of the plume. Rick stated that an EIR is not needed to determine any environmental issue. When CA bought the property they were aware of the environmental issue and the State’s DTSC investigated and determined remedial measures for this site. The good news is that the toxic plume has already been dealt with. The Mobil site will be tested and that soil will be remediated as well. CA is well aware of the plume of water and any possible contaminants; currently enzymes and required measures are being taken. The state has a report and the soil is cleaned up. The water will likely be treated for years. The other alternative is to go down 50-60 feet and pump all the water out but the State does not require that and it is not physically possible. This site does not connect to the aquifer so there is no danger in terms of drinking water. The project will be processed under an MND such that an EIR will not be required. Eric spoke a second time about chemicals in the soil and the plume with cancers; he wants to know what an EIR would reveal. (5) Sue Kohl spoke on behalf of the northern part of the Alphabet Streets. The concern is that if with a forced right hand turn those folks will have a hard time getting home because they have to circle around also. Keeping it to be a right and left turn would help those residents and maybe leaving it as a two-way turn and seeing if there is a problem then later impose a right hand only turn requirement. Rick stated that it is up to the neighborhood. (6) Susan Payne spoke in support of the project and ability of residents to stay here and enjoy the Palisades village area without having to get into their cars. Also Rick Caruso will help ensure a better mix of tenants. (7) Maryam Zar asked about security and whether the project will attract panhandlers and transients. Rick stated that the project is being designed for the community not for people coming in from other areas. There is a homeless problem throughout the City and in the Palisades. Currently CA has 24-hour security that encourages transients to move along or they provide assistance for them to relocate. CA has a zero tolerance for crime, graffiti or trash. CA just agreed with LAPD to have a dedicated foot patrol at the Grove and would like to have that here in the Palisades. CA has also joined the BID and would like to be good corporate neighbors. (8) David Kaplan spoke in favor of residents being able to leave their cars and enjoy the village. (9) Reza Akef asked about what happens to the streets and sidewalks surrounding the property after the impacts of heavy construction equipment. Would there be a commitment by CA to improve the streets and sidewalks not only in their own project but surrounding? Rick stated that the design does include sidewalks and trees outside the project, CA has never left a pothole on any street surrounding their projects and is happy to commit to sound streets. Reza expressed that young families and parents really want this project but are not represented here this evening.

(4)  Public Comment on the Application.

Comments were called in alphabetical order based upon preferences indicated first against, for and then mixed. Following completion of these remarks, Chris announced that public comment was now closed.
*Bart Bartholomhew. More parking is needed, 200 spaces or more. Too many employees park on the Alphabet Streets. There should be a third level of underground parking free to anyone working in town.
*Craig Au. Parking is a concern but larger houses are being built in the Alphabet Streets and younger people want to walk or bike to this project. The local use is not going to require lots of additional parking.
*Bill Bruns. Bill wrote an essay in the Palisades News objecting to a one way Swarthmore street. Alphabet Street residents want a third artery to get into town. If Swarthmore is closed, then folks go down Monument and Via and that just increases impacts on those two streets. The one way Swarthmore has advantages for the project but long term it is not a good thing for the residents.
*Erica Simpson. Small business owner (P2) on Swarthmore since 1999. Concerns are how construction is handled on Swarthmore and how that impacts other businesses, i.e., how can work be done without putting adjacent stores out of business. Rick said that ads and signage support retailers.
*Ron Aragon. His outreach efforts as a real estate agent have resulted in feedback from residents that is very, very positive and those voices (silent majority) are not always heard nor necessarily reflected in these meetings.
*LeeAnn Dailey. California modernism is part of the street now and the design should carry on. Culture and art should be reflected in the project with attention to noise and light. *Stacy Thompson – Riviera resident who is concerned with traffic and the draw of people into the Palisades. Her concerns are with the level of development overall in the Westside and this project is too large for such a small area with one road in and one road out (Sunset). She would like to see the project downsized and an EIR done for traffic, density and construction. Rick pledged to work to resolve construction issues.
*Flo Elfant – spoke in support of the project.
*Ron Dean – was on Marvin Braude’s Specific Plan committee. Ron stated that the Specific Plan committee did anticipate development like this and the committee was created back then to deal with big projects. Ron said that only one building is entitled to a 2.0 FAR and that applies just to the building. The 2.0 FAR applies only to one building with residential and the remainder of the project should be subject to a 1.5 FAR. David Kaplan responded by stating that it was possible to conceive a project going into that property with residential in each second story. Rick Caruso stated that he has met with Ron and they have a large disagreement on the Specific Plan but it is a moot issue because the proposal is to build less then what the Specific Plan allows. There is a FAR problem and spreading out does not solve it because CA is not proposing to build residential. The height is being measured from average height and not from the lowest height that is what the Specific Plan requires. Ron is not saying the height is terrible but where is the red line measurement for the Specific Plan? Ron reiterated that the plan did envision a large development. The 2-foot set back was to allow canyon views and open space between the buildings. David responded by stating that at the 1.5 FAR the development still complies at 107,767 square feet.
*Jewel Fahr – lives on Fiske and is worried about people who don’t want to pay for parking and how does that affect the Alphabet Streets. The street is already so congested and homeowners cannot park in front of their own homes. Rick said parking would be validated for people shopping at the project. Rick agreed that parking is already difficult in the Alphabet Streets and is supportive should the residents wish to pursue permit parking.
*Esther – retail store owner. Employee parking is not being addressed. Permit parking is inconvenient in terms of number of permits and how to meet guests. Her employees have a hard time parking and getting to the location.
*Jon Tower – how are people going to access the underground parking? They would come up Swarthmore. No one crosses Monument to get in.
*Ali Karimi – suggested that the Grove generates crime and he wants residents to look at the houses near the Grove that have bars on the houses. This project will bring crime and people who don’t leave in the Palisades to the Palisades. Rick stated that LAPD statistics are that crime around the Grove has dropped 42%.
*Bobbie Farberow. People wanted to be walking distance from Morts. This project gives residents a variety of businesses to walk to in the village. The City Attorney screwed up the Specific Plan and did not put in the ability for people to eat on the sidewalks and to have a drink in town. Mort paid for tables outside at their restaurant and in the streets. People want to eat out and sit on the sidewalks.
*Cabell Smith – lives on Fiske Street and wonders what the process is after the project is built if there are problems, i.e., what if it gets rowdy, what if valet parking is a nightmare? How does CA interface with the community after the project is done? Rick says he owns every project he has ever built, he lives 10 minutes from here and wants to visit with his family and be happy. There is an onsite management company. The residents are his guests and operations will be adjusted, like they have done with every project, as necessary.
*Kat Smith – moved to Pacific Palisades from Santa Monica; she does not want people coming here who did not live here. She is concerned about traffic, the one-way Swarthmore and how many future stores vs. how many stores there are now. She also wonders if the open space has been reduced in favor of more store space. Rick said the 10,000 square feet has always been the same as is on the plan and is larger then what CA has at the Grove. There are no destination retailers in the project, the market is only 10,000 square feet and given the amount of markets in adjacent communities it is not a real draw, and people from Brentwood/Santa Monica/Malibu already come to the Palisades. The theater is very, very small and an idea is to give 90272 residents priority when making a reservation.
-Jay Rosendahl – supports the project and making Swarthmore one-way on the grounds of safety.
-Allan Frankel – lives on Hartzell and is concerned with what the Grove has done negatively for surrounding areas and the noise factor. What is the illumination and will it impact seeing stars at night? The MND report from the City looks at noise and light illumination. The community has asked about operating hours and they are considering earlier closing hours for those businesses next to residential areas when compared to Sunset Boulevard. Tentative operating hours could be 9 pm or 10 pm closing during the week and perhaps a few hours later on the weekends.
-Ted Weitz – when discussed by PPCC in March 2015 it was stated that 80% would comply with the Specific Plan. Ted spoke in favor of the Specific Plan and how this project could be good without adjusting the Specific Plan (height, setbacks, etc.). Measurements are done so we don’t know what the heights really are.
-Lisa Morrin – are you aware of the changing sentiment in the Palisades, i.e., people don’t want the market now without a third level of underground parking and concerns over traffic. Would you eliminate the specialty market? CA says that their thousands of responses don’t reflect that sentiment. Rick addressed a rumor that there is not adequate parking and under any measure the project meets what Code requires, more than what the Code requires in fact.
-Rob Weber – lives next door to the park. He is concerned with parking and regardless of what the Code says the scope of development, employees and demand will bring people who don’t want to pay many of whom park at the Recreation Center. He would encourage CA to find more parking.
-Marge Gold – favors revitalizing the Palisades, however parking is a concern and there must be enough employee parking. The project started out as a face lift and now it is too large, i.e., the project should be scaled back. The Specific Plan should be supported and defended, now and for future developers.
-Mark Grinblatt – would like the alleyway kept as one way pointed towards Monument. If there was a light at the end and Swarthmore should be kept two ways. Alley way one-way and Swarthmore two ways.
-Rene Guardia – the community room is a very large space and where do those people park? Rick said the room was a response to what the community wanted and the intent is not for it to be general assembly; it is a local room for kids’ birthday parties.
-Robin Weitz – is concerned about the liquor licenses. In the Palisades why are more needed in the village, this is a family community and we are not all alcoholics. Rick explained that the area needs a diversity of restaurants and to attract good restaurants liquor licenses are needed. If someone has a full liquor license maybe they are placed closer to Sunset and away from residences. There are no bars or dance clubs proposed.
-Tracy Lundberg – when you exit the parking lot can you make a left on Monument? Rick said no. Tracy reiterated Sue Kohl’s concerns about how north residents of the Alphabet Streets get to their homes. Loading is back off the alley.
-Sandy Eddy – Via resident feels that the project is mansionizing the Palisades once again. She is hopeful that the project will be right sized to the community.
-Sean Masterson – lives behind the park. He is concerned about employee parking because employees use the park for parking illegally. Could the theater be a multi-use facility to include live acts?
-Andy Gavin – Goucher resident. Also concerned about traffic pattern of north Alphabet Street residents getting to and from home.
-Rena Repetti – the 2-foot setback in the Specific Plan seems like a wise thing and would add space to sidewalks. If the plan is to widen the sidewalks, then why is CA asking for a zero-foot setback?
-Reed Saxon – Wildomar resident. Concerned about parking not just in the project’s area but the overall affect on the community. He believes the project is under-parked and would like to see a third level of underground parking.
-Adam Glazer – President, Chamber of Commerce. Adam spoke in terms of supporting the project not only in 2017 but long term in the future.
-Kathryn – questioned the elevations at the Sunset corner being so much higher then the rest of the elevations. She would like to see the corner blend in with the rest of the community and not have the elevations go over 30 feet. Rick did say that there are 4 stories in the village and other buildings over 30 feet but CA is willing to adjust. Rick addressed the measuring using the average with the City because the street elevations decline.
-Lisa Peier – property values show a huge support for the project, people who buy here with young families are not represented here and they are very enthusiastic about the project. Please consider them although they are not represented tonight.
-Lynn Hylen – is employee parking included in the garage? Rick said that during peak periods employees are taken out of the garage or bussed in from other locations. CA has talked to Palisades High School about using their lot on off hours and over the weekend. Can the PPCC pass a resolution to require employers to provide employee parking?

5.    Adjournment.  Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 8:44 pm.

_________________________

Return to top of page

MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 10th 2015

Voting Members in Attendance:  Chris Spitz, Maryam Zar, Jennifer Malaret, Richard Cohen, Barbara Kohn, Ted Mackie, Stuart Muller, Bruce Schwartz, Howard Robinson, Kelly Comras, Peter Culhane, Rick Mills, Sue Kohl, Stuart Muller, Cathy Russell, Gil Dembo and George Wolfberg.

Voting Alternates:  Susan Payne and Eric Dugdale.

Non-voting Advisors and Alternates:  Donna Vaccarino, Brian Deming, Doug McCormick, Steve Boyers, Ted Mackie, Sharon Kilbride and Veslemoey Zwart.

Start of Business Meeting

1.    Reading of Community Council’s Mission.  Chris deferred the reading of the Mission Statement.

2.    Call to Order and Introduction of the Board, Dignitaries, and Past Award Winners.  Chris Spitz called the meeting to order at 7:09 pm. Chris acknowledged Board members in attendance. Chris acknowledged past PPCC Chairs. Chris introduced the City and State dignitaries. Chris and Maryam introduced the Past Citizens of the Year. Maryam introduced the past Sparkplug winners. Chris introduced prior Pride of the Palisades award winner, Bill Bruns. Chris and Maryam acknowledged the past Community Service Award honorees.

3.    Certification of Quorum.  Chris certified that a quorum was present at 7:10 pm.

4.    Adoption of Minutes/Upcoming Meetings.  Chris deemed the minutes of 11/12/15 and 11/18/15 adopted as corrected. Upcoming meetings: 1/14/16. Briefing by FAA officials regarding new flight path over Pacific Palisades (Metroplex plan); (tentative) VPLUC updates/recommendations and further Board discussion of the Village Project; (tentative) presentation regarding proposed Village Starbucks CUB (onsite beer and wine sales). 1/28/16. Presentation by LADWP officials regarding proposed temporary facilities to increase power capacity due to overloaded circuits in areas of the Palisades.

5.    Consideration of Agenda.  Chris considered the agenda.

6.    Treasurer’s Report.  Chris stated that the Treasurer’s report was deferred.

7.    Reports, Announcements and Concerns from the President.

7.1.    Announcements from the President, Chris Spitz.  Chris stated that announcements were as stated in the agenda (note: presented below as written and previously distributed).

7.1.1.    Short Term Rentals Update.  Short Term Rentals Update. Chris announced that the draft ordinance expected to be distributed by the Planning Department in December (draft not yet distributed as of this agenda distribution).

7.1.2.    Above Ground Facilities (AGF) Ordinance Revision Update. Chris announced that the City Attorney has advised that completion of a draft ordinance (revised by the City Attorney) is expected in early December (draft not yet distributed as of this agenda distribution).

7.1.3.    16900-17000 Sunset Blvd. Apartment Project.  Chris announced that the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission on 12/2/15 granted appeals of the Zoning Administrator’s issuance of a Coastal Development Permit. See PPCC position letter attached.

7.1.4.    Chris announced the appointment of New Senior Planner, Council District 11/Councilmember Mike Bonin – Ezra Gale. Tricia Keane remains Director of Planning for CD 11.

7.1.5.    Proposed BMO/BHO Amendments.  See Item 9.1 below (old business).

7.2.    Announcements from Governmental Representatives Representatives (Note: Contact information at: http://www.pp90272.org/Governmental%20Reps.pdf) —  None.

7.3.    Announcements from Board Members and Advisors — None.

8.    Reports from Committees.

8.1.    Bylaws Committee (Richard Cohen and Jennifer Malaret, Co-Chairs).

Second reading of Motions 1(A) and (2) regarding proposed bylaws changes (organizational membership, meetings). Chris deferred the item to the next PPCC meeting.
MOTION 1(A): Background. On March 12, 2015, PPCC’s Board directed the Bylaws Committee to explore modifications to the Bylaws relative to Article VIII(1)(A) “Selection and Election of Representatives, Organization Representatives and Alternates” with reference to organizations eligible to send representatives as set forth on Appendix A. The Board directed three possible areas of amendment: (1) the four categories which currently have one organization (“standing seat”) should be reconstituted such that those categories have multiple organizations and rotate appointment as presently do the other five multiple organization categories. (2) faith based organizations should be eligible to send representatives and have the opportunity for inclusion, and (3) a process should be established whereby any organization not listed and that believes it is not adequately represented by an eligible organization, may submit an application for inclusion. On October 8, 2015 a motion to facilitate all three areas of these amendments garnered a majority of favorable board member votes but failed to pass because it did not receive the two-thirds majority vote required by PPCC’s Bylaws (“Organization Representatives Motion #1).
Motion 1(A). The Bylaws Committee recommends that the Board vote to adopt the proposed amendments distributed with the agenda, referred to as “Organization Representatives Motion #1(A)”. The proposed amendments are now limited to: (1) improving calendaring of the process by which organization representatives and their alternates are selected, (2) providing a procedure for membership application by existing and new organizations, and (3) non-substantive corrective and clarifying language regarding vacancies and other matters.
MOTION 2:
The Bylaws Committee recommends that, to expedite and preserve efficiency at PPCC’s scheduled and public meetings, Article XII, Sec. 2(B) (Amendments) be amended as follows: “No amendment or new Bylaw may be voted upon until the entire text [delete “it”] has been distributed with [delete “read at”] the agenda for two consecutive Board [delete “council”] meetings.

9.    Old Business.

9.1.    Proposed BMO/BHO Amendments (“Draft BMO/BHO Ordinance”); CF 14-0656.

Report as written in agenda. Jennifer Malaret reported that the Planning Department is currently holding listening sessions including two that were held during the week of December 2, 2015, in West Los Angeles (Culver City, Westwood). At the 12/3/15 session, Planning staff announced their intent to present the Draft BMO/BHO Ordinance to the City Planning Commission in March, 2016 and their directive from Councilmember Koretz that the proposed amendments be enacted within the next two years (i.e., separate from and prior to any enactment of the re:code LA zoning effort).

10.    New Business.

10.1.    2015 PPCC Awards Presentation.

Welcome by Event Committee Chair Peter Culhane. Peter Culhane thanked the attendees and committee for a wonderful evening. Peter introduced the Master of Ceremonies/Guest Speaker Finn-Olaf Jones. Finn gave the key note address. Governmental representatives Daniel Tamm (on behalf of Mayor Garcetti), Mike Bonin (CD-11), Janet Turner (on behalf of Ted Lieu), Stephanie Cohen (on behalf of Richard Bloom), Lauren Pizer Mains (on behalf of Ben Allen) and Mayra Ceballos (on behalf Mike Feuer) acknowledged each of the award winners and provided certificates. Chris Spitz presented the PPCC Awards: Citizen of the Year – Sharon Kilbride; Golden Sparkplugs – Laurel Garver, Laurie Sale, Doug Suisman; Pride of the Palisades – the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness. Finn Olaf-Jones introduced each of the award winners. Doug, Laurel, Laurie and Sharon each provided comments and thanked the community for their support and involvement. George Wolfberg introduced Sharon Kilbride for the Citizen of the Year award.

10.2.   Silent and live auction fundraisers were held.

11.    General Public Comment — None.

12.    Adjournment. Chris Spitz adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.

ATTACHMENT:  ITEM 7.1.5 – PPCC POSITION LETTER, 16900-17000 SUNSET BOULEVARD APARTMENT PROJECT
November 17, 2015
West Los Angeles Planning Commission 200 North Spring Street, Room 272 Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: ZA-2012-130- CDP-MEL-1A Project @ 16990-17000 Sunset Blvd., Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 Hearing Date: December 2, 2015
Honorable Commissioners:
Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) has been the voice of the community for more than forty years. The public record will evidence that, on April 10, 2012, February 23, 2013, June 17, 2013, and January 6, 2015, PPCC submitted comments and concerns upon which the council based its request for the City of Los Angeles to require that a Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared for this proposed multi-family residential development.
PPCC reiterates its request that prior to issuance of a Coastal Development Permit, a Focused EIR be required for this proposed project regarding soils, hydrology, haul routes, traffic and storm-drain/sewer access. PPCC has not considered and therefore takes no position on other legal or factual issues raised in this matter, except that consistent with its
“Guiding Principles” (attached to the letter of January 6, 2015), PPCC requests that the West Los Angeles Planning Commission apply, uphold and enforce all applicable City zoning regulations and provisions of the Coastal Act.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Christina Spitz, President
Pacific Palisades Community Council
cc (via email): Councilmember Mike Bonin (CD11)
Debbie Dyner-Harris, District Director,
CD11 Sharon Shapiro, Field Deputy, CD11
Tricia Keane, Planning Director, CD11

_________________________

Return to top of page